Background: The Classroom-as-Organization (CAO) is an established experiential education approach in management education. Purpose: The purpose of the paper is to explore how students and instructors use Slack to communicate in a CAO. Methodology/Approach: We conduct a discourse analysis of three separate exchanges on Slack, an application used for student and instructor communication in an externally oriented CAO. Findings/Conclusions: While Slack provides a venue where problems can be solved, and group dynamics patterns emerge quicker, it presents challenges for instructors, particularly surrounding the balance between suggestion and directive. Implications: Instructors need to be mindful of the benefits and challenges of using Slack when it comes to problem-solving, expressing emotions, and critical thinking for class activities. Institutional support for CAOs may be essential to reduce the pressure on instructors to monitor student activity on Slack.
ArmstrongS. J. (2011). From the editors: Continuing our quest for meaningful impact on management practice. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 10(2), 181–187. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMLE.2011.62798928
2.
ArnfalkP.KoggB. (2003). Service transformation—Managing a shift from business travel to virtual meetings. Journal of Cleaner Production, 11(8), 859–872. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-6526(02)00158-0
3.
AustinJ. L. (1975). How to do things with words. Oxford university press.
BowenJ. L. (2014). Emotion in organizations: Resources for business educators. Journal of Management Education, 38(1), 114–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562913488110
6.
BrightD. S.CazaA.TureskyE. F.PutzelR.NelsonE.LuechtefeldR. (2016). Constructivist meta-practices: When students design activities, lead others, and assess peers. Journal of Leadership Education, 15(4), 75–99. https://doi.org/10.12806/V15/I4/R6
7.
BrownG.CrossleyC.RobinsonS. L. (2014). Psychological ownership, territorial behavior, and being perceived as a team contributor: The critical role of trust in the work environment. Personnel Psychology, 67(2), 463–485. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12048
BuchemI. (2012). Psychological ownership and personal learning environments: Do sense of ownership and control really matter?PLE Conference Proceedings, 1, 101–121.
10.
ByronK. (2008). Carrying too heavy a load? The communication and miscommunication of emotion by email. The Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 309–327. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2008.31193163
11.
CavanaughJ. M.GiapponiC. C.GoldenT. D. (2016). Digital technology and student cognitive development: The neuroscience of the university classroom. Journal of Management Education, 40(4), 374–397. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562915614051
12.
ChappellS.ThomasD. (2019). The shadow side of teaching Classroom as Organization. Journal of Management Education, 43(4), 461–470. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562918820552
13.
ChenX.LeeC.HuiC.LinW.BrownG.LiuJ. (2023). Feeling possessive, performing well? Effects of job-based psychological ownership on territoriality, information exchange, and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 108(3), 403–424. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0001027.supp
14.
CocieruO. C.KatzM.McDonaldM. A. (2020a). A social network comparison between a Classroom-as-Organization and traditional management classes. Journal of Education for Business, 95(8), 541–547. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2020.1729684
15.
CocieruO. C.KatzM.McDonaldM. A. (2020b). Understanding interactions in a Classroom-as-Organization using dynamic network analysis. Journal of Experiential Education, 43(1), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053825919888778
16.
CocieruO. C.LyleM. C. B.McDonaldM. A. (2021). An exploration of the dynamic nature of psychological ownership in a Classroom-as-Organization. Journal of Experiential Education, 44(3), 293–307. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053825920973704
17.
CohenA. R. (1976). Beyond simulation: Treating the classroom as an organization. The Teaching of Organizational Behavior, 2(1), 13–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/105256297600200103
DawkinsS.TianA. W.NewmanA.MartinA. (2017). Psychological ownership: A review and research agenda. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(2), 163–183. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2057
20.
De GuineaA. O.WebsterJ.StaplesD. S. (2012). A meta-analysis of the consequences of virtualness on team functioning. Information & Management, 49(6), 301–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2012.08.003
21.
DommettE. J. (2018). Learner ownership of technology-enhanced learning. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 15(1), 79–86. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-08-2017-0042
22.
DurantiA.GoodwinC. (1992). Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon (Vol. 11). Cambridge University Press Cambridge.
23.
EdwardsD.PotterJ. (1992). Discursive psychology. Sage Publications, Inc.
24.
GeeJ. P. (2010). How to do discourse analysis: A toolkit. Routledge.
GralewskiM. (2011). The philosophical underpinnings of social constructionist discourse analysis. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics, 7(1), 155–171. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10016-011-0007-4
27.
HanksW. F. (2018). Language & communicative practices. Routledge.
28.
