This cross-sectional quantitative study investigated parents’ perceptions of the quality of family-centered practice in an early intervention service for young children who are deaf or hard of hearing through the use of the Measures of Processes of Care (MPOC-56). The results indicated that the majority of families accessing the service were satisfied with the family-centered practices they were receiving. Consistent with previous studies in different disability settings, families were least satisfied with the provision of general information regarding the child’s disability, identifying further access to unbiased information and resources is needed. This highlighted a tension in the role of organizations operating within individualized funding models in regard to who is responsible for the dissemination of reliable and evidence-based general information. As the MPOC-56 has not been used in deaf or hard of hearing populations previously, this study found it was an appropriate measure for caregiver perceptions of family-centered practice within this population.
AithalS.AithalV.KeiJ.DriscollC. (2012). Conductive hearing loss and middle ear pathology in young infants referred through a newborn universal hearing screening program in Australia. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 23(9), 673–685. https://doi.org/10.3766/jaaa.23.9.2
3.
AlsemM. W.VerhoefM.GorterJ. W.LangezaalL. C. M.Visser-MeilyJ. M. A.KetelaarM. (2016). Parents’ perceptions of the services provided to children with cerebral palsy in the transition from preschool rehabilitation to school-based services: Perception of services in paediatric rehabilitation. Child: Care, Health and Development, 42(4), 455–463. https://doi.org/10.1111/cch.12341
4.
BrienJ.PageJ.BermanJ. (2017). Enabling the exercise of choice and control: How early childhood intervention professionals may support families and young children with a disability to exercise choice and control in the context of the National Disability Insurance Scheme. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 42(2), 37–44. https://doi.org/10.23965/AJEC.42.2.05
5.
ChristiansenJ. B.LeighI. W. (2004). Children with cochlear implants: Changing parent and deaf community perspectives. Archives of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, 130(5), 673–677. https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.130.5.673
6.
CunninghamB. J.RosenbaumP. L. (2014). Measure of processes of care: A review of 20 years of research. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 56(5), 445–452. https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.12347
7.
DavidC.WestR. (2017). NDIS self-management approaches: Opportunities for choice and control or an uber-style wild west?The Australian Journal of Social Issues, 52(4), 331–346. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajs4.23
DeckerK. B.VallottonC. D. (2016). Early intervention for children with hearing loss: Information parents receive about supporting children’s language. Journal of Early Intervention, 38(3), 151–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053815116653448
10.
DempseyI.DunstC. J. (2004). Help giving styles and parent empowerment in families with a young child with a disability. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 29(1), 40–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668250410001662874
11.
DunstC. J.BoydK.TrivetteC. M.HambyD. W. (2002). Family-oriented program models and professional help giving practices. Family Relations, 51(3), 221–229. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2002.00221.x
12.
DunstC. J.TrivetteC. M.HambyD. W. (2007). Meta-analysis of family-centered help giving practices research. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 13(4), 370–378. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrdd.20176
13.
DykemaJ.JonesN. R.PichéT.StevensonJ. (2013). Surveying clinicians by web: Current issues in design and administration. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 36(3), 352–381. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163278713496630
FieldA. P. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd ed.). Sage.
17.
FosterT. D.DeckerK. B.VaterlausJ. M.BellevilleA. (2020). How early intervention practitioners describe family-centred practice: A collective broadening of the definition. Child: Care, Health and Development, 46(3), 268–274. https://doi.org/10.1111/cch.12749
18.
GaleE.BerkeM.BenedictB.OlsonS.PutzK.Yoshinaga-ItanoC. (2019). Deaf adults in early intervention programs. Deafness & Education International, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/14643154.2019.1664795
19.
GilliverM.ChingT. Y. C.Sjahalam-KingJ. (2013). When expectation meets experience: Parents’ recollections of and experiences with a child diagnosed with hearing loss soon after birth. International Journal of Audiology, 52(Suppl. 2), S10–S16. https://doi.org/10.3109/14992027.2013.825051
20.
HowardA.BlakemoreT.JohnstonL.TaylorD.DibleyR. (2015). “I’m not really sure but I hope it’s better”: Early thoughts of parents and carers in a regional trial site for the Australian National Disability Insurance Scheme. Disability and Society, 30(9), 1365–1381. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2015.1093462
21.
HsiehH.-F.ShannonS. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288.
22.
HydeM.PunchR.KomesaroffL. (2010). Coming to a decision about cochlear implantation: Parents making choices for their deaf children. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 15(2), 162–178. https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/enq004
23.
IngberS.DromiE. (2010). Actual versus desired family-centered practice in early intervention for children with hearing loss. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 15(1), 59–71. https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/enp025
24.
JungL. (2010). Identifying families’ supports and other resources. In McWilliamR. (Ed.), Working with families of young children with special needs (pp. 9–26). The Guildford Press.
