Early intervention (EI) sessions are intended to occur in a child’s natural environment. Part of a child’s natural environment includes the materials they typically can access. Recommended practices in the field suggest that EI providers should use materials in children’s homes rather than bringing a toy bag to address the child and family goals. However, the use of the toy bag is still prevalent in the field. The purpose of this qualitative study was to understand the perspectives of EI special instructors related to how they select materials for their EI sessions. Findings include five themes that represent tensions that EI providers experienced when selecting materials for EI sessions: (a) the journey of bagless intervention, (b) family-centered versus judgment-based views, (c) the natural environment versus the “ideal” environment, (d) professional responsibilities, and (e) addressing children’s needs. Implications include the need for high-quality preservice preparation and professional development related to this recommended practice and continued research related to bagless intervention.
BradshawW. (2013). A framework for providing culturally responsive early intervention services. Young Exceptional Children, 16(1), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/1096250612451757
2.
BrantlingerE.JimenezR.KlingnerJ.PugachM.RichardsonV. (2005). Qualitative studies in special education. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 195–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290507100205
3.
BrownJ. A.WoodsJ. J. (2016). Parent-implemented communication intervention: Sequential analysis of triadic relationships. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 36(2), 115–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121416628200
4.
BruderM. B.DunstC.MaudeS. P.SchnurrM.Van PolenA.ClarkG. F.WinslowA.GethmannD. (2020). Practitioner appraisals of their desired and current use of the 2014 Division for Early Childhood Recommended Practices. Journal of Early Intervention, 42(3), 259–274. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053815119886105
5.
CampbellP. H.ColettiC. E. (2013). Early intervention provider use of child caregiver-teaching strategies. Infants and Young Children, 26(3), 235–248. https://doi.org/10.1097/IYC.0b013e318299918f
6.
CampbellP. H.SawyerL. B. (2007). Supporting learning opportunities in natural settings through participation-based services. Journal of Early Intervention, 29(4), 287–305. https://doi.org/10.1177/105381510702900402
7.
CampbellP. H.SawyerL. B. (2009). Changing early intervention providers’ home visiting skills through participation in professional development. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 28(4), 219–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121408328481
8.
ChildressD. C. (2004). Special instruction and natural environments. Infants and Young Children, 17(2), 162–170.
9.
ChildressD. C. (2021). Pause and reflect: Your guide to a deeper understanding of early intervention practice. Brookes Publishing.
10.
CiupeA.SalisburyC. (2020). Examining caregivers’ independence in early intervention home visit sessions. Journal of Early Intervention, 42(4), 338–358. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053815120902727
11.
CrawfordM. J.WeberB. (2014). Early intervention every day! Embedding activities in daily routines for young children and their families. Brookes Publishing.
12.
CreswellJ.PothC. (2017). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage.
13.
DeckerK. D.MeldrumJ.VaterlausJ. M.FosterT. D. (2021). Parents’ Part C experiences in rural areas: Alignment with recommended practices. Journal of Early Intervention, 43(2), 155–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053815120953484
14.
Division for Early Childhood. (2020). Initial practice-based professional preparation standards for early interventionists/early childhood special educators (EI/ECSE) (Initial birth through age 8). https://www.dec-sped.org/ei-ecse-standards
DunstC. J.BruderM. B.Espe-SherwindtM. (2014). Family capacity-building in early childhood intervention: Do context and setting matter?School Community Journal, 24(1), 37–48.
17.
DunstC. J.HambyD. W.HowseR. B.WilkieH.AnnasK. (2019). Metasynthesis of preservice professional preparation and teacher education research studies. Education Science, 9(1), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9010050
18.
DunstC. J.HambyD. W.TrivetteC. M.RaabM.BruderM. B. (2000). Everyday family and community life and children’s naturally occurring learning opportunities. Journal of Early Intervention, 23(3), 151–164. https://doi.org/10.1177/10538151000230030501
19.
FlemingJ. L.SawyerL. B.CampbellP. H. (2011). Early intervention providers’ perspectives about implementing participation-based practices. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 30(4), 233–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121410371986
20.
HwangA.ChaoM.LiuS. (2013). A randomized controlled trial of routines-based early intervention for children with or at risk for developmental delay. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34(10), 3112–3123.
JungL. A. (2003). More is better: Maximizing natural learning opportunities. Young Exceptional Children, 6(3), 21–26.
25.
McWilliamR. A. (2010). Routines-based early intervention: Supporting young children and their families. Brookes Publishing.
26.
McWilliamR. A. (2012). Implementing and preparing for home visits. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 31(4), 224–231.
27.
MeadanH.DouglasS. N.KammesR.Schraml-BlockK. (2018). “I’m a different coach with every family”: Early interventionists’ beliefs and practices. Infants and Young Children, 31(3), 200–214. https://doi.org/10.1097/IYC.0000000000000118
PetersonC. A.EshbaughE. M.JeonH.-J.KantzK. R. (2007). Enhancing parent-child interactions through home visiting: Practice or unfulfilled promise?Journal of Early Intervention, 29(2), 119–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/105381510702900205
QR Collective. (2023). Reflexive quality criteria: Questions and indicators for purpose-driven special education qualitative research . Exceptional Children, 89(4), 449–466.
32.
SaldanaJ. M. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (4th ed.). Sage.
33.
SpenceC. M.Rooks-EllisD. L.RuizA. B.FishL. A.JonesB.O’GradyC. E.SulinskiE. (2022). The language we use: Providers’ perceptions about families. Early Childhood Education Journal, 50, 1291–1302.
34.
StewartS. L.ApplequistK. (2019). Diverse families in early intervention: Professionals’ views of coaching. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 33(2), 242–256.
35.
TomczukL.StewartR. E.BeidasR. S.MandellD. S.PellecchiaM. (2022). Who gets coached? A qualitative inquiry into community clinicians’ decisions to use caregiver coaching. Autism, 26(3), 575–585.
36.
TomenyK. R.García-GrauP.McWilliamR. A. (2021). Early interventionists’ ratings of family-centered practices in natural environments. Infants & Young Children, 34(4), 266–283.
37.
TrivetteC. M.DunstC. J.HambyD. W.O’HerinC. E. (2009). Characteristics and consequences of adult learning methods and strategies. Practical Evaluation Reports, 2(1), 1–33. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED565253.pdf
WilliamsC. S.OstroskyM. M. (2019). What about MY TOYS? Common questions about using a bagless approach in early intervention. Young Exceptional Children, 23(2), 76–86.
40.
WindsorK. S.WoodsJ.KaiserA. P.SnyderP.SalisburyC. (2019). Caregiver-implemented intervention for communication and motor outcomes for infants and toddlers. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 39(2), 73–87.
Workgroup on Principles and Practices in Natural Environments, OSEP TA Community of Practice: Part C Settings. (2008a, February). Agreed upon mission and key principles for providing early intervention services in natural environments. https://ectacenter.org/topics/eiservices/keyprinckeyprac.asp
43.
Workgroup on Principles and Practices in Natural Environments, OSEP TA Community of Practice: Part C Settings. (2008b, March). Seven key principles: Looks like / doesn’t look like. https://ectacenter.org/topics/eiservices/keyprinckeyprac.asp