HendryJ. R.HillerT. B.MartinE. C.BoydN. M. (2017). Context and pedagogy: A quarter-century of change in an introductory management course. Journal of Management Education, 41(3), 346–384. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562917697758
29.
HillJ.LaFolletteR.GrossoR.AxelsonD.HartK.McDonoughE. (2019). Using Slack to facilitate virtual small groups for individualized interactive instruction. AEM Education and Training, 3(1), 92–95. https://doi.org/10.1002/aet2.10201
30.
HoughtonJ. D.WuJ.GodwinJ. L.NeckC. P.ManzC. C. (2012). Effective stress management: A model of emotional intelligence, self-leadership, and student stress coping. Journal of Management Education, 36(2), 220–238. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562911430205
KirkC. P.SwainS. D. (2018). Consumer psychological ownership of digital technology. In PeckJ.ShuS. B. (Eds.), Psychological ownership and consumer behavior (pp. 69–90). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77158-8_5
33.
LindsayC. (1992). Learning through emotion: An approach for integrating student and teacher emotions into the classroom. Journal of Management Education, 16(1), 25–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/105256299201600103
34.
MarlowS. L.LacerenzaC. N.SalasE. (2017). Communication in virtual teams: A conceptual framework and research agenda. Human Resource Management Review, 27(4), 575–589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.12.005
35.
McDonaldM. A.SpenceK. (2016). Experiential learning: Impacting student lateral and vertical development. Sport Management Education Journal, 10(2), 140–147. https://doi.org/10.1123/smej.2015-0026
36.
McDonaldM. A.SpenceK.SheehanB. (2011). Classroom-as-Organization an integral approach. Journal of Integral Theory & Practice, 6(2), 67–81.
37.
MeiselS.MarxB. (1999). Screen to screen versus face to face: Experiencing the differences in management education. Journal of Management Education, 23(6), 719–731. https://doi.org/10.1177/105256299902300609
38.
MillerJ. A. (1991). Experiencing management: A comprehensive, “hands-on” model for the introductory undergraduate management course. Journal of Management Education, 15(2), 151–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/105256299101500202
39.
MontriefT.HaasM. R. C.AlvarezA.GottliebM.SiegalD.ChanT. (2020). Thinking outside the Inbox: Use of Slack in clinical groups as a collaborative team communication platform. AEM Education and Training, 5(1), 121–129. https://doi.org/10.1002/aet2.10497
40.
PotterJ.WetherellM. (1987). Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour. Sage Publications, Inc.
41.
PurvanovaR. K.KendaR. (2021). The impact of virtuality on team effectiveness in organizational and non-organizational teams: A meta-analysis. Applied Psychology, 71(3), 1082–1131. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12348
42.
PutzelR. (1992). Experience Base” learning: A Classroom-as-Organization using delegated, rank-order grading. Journal of Management Education, 16(2), 204–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/105256299201600206
43.
PutzelR. (2007). XB: New-paradigm management of the classroom as a complex organization. Journal of Business and Leadership: Research, Practice, and Teaching, 3(1), 136–143. https://doi.org/10.58809/DSJQ7935
44.
RaabN. (1997). Becoming an expert in not knowing: Reframing teacher as consultant. Management Learning, 28(2), 161–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507697282005
RommeA. G. L.PutzelR. (2003). Designing management education: Practice what you teach. Simulation & Gaming, 34(4), 512–530. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878103258202
47.
RooseK. (2021). Futureproof: 9 Rules for Humans in the Age of Automation. Random House.
48.
RossS. M. (2019). Slack it to me: Complementing LMS with student-centric communications for the millennial/post-millennial student. Journal of Marketing Education, 41(2), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475319833113
SearleJ. R. (1979). Expression and meaning: Studies in the theory of speech acts. Cambridge University Press.
52.
SheehanB. J.McDonaldM. A.SpenceK. K. (2009). Developing students’ emotional competency using the classroom-as-organization approach. Journal of Management Education, 33(1), 77–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562908328920
SoxC. B.KlineS. F.CrewsT. B.StrickS. K.CampbellJ. M. (2017). Virtual and hybrid meetings: A mixed research synthesis of 2002-2012 research. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 41(8), 945–984. https://doi.org/10.1177/1096348015584437
56.
ThomasD. R.ChappellS. F.BrightD. S. (2020). Classroom as Organization. Edward Elgar Publishing.
57.
Van DijkT. A. (2009). Society and discourse: How social contexts influence text and talk. Cambridge University Press.
58.
WagenheimG. (1992). TEAMS. Team Exercise for Action Management Skills: A semester-long team-management simulation. http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED351756
59.
WoodL. A.KrogerR. O. (2000). Doing discourse analysis: Methods for studying action in talk and text. Sage.
