Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Each year, millions of people visit national parks, unaware that many parks’ namesake features are in jeopardy. National parks in southern California and Alaska are experiencing the effects of climate change at an accelerated rate compared to other areas of the country. This paper examines the implications for site programming that emerge when the Four-Truth Framework, developed by the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission, is applied to how people respond to climate change at Joshua Tree and Glacier Bay National Parks. Our research team collected data onsite and online in 2023 through observations, artifact analysis, and semi-structured interviews with staff, stakeholders, and visitors—using Reflexive Thematic Analysis to generate our findings. By harnessing the power of the Four-Truth Framework, interpreters can foster a sense of place, encourage critical curiosity, and ultimately shift the dynamics of climate change communication.

Keywords

climate change communication curiosity four truth lens Glacier Bay National Park heritage interpretation Joshua Tree National Park national parks place

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Altman

Low

S. M.

(Eds.). (1992). Place attachment (vol. 12, Human behavior and environment). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-8753-4_1

Auger

(2007). Healing the wounds of a nation: The Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa. Drake University Social Science Journal, 31(1), 1–19. https://www.drake.edu/media/departmentsoffices/dussj/2010-2007documents/HealingAuger.pdf

Barrows

(2022, June 6). Joshua trees at the hub of an ecosystem. ANR Blogs. https://ucanr.edu/blogs/blogcore/postdetail.cfm?postnum=52409

Beard

C. A.

Thompson

J. L.

(2012). Engaging visitors in climate change communication: A case study of Southern Florida’s national parks and wildlife refuges. Applied Environmental Education & Communication, 11(1), 25–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/1533015X.2012.728062

Brown

(2021). Atlas of the heart: Mapping meaningful connection & the language of human experience. Random House.

Cerda

(2024, August 12). Americans see many federal agencies favorably, but Republicans grow more critical of Justice Department. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2024/08/12/americans-see-many-federal-agencies-favorably-but-republicans-grow-more-critical-of-justice-department/

Chadwick

Smith

(Hosts). (2023, March 11). Transition zone. (No. 1) [Audio podcast episode]. In Where two deserts meet. NPS. https://www.nps.gov/podcasts/desertsmeet.htm

Coble

(2021, October). The arc of interpretation bends toward engagement. Legacy, 32(5), 28.

Coble

Cid

(2023, September/October). The four truths: Activating inquiry and story in ways that have the potential to heal. Legacy, 34(5), 12–18.

10.

Coble

Lindsay

Blair-Bruce

Cid

Craig

Fitzsimmons

Galan

Miller

Overholser

Stanton

Westhoff

(2024, November/December). Engaging with contested heritage: Working through and walking alongside (Part 1). Legacy, 35(6). https://national-association-for-interpretation.foleon.com/legacy/novdec24/heritage-leadership

11.

Coble

Lindsay

Blair-Bruce

Cid

Craig

Fitzsimmons

Galan

Miller

Overholser

Stanton

Westhoff

(2025, Jan/Feb). Engaging with contested heritage: Working through and walking alongside (Part 2). Legacy, 36(1). https://national-association-for-interpretation.foleon.com/legacy/janfeb25/heritage-leadership

12.

Cresswell

(2015). Place: An introduction (2nd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.

13.

Davis

Thompson

(2020). America’s largest classroom: What we learn from our national parks ( Thompson

J. L.

Houseal

A. K.

Cook

A. M.

, Eds.). University of California Press.

14.

Ensign

(2018). Speaking truth to power: An analysis of American truth-telling efforts vis-a-vis the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission. N.Y.U. Review of Law & Social Change, 42(1), 1–44.

15.

Gonzalez

(2020). Human-caused climate change in United States national parks and solutions for the future. Parks Stewardship Forum, 36(2). https://doi.org/10.5070/P536248262

16.

Gonzalez

Wang

Notaro

Vimont

D. J.

Williams

J. W.

(2018). Disproportionate magnitude of climate change in United States national parks. Environmental Research Letters, 13(10), Article 104001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aade09

17.

Guzmán

(2024). I never thought of it that way: How to have fearlessly curious conversations in dangerously divided times. BenBella Books, Inc.

18.

Halperin

Walton

(2018). The importance of place in communicating climate change to different facets of the American public. Weather, Climate, and Society, 10(2), 291–305. https://doi.org/10.1175/WCAS-D-16-0119.1

19.

Hayhoe

(2021). Saving us: A climate scientist’s case for hope and healing in a divided world. One Signal Publishers/Atria.

20.

Herwitz

(2005). The future of the past in South Africa: On the legacy of the TRC. Social Research, 72(3), 531–548.

21.

Hoffman

A. J.

(2015). How culture shapes the climate debate. Stanford University Press.

22.

Hornsey

Lewandowsky

(2022). A toolkit for understanding and addressing climate scepticism. Nature Human Behaviour, 6(11), 1454–1464. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-022-01463-y

23.

IPCC. (2023). Synthesis report of the IPCC sixth assessment report (AR6) summary for policymakers. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/syr/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_SYR_SPM.pdf

24.

Keltner

(2023). Awe: The new science of everyday wonder and how it can transform your life. Penguin Press.

25.

Leiserowitz

Maibach

Roser-Renouf

(2011, June 27). Global warming’s six Americas in May 2011. Yale Program on Climate Change Communication. https://climatecommunication.yale.edu/publications/global-warmings-six-americas-in-may-2011/

26.

