Families of young children with medical complexities experience barriers related to their children’s disability, which are exacerbated for families with additional marginalized identities. An intersectional lens is important for understanding how a family’s multiple and overlapping identities shape their experiences. In this case study, we explored the ways in which one family’s intersectionality resulted in issues of power within their daily life and early intervention services using multiple sources of qualitative data. Our findings include five patches that illustrate the family’s intersectional experiences and highlight issues of power, bias, and oppression. The patches include (1) the child’s birth and neonatal experience, (2) evicted to unhoused, (3) disruptions caused by social services, (4) disruptions and decisions about EI, and (5) providers’ passivity and insensitivity to intersectional identities. We share implications for how EI providers, systems leaders, and researchers can use an intersectional lens in their work.
AllshouseC.ComeauM.RodgersR.WellsN. (2018). Families of children with medical complexity: A view from the front lines. Pediatrics, 141(3), 195–201. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2017-1284D
2.
AnnammaS. A.ConnorD.FerriB. (2013). Dis/ability critical race studies (DisCrit): Theorizing at the intersections of race and dis/ability. Race Ethnicity and Education, 16(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2012.730511
3.
AnnammaS. A.JacksonD. D.MorrisonD. (2017). Conceptualizing color-evasiveness: Using dis/ability critical race theory to expand a color-blind racial ideology in education and society. Race Ethnicity and Education, 20(2), 147–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2016.1248837
4.
BayerN. D.WangH.YuJ. A.KuoD. Z.HaltermanJ. S.YueL. (2021). A national mental health profile of parents of children with medical complexity. Pediatrics, 148(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2020-023358
5.
BlanchardS. B.Ryan NewtonJ.DidericksenK. W.DanielsM.GlossonK. (2021). Confronting racism and bias within early intervention: The responsibility of systems and individuals to influence change and advance equity. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 41(1), 6–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121421992470
6.
BradshawW. (2013). A framework for providing culturally responsive early intervention services. Young Exceptional Children, 16(1), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/1096250612451757
7.
BrantlingerE.JimenezR.KlingnerJ.PugachM.RichardsonV. (2005). Qualitative studies in special education. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 195–207.
BrownS. M.BenderK.OrsiR.McCraeJ. S.PhillipsJ. D.RienksS. (2019). Adverse childhood experiences and their relationship to complex health profiles among child welfare-involved children: A classification and regression tree analysis. Health Services Research, 54(4), 902–911. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.13166
10.
ChudzikM.WilliamsC. S.HoldenE. (in press). Early intervention providers’ use of Trauma-informed care: A qualitative exploration. Journal of Early Intervention.
11.
CohenE.KuoD. Z.AgrawalR.BerryJ. G.BhagatS. K.SimonT. D.SrivastavaR. (2011). Children with medical complexity: An emerging population for clinical and research initiatives. Pediatrics, 123(3), 529–538. https://doi.org/10.1542%2Fpeds.2010-0910
12.
CrenshawK. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039
HamiltonM. B.StansberryL.PearsonJ. N. (2021). Culturally competent educational practices: Supporting students with disabilities and their families. Journal of the Division on Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 8, 114–128. https://exceptionalchildren.org/sites/default/files/2023-04/doj_2021.pdf
15.
HaynesC.JosephN. M.PattonL. D.StewartS.AllenE. L. (2020). Toward an understanding of intersectionality methodology: A 30-year literature synthesis of black women’s experiences in higher education. Review of Educational Research, 90(6), 751–787. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654320946822
16.
IDEA. (2004). Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, U.S.C. § 1400 et seq.
17.
LoveH. R.BenekeM. R. (2021). Pursuing justice-driven inclusive education research: Disability critical race theory (DisCrit) in early childhood. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 41(1), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121421990833
18.
NolanK. W.YoungE. C.HebertE. B.WildingG. E. (2005). Service coordination for children with complex healthcare needs in an early intervention program. Infants & Young Children, 18(2), 161–170. https://10.1097/00001163-200504000-00008
19.
OlkinR. (2002). Could you hold the door for me? Including disability in diversity. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 8(2), 130–137. https://doi.org/10.1037/1099-9809.8.2.130
20.
PetersonC. A.MayerL. M.SummersJ. A.LuzeG. J. (2010). Meeting needs of young children at risk for or having a disability. Early Childhood Education Journal, 37(6), 509–517. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-010-0375-3
21.
RatliffeC. E.HarriganR. C.HaeyJ.TseA.OlsenT. (2002). Stress in families with medically fragile children. Issues in Comprehensive Pediatric Nursing, 25, 167–188. https://10.1080/01460860290042558
22.
SobotkaS. A. (2023). Magic mothers: How parents of children with invasive mechanical ventilation can make health system crises disappear. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 37(1), 185–197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-023-09936-2
23.
StakeR. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Sage.
24.
StakeR. E. (2010). Qualitative research: Studying how things work. Guilford Press.
StewartS. L.ApplequistK. (2019). Diverse families in early intervention: professionals’ views of coaching. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 33(2), 242–256.
27.
The QR Collective. (2023). Reflexive quality criteria: Questions and indicators for purpose-driven special education qualitative research. Exceptional Children, 89(4), 449–466. https://doi.org/10.1177/00144029231168106
28.
ThomasM. E. (2009). Auto-photography. In KitchinR.ThriftN. (Eds.), International encyclopedia of human geography (pp. 244–251). Elsevier.
29.
TomczukL.StewartR. E.BeidasR. S.MandellD. S.PellecchiaM. (2022). Who gets coached? A qualitative inquiry into community clinicians’ decisions to use caregiver coaching. Autism, 26(3), 575–585. https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613211059499
WesleyP. W.BuysseV.KeyesL. (2000). Comfort zone revisited: Child characteristics and professional comfort with consultation. Journal of Early Intervention, 23(2), 106–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/105381510002300205
32.
WilliamsC. S.HardyJ. K.SawyerG. E.Light-ShrinerC. (2024). What supports and barriers influence early intervention providers’ practices? A qualitative study. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 45(3), 210–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/02711214241296372
33.
WilliamsC. S.SawyerG. E.OstroskyM. M. (2025). Complex medical needs and homelessness: A case study of the natural environment. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 45(1), 7–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/02711214251316522
34.
Workgroup on Principles and Practices in Natural Environments OSEP TA Community of Practice. (2008). Agreed upon practices for providing early intervention services in natural environments. https://ectacenter.org/topics/eiservices/keyprinckeyprac.asp
35.
YinR. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage.
