This article discusses developing special education teacher candidates who have a solid knowledge of scientifically aligned reading practices. Challenges in preservice teacher education are presented, including alignment of course work and clinical experiences to the robust evidence base in reading science. Key questions and resources are presented to guide teacher education in developing evidence-based reading methods courses and clinical experiences.
Al OtaibaS.BakerK.LanP.AllorJ.RivasB.YovanoffP.KamataA. (2019). Elementary teacher’s knowledge of response to intervention implementation: A preliminary factor analysis. Annals of Dyslexia, 69(1), 34–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-018-00171-5
2.
BarnesS. K.BurchardM. S. (2011). Quality and utility of the Multi-Tiered Instruction Self-Efficacy Scale. Research & Practice in Assessment, 6, 22–42.
Binks-CantrellE.JoshiR. M.WashburnE. K. (2012). Validation of an instrument for assessing teacher knowledge of basic language constructs of literacy. Annals of Dyslexia, 62(3), 153–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-012-0070-8
5.
BlantonL. P.BovedaM.MunozL. R.PugachM. C. (2017). The affordances and constraints of special education initial teacher licensure policy for teacher preparation. Teacher Education and Special Education, 40(1), 77–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406416665449
6.
BosC.MatherN.DicksonS.PodhajskiB.ChardD. (2001). Perceptions and knowledge of preservice and inservice educators about early reading instruction. Annals of Dyslexia, 51, 97–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-001-0007-0
7.
BrownellM. T.BenedictA. E.LekoM. M.PetyonD. P.PuaD.Richards-TutorC. (2019). A continuum of pedagogies for preparing teachers to use high-leverage practices. Remedial and Special Education, 40(6), 338–355. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932518824990
8.
BrownellM. T.RossD. D.ColónE. P.McCallumC. L. (2005). Critical features of special education teacher preparation: A comparison with general teacher education. Journal of Special Education, 38, 242–252. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224669050380040601
9.
CastlesA.RastleK.NationK. (2018). Ending the reading wars: Reading acquisition from novice to expert. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 19(1), 5–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100618772271
10.
ConnC. A.BohanK. J.Bies-HernandezN. J.PowellP. J.SweenyS. P.PersignerL. L.PersingerJ. D. (2022). Expected data literacy knowledge and skills for early career teachers: Perspectives from school and district personnel. Teaching and Teacher Education, 111, Article 103607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103607
11.
CunninghamA. E.PerryK. E.StanovichK. E.StanovichP. J. (2004). Disciplinary knowledge of K-3 teachers and their knowledge calibration in the domain of early literacy. Annals of Dyslexia, 54(1), 139–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-004-0007-y
DrakeG.WalshK. (2020). 2020 teacher prep review: Program performance in early reading instruction. National Council on Teacher Quality.
14.
DuFourR. (2004). What is a professional learning community?Educational Leadership, 61(8), 6–11.
15.
DukeN. K.WardA. E.PearsonP. D. (2021). The science of reading comprehension instruction. The Reading Teacher, 74(6), 663–672. http://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1993
16.
EdWeek Research Center. (2020). Early reading instruction: Results from a national survey. Editorial Projects in Education.
17.
EnglertC. S.MariageT. V.TruckenmillerA. J.BrehmerJ.HicksK.ChamberlainC. (2020). Preparing special education preservice teachers to teach phonics to struggling readers: Reducing the gap between expert and novice performance. Teacher Education and Special Education, 43(3), 235–256. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406419863365
18.
GoldhaberD.RonfeldtM.CowanJ.GratzT.BardelliE.TruwitM. (2022). Room for improvement? Mentor teachers and the evolution of teacher preservice clinical evaluations. American Educational Research Journal, 59(5), 1011–1048. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312211066867
GrossmanP.ComptonC.IgraD.RonfeldtM.ShahanE.WilliamsonP. (2009). Teaching practice: A cross-professional perspective. Teacher College Record, 111, 2055–2100. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810911100905
21.
HammernessK.Darling-HammondL.GrossmanP.RustF.ShulmanL. (2005). How teachers learn and develop. In Darling-HammondL.BransfordJ. (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do (pp. 358–389). Jossey-Bass.
22.
KosnickC.BeckC. (2008). In the Shadows: Non-tenure-line instructors in pre-service teacher education. European Journal of Teacher Education31(2), 185–202.
23.
LekoM. M.BrownellM. T.SindelarP. T.KielyM. T. (2015). Envisioning the future of special education personnel preparation in a standards-based era. Exceptional Children, 82(1), 25–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402915598782
24.
LyonR. G.WeiserB. (2009). Teacher knowledge, instructional expertise, and the development of reading proficiency. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42(5), 475–480. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219409338741
25.
