Assessment of Service-Learning in the Deaf-Blind Community

Abstract

The concurrent conditions of deafness and blindness present a set of unique needs within a community that highly values independence and autonomy. This project assesses the service-learning initiative in a post-secondary Interpreter Education Program (IEP) in which students learn via civic engagement with the Deaf-Blind community to employ concepts and skills acquired from coursework. In 2005, several years after implementing service-learning in the Interpreting for Individuals Who Are Deaf-Blind course, the program assessed project efficacy through reflective journal analysis and stakeholder interviews. Results indicated dominant themes around Deaf-Blind consumer empowerment, personal attitudes, coping strategies, and application of experiences to specific topics addressed in class. Outcomes of this assessment are being used to revise the course so as to align objectives more closely with needs of students and community entities that serve persons who are Deaf-Blind.

Keywords

Deaf-Blind Experiential Education Service-Learning

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Arkansas Deaf-Blind Community (2006). Our goals and purpose. Retrieved 7/24/06 from http://www.Deafvision.net/adbc/Goals_purpose.htm.

Bailis

L. N.

(2001). The National Society for Experiential Education in Service-Learning. New Directions for Higher Education, 114, 61–65.

Cantor

J. A.

(1997). Experiential learning in higher education: Linking classroom and community. ERIC Clearinghouse on Higher Education Washington, DC (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED404948).

Choudhuri

Glauser

Peregoy

(2004). Guidelines for writing a qualitative manuscript for the Journal of Counseling & Development. Journal of Counseling & Development, 82, 443–446.

Conference of Interpreter Trainers (n.d.) National interpreter education standards. Retrieved August 4, 2006, from http://www.cit-asl.org/docs/Standards.pdf.

Dewey

(1933). How we think. Boston: Heath.

Ehrlich

(1996). Forward. In B. Jacoby & Associates (Eds.), Service-learning in higher education: Concepts and practices. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Eyler

(2001). Creating your reflection map. New Directions for Higher Education, 114, 35–43.

Grassi

Hanley

Liston

(2004). Service-learning: An innovative approach for second language learners. Journal of Experiential Education, 27(1), 87–110.

10.

Greenberg

(1989). Of such small differences. New York: Signet.

11.

Hirschinger-Blank

Markowitz

M. W.

(2006). An evaluation of a pilot service-learning course for criminal justice undergraduate students. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 17(1), 69–86.

12.

Huba

M. E.

Freed

J. E.

(2000). Learner-centered assessment on college campuses: Shifting the focus from teaching to learning. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

13.

Hubbs

Brand

(2005). The paper mirror: Understanding reflective journaling. Journal of Experiential Learning, 28(1), 60–71.

14.

Jolley

(2002). Service learning in the Deaf-Blind community: A win/winning situation. In Hallinan

(Ed.), Proceedings of the Sixth National Deaf-Blind Conference of Australia, 116–126.

15.

King

(2004). Service-learning as a site for critical pedagogy: A case of collaboration, caring, and defamiliarization across borders. The Journal of Experiential Education, 26(3), 121–137.

16.

Maher

(2003). Individual beliefs and cultural immersion in service-learning: Examination of a reflection process. The Journal of Experiential Education, 26(2), 88–96.

17.

Marshall

Rossman

G. B.

(2006). Designing qualitative research (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

18.

Monikowski

Peterson

(2005). Service-learning in interpreting education: Living and learning. In Marschark

Peterson

Winston

E. A.

(Eds.), Sign language interpreting and interpreter education (pp. 188–207). New York: Oxford University Press.

19.

Ngai

S. S.

(2006). Service-learning, personal development, and social commitment: A case study of university students in Hong Kong. Adolescence, 42(161), 165–176.

20.

Patton

M. Q.

(2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

21.

Prentice

(2000). Service-learning programs on community college campuses. Los Angeles: ERIC Clearinghouse for Community Colleges. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED451857).

22.

Rosenberg

R. L.

(2000). Becoming the change we wish to see in the world: Combating through service-learning learned passivity. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 4, 6–11.

23.

Sawyer

(2004). Fundamental aspects of interpreter education: Curriculum and assessment. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

24.

Service-learning Research and Development Center (2002). Criteria for service-learning course review at UC Berkeley. Berkeley, CA: University of California at Berkeley.

25.

Smith

T. B.

(1994). Guidelines: Practical tips for working and socializing with Deaf-Blind people. Burtonsville, MD: Sign Media.

26.

Zlotkowski

Williams

(2003). The faculty role in civic engagement. Peer Review, 5(3), 9–11.