Background: As a psychological construct, inspiration has not received extensive examination in the outdoor literature. Inspiration can be characterized in terms of evocation, motivation, and transcendence. Purpose: This qualitative study explored the experience of inspiration in response to natural landscapes utilizing Bergson's qualitative multiplicity, the experience of co-occurring heterogeneous elements. Methodology/Approach: Survey respondents participated in a traveling field course visiting 19 U.S. National Parks in 2015 (n = 15, 26 days) and 14 parks in 2017 (n = 15, 18 days). Respondents described inspirational experiences in each park. Findings/Conclusions: Qualitative analysis of responses revealed a characteristic pattern: landscape features, landscape qualities, and affective responses. Participants cited vertical features, vastness, and beauty as triggers of inspiration, and characterized inspiration in terms of awe, wonder, and sublimity. Implications: This study describes inspiration in the outdoors, with implications for planning direct experiences of natural landscapes to maximize inspiration.
ArcangeliM.DokicJ.SperdutiM. (2019). The beautiful, the sublime and the self. In CovaF.RéhaultS. (Eds.), Advances in experimental philosophy of aesthetics (pp. 175–196). Bloomsbury.
4.
ArcangeliM.SperdutiM.JacquotA.PiolinoP.DokicJ. (2020). Awe and the experience of the sublime: A complex relationship. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1340. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01340
5.
BaiY.MaruskinL.ChenS.GordonA.StellarJ.McNielG.PengK.KeltnerD. (2017). Awe, the diminished self, and collective engagement: Universals and cultural variations in the small self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(2), 185–209. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000087
6.
BergsonH. (2001). Time and free will: An essay on the immediate data of consciousness (PogsonF., Trans.; 3rd ed.). Dover Press. (Original work published 1889).
7.
BergsonH. (2010). The creative mind: An introduction to metaphysics. (AndisonM., Trans.). Dover Press. (Original work published 1934).
8.
BethelmyL.CorralizaJ. (2019). Transcendence and sublime experience in nature: Awe and inspiring energy. Frontiers in Psychology, 13(10), 509. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00509. PMID: 30918493; PMCID: PMC6424873
9.
BradyE. (2013). The sublime response in modern philosophy: Aesthetics, ethics, and nature. Cambridge University Press.
10.
BrunnerE.DawsonV. (2017). Marketing the recreational sublime: Jumbo Wild and the rhetorics of humans in nature. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 34(4), 386–399. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295036.2017.1322706
11.
BurkeE. (2015). A philosophical inquiry into the origins of our ideas of the sublime and the beautiful. (GuyerP., Ed.). Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1757).
12.
CarsonR. (1965). The sense of wonder. Harper & Row.
13.
ChaudhuryS. H.GargN.JiangX. (2022). The curious case of threat-awe: A theoretical and empirical reconceptualization. Emotion, 22(7), 1653–1669. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000984
14.
ChiricoA.FerriseF.CordellaL.GaggioliA. (2018). Designing awe in virtual reality: An experimental study. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(January), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02351
15.
CostelloeT. M. (2012). The sublime: A short introduction to a long history. In CostelloeT. M. (Ed.), The sublime from antiquity to the present (pp. 1–7). Cambridge University Press.
16.
CreswellJ. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage.
17.
DanielB.ShoresJ.FairclothW. B. (2021). The effects of natural landscapes on inspiration: An exploratory study. Journal of Outdoor Recreation, Education, and Leadership, 13(4), 30–45. https://doi.org/10.18666/JOREL-2021-V13-I4-10633
18.
De FreitasE.FerraraF. (2015). Movement, memory, and mathematics: Henri Bergson and the ontology of learning. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 34(6), 565–585. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-014-9455-y
19.
DeLucaK.DemoA. (2000). Imaging nature: Watkins, Yosemite, and the birth of environmentalism. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 17(3), 241–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295030009388395
20.
DemarsS. (1991). The tourist in Yosemite: 1855-1985. Utah University Press.
21.
FisherP. (1998). Wonder, the rainbow, and the aesthetics of rare experiences. Harvard University Press.
22.
FredricksonL. M.AndersonD. H. (1999). A qualitative exploration of the wilderness experience as a source of spiritual inspiration. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19(1), 21–39. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.1998.0110
23.
GlaserB. (1965). The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Social Problems, 12(4), 436–445. https://doi.org/10.2307/798843
24.
GlaserB. G.StraussA. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine.
25.
GordonA.StellarJ.AndersonC.McNeilG.LoewD.KelterD. (2017). The dark side of the sublime: Distinguishing a threat-based variant of awe. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(2), 310–328. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000120
26.
GunterP. A. (2018). Bergson, materialization, and the peculiar nature of space. Lo Sgardo - Rivista di Filosofia, 26(1), 231–245.
IshizuT.ZekiS. (2014). A neurobiological enquiry into the origins of our experience of the sublime and beautiful. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 891. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00891
30.
JiangT.SedikidesC. (2022). Awe motivates authentic-self pursuit via self-transcendence: Implications for prosociality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 123(3), 576–596. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000381
31.
JukesS.StewartA.MorseM. (2022). Following lines in the landscape: Playing with a posthuman pedagogy in outdoor environmental education. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 38(3-4), 345–360. https://doi.org/10.1017/aee.2021.18
32.