MandinachE. B.GummerE. S. (2016). What does it mean for teacher to be data literate: Laying out skills, knowledge, and dispositions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 60, 366–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.07.011
26.
MerkS.PoindlS.WursterS.BohlT. (2020). Fostering aspects of pre-service teachers’ data literacy: Results of a randomized controlled trial. Teaching and Teacher Education, 91, Article 103043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103043
27.
MoatsL. C. (2014). What teachers don’t know and why they aren’t learning it: Addressing the need for content and pedagogy in teacher education. Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties, 9(2), 75–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/19404158.2014.941093
28.
MoatsL. C. (2020). Teaching reading” is” rocket science: What expert teachers of reading should know and be able to do. American Educator, 44(2), Article 4.
29.
MoatsL. C.FoormanB. R. (2003). Measuring teachers’ content knowledge of language and reading. Annals of Dyslexia, 53(1), 23–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-003-0003-7
30.
National Council on Teacher Quality. (2013). State teacher policy yearbook: Improving teacher preparation national summary. https://www.nctq.org/
31.
National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
32.
PutmanR. S.DixonK. V. (2022). Beyond knowledge: Helping preservice teachers apply the science of reading research in authentic classroom contexts. In Handbook of research on reconceptualizing preservice teacher preparation in literacy education (pp. 285-300). IGI Global.
Peterson-AhmadM. B.PembertonJ.HoveyK. A. (2018). Virtual learning environments for teacher preparation. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 54(4), 165–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/00228958.2018.1515544
35.
PiastaS. B.ConnorC. M.FishmanB. J.MorrisonF. J. (2009). Teachers’ knowledge of literacy concepts, classroom practices, and student reading growth. Scientific Studies of Reading, 13(3), 224–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888430902851364
36.
RaynerK.FoormanB. R.PerfettiC. A.PesetskyD.SeidenbergM. S. (2001). How psychological science informs the teaching of reading. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 2(2), 31–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/1529-1006.00004
37.
ReganK.WeissM. P. (2020). Big-in-ear coaching for teacher candidates: What, why, and how to get started. Intervention in School and Clinic, 55(3), 178–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451219842218
38.
RonfeldtM. (2015). Field placement schools and instructional effectiveness. Journal of Teacher Education, 66(4), 304–320. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487115592463
SnowlingM. J.HulmeC. E. (2005). The science of reading: A handbook. Blackwell Publishing.
41.
ScarboroughH. (2001). Connecting early language and literacy to later reading (dis)abilities: Evidence, theory and practice. In NewmanS.DickinsonD. (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (pp. 97–110). Guilford Press.
42.
SlatteryJ. M.CarlsonJ. F. (2005). Preparing an effective syllabus: Current best practices. College Teaching, 53(4), 159–164. https://doi.org/10.3200/CTCH.53.4.159-164
43.
SolariE. J.TerryN. P.GaabN.HoganT. P.NelsonN. J.PentimontiJ. M.PetscherY.SaykoS. (2020). Translational science: A road map for the science of reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 55, S347–S360. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.357
44.
Spear-SwerlingL.CheesmanE. (2012). Teachers’ knowledge base for implementing response-to-intervention models in reading. Reading and Writing, 25(7), 1691–1723. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-011-9338-3
45.
Spear-SwerlingL.ZibulskyJ. (2014). Making time for literacy: Teacher knowledge and time allocation in instructional planning. Reading and Writing, 27(8), 1353–1378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-013-9491-y
46.
SpiroR. J.CoulsonR. L.FeltovichP. J.AndersonD. K. (1988). Cognitive flexibility theory: Advanced acquisition in ill-structured domains (No. 441). Center for the Study of Reading.
47.
StanovichP.StanovichK. (2003). Using research and reason in education: How teachers can use scientifically based research to make curricular and instructional decisions. National Institute for Literacy.
48.
TheobaldR. J.GoldhaberD. D.HoldenK. L.SteinM. L. (2022). Special education teacher preparation, literacy instructional alignment, and reading achievement for students with high-incidence disabilities. Exceptional Children, 88(4), 381–400. https://doi.org/10.1177/00144029221081236
49.
WilcoxK. A.Murakami-RamalhoE.UrickA. (2013). Just-in-time pedagogy: Teachers’ perspectives on the response to intervention framework. Journal of Research in Reading, 36(1), 75–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2011.01494.x
50.
WhitneyL.GolezF.NagelG.NietoC.NietoC. (2002). Listening to voices of practicing teachers to examine the effectiveness of a teacher education program. Action in Teacher Education, 23(4), 69–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2002.10463090