Children with medical complexities (MC) are one population of infants and toddlers served under Part C Early Intervention (EI) of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (2004). Children with MC and their families have unique characteristics, such as requiring frequent medical appointments, needing extensive medical equipment, and incurring significant financial and social impacts. The literature on children with MC in EI is scant. The purpose of this qualitative study was to understand what practices EI providers believe are important for children with MC and their families, using interview data from 19 EI providers across the United States. We constructed four themes that represent the findings: (a) capacity-building practices, (b) individualizing and slowing down, (3) collaborating with professionals, and (c) intentionality around intersectionality. More research is needed that focuses on this population of infants and toddlers, so that we ensure that EI providers are well prepared to address their unique needs, and that families and children with MC receive the best care possible.
AnnammaS. A.ConnorD.FerriB. (2013). Dis/ability critical race studies (DisCrit): Theorizing at the intersections of race and dis/ability. Race, Ethnicity and Education, 16(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2012.730511
3.
BazeleyP. (2021). Qualitative data analysis: Practical strategies (2nd ed.). Sage.
4.
BlanchardS. B.Ryan NewtonJ.DidericksenK. W.DanielsM.GlossonK. (2021). Confronting racism and bias within early intervention: The responsibility of systems and individuals to influence change and advance equity. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 41(1), 6–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121421992470
5.
BrantlingerE.JimenezR.KlingnerJ.PugachM.RichardsonV. (2005). Qualitative studies in special education. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 195–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290507100205
BruderM. B.CatalinoT.ChiarelloL. A.Cox MitchellM.DeppeJ.GundlerD.KempP.LeMoineS.LongT.MuhlenhauptM.PrelockP.SchefkindS.StaytonV.ZieglerD. (2019). Finding a common lens: Competencies across professional disciplines providing early childhood intervention. Infants and Young Children, 32(4), 280–293. https://doi.org/10.1097/IYC.0000000000000153
8.
CohenE.KuoD. Z.AgrawalR.BerryJ. G.BhagatS. K. M.SimonT. D.SrivastavaR. (2011). Children with medical complexity: An emerging population for clinical and research initiatives. Pediatrics, 127(3), 529–538. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2010-0910
9.
CreswellJ. W.CreswellJ. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage.
10.
DeckerK. D.MeldrumJ.VaterlausJ. M.FosterT. D. (2021). Parents’ Part C experiences in rural areas: Alignment with recommended practices. Journal of Early Intervention, 43(2), 155–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053815120953484
Division for Early Childhood. (2020). Initial practice-based professional preparation standards for early interventionists/early childhood special educators (EI/ECSE) (Initial birth through age 8). https://www.dec-sped.org/ei-ecse-standards
FeinsteinJ. A.HallM.DavidsonA.FeudtnerC. (2024). Pediatric complex chronic condition system version 3. JAMA Network Open, 7(7), 1–10.
15.
FlemingJ. L.SawyerL. B.CampbellP. H. (2011). Early intervention providers’ perspectives about implementing participation-based practices. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 30(4), 233–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121410371986
HarrisP. A.TaylorR.ThielkeR.PayneJ.GonzalezN.CondeJ. G. (2009). Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 42(2), 377–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010
18.
Individuals With Disabilities Education Act of 2004, 20 U. S. C. § 1400 et seq. (2004).
LeyenaarJ. K.SchaeferA. P.FreyleueS. D.AustinA. M.SimonT. D.CleaveJ. V.MoenE. L.O’MalleyA. J.GoodmanD. C. (2022). Prevalence of children with medical complexity and associations with health care utilization and in-hospital mortality. JAMA Pediatrics, 176(6), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2022.0687
21.
LoveH. R.BenekeM. R. (2021). Pursuing justice-driven inclusive education research: Disability critical race theory (DisCrit) in early childhood. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 41(1), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121421990833
McWilliamR. A. (2010). Routines-based early intervention: Supporting young children and their families. Brookes Publishing.
24.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Sage.
25.
PletcherL. C.YounggrenN. O. (2013). The early intervention workbook: Essential practices for quality services. Brookes Publishing.
26.
QR Collective. (2023). Reflexive quality criteria: Questions and indicators for purpose-driven special education qualitative research. Exceptional Children, 89(4), 449–466. https://doi.org/10.1177/00144029231168106
27.
RushD. D.SheldenM. L. (2020). The early childhood coaching handbook (2nd ed.). Brookes Publishing.
28.
SheldenM. L.RushD. D. (2022). The early intervention teaming handbook (2nd ed.). Brookes Publishing.
29.
StewartS. L.ApplequistK. (2019). Diverse families in early intervention: Professionals’ views of coaching. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 33(2), 242–256.
30.
TrainorA. A.GraueE. (2014). Evaluating rigor in qualitative methodology and research dissemination. Remedial and Special Education, 35(5), 267–274. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932514528100
31.
VailC. O.Liberman-BetzR. G.McCorkleL. S. (2018). The impact of funding on Part C systems: Is the tail wagging the dog?Journal of Early Intervention, 40(3), 229–245.
32.
VERBI Software. (2024). MAXQDA 2024 [computer software].
33.
WilliamsC. S.HardyJ. K.SawyerG. E.Light-ShrinerC. (2024). What supports and barriers influence early intervention providers’ practices? A qualitative study. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 45, 210–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/02711214241296372
34.
WilliamsC. S.SawyerG. E.OstroskyM. M. (2025a). A close look at intersectionality in an early intervention case study. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/02711214251400271
35.
WilliamsC. S.SawyerG. E.OstroskyM. M. (2025b). Complex medical needs and homelessness: A case study of the natural environment. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 45(1), 7–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/02711214251316522
Workgroup on Principles and Practices in Natural Environments OSEP TA Community of Practice. (2008). Agreed upon practices for providing early intervention services in natural environments. https://ectacenter.org/topics/eiservices/keyprinckeyprac.asp
38.
YuJ. A.McKernanG.HagermanT.SchenkerY.HoutrowA. (2021). Most children with medical complexity do not receive care in well-functioning health care systems. Hospital Pediatrics, 11(2), 183–191. https://doi.org/10.1542/hpeds.2020-0182
39.
ZieglerS. A.Hadders-AlgraM. (2020). Coaching approaches in early intervention and pediatric rehabilitation. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 65(5), 569–574.
