The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) governs the Early Intervention (EI) system for families of children aged birth to three with or at risk for developmental delays and disabilities. In EI, families have a key point of contact who manages their evaluations and services, the service coordinator (SC). In Illinois, counties are grouped into 25 Child and Family Connection (CFC) regional offices to serve EI families. SCs in each CFC are overseen by an SC supervisor. There is limited research on the supervision of SCs. The purpose of this qualitative study was to offer an in-depth look at the barriers SC supervisors face and the supervisory characteristics that affect their work. During semistructured interviews, seven participants discussed the traits, motivation, and communication skills influencing their effectiveness, the systemic barriers they face, and the emotional strain these challenges place on SC supervisors. Implications for research and practice are discussed.
BrantlingerE.JiménezR. T.KlingnerJ. K.PugachM. C.RichardsonV. (2005). Qualitative studies in special education. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 195–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290507100205
4.
BromerJ.RagoneseC.PorterT.JonesA.KorfmacherJ. (2018). Supporting family child care providers through professional development systems. Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
5.
BronfenbrennerU. (1992). Ecological systems theory. In VastaR. (Ed.), Six theories of child development: Revised formulations and current issues (pp. 187–249). Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
6.
BruderM. B. (2005). Service coordination and integration in a developmental systems approach to early intervention. In GuralnickM. J. (Ed.), The developmental systems approach to early intervention (pp. 29–58). Brookes.
7.
ChampineR. B.LangJ. M.NelsonA. M.HansonR. F.TebesJ. K. (2019). Systems measures of a trauma-informed approach: A systematic review. American Journal of Community Psychology, 64(3–4), 418–437. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12388
8.
CheungW. C.Aleman-TovarJ.JohnstonA.LittleL. M.BurkeM. M. (2022). A qualitative study exploring parental perceptions of telehealth in early intervention. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 35(3), 353–373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-022-09853-w
9.
ChildressD. C.NicholsS.SchnurrM. (2019). Strengths and challenges of service coordination in eight states. Infants and Young Children, 32(2), 139–148. https://doi.org/10.1097/iyc.0000000000000140
10.
ColeP.OserC.WalshS. (2011). Building on the foundations of Part C legislation: Beginning the conversation for reauthorization. Zero to Three, 31(4), 52–60.
11.
CreswellJ. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Sage.
12.
CreswellJ. W.PothC. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage.
13.
DamschroderL. J.AronD. C.KeithR. E.KirshS. R.AlexanderJ. A.LoweryJ. C. (2009). Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: A consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implementation Science, 4(50), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-50
14.
DunstC. J.BruderM. B. (2006). Early intervention service coordination models and service coordinator practices. Journal of Early Intervention, 28(3), 155–165. https://doi.org/10.1177/105381510602800301
15.
FixsenD. L.NaoomS. F.BlaseK. A.FriedmanR. M.WallaceF. (2005). Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature. National Implementation Research Network.
FultonK.TerolA. K.HardyA.BurkeM. M. (2024). Family perspectives of the roles of parent training and information centers and service coordinators in early intervention. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 44(4), 316–329.
HarbinG. L.BruderM. B.AdamsC.MazzarellaC.WhitbreadK.GabbardG.StaffI. (2004). Early intervention service coordination policies. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 24(2), 89–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/02711214040240020401
22.
HeffronM. C.MurchT. (2010). Reflective supervision and leadership in infant and early childhood programs. Zero to Three.
JahromiV. K.TabatabaeeS. S.AbdarZ. E.RajabiM. (2016). Active listening: The key of successful communication in hospital managers. Electronic Physician, 8(3), 2123–2128. https://doi.org/10.19082/2123
27.
JohnsonS. M.BergJ. H.DonaldsonM. L. (2012). Who stays in teaching and why: A review of the literature on teacher retention. Harvard Graduate School of Education.
28.
MalterudK.SiersmaV. D.GuassoraA. D. (2015). Sample size in qualitative interview studies. Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1753–1760. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315617444
NolanK. J.YoungE. C.HebertE. A.WildingG. E. (2005). Service coordination for children with complex healthcare needs in an early intervention program. Infants and Young Children, 18(2), 161–170. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001163-200504000-00008
RomerE. F.UmbreitJ. (1998). The effects of family-centered service coordination. Journal of Early Intervention, 21(2), 95–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/105381519802100202
33.
SherfE. N.VenkataramaniV.GajendranR. S. (2018). Too busy to be fair? The effect of workload and rewards on managers’ justice rule adherence. Academy of Management Journal, 62(2), 469–502. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.1061
34.
TalbotK. (1999). Mothers now childless: Personal transformation after the death of an only child. Omega–journal of Death and Dying, 38(3), 167–186. https://doi.org/10.2190/lt9p-9pj7-0rxh-ed2c
TustonjaM.Topić StipićD.SkokoI.ČuljakA.VegarA. (2024). Active listening – a model of empathetic communication in the helping professions. Medicina Academica Integrativa, 1(1), 42–47. https://pauk.sum.ba/ojs/mai/article/view/7
VearsD. F.GillamL. (2022). Inductive content analysis: A guide for beginning qualitative researchers. Focus on Health Professional Education: A Multi-disciplinary Journal, 23(1), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.11157/fohpe.v23i1.544
39.
WhitebookM.PhillipsD.HowesC. (2014). Worthy work, STILL unlivable wages: The early childhood workforce 25 years after the National Child Care Staffing Study. Center for the Study of Child Care Employment, University of California, Berkeley.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
