Background: University education trains students to apply various instructional design (ID) models and learning theories to design instruction systematically but does not account for the challenges that an instructional designer will encounter during project implementation in the real world. Hence, providing students with authentic experiences in ID is imperative. Purpose: This study examined how a service-learning experience in an ID course provided an authentic learning experience and impacted four graduate students’ professional development and community engagement. Methodology: In this multiple case study, a questionnaire with open- and closed-ended questions was administered. Using pattern-matching analysis of questionnaire responses, reflection assignments, and project artifacts, this study investigated three areas: how students connected ID learning to real-world needs, the influence on their attitudes toward community service and career choices, and their development of self-awareness. Findings: The service-learning experience helped students apply theoretical knowledge in an authentic context, develop essential professional competencies like communication and project management, and cultivate empathy through community engagement. The experience also influenced participants’ career interests and enhanced their awareness of personal strengths, limitations, and biases. Implications: Service-learning experiences in ID courses can be designed to support professional development and personal growth and prepare practitioners with technical expertise and civic awareness.
AlmutairiA. F.GardnerG.McCarthyA. (2014). Practical guidance for the use of a pattern-matching technique in case-study research: A case presentation. Nursing & Health Sciences, 16(2), 239–244. https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12096
BaakiJ.MaddrellJ. (2020). Building empathy and developing instructional design experience and skills: A case study of using personas to design open education resources. The Journal of Applied Instructional Design, 9(3), 77–98. https://doi.org/10.51869/93jbjm
4.
BotelhoJ.EddyR. M.GalportN.Avila-LinnC. (2020). Uncovering the quality of STEM service-learning course implementation and essential elements across the California State University system. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 26(2), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3998/mjcsloa.3239521.0026.201
BresciaW.MullinsC.MillerM. T. (2009). Project-based service-learning in an instructional technology graduate program. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 3(2), Article 20. https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2009.030220
7.
BringleR.HatcherJ. (1995). A service learning curriculum for faculty. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 2(1), 112–122. https://hdl.handle.net/1805/4591
8.
BrubakerD. C.OstroffJ. H. (Eds.). (2023). Life, learning, and community: Concepts and models for service learning in biology. Taylor & Francis.
9.
CaskurluS.RichardsonJ. C.AlamriH. A.ChartierK.FarmerT.JanakiramanS.StraitM.YangM. (2021). Cognitive load and online course quality: Insights from instructional designers in a higher education context. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(2), 584–605. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13043
10.
CaulfieldJ.WoodsT. (2013). Experiential learning: Exploring its long-term impact on socially responsible behavior. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 13(2), 31–48. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1011680
11.
ChartierS. (2021). Investigating instructional design expertise: A 25-year review of literature. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 34(2), 111–130. https://doi.org/10.1002/piq.21345
12.
DamonW. (2009). The path to purpose: How young people find their calling in life. The Free Press.
13.
DanielK. L.MishraC. (2017). Student outcomes from participating in an international STEM service-learning course. SAGE Open, 7(1), 2158244017697155. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244017697155
14.
DenzinN. K. (1978). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
EricksonF. (2012). Qualitative research methods for science education. In Second international handbook of science education (pp. 1451–1469). Springer.
17.
EylerJ.GilesD. E.,Jr. (1999). Where's the learning in service-learning? Jossey-Bass higher and adult education series. Jossey-Bass, Inc.
FaulconerE. (2021). eService-learning: A decade of research in undergraduate online service–learning. American Journal of Distance Education, 35(2), 100–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2020.1849941
20.
FiguccioM. J. (2020). Comparing the effectiveness of service-learning in lower- & upper-division psychology courses. The SUNY Journal of the Scholarship of Engagement, 1(3), 1–14. https://digitalcommons.cortland.edu/jose/vol1/iss2/3
21.
GelmonS. B.HollandB. A.SpringA. (2018). Assessing service-learning and civic engagement: Principles and techniques. Campus Compact.
22.
GrayM. J.OndaatjeE. H.GeschwindS.FrickerR.GoldmanC.KaganoffT.RobynA.SundtM.VogelgesangL.KleinS. (1999). Combining service and learning in higher education. Rand Corporation.
23.
GuthrieK. L.McCrackenH. (2014). Reflection: The importance of making meaning in e-service-learning courses. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 26, 238–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-014-9087-9
24.
HansenA. K.ConnorsP.Donnelly-HermosilloD.FullR.HoveA.LanierH.LentD.NationJ.TuckerK. P.WardJ.WhitenackL.ZavaletaE. (2021). Biology beyond the classroom: Experiential learning through authentic research, design, and community engagement. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 61(3), 926–933. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icab155
25.
HayfordB.BlomstormS.DeBoerB. (2014). STEM and service-learning: Does service learning increase STEM literacy?International Journal of Research on Service-Learning and Community Engagement, 2(1), 32–43. https://doi.org/10.37333/001c.002001004
26.
HildenbrandS. M.SchultzS. M. (2015). Implementing service learning in pre-service teacher coursework. Journal of Experiential Education, 38(3), 262–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053825915571748
JordiR. (2011). Reframing the concept of reflection: Consciousness, experiential learning, and reflective learning practices. Adult Education Quarterly, 61(2), 181–197. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741713610380439
29.
KawaiT. (2021). A theoretical framework on reflection in service learning: Deepening reflection through identity development. Frontiers in Education, 5, 604997. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.604997
30.
KohlbacherF. (2006). The use of qualitative content analysis in case study research. In Forum qualitative sozialforschung/forum: Qualitative social research (Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 1–30). Institut fur Klinische Sychologie and Gemeindesychologie.