Leiserowitz

Maibach

Rosenthal

Kotcher

Goddard

Carman

Myers

Verner

Goldberg

Ettinger

Fine

Their

(2025, February 13). Climate change in the American mind: Beliefs & attitudes, fall 2024. Yale Program on Climate Change Communication. https://climatecommunication.yale.edu/publications/climate-change-in-the-american-mind-beliefs-attitudes-fall-2024/

27.

Little

(2019). Violence, silence and the four truths: Towards healing in U.S.-American historical memory. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 25(7), 631–640. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2018.1542333

28.

Marlon

Goddard

Howe

Mildenberger

Jefferson

Rosenthal

Carman

Fine

Gillreath-Brown

Leiserowitz

(2025, March 15). Yale Climate Opinion Maps 2024. Yale Program on Climate Change Communication. https://climatecommunication.yale.edu/visualizations-data/ycom-us-2024/

29.

Marshall

(2015). Don’t even think about it: Why our brains are wired to ignore climate change (Paperback ed.). Bloomsbury.

30.

Merriam

Tisdell

(2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

31.

Myers

Maibach

Roser-Renouf

Akerlof

Leiserowitz

(2012). The relationship between personal experience and belief in the reality of global warming. Nature Climate Change, 3(4), 343–347. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1754

32.

National Association of State Park Directors. (2024). About us: Get to know America’s state parks. https://www.stateparks.org/about-us/

33.

National Park Service. (2023). National Park Service climate change response strategy: 2023 update. https://www.nps.gov/subjects/climatechange/upload/NPSClimateChange ResponseStrategy2023.pdf

34.

National Park Service. (2024, August 2). Joshua Tree National Park: Climate change. https://www.nps.gov/jotr/learn/nature/climate-change.htm

35.

National Park Service. (2025a, February 18). Glacier Bay National Park & Preserve: Climate change. https://www.nps.gov/glba/learn/nature/climate-change.htm

36.

National Park Service. (2025b). Visitor use data. U.S. Department of the Interior. https://www.nps.gov/subjects/socialscience/visitor-use-statistics-dashboard.htm

37.

National Park Service. (2025c, March 21). Frequently asked questions. https://www.nps.gov/aboutus/faqs.htm

38.

National Park Service Centennial Act, Pub. L.114-289, 130 Stat. 1482 (2016). https://www.congress.gov/114/statute/STATUTE-130/STATUTE-130-Pg1482.pdf

39.

National Park Service Omnibus Act, Pub.L.No. 105-391, 1123 Stat. 3497 105-767 (1998). https://www.congress.gov/105/statute/STATUTE-112/STATUTE-112-Pg3497.pdf

40.

National Park Service Organic Act, Pub. L.No. 64-235, 39 Stat.535 (1916). https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/COMPS-1725/pdf/COMPS-1725.pdf

41.

Nicolosi

Corbett

(2018). Engagement with climate change and the environment: A review of the role of relationships to place. Local Environment, 23(1), 77–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2017.1385002

42.

Orth

(2023, January 20). Americans hold the National Park Service in high esteem. YouGov. https://today.yougov.com/travel/articles/45026-americans-hold-national-park-service-high-esteem

43.

Park

(2010). Making sense of the meaning literature: An integrative review of meaning making and its effects on adjustment to stressful life events. Psychological Bulletin, 136(2), 257–301. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018301

44.

Poli

O’Reilly

J. X.

Mars

R. B.

Hunnius

(2024). Curiosity and the dynamics of optimal exploration. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 28(5), 441–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2024.02.001

45.

Stedman

(2002). Toward a social psychology of place: Predicting behavior from place-based cognitions, attitude, and identity. Environment and Behavior, 34(5), 561–581. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916502034005001

46.

Sweet

Green

Heintz

Frakes

Graver

Rangitsch

Rodgers

Heacox

Barrows

(2019). Congruence between future distribution models and empirical data for an iconic species at Joshua Tree National Park. Ecosphere, 10(6), Article e02763. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.2763

47.

Switzler

Johnson

R. D.

Coble

Cid

Galan

Kellert

Lindsay

Blair-Bruce

Craig

Fitzsimmons

Miller

Overholser

Stanton

Westhoff

(2025, Mar/April). Engaging with contested heritage: Working through and walking alongside (Part 3). Legacy, 36(2). https://national-association-for-interpretation.foleon.com/legacy/mar-april25/heritage-leadership

48.

Terry

Hayfield

(2021). Essentials of thematic analysis (1st ed.). American Psychological Association.

49.

Torpey

(2017, July). Interview with a park interpreter. Bureau of Labor Statistics. https://www.bls.gov/careeroutlook/2017/interview/park-interpreter.htm

50.

Tutu

Mkhize

Boraine

Ntsebeza

Burton

Orr

Finca

Potgieter

Khampepe

Randera

Lyster

Sooka

Malan

Wildschut

Mgojo

(1998). Truth & Reconciliation Commission report (Vol. 1, p. 4554). Department of Justice and Constitutional Development. https://www.justice.gov.za/trc/report/

51.

Tyson

Funk

Kennedy

(2023, August 9). What the data says about Americans’ views of climate change. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2023/04/18/for-earth-day-key-facts-about-americans-views-of-climate-change-and-renewable-energy/

52.

U.S. Census Bureau. (2020). United States [Online profile]. https://data.census.gov/profile/United_States?g=010XX00US

53.

Waters

Wilson

Dean

(2024). The role of iconic places, collective efficacy, and negative emotions in climate change communication. Environmental Science & Policy, 151, 103635–103635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2023.103635

Place,Curiosity,and Connection: Applying a Four Truth Lens to Climate Change Communication in Two Iconic National Parks

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References