In recent years there has been a growing call for introspective examinations to uncover the unquestioned assumptions that ground our areas of study. In this paper, we reflectively examine one area of leisure studies—challenge (ropes) courses. By revealing the assumptions that shape practice and research in this field, we also reveal hidden biases that have inadvertently restricted our understanding of challenge courses. When made visible, these assumptions can be openly tested to provide stronger support for, or perhaps meaningful refinements in, the use of challenge courses. This article: (a) describes typical features that comprise a challenge course, (b) offers examples of traditional research methods used to study challenge courses, (c) details two central assumptions found in the research (risk—real or perceived—leads to positive outcomes, and benefits are transferable), and in light of the assumptions presented, (d) provides suggestions for future research and practice.
AttarianA.HoldenG. T. (2001). The research and literature on challenge courses: An annotated bibliography. Jonas Ridge, NC: Alpine Towers International.
2.
BramwellK.ForresterS.HouleB.LarocqueJ.VilleneuveL.PriestS. (1997). One shot wonders don't work: A casual-comparative case study. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Leadership, 14(2), 15–17.
3.
BronsonJ.GibsonS.KisharR.PriestS. (1992). Evaluation of team development in a corporate adventure training program. Journal of Experiential Education, 15(2), 50–53.
4.
BurgJ. E. (2001). Emerging issues in therapeutic adventure with families. Journal of Experiential Education, 24(2), 118–122.
5.
CarlsonJ.A.EvansK. (2001). Whose choice is it? Contemplating challenge-by-choice and diverse-abilities. Journal of Experiential Education, 24(1), 58–63.
6.
CassidyK. (2001). Enhancing your experiential program with narrative theory. Journal of Experiential Education, 24(1), 22–26.
7.
ConstantineM. (1993). The effects of a ropes course experience on perceived self-efficacy: A study designed to examine the effects of an adventure program. Pennsylvania Journal of Health, Physical Education, Recreation, and Dance, 63(2), 10.
8.
FinkenbergM. E.ShowsD.DiNucciJ. M. (1994). Participation in adventure-based activities and self-concepts of college men and women. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 78, 1119–1122.
9.
GoldenbergM. A.KlenoskyD. B.O'LearyJ. T.TemplinT. J. (2000). A means-end investigation of challenge course experiences. Journal of Leisure Research, 32, 208–224.
10.
GoldmanK.PriestS. (1990). Risk taking transfer in development training. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Leadership, 7(4), 32–35.
11.
GreenG. T.KleiberD. A.TarrantM. A. (2000). The effect of an adventure-based recreation program on development of resiliency in low income minority youth. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 18, 76–97.
12.
HartL.SilkaL. (1994). Building self-efficacy through women-centered ropes course experiences. Women and Therapy, 15(3/4), 111–127.
13.
HerbertJ. T. (1996). Use of adventure-based counseling programs for persons with disabilities. Journal of Rehabilitation, 62(4), 3–9.
14.
KlintK. A.PriestS. (in press). Qualitative research on the transfer effectiveness of a corporate adventure training program. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Leadership.
15.
LongA. (2001). Learning the ropes: Exploring the meaning and value of experiential education for girls at risk. Journal of Experiential Education, 24(2), 100–108.
16.
LucknerJ. L. (1989). Altering locus of control of individuals with hearing impairments by outdoor-adventure courses. Journal of Rehabilitation, 55(2), 62–67.
17.
MartinP.PriestS. (1986). Understanding the adventure experience. Journal of Adventure Education, 3(1), 18–21.
18.
MaxwellJ. (1997). Increasing work group effectiveness: Combining corporate adventure training with traditional team building methods. Journal of Experiential Education, 20(1), 26–33.
19.
MeyerB. B. (2000). The ropes and challenge course: A quasi-experimental examination. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 90, 1249–1257.
20.
PriestS. (1992). Factor exploration and confirmation for the dimensions of an adventure experience. Journal of Leisure Research, 24, 127–139.
21.
PriestS. (1995). The effect of belaying and belayer type on the development of interpersonal partnership trust in rock climbing. Journal of Experiential Education, 18(2), 107–109.
22.
PriestS. (1996a). Developing organizational trust: Comparing the effects of challenge courses and group initiatives. Journal of Experiential Education, 19(1), 40–42.
23.
PriestS. (1996b). The effect of two different debriefing approaches on developing self-confidence. Journal of Experiential Education, 19(1), 40–42.
24.
PriestS. (1998). Physical challenge and the development of trust through corporate adventure training. Journal of Experiential Education, 21(1), 31–34.
PriestS.GassM. (1997). An examination of “problem-solving” versus “solution-focused” facilitation styles in a corporate setting. Journal of Experiential Education, 20(1), 34–39.
27.
PriestS.GassM.FitzpatrickK. (1999). Training corporate managers to facilitate: The next generation of facilitating experiential methodologies?Journal of Experiential Education, 22(1), 50–53.
28.
PriestS.LesperanceM. A. (1994). Time series trends in corporate team development. Journal of Experiential Education, 17(1), 34–39.
29.
RhonkeK. (1989). Cowstails and cobras II. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
30.
RobitschekC. (1996). At-risk youth and hope: Incorporating a challenge course into a summer program. The Career Development Quarterly, 45, 163–169.
31.
RoidG. H.FittsW. H. (1989). Tennessee Self-Concept Scale, Revised: manual. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
32.
ShererM.MadduxJ.MercandanteB.Prentice-DunnS.JacobB.RogersR. (1982). The self-efficacy scale: Construction and validation. Psychological Reports, 51(2), 663–671.
33.
SmithR.PriestS. (in press). Barriers to transference from corporate adventure training to the workplace. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Leadership.
34.
SnyderC. R.HarrisC.AndersonJ. R.HolleranS. A.IrvingL. M.SigmonS. T., (1991). The will and the ways: Development and validation of an individual-differences measure of hope. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 570–585.
35.
StrausA.CorbinJ. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
36.
VincentS. M. (1995). Emotional safety in adventure therapy programs: Can it be defined?Journal of Experiential Education, 18(2), 76–81.
37.
WittP. A.BakerD.ScottD. (1996). The Protective Factors Scale. Unpublished instrument, Department of Recreation, Park, and Tourism Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.