31.
KolbA. Y.KolbD. A. (2017). Experiential learning theory as a guide for experiential educators in higher education. Experiential Learning & Teaching in Higher Education, 1(1), 7–44. https://nsuworks.nova.edu/elthe/vol1/iss1/7
32.
KolbD. A. (2014). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. FT press.
33.
LeeS. J.WilderC.YuC. (2018). Exploring students’ perceptions of service-learning experiences in an undergraduate web design course. Teaching in Higher Education, 23(2), 212–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2017.1379486
34.
Levesque-BristolC.KnappT. D.FisherB. J. (2011). The effectiveness of service-learning: It's not always what you think. Journal of Experiential Education, 33(3), 208–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/105382590113300302
35.
LinS.NgaiG.KwanK. P.ChanS. C. F.LoK. W. K. (2025). Mandatory academic service learning and continual civic engagement: Which learning outcomes matter?Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 34(3), 965–974. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-024-00911-9
36.
LincolnY. S.GubaE. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.
37.
LoK. W.NgaiG.ChanS. C.KwanK. P. (2022). How students’ motivation and learning experience affect their service-learning outcomes: A structural equation modeling analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 825902. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.825902
38.
MaddrellJ. (2014). Service-learning instructional design considerations. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 26(3), 213–226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-014-9085-y
39.
MathesonB.PetersenE. J. (2020). Engaging US students in culturally aware content creation and interactive technology design through service learning. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 63(2), 188–200. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2020.2982253
40.
MerriamS. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. Jossey-Bass.
41.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Sage.
42.
NgaiG.ChanS. C.KwanK. P. (2018). Challenge, meaning and preparation: Critical success factors influencing student learning outcomes from service-learning. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 22(4), 55–80. https://openjournals.libs.uga.edu/jheoe/article/view/1417/1414
43.
NielsenD. (2016). Facilitating service learning in the online technical communication classroom. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 46(2), 236–256. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047281616633600
44.
OkpalaC. O.SturdivantL.HopsonL. (2009). Assessment of the impact of service learning on academic growth of college students. Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 6(4), 65–68. https://doi.org/10.19030/tlc.v6i4.1156
45.
PalidO.CashdollarS.DeangeloS.ChuC.BatesM. (2023). Inclusion in practice: A systematic review of diversity-focused STEM programming in the United States. International Journal of STEM Education, 10(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00387-3
46.
ParharM.MishraS. (2000). Competencies for web-based instructional designers. Indian Journal of Open Learning, 9(3), 415–422. https://cemca.org/ckfinder/userfiles/Parhar_M__Mishra_S__0115.pdf
47.
ParkJ. Y.LuoH. (2017). Refining a competency model for instructional designers in the context of online higher education. International Education Studies, 10(9), 87–98. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v10n9p87
48.
PattonM. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th ed.). Sage.
49.
Rimm-KaufmanS. E.MerrittE. G.LapanC.DeCosterJ.HuntA.BowersN. (2021). Can service-learning boost science achievement, civic engagement, and social skills? A randomized controlled trial of Connect Science. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 74, 101236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2020.101236
SaldanaJ. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). Sage.
52.
SeamanJ. (2008). Experience, reflect, critique: The end of the “learning cycles” era. Journal of Experiential Education, 31(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/105382590803100103
53.
SeamanJ.BrownM.QuayJ. (2017). The evolution of experiential learning theory: Tracing lines of research in the JEE. Journal of Experiential Education, 40(4), NP1–NP21. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053825916689268
Slagter van TryonP. J.McDonaldJ.HirumiA. (2018). Preparing the next generation of instructional designers: A cross-institution faculty collaboration. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 30(1), 125–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-018-9167-3
56.
SmithC. (2012). Evaluating the quality of work-integrated learning curricula: A comprehensive framework. Higher Education Research & Development, 31(2), 247–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2011.558072
57.
SmithC.FernsS.RussellL. (2016). Designing work-integrated learning placements that improve student employability: Six facets of the curriculum that matter. Asia-Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education, 17(2), 197–211. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1114030.pdf
58.
SmithC.WorsfoldK. (2015). Unpacking the learning–work nexus: “Priming” as lever for high-quality learning outcomes in work-integrated learning curricula. Studies in Higher Education, 40(1), 22–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.806456
59.
StakeR. E. (2006). Multiple case study analysis. Guilford Press.
60.
StefaniakJ. (2020). A systems view of supporting the transfer of learning through e-service-learning experiences in real-world contexts. TechTrends, 64, 561–569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-020-00487-3
61.
StefaniakJ. E. (2015). The implementation of service-learning in graduate instructional design coursework. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 27(1), 2–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-015-9092-7
62.
StefaniakJ. E.MaddrellJ.EarnshawY.HaleP. (2018). The evolution of designing e-service-learning projects: A look at the development of instructional designers. International Journal of Designs for Learning, 9(1), 122–134. https://doi.org/10.14434/ijdl.v9i1.23298
63.
TrespalaciosJ. H.ArmstrongT.GoodwillC. (2022). Implementing service-learning through an online graduate course in instructional design. In Research anthology on service learning and community engagement teaching practices (pp. 298–314). IGI Global.
64.
VerstegenD.BarnardY.PilotA. (2008). Instructional design by novice designers: Two empirical studies. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 19(2), 351–383. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/22961/.
65.
YazanB. (2015). Three approaches to case study methods in education: Yin, Merriam, and Stake. The Qualitative Report, 20(2), 134–152. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2015.2102
66.
YinR. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Sage.
67.
YinR. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods. Sage.