Background: While the learning benefits of experiential education are well-documented, there are few empirical studies of program implementation and assessment. Purpose: We investigated how experiential learning (EL) was implemented and assessed within EL-endorsed courses across six academic colleges and nine courses within one university in the Southeast U.S. Method: We conducted qualitative interviews with instructors to examine how the EL activities were structured and delivered, as well as challenges and successes. We also completed quantitative analyses of student learning across three learning outcomes through comparison of instructor and author rubric ratings of student reflections. Findings: EL was implemented individually and within student groups, including activities related to equine leadership, community art, storybook creation, Model United Nations participation, pedestrian safety, plant physiology, fingerprint analysis, community nursing, and business simulations. Significant differences were found among instructor and author ratings of student learning outcomes. Implications: Student and instructor reflections across learning objectives overwhelmingly pointed to the benefits and successes of EL activities for undergraduate students, ranging from confidence and collaboration to connections to university courses and professional responsibilities. We present future directions related to how EL can be implemented at the university level.
AustinM. J.RustD. Z. (2015). Developing an experiential learning program: Milestones and challenges. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 27(1), 143–153. http://www.isetl.org/ijtlhe/
BoudD. (1989). Some competing traditions in experiential learning. In WellS. W.McGillI. (Eds.), Making sense of experiential learning: Diversity in theory and practice (pp. 39–49). Open University Press.
4.
BradberryL. A.De MaioJ. (2018). Learning by doing: The long-term impact of experiential learning programs on student success. Journal of Political Science Education, 15(1), 94–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/15512169.2018.1485571
5.
CantorJ. A. (1997). Experiential learning in higher education: Linking classroom and community. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 7. The George Washington University, School of Education and Human Development. http://eric.ed.gov/congtentdelivery/servlet/ERICservlet?accno=ED404948
6.
DeweyJ. (1938). Experience and education. Collier Books.
LewisL. H.WilliamsC. J. (1994). Experiential learning: Past and present. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 1994(62), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.36719946203
11.
PriceA.SavoieM. (2024). A case study of an experiential-learning program at a regional comprehensive university: Assessment, scalability, and racial and ethnic equity. Experiential Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 7(2), 74–86. https://doi.org/10.46787/elthe.v7i2.3946
12.
PurdieF.WardL.McadieT.KingN.DrysdaleM. (2013). Are work-integrated learning (WIL) students better equipped psychologically for work post-graduation than their non-work-integrated learning peers? Some initial findings from a UK university. Asia-Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education, 14(2), 117–125. https://www.ijwil.org/files/APJCE_14_2_117_125.pdf
TinsleyH. E.WeissD. J. (2000). Interrater reliability and agreement. In Handbook of applied multivariate statistics and mathematical modeling (pp. 95–124). Academic Press.
15.
WeilS. W.McGillI. (1989). A framework for making sense of experiential learning. In WellS. W.McGillI. (Eds.), Making sense of experiential learning: Diversity in theory and practice (pp. 3–24). Open University Press.
16.
WilliamsL.SembianteS. F. (2022). Experiential learning in U.S. undergraduate teacher preparation programs: A review of the literature. Teaching and Teacher Education, 112, 103630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103630
