Service-Learning with Intergenerational and Cross-Cultural Social Interactions: A Study of University Students in Hong Kong

Abstract

Background: Service-learning (SL) is an experiential educational approach integrating community service with academic study and personal growth. It is valued in higher education for enhancing student learning and development. Including intergenerational and cross-cultural engagement can promote social interaction between students and the community, although it also comes with challenges. Purpose: This paper reports on an investigation of the benefits and challenges of implementing SL projects with intergenerational and cross-cultural communication. Methodology/Approach: This study employed a mixed method combining quantitative and qualitative approaches to analyze survey results, student reflective reports for the course, and interview data. Findings/Conclusions: The outcomes encompassed enhancing professional skills, practical experience, and exploration of career options. Additionally, the analysis highlighted the positive impact of SL on students’ personal development. Furthermore, implementing SL projects with intergenerational and cross-cultural social interaction presented several challenges, including communication barriers among generations, resistance from interviewees who may be distracted, and cultural barriers for international students. Implications: In conclusion, this paper provides discussion and suggestions regarding designing and implementing SL projects within the human-computer interaction course. These insights are beneficial for enhancing the delivery of SL practice, particularly within the dynamic contexts of intergenerational and cross-cultural social interaction.

Keywords

service-learning intergenerational communication cross-cultural communication social interaction human-computer interaction

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Akatsu

Miki

(2004). Usability research for the elderly people. Oki Technical Review (Special Issue on Human Friendly Technologies), 71(3), 54–57. https://doi.org/10.18046/syt.v15i42.2537

Amran

M. S.

Kutty

Surat

(2019). Creative problem-solving (CPS) skills among university students. Creative Education, 10(12), 3049–3058. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2019.1012229

Astin

Vogelgesang

Ikeda

Yee

(2000). How service learning affects students. Higher Education Research Institute.

Bales

S. S.

Eklund

S. J.

Siffin

C. F.

(2000). Children’s perceptions of elders before and after a school-based intergenerational program. Educational Gerontology, 26(7), 677–689. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601270050200662

Belford

(2017). International students from Melbourne describing their cross-cultural transitions experiences: Culture shock, social interaction, and friendship development. Journal of International Students, 7(3), 499–521. https://doi.org/10.32674/jis.v7i3.206

Blouin

D. D.

Perry

E. M.

(2009). Whom does service learning really serve? Community-based organizations’ perspectives on service learning. Teaching Sociology, 37(2), 120–135. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055X0903700201

Chan

S. C.

Ngai

Lam

C. H.

Kwan

K. P.

(2021). How participation affects university students’ perspectives toward mandatory. Journal of Experiential Education, 44(2), 137–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/105382592094888

Chow

Y.-L.

(2020). Development of the Hong Kong identity scale: Differentiation between Hong Kong ‘locals’ and mainland Chinese in cultural and civic domains. Journal of Contemporary China, 29(124), 568–584. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2019.1677365

Coulter-Kern

Schenkel

Walker

Fogle

(2013). Improving student’s understanding of career decision-making through service learning. College Student Journal, 47(2), 306–311. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2003.0040

10.

Crago

M. B.

Eriks-Brophy

Pesco

McAlpine

(1997). Culturally based miscommunication in classroom interaction. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 28(3), 245–254. https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461.2803.245

11.

Driscoll

Holland

Gelmon

Kerrigan

(1996). An assessment model for service-learning: Comprehensive case studies of impact on faculty, students, community, and institution. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 3(1), 66–71.

12.

Faiola

(2007). The design enterprise: Rethinking the HCI education paradigm. Design Issues, 23(3), 30–45. https://doi.org/10.1162/desi.2007.23.3.30

13.

Feyt

Mwalemba

(2021). The role of service-learning in information systems education. Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 18, 103–119. https://doi.org/10.28945/4797

14.

Giles

Eyler

(1994). The theoretical roots of service-learning in John Dewey: Toward a theory of service-learning. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 1(1), 7–85.

15.

Guo

Jamal

(2007). Nurturing cultural diversity in higher education: A critical review of selected models. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 37(3), 27–49. https://doi.org/10.47678/cjhe.v37i3.529

16.