25.
KecmanE. (2019). Old challenges, changing contexts: Reviewing and reflecting on information provision for parents of children who are deaf or hard-of-hearing. Deafness and Education International, 21(1), 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/14643154.2018.1506072
26.
KertoyM. K.RussellD. J.RosenbaumP.JafferS.LawM.McCauleyD.GorterJ. W. (2013). Development of an outcome measurement system for service planning for children and youth with special needs. Child: Care, Health and Development, 39(5), 750–759. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2214.2012.01409.x
27.
KingS.KingG.RosenbaumP. (2004). Evaluating health service delivery to children with chronic conditions and their families: Development of a refined Measure of Processes of Care (MPOC-20). Children’s Health Care, 33(1), 35–57. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326888chc3301_3
28.
LederbergA. R.SchickB.SpencerP. E. (2013). Language and literacy development of deaf and hard-of-hearing children: Successes and challenges. Developmental Psychology, 49(1), 15–30. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029558
29.
LietzC. A.GeigerJ. M. (2017). Guest editorial: Advancing a family-centered practice agenda in child welfare. Journal of Family Social Work, 20(4), 267–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/10522158.2017.1348105
30.
MarchbankA. M. (2017). The National Disability Insurance Scheme: Administrators’ perspectives of agency transition to “user pay” for early intervention service delivery. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 42(3), 46–53. https://doi.org/10.23965/AJEC.42.3.06
31.
McConachieH.LoganS. (2003). Validation of the measure of processes of care for use when there is no child development centre. Child: Care, Health and Development, 29(1), 35–45. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2214.2003.00314.x
32.
MoellerM. P.CarrG.SeaverL.Stredler-BrownA.HolzingerD. (2013). Best practices in family-centered early intervention for children who are deaf or hard of hearing: An international consensus statement. The Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 18(4), 429–445. https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/ent034
33.
NickbakhtM.MeyerC.ScarinciN.BeswickR. (2019). A qualitative investigation of families’ needs in the transition to early intervention after diagnosis of hearing loss. Child: Care, Health and Development, 45(5), 670–680. https://doi.org/10.1111/cch.12697
34.
PighiniM. J.GoelmanH.BuchananM.Schonert-ReichlK.BrynelsenD. (2014). Learning from parents’ stories about what works in early intervention. International Journal of Psychology, 49(4), 263–270. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12024
35.
PoyntonT. A.DeFouwE. R.MorizioL. J. (2019). A systematic review of online response rates in four counseling journals. Journal of Counseling and Development, 97(1), 33–42. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcad.12233
36.
RanasingheT.JeyaseelanD.WhiteD.RussoR. (2017). Parents’ experiences in registering with and accessing funding under the National Disability Insurance Scheme for early intervention services for children with developmental disabilities. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health, 53(1), 26–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpc.13312
37.
RiceG. B.LenihanS. (2005). Early intervention in auditory/oral deaf education: Parent and professional perspectives. The Volta Review, 105(1), Article 73.
38.
RobertsR. M.SandsF.GannoniA.MarcianoT. (2015). Perceptions of the support that mothers and fathers of children with cochlear implants receive in South Australia: A qualitative study. International Journal of Audiology, 54(12), 942–950. https://doi.org/10.3109/14992027.2015.1060641
39.
Sánchez-FernándezJ.Muñoz-LeivaF.Montoro-RíosF. J. (2012). Improving retention rate and response quality in web-based surveys. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(2), 507–514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.10.023
SiebesR. C.WijnroksL.KetelaarM.van SchieP. E. M.GorterJ. W.VermeerA. (2007). Parent participation in paediatric rehabilitation treatment centres in the Netherlands: A parents viewpoint. Child: Care, Health and Development, 33(2), 196–205. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2214.2006.00636.x
42.
TraceyD.JohnstonC.PappsF. A.MahmicS. (2018). How do parents acquire information to support their child with a disability and navigate individualised funding schemes?Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 18(1), 25–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-3802.12390
43.
VohrB.Jodoin-KrauzykJ.TuckerR.TopolD.JohnsonM. J.AhlgrenM.PierreL. S. (2011). Expressive vocabulary of children with hearing loss in the first 2 years of life: Impact of early intervention. Journal of Perinatology, 31(4), 274–280. https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2010.110
44.
WeiglK.TikkK.HoffmeisterM.De ToniE. N.HampeJ.KolligsF.… BrennerH. (2019). A web-based survey among adults aged 40–54 years was time effective and yielded stable response patterns. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 105, 10–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.08.021
45.
ZivianiJ.DarlingtonY.FeeneyR.RodgerS.WatterP. (2013). Service delivery complexities: Early intervention for children with physical disabilities. Infants and Young Children, 26(2), 147–163. https://doi.org/10.1097/IYC.0b013e3182854224
