Teacher knowledge and instructional expertise have been found in correlational and pre- and posttest studies to be related to student reading achievement. This article summarizes data presented in this special issue and additional research to address four questions: (a) What do expert reading teachers know? (b) Why do teachers need to acquire this knowledge? (c) Do teachers believe they have this knowledge? and (d) Are teachers being adequately prepared to teach reading? Well-designed studies relevant to this topic have been sparse with a noticeable lack of attention given to identifying specific causal links between teacher knowledge, teaching expertise, and student reading achievement. Until the appropriate research designs and methodologies are applied to address the question of causal effects, conclusions about the specific content that teachers must know and the instructional practices that are most beneficial in presenting this content are preliminary at best. Future studies of the effect of essential reading content knowledge must be extended beyond word-level skills to vocabulary, reading comprehension, and writing.
Al Otaiba, S., Kosanovich-Grek, M.L., Torgesen, J.K., Hassler, L., & Wahl, M. ( 2005). Reviewing core kindergarten and first-grade reading programs in light of No Child Left Behind: An exploratory study. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 21, 377-400.
2.
Bos, C., Mather, N., Dickson, S., Podhajski, B., & Chard, D. ( 2001). Perceptions and knowledge of preservice and inservice educators about early reading instruction. Annals of Dyslexia , 51, 97-120.
3.
Cunningham, A.E., Perry, K.E., Stanovich, K.E., & Stanovich, P.J. (2004). Disciplinary knowledge of K-3 teachers and their knowledge calibration in the domain of early literacy . Annals of Dyslexia, 54, 139-167.
4.
Cunningham, A.E., Zibulsky, J., Stanovich, K.E., & Stanovich, P.J. (2009). How teachers would spend their time teaching language arts: The mismatch between self-reported and best practices. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42(5), 418-430.
5.
Fletcher, J.M., Lyon, G.R., Fuchs, L., & Barnes, M. ( 2007). Learning disabilities: From identification to intervention . New York: Guilford.
6.
Foorman, B.R., Francis, D.J., Fletcher, J.M., Schatschneider, C., & Mehta, P. ( 1998). The role of instruction in learning to read: Preventing reading failure in at-risk children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 37-55.
7.
Foorman, B.R., & Torgesen, J. ( 2001). Critical elements of classroom and small group instruction promote reading success in all children. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 16, 203-212.
8.
Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. ( 2006). Introduction to response to intervention: What, why, and how valid is it?Reading Research Quarterly, 41, 93-99.
9.
Gambrell, L., Almasi, J.F., Xie, Q., & Heland, V. ( 1995). Helping first-graders get a running start in reading . In L. M. Morrow (Ed.), Family literacy: Connections in schools and communities (pp. 143-154). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
10.
Joshi, R.M., Binks, E., Hougen, M., Dahlgren, M., Ocker-Dean, E., & Smith, D. ( 2009). Why elementary teachers might be inadequately prepared to teach reading. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42(5), 392-402.
11.
Kaiser, L., Rosenfield, S., & Gravois, T. ( 2009). Teachers’ perception of satisfaction, skill development, and skill application after instructional consultation services. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42(5), 444-457.
12.
Levine, A. ( 2006). Educating school teachers. Washington, DC: Education Schools Project.
13.
Lyon, G.R. ( 1997, September). NICHD research findings in learning disabilities . Washington, DC: Congressional Printing Office.
14.
Lyon, G.R. ( 1999). In celebration of science in the study of reading development, reading difficulties, and reading instruction: The NICHD perspective. Issues in Education: Contributions From Educational Psychology, 5, 85-115.
15.
Lyon, G.R. ( 2005). Why scientific evidence must guide educational policy and instructional practices in learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 28, 140-145.
16.
Marzano, R.J., Pickering, D.J., & Pollock, J.E. ( 2001). Classroom instruction that works: Research-based strategies for increasing student achievement. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
17.
Mathes, P.G., & Torgesen, J.K. (1998). The role of instruction in learning to read: Preventing reading failure in at-risk children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 37-55.
18.
McCardle, P., & Chhabra, V. (Eds.). (2004). The voice of evidence in reading research. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
19.
Moats, L. ( 2004). Science, language, and imagination in the professional development of reading teachers. In P. McCardle & V. Chhabra (Eds.), The voice of evidence in reading research (pp. 285-287). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
20.
Moats, L.C., & Foorman, B.R. ( 2003). Measuring teachers’ content knowledge of language and reading. Annals of Dyslexia, 53, 23-45.
21.
Moats, L.C., & Lyon, G.R. ( 1996). Wanted: Teachers with knowledge of language. Topics in Language Disorders, 16, 73-86.
22.
National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction . Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
23.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, 20 U.S.C. § 6319 (2008).
24.
Podhajski, B., Mather, N., Nathan, J., & Sammons, J. ( 2009). Professional development in scientifically based reading instruction: Teacher knowledge and reading outcomes. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42(5), 403-417.
25.
Rayner, K., Foorman, B.R., Perfetti, C., Pesetsky, D., & Seidenberg, M.S. (2001). How psychological science informs the teaching of reading. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 2, 31-74.
26.
Sanders, W.L., & Horn, S.P. ( 1998). Research findings from the Tennessee Value-Added Assessment System (TVAAS) database: Implications for educational evaluation and research . Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 12, 247-256.
27.
Sanders, W.L., & Rivers, J.C. ( 1996). Cumulative and residual effects of teachers on future student academic achievement (Research Progress Report). Knoxville: University of Tennessee Value-Added Research and Assessment Center.
28.
Snow, C., Burns, M. S., & Griffin, P. (Eds.). (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children . Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
29.
Spear-Swerling, L., & Brucker, P. ( 2003). Teachers’ acquisition of knowledge about English word structure. Annals of Dyslexia, 53, 72-103.
30.
Spear-Swerling, L., & Brucker, P. ( 2004). Preparing novice teachers to develop basic reading and spelling skills in children. Annals of Dyslexia, 54, 332-364.
31.
Stotsky, S. ( 2009). Licensure tests for special education teachers: How well they assess knowledge of reading instruction and mathematics. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42(5), 464-474.
32.
Vellutino, F.R., Scanlon, D.M., & Jaccard, J. ( 2003). Toward distinguishing between cognitive and experiential deficits as primary sources of difficulty in learning to read: A two-year follow-up of difficult to remediate and readily remediated poor readers. In B. R. Foorman (Ed.), Preventing and remediating reading difficulties: Bringing science to scale (pp. 73-120). Baltimore, MD: York Press.
33.
Wanzek, J., & Vaughn, S. ( 2007). Research-based implications from extensive early reading interventions. School Psychology Review, 36, 541-561.
34.
Wright, S.P., Horn, S.P., & Sanders, W.L. ( 1997). Teacher and classroom context effects on student achievement: Implications for teacher evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 1, 57-67.
