This study examined the long-term effects of participation in a half-day, low-element challenge course on the group functioning of members of college student organizations. Seventy-six participants completed measures of group cohesion, group effectiveness, and individual effectiveness within the group at four points in time: (a) one week prior to the course (baseline), (b) immediately prior to the course (pretest), (c) immediately following the course (posttest), (d) and two months after the course (follow-up). Results showed no change in group functioning from baseline to pretest, significant increases in group functioning from pretest to posttest, and a return to pretest levels of group functioning at follow-up. Implications of these results and ideas for extending the longevity of challenge course gains are discussed.
AttarianA., & HoldenG. T. (2001) The literature and research on challenge courses: An annotated bibliography.Raleigh, NC: North Carolina State University and Alpine Towers International.
3.
AubreyA., & McCleodM. (1994). So … what does rock climbing have to do with career planning?Women & Therapy, 15, 205–216.
4.
BakemanR., & HelmreichR. (1975). Cohesiveness and performance: Covariation and causality in an undersea environment.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 11, 478–489.
5.
BollenK., & HoyleR. (1990). Perceived cohesion: A conceptual and empirical examination.Social Forces, 69, 479–504.
6.
BronsonJ., GibsonS., KicharR., & PriestS. (1992). Evaluation of team development in a corporate training program.Journal of Experiential Education, 15, 50–53.
7.
BuntingC. J., & DonleyJ. P. (2002, January). Ten years of challenge course research: A review of affective outcome studies. Poster session presented at the 6th Coalition for Education in the Outdoors Research Symposium, Bradford Woods, IN.
8.
CarlessS., & DePaolaC. (2000). The measurement of cohesion in work teams.Small Group Research, 31, 71–88.
9.
CarronA., ColmanM., & WheelerJ. (2002). Cohesion and performance in sport: A meta-analysis.Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 24(2), 168–188.
10.
CarronA.V., & SpinkK. S. (1995). The group size/cohesion relationship in minimal groups.Small Group Research, 26(1), 86–105.
11.
CarronA., WidmeyerW., & BrawleyL. (1985). The development of an instrument to assess cohesion in a sports team: The Group Environment Questionnaire.Journal of Sport Psychology, 7, 244–266.
12.
ChakravortyD., TrunnellE., & EllisG. (1995). Ropes course participation and post-activity processing on transient depressed mood of hospitalized adult psychiatric patients.Therapeutic Recreation Journal, 29(2), 104–113.
13.
ChinW., SalisburyW., PearsonA., & StollakM. (1999). Perceived cohesion in small groups: Adapting and testing the Perceived Cohesion Scale in a small-group setting.Small Group Research, 30, 751–766.
14.
DavisD., RayJ., & SaylesC. (1995). Ropes course training for youth in a rural setting: “At first I thought it was going to be boring …”Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 12, 445–463.
15.
Davis-BermanJ., & BermanD. (1993). Therapeutic wilderness programs: Issues of professionalization in an emerging field.Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 23, 127–134.
16.
DirksK., & FerrinD. (2001). The role of trust in organizational settings.Organization Science, 12, 450–467.
17.
EwertA., & HeywoodJ. (1991). Group development in the natural environment: Expectations, outcomes, and techniques.Environment and Behavior, 23, 592–615.
GlassJ., & BenshoffJ. (2002). Facilitating group cohesion among adolescents through challenge course experiences.Journal of Experiential Education, 25(2), 268–277.
20.
GoldenbergM. A., KlenoskyD. B., O'LearyJ. T., & TemplinT. J. (2000). A means-end investigation of ropes course experiences.Journal of Leisure Research, 32, 208–225.
21.
HansonP., & LubinB. (1986). Team building as group development.Organization Development Journal, 4, 27–35.
22.
HartL., & SilkaL. (1994). Building self-efficacy through women-centered ropes course experiences.Women & Therapy, 15, 111–127.
23.
HattieJ., MarshH.W., NeillJ. T., & RichardsG. E. (1997). Adventure education and Outward Bound: Out-of-class experiences that make a lasting difference.Review of Educational Research, 67, 43–87.
24.
HutchingsP., & WutzdorffA. (1988). Effective integration of knowledge and experience is grounded in ideas about how students learn. In HutchingsP., & WutzdorffA. (Eds.), Knowing and doing: Learning through experience (pp. 5–20). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
25.
KeetonM., & TateP. (1978). The boom in experiential learning. In KeetonM., & TateP. (Eds.), Learning by experience: What, why, how (pp. 1–8). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
26.
LongJ. (1984). The wilderness lab.Training and Development Journal, 38, 58–69.
27.
LucknerJ., & NadlerR. (1995). Processing adventure experiences: It's the story that counts.Therapeutic Recreation Journal, 29(3), 175–183.
28.
MeyerB. (2000). The ropes and challenge course: A quasi-experimental examination.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 90, 1249–1257.
NeillJ., HeyligerJ., ChlichC., NelsonA., PutnamK., StauntonN. (2003) Project Adventure research: An overview of the research literature. Unpublished manuscript, University of New Hampshire, Durham
31.
PriestS. (1996a). Developing organizational trust: Comparing the effects of ropes courses and group initiatives.Journal of Experiential Education, 19, 37–39.
RaiolaE., & O'KeefeM. (1999). Philosophy in practice: A history of adventure programming. In MilesJ. C., & PriestS. (Eds.), Adventure Programming (pp. 45–53). State College, PA: Venture.
38.
RobitschekC. (1996). At-risk youth and hope: Incorporating a ropes course into a summer jobs program.The Career Development Quarterly, 45, 163–169.
39.
StauntonN. (2003) A meta-analysis of adventure therapy program outcomes. Unpublished master's thesis, University of New Hampshire, Durham.
40.
StophaB. (1994). Women on the ropes: Change through challenge.Women & Therapy, 15, 101–109.
41.
SullivanP., & FeltzD. (2001). The relationship between intrateam conflict and cohesion within hockey teams.Small Group Research, 32(3), 342–355.
42.
WattsF. N., CohenJ., & ToplisR. (1994). Personality and coping strategies on a stressful expedition.Personality & Individual Differences, 17, 647–656.
43.
YamnillS., & McLeanG. (2001). Theories supporting transfer of training.Human Resource Development Quarterly, 12(2), 195.