KantI. (2000). Critique of the power of judgment, (GuyerP. (Ed.). GuyerP.MatthewsE. (Trans.)). Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1790).
33.
KaukoT. (2004). Sign value, topophilia, and the locational component in property prices. Environment and Planning A, 36(5), 859–878. https://doi.org/10.1068/a36191
34.
KeltnerD.HaidtJ. (2003). Approaching awe, a moral, spiritual, and aesthetic emotion. Cognition and Emotion, 17(2), 297–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930302297
35.
LawlorL. (2010). Intuition and duration: An introduction to Bergson’s ‘Introduction to Metaphysics’. In KellyM. (Ed.), Bergson and phenomenology (pp. 25–41). Palgrave Macmillan.
Meyers-LevyJ.ZhuR. (2007). The influence of ceiling height: The effect of priming on the type of processing that people use. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(2), 174–186. https://doi.org/10.1086/519146
40.
MilyavskayaM.IanakievaI.Foxen-CraftE.ColantuoniA.KoestnerR. (2012). Inspired to get there: The effects of trait and goal inspiration on goal progress. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 56–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.08.031
41.
OchoaL. (2010). Topophilia: A tool for the demarcation of cultural microregions: The case of the Huaxteca. In StallerJ.CarrascoM. (Eds.), Pre-Columbian foodways (pp. 535–552). Springer.
42.
OgunseitanO. (2005). Topophilia and the quality of life. Environmental Health Perspectives, 113(2), 143–148. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.7467
43.
OravecC. (1981). John Muir, Yosemite, and the sublime response: A study in the rhetoric of preservationism. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 67(3), 245–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335638109383570
44.
OzgucU.LittleA. (2023). The politics of temporality and the ethos of open societies: Transfrontier conservation areas as spatio-temporal chokepoints. Geopolitics, 2(28), 570–592. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2022.2047653
45.
PelowskiM.HurY.-J.CotterK. N.IshizuT.ChristensenA. P.LederH.McManusI. C. (2021). Quantifying the if, the when, and the what of the sublime: A survey and latent class analysis of incidence, emotions, and distinct varieties of personal sublime experiences. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 15(2), 216–240. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000273
46.
PulkiJ.DahlinB.VarriV. M. (2017). Environmental education as a lived-body practice? A contemplative pedagogy perspective. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 51(1), 214–229. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9752.12209
47.
RoggenbuckJ. W.DriverB. L. (2000). Benefits of nonfacilitated uses of wilderness. Presented at Wilderness science in a time of change conference. Missoula, MT, 1999. Ogden, UT: US Dept. of Agriculture. Proceedings RMRS-P-15-VOL-3.
48.
RousellD.Peñaloza-CaicedoA. (2022). Listening for futures along Birrarung Marr: Speculative immersive experience in environmental education. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 38(3-4), 431–450. https://doi.org/10.1017/aee.2022.34
49.
RuanX.HogbenP. (Eds.). (2007). Tophophilia and topophobia: Reflections on twentieth-century human habitat. Routledge.
ShiotaM. N.KeltnerD.MossmanA. (2007). The nature of awe: Elicitors, appraisals, and effects on self-concept. Cognition and Emotion, 21(5), 944–963. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930600923668
54.
StedmanR.IngallsM. (2013). Topophilia, biophilia, and greening in the red zone. In TidballT. G.KrasnyM. E. (Eds.), Greening in the red zone: Disaster, resilience and community greening (pp. 129–144). Springer.
55.
StraumeL. V.VittersøJ. (2012). Happiness, inspiration, and the fully functioning person: Separating hedonic and eudaimonic well-being in the workplace. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 7(5), 387–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2012.711348
56.
ThrashT. M.ElliotA. J. (2003). Inspiration as a psychological construct. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4), 871–889. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.871
57.
ThrashT. M.ElliotA. J. (2004). Inspiration: Core characteristics, component processes, antecedents, and function. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(6), 957–973. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.6.957
58.
ThrashT. M.ElliotA. J.MaruskinL. A.CassidyS. E. (2010). Inspiration and the promotion of well-being: Tests of causality and mediation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(3), 488–506. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017906
59.
ThrashT. M.MoldovanE. G.OleynickV. C.MaruskinL. A. (2014). The psychology of inspiration. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8(9), 495–510. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12127
60.
TuanY. (1974). Topophilia: A study of environmental perception, attitudes, and values. University of Chicago Press.
TuanY. (1977). Space and place: The perspective of experience. University of Minnesota Press.
63.
TuanY. (1996). Cosmos and hearth: A cosmopolite’s viewpoint. University of Minnesota Press.
64.
VartanianO.NavarreteG.ChatterjeeA.FichL. B.Gonzalez-MoraJ. L.LederH.ModronoC.NadalM.RostrupN.SkovM. (2015). Architectural design and the brain: Effects of ceiling height and perceived enclosure on beauty judgments and approach-avoidance decisions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 41, 10–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.11.006
WatzlawickP.Beavin-BavelasJ.JacksonD. (1967). Pragmatics of human communication – A study of interactional patterns, pathologies and paradoxes. Norton.
67.
WienerN. (1948). Cybernetics: Or control and communication in the animal and the machine. MIT Press. ISBN 978-0-262-73009-9.
