In the fairy tale “Goldilocks,” a young girl enters the home of three bears. As she explores the porridge, chairs, and beds, in each situation she is seeking what is “just right.” It seems that Goldilocks is the perfect metaphor for describing learners experiencing universal design for learning (UDL) because it highlights the importance of learner agency. However, who is in charge of designing the bear’s home to ensure that all that is needed is in place? The teacher’s role in implementing UDL is a topic that has been woefully understudied. This article describes critical practices needed to help teachers design the UDL buffet in ways that provide meaningful support for diverse learners to be successful in achieving high academic standards within the time constraints of the curriculum.
AkosP.GalassiJ. P. (2004). Middle and high school transitions as viewed by students, parents, and teachers. Professional School Counseling, 7(4), 212–221.
2.
BollerB. (2008). Teaching organizational skills in middle school: Moving toward independence. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 81(4), 169–171.
3.
BurgstahlerS. E.CoryR. C.(Eds.). (2010). Universal design in higher education: From principles to practice. Harvard Education Press.
4.
CoureyS. J.TappeP.SikerJ.LePageP. (2012). Improved lesson planning with universal design for learning (UDL). Teacher Education and Special Education, 36(1), 7–27.
5.
Darling-HammondL. (2015). Want to close the achievement gap? Close the teaching gap. American Educator, 38(4), 14–18.
6.
EdyburnD. L. (2002). Cognitive rescaling strategies: Interventions that alter the cognitive accessibility of text. Closing the Gap, 21(1), 1, 10–11, 21.
7.
EdyburnD. L. (2010). Would you recognize universal design for learning if you saw it? Ten propositions for new directions for the second decade of UDL. Learning Disability Quarterly, 33(1), 33–41.
8.
EdyburnD. L.EdyburnK. D. (2015). Design for more types: Designing text to support the access, engagement, and success of diverse learners. In EdyburnD.L. (Ed.), Advances in special education technology: Vol. 2. Accessible instructional design (pp. 121–159). Emerald.
9.
FirmenderJ. M.ReisS. M.SweenyS. M. (2013). Reading comprehension and fluency levels ranges across diverse classrooms: The need for differentiated reading instruction and content. Gifted Child Quarterly, 57(1), 3–14.
10.
FowlerS. A.ColemanM. R.BogdanW. K. (2019). The state of the special education profession survey report. Teaching Exceptional Children, 52(1), 8–29.
11.
HardenR. T. M.StevensonM.DownieW. W.WilsonG. M. (1975). Assessment of clinical competence using objective structured examination. British Medical Journal, 1(5955), 447–451.
12.
IsraelM.RibuffoC.SmithS. (2014). Universal design for learning innovation configuration: Recommendations for teacher preparation and professional development (Document No. IC-7). University of Florida, Collaboration for Effective Educator, Development, Accountability, and Reform Center. http://ceedar.education.ufl.edu/tools/innovation-configurations
13.
LekoM. M.MundyC. A.KangH. J.DatarS. D. (2013). If the book fits: Selecting appropriate texts for adolescