Background: Parent education programs take many forms and attempt to raise parents’ awareness of factors that positively affect child development. Program effectiveness varies greatly depending on whether parents feel engaged and interested by program content. Purpose: This article discusses a novel, “arts-informed” approach to parent education in a program called ThroughPlay. The program was collaboratively developed with local artists and uses a multimedia presentation (e.g., film, photography, music, and design) to translate scientific information about play and human development to public audiences in more visceral and compelling ways. Methodology/Approach: Sections of the article discuss the growing use of the arts for translating science, the benefits of integrating the arts for emotional engagement and education, and how the arts were collaboratively incorporated to create the ThroughPlay presentation. Findings/Conclusions: Consistent with notions of experiential learning and embodied cognition, arts-informed programs are thought to be effective by instigating an intellectually and emotionally engaging learning process. Implications: Arts–science collaborations are emerging at research universities across the country and are increasingly recognized as having great promise for community engagement and science outreach.
AberJ. L.Bishop-JosefS. J.JonesS. M.McLearnK. T.PhillipsD. A. (Eds.). (2007). Child development and social policy: Knowledge for action. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
2.
AndermanE.MaehrM.MidgleyC. (1999). Declining motivation after the transition to middle school: Schools can make a difference. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 32, 131-147.
3.
BennettD.SunderlandN.BartleetB.PowerA. (2016). Implementing and sustaining higher education service-learning initiatives: Revisiting Young et al.’s organizational tactics. Journal of Experiential Education, 39, 145-163. doi:10.1177/1053825916629987
4.
Bensaude-VincentB. (2001). A genealogy of the increasing gap between science and the public. Public Understanding of Science, 10, 99-113.
5.
BersM. U. (2010). Beyond computer literacy: Supporting youth’s positive development through technology. New Directions for Youth Development, 128, 13-23. doi:10.1002/yd.371
6.
BlaisureK. R.GeaslerM. J. (2000). The divorce education intervention model. Family Court Review, 38, 501-513. doi:10.1111/j.174-1617.2000.tb00587.x
7.
BrownS. (2010). Play. New York, NY: Avery.
8.
ColeA. L.KnowlesG. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of the arts in qualitative research: Perspectives, methodologies, examples, and issues. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
9.
CsikszentmihalyiM. (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety: The experience of play in work and games. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
10.
CsikszentmihalyiM.RathundeK.WhalenS. (1997). Talented teenagers: The roots of success and failure. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
11.
DamasioA. (1994). Descartes’ error. New York, NY: Penguin.
12.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
13.
DemboM. H.SweitzerM.LauritzenP. (1985). An evaluation of group parent education: Behavioral, PET, and Adlerian programs. Review of Educational Research, 55, 155-200. doi:10.2307/1170189
14.
DeweyJ. (1980). Art as experience. New York, NY: Perigee. (Original work published 1934)
15.
DowellE.WeitkampE. (2012). An exploration of the collaborative processes of making theatre inspired by science. Public Understanding of Science, 21, 891-901. doi:10.1177/0963662510394278
16.
DrummI. A.BelantaraB.DorneyS.WatersT. P.PerisE. (2015). The Aeolus project: Science outreach through art. Public Understanding of Science, 24, 375-385. doi:10.1177/0963662513501741
17.
EdwardsD. (2010). Artscience: Creativity in the post-Google generation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
18.
EisnerE. W. (1997). The promise and perils of alternative forms of data representation. Educational Researcher, 26(6), 4-10. doi:10.2307/1176961
19.
FriedmanA. J. (2013). Reflections on communicating science through art. Curator, 56, 3-10. doi:10.1111/cura.12001
GardnerH. (1990). Art education and human development. Los Angeles, CA: The Getty Education Institute for the Arts.
22.
GergenM. M.GergenK. J. (2010). Performative social science and psychology. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 12, 1-9. doi:10.17169/fqs-12.1.1595
23.
GinsburgK. (2007). The importance of play in promoting healthy child development and maintaining strong parent-child bonds. Pediatrics, 119, 182-191. doi:10.1542/peds.2006-2697
24.
GrangerD. (2016). Dewey from STEM to STEAM. Education and Culture, 32, 1-4. doi:10.5703/educationculture.32.2.0001
25.
GrayP. (2013). Free to learn: Why unleashing the instinct to play will make our children happier, more self-reliant, and better students for life. New York, NY: Basic Books.
26.
IsabellaR. A.BelskyJ. (1991). Interactional synchrony and the origins of infant-mother attachment: A replication study. Child Development, 62, 373-384. doi:10.2307/1131010
27.
JohnsonM. (2007). The meaning of the body: Aesthetics of human understanding. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
28.
KleiberD. (1999). Leisure experience and human development. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
29.
KokkosA. (2010). Transformative learning through aesthetic experience: Towards a comprehensive method. Journal of Transformative Education, 8, 155-177. doi:10.1177/1541344610397663
30.
KrippelG.McKeeA. J.MoodyJ. (2010). Multimedia use in higher education: Promises and pitfalls. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, 2, 1-8.
31.
KumagaiA. K. (2012). Acts of interpretation: A philosophical approach to using creative arts in medical education. Academic Medicine, 87, 1138-1144. doi:10.1097/acm.0b013e31825d0fd7
32.
LakoffG.JohnsonM. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh. New York, NY: Basic Books.
33.
LayzerJ. I.GoodsonB. D.BernsteinL.PriceC. (2001). National evaluation of family support programs final report volume A: The meta-analysis, April 2001 (Report)(Volume A). Washington, DC: US Department of Health & Human Services.
34.
LeavyP. (2009). Method meets art: Arts-based research practice. New York, NY: Guildford Press.
35.
LeavyP. (Ed.). (2018). Handbook of arts-based research. New York, NY: Guildford Press.
36.
LesenA. E.RoganA.BlumM. J. (2016). Science communication through art: Objectives, challenges, and outcomes. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 31, 657-660. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2016.06.004
37.
MackhB. M. (2015). Surveying the landscape: Arts integration at research universities. Ann Arbor: ArtsEngine, University of Michigan.
38.
MattinglyD. J.PrislinR.McKenzieT. L.RodriguezJ. L.KayzarB. (2002). Evaluating evaluations: The case of parent involvement programs. Review of Educational Research, 72, 549-576. doi:10.3102/00346543072004549
39.
McGroderS. M.HyraA. (2009). Developmental and economic effects of parenting programs for expectant parents and parents of preschool-age children. The Partnership for America’s Economic Success, 10, 1-70.
40.
McintoshP.WarrenD. (Eds.). (2013). Creativity in the classroom: Case studies in using the arts in teaching and learning in higher education. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
41.
McLeanK.EdwardsS.EvangelouM.SkouterisH.HarrisonL. J.HarrisonS.. . . LambertP. (2017). Playgroups as sites for parental education. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 15, 227-237. doi:10.1177/1476718x15595753
42.
MendozaJ.KatzL. G.RobertsonA. S.RothenbergD. (2003). Connecting with parents in the early years. Champaign: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign College of Education.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2018). The integration of the humanities and arts with sciences, engineering, and medicine in higher education: Branches from the same tree. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
45.
PlassJ. L.KaplanU. (2016). Emotional design in digital media for learning. In TettegahS.Y.GartmeirM. (Eds.), Emotions, technology, design, and learning (pp. 131-161). New York, NY: Elsevier.
46.
RathundeK. (2009). Nature and embodied education. Journal of Developmental Processes, 4, 70-80.
47.
RathundeK.CsikszentmihalyiM. (2006). The developing person: An experiential perspective. In LernerR. M. (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol.1. Theoretical models of human development (6th ed., pp. 465-515). New York, NY: John Wiley.
48.
RathundeK.IsabellaR. (2017a). Play, flow, and tailoring identity in middle adulthood. In SinnottJ. (Ed.), Identity flexibility during adulthood (pp. 211-232). New York, NY: Springer.
49.
RathundeK.IsabellaR. (2017b). Playing music and identity development in middle adulthood: A theoretical and autoethnographic account. In MantieR.SmithG. D. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of music making and leisure (pp. 131-149). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
50.
RenningerK. A.HidiS.KrappA. (Eds.). (1992). The role of interest in learning and development. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
51.
SahlbergP. (2011). Finnish lessons: What can the world learn from educational change in Finland?New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
52.
SaundersR.McFarland-PiazzaL.JacobvitzD.Hazen-SwannN.BurtonR. (2013). Maternal knowledge and behaviors regarding discipline: The effectiveness of a hands-on education program in positive guidance. Journal of Child Family Studies, 22, 322-334. doi:10.1007/s10826-012-9581-5
53.
SchwartzB. (2014). Communicating science through the performing arts. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 39, 275-289. doi:10.1179/0308018814z.00000000089
54.
SeamanJ.BrownM.QuayJ. (2017). The evolution of experiential learning theory: Tracing lines of research in the JEE. Journal of Experiential Education, 40(4), NP1-NP21. doi:10.1177/1053825916689268
55.
ShonkoffJ. P.BalesS. N. (2011). Science does not speak for itself: Translating child development research for the public and its policymakers. Child Development, 82, 17-32. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01538.x
56.
SibthorpJ.CollinsR.RathundeK.PaisleyK.SchumannS.PhojaM.. . . BaynesS. (2015). Fostering experiential self-regulation through outdoor adventure education. Journal of Experiential Education, 38, 26-40. doi:10.1177/1053825913516735
57.
StebbinsR. A. (1982). Serious leisure: A conceptual statement. Sociological Review, 25, 251-272. doi:10.2307/1388726
58.
ThomasE.MulveyA. (2008). Using the arts in teaching and learning: Building student capacity for community-based work in health psychology. Journal of Health Psychology, 13, 239-250. doi:10.1177/1359105307086703
59.
TractinskyN.KatzA. S.IkarD. (2000). What is beautiful is usable. Interacting With Computers, 13, 127-145. doi:10.1016/s0953-5438(00)00031-x
60.
UmE.PlassJ. L.HaywardE. O.HomerB. D. (2012). Emotional design in multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 485-498. doi:10.1037/a0026609
61.
WankelL. A.BlessingerP. (2013). Increasing student engagement and retention using multimedia technologies. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
62.
WooY. Y. J. (2008). Engaging new audiences: Translating research into popular media. Educational Researcher, 37, 321-329. doi:10.3102/0013189x08324229