Hannon

(2006). Service learning in information technology leadership: A natural connection. Peer Review, 8(4), 16–20.

17.

Hill

Betts

L. R.

Gardner

S. E.

(2015). Older adults’ experiences and perceptions of digital technology: (Dis)empowerment, wellbeing, and inclusion. Computers in Human Behavior, 48, 415–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.062

18.

Hou

S.-I.

(2010). Developing a faculty inventory measuring perceived service-learning benefits and barriers. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 16(2), 78–89.

19.

Jackson

(2011). Cultivating cosmopolitan, intercultural citizenship through critical reflection and international, experiential learning. Language and Intercultural Communication, 11(2), 80–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2011.556737

20.

Jefferies

L. N.

Roggeveen

A. B.

Enns

J. T.

Bennett

P. J.

Sekuler

A. B.

Di Lollo

(2015). On the time course of attentional focusing in older adults. Psychological Research, 79, 28–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-013-0528-2

21.

Kessler

E.-M.

Staudinger

U. M.

(2007). Intergenerational potential: Effects of social interaction between older adults and adolescents. Psychology and Aging, 22(4), 690–704. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.22.4.690

22.

Lampe

(2016). Citizen interaction design: Teaching HCI through service. Interactions, 23(6), 66–69. https://doi.org/10.1145/2991895

23.

Lau

(1992). Collectivism’s individualism: Value preference, personal control, and the desire for freedom among Chinese in mainland China, Hong Kong, and Singapore. Personality and Individual Differences, 13(3), 361–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(92)90115-6

24.

Levesque-Bristol

Knapp

T. D.

Fisher

B. J.

(2011). The effectiveness of service-learning: It’s not always what you think. Journal of Experiential Education, 33(3), 208–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/105382590113300302

25.

Lewthwaite

(1996). A study of international students’ perspectives on cross-cultural adaptation. International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling, 19(2), 167–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00114787

26.

Mankoff

(2006). Practical service learning issues in HCI. In CHI ‘06 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems, pp. 201–206. Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/1125451.1125494

27.

McDonald

Hill

B. M.

Greenstadt

Forte

(2019). Privacy, anonymity, and perceived risk in open collaboration: A study of service providers. Proceedings of the 2019 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, pp. 1–12, https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300901

28.

Meshel

D. S.

MCGlynn

R. P.

(2004). Intergenerational contact, attitudes, and stereotypes of adolescents and older people. Educational Gerontology, 30(6), 457–479. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601270490445078

29.

Molee

L. M.

Henry

M. E.

Sessa

V. I.

McKinney-Prupis

E. R.

(2011). Assessing learning in service-learning courses through critical reflection. Journal of Experiential Education, 33(3), 239–257. https://doi.org/10.1177/105382590113300304

30.

Molinsky

(2007). Cross-cultural code-switching: The psychological challenges of adapting behavior in foreign cultural interactions. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 622–640. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.24351878

31.

Morin

E. L.

(2009). Service learning pitfalls: Problems you didnt see coming. College Teaching Methods & Styles Journal (CTMS), 5(1), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.19030/ctms.v5i1.5041

32.

Nejmeh

B. A.

(2012). Service-learning in computer and information sciences: Practical applications in engineering education. IEEE Press/Wiley, https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118319130

33.

Neuliep

J. W.

(2012). The relationship among intercultural communication apprehension, ethnocentrism, uncertainty reduction, and communication satisfaction during initial intercultural interaction: An extension of anxiety and uncertainty management (AUM) theory. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 41(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/17475759.2011.623239

34.

Owens

D. L.

Srivastava

Feerasta

(2011). Viewing international students as state stimulus potential: Current perceptions and future possibilities. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 21(2), 157–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2011.623730

35.

Paul

Stegbauer

(2005). Is the digital divide between young and elderly people increasing? First Monday, 10(10). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v10i10.1286

36.

Peterson

D. M.

Briggs

Dreasher

Horner

D. D.

Nelson

(1999). Contributions of international students and programs to campus diversity. New Directions for Student Services, 1999(86), 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1002/ss.8609

37.

