Background: Employers consider strong leadership skills among highly desirable qualities for new hires. To meet the needs of today’s complex workforce, colleges and universities have increased opportunities for experiential learning for students. However, it is not known how students make meaning of these experiences in context with their personal backgrounds and experiences. Purpose: This study examines how women and men in college make meaning of leadership and leaders through experiential community-based mentoring participation. Methodology/Approach: A two-step qualitative content analysis of reflective journals, with a sample of 20 students utilizing the constant comparative method, is used to generate overarching themes. A second qualitative analysis compares how men and women understand leadership differently. Findings/Conclusions: Findings reveal that, despite a shift in the leadership literature away from hierarchical or trait models toward transformational, relational models that are typically more inclusive of women, our participants still made meaning of leadership and leaders in ways that were more closely aligned with antiquated understandings of leadership. Implications: Recommendations including use of experiential learning as a tool to intentionally increase leadership development and efficacy for women and men in college are discussed.
AstinA. W.SaxL. J. (1998). How undergraduates are affected by service participation. Journal of College Student Development, 39(3), 251–263.
2.
AstinH. S.LelandC. (1991). Women of influence, women of vision: A cross generational study of leaders and social change. Jossey-Bass.
3.
BelenkyM. F.ClinchyB. M.GoldbergerN. R.TaruleJ. M. (1986). Women’s ways of knowing: The development of self, voice, and mind. New York, NY: Basic Books.
BrescollV. L. (2016). Leading with their hearts? How gender stereotypes of emotion lead to biased evaluations of female leaders. The Leadership Quarterly, 27(3), 415–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.02.005
6.
BringleR. G.HatcherJ. A.JonesS. G. (Eds.). (2011). International service learning: Conceptual frameworks and research. Stylus.
7.
Cranwell-WardJ. (2001, May15). Multiskilling will set the agenda for female managers. Personnel Today, 22.
8.
DinizA. M.AlfonsoS.AraújoA. M.DeañoM.CostaA. R.CondeA.AlmeidaA. S. (2018). Gender differences in first-year college students’ academic expectations. Studies in Higher Education, 43(4), 689–701. http://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2016.1196350
9.
DuganJ. P. (2006). Exploring using the social change model: Leadership development among college men and women. Journal of College Student Development, 47(2), 217–225. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2006.0015
10.
DuganJ. P.KomivesS. R. (2007). Developing leadership capacity in college students. National Clearinghouse for Leadership Programs.
11.
ErvinC.BaghurstT. (2017). College mentoring: Alumni views on program efficacy in shaping leadership ability. International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring, 15(1), 169–185.
12.
EylerJ.GilesD. EJr.. (1999). Where’s the learning in service learning?San Franscico, CA: Jossey-Bass.
13.
GardnerJ. W. (1990). On leadership. The Free Press.
14.
GlaserB.StraussA. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine Publishing.
HepburnM.NiemiR.ChapmanC. (2000). Service learning in college political science: Queries and commentary. PS: Political science and politics, 33, 617–621. https://doi.org./10.2307/420867
17.
HoytC. L.MurphyS. E.HalversonS. K.WatsonC. B.ChaseJ. P. M. (2003). Group leadership: Efficacy and effectiveness. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 7(4), 259–274. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2699.7.4.259
18.
JonesS. R.AbesE. S. (2004). Enduring influences of service-learning on college students’ identity development. Journal of College Student Development, 45, 149–166. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2004.0023
19.
KezarA.MoriartyD. (2000). Expanding our understanding of student leadership development: A study exploring gender and ethnic identity. Journal of College Student Development, 41(1), 55–69.
20.
KilgoC. A.SheetsJ. K. E.PascarellaE. T. (2015). The link between high-impact practices and student learning: Some longitudinal evidence. Higher Education, 69, 509–525. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9788-z
21.
KuhG. D. (2008). High-impact educational practices: What they are, who has access to them, and why they matter. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities.
22.
LincolnY. S.GubaE. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
23.
MerriamS. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. Jossey-Bass.
24.
MooreR. (2009). Towards the sociology of truth. Continuum.
25.
PopperK. (1963). Conjectures and refutations: The growth of scientific knowledge. Routledge.
RogersE. B.RoseJ. (2019). A critical exploration of women’s gendered experiences in outdoor leadership. Journal of Experiential Education, 42(1), 37–50. http://doi.org/10.1177/1053825918820710
28.
RosenerJ. B. (1990, November–December). Ways women lead. Harvard Business Review, 119–125.
29.
SaxL. J.HarperC. E. (2007). Origins of the gender gap: Pre-college and college influences on differences between women and men. Research in Higher Education, 48(6), 669–694. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-006-9046-z
30.
SigmonR. (1979). Service-learning: Three principles. Synergist, 8(1), 9–11.
31.
WarrenK.MittenD.D’AmoreC.LotzE. (2019). The gendered hidden curriculum of adventure education. Journal of Experiential Education, 42(2), 140–154. http://doi.org/10.1177/1053825918813398
32.
WozencroftA.PateJ.GriffithsH. (2015). Experiential learning and its impact on students’ attitudes on youth with disabilities. Journal of Experiential Education, 33(2), 129–143. http://doi.org/10.1177/1053825914524363