Plattner

(2013). An introduction to design thinking. Institute of Design at Stanford, 1–15. https://web.stanford.edu/∼mshanks/MichaelShanks/files/509554.pdf

38.

Roldan

Gao

Hishikawa

A. M.

Zhang

Froehlich

J. E.

Yip

(2020). Opportunities and challenges in involving users in project-based HCI education. Proceedings of the 2020 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, pp. 1–15, https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376530

39.

Roodin

Brown

L. H.

Shedlock

(2013). Intergenerational service-learning: A review of recent literature and directions for the future. Gerontology & Geriatrics Education, 34(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701960.2012.755624

40.

Rosenberger

(2000). Beyond empathy: Developing critical consciousness through service learning. Integrating Service Learning and Multicultural Education in Colleges and Universities, 23–43. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410606051-9

41.

Sanders

C. K.

Scanlon

(2021). The digital divide is a human rights issue: Advancing social inclusion through social work advocacy. Journal of Human Rights and Social Work, 6(2), 130–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41134-020-00147-9

42.

Shneiderman

Bishop

Friedman

Lazar

Marsden

Nass

(2006). Making a difference: Integrating socially relevant projects into HCI teaching. In CHI ‘06 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems, pp. 41–44, https://doi.org/10.1145/1125451.1125463

43.

Snell

R. S.

Lau

K. H.

(2020). The development of a service-learning outcomes measurement scale (S-LOMS). Metropolitan Universities, 31(1), 44–77.

44.

Strage

(2004). Long-term academic benefits of service-learning: When and where do they manifest themselves? College Student Journal, 38(2).

45.

Strom

R. D.

Strom

P. S.

(2015). Assessment of intergenerational communication and relationships. Educational Gerontology, 41(1), 41–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601277.2014.912454

46.

Thomas

(1984). Cross-cultural discourse as ‘unequal encounter’: Towards a pragmatic analysis1. Applied Linguistics, 5(3), 226–235. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/5.3.226

47.

Vaismoradi

Turunen

Bondas

(2013). Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nursing & Health Sciences, 15(3), 398–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12048

48.

Vassilakopoulou

Hustad

(2021). Bridging digital divides: A literature review and research agenda for information systems research. Information Systems Frontiers. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-020-10096-3

49.

Waldstein

F. A.

Reiher

T. C.

(2001). Service-learning and students’ personal and civic development. Journal of Experiential Education, 24(1), 7–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/105382590102400104

50.

Wang

McKee

Torbica

Stuckler

(2019). Systematic literature review on the spread of health-related misinformation on social media. Social Science & Medicine, 240, 112552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112552

51.

Whitley

M. A.

Farrell

Maisonet

Hoffer

(2017). Reflections on service-learning: Student experiences in a sport-based youth development course. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 88(7), 23–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.2017.1340202

52.

Yao

Zhang

Liu

Chu

Zeng

(2021). Bridging the digital divide between old and young people in China: Challenges and opportunities. The Lancet Healthy Longevity, 2(3), e125–e126. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2666-7568(21)00032-5

53.

Yusof

Tengku Ariffin

T. F.

Awang Hashim

Nordin

Kaur

(2020). Challenges of service learning practices: Student and faculty perspectives from Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 17(2), 279–309. https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2020.17.2.10

54.

Yusop

Correia

A.-P.

(2013). The benefits and challenges of implementing service-learning in an advanced instructional design and technology curricula: Implications for teaching professional courses. The New Educational Review, 32, 220–232. https://doi.org/10.15804/tner.13.32.2.18

55.

Zhao

(2007). Cultural conflicts in an intercultural classroom discourse and interpretations from a cultural perspective. Intercultural Communication Studies, 16(1), 129–136. https://doi.org/10.36923/jicc.v20i3.309

56.

Ziegert

A. L.

McGoldrick

(2008). When service is good for economics: Linking the classroom and community through service-learning. International Review of Economics Education, 7(2), 39–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1477-3880(15)30090-6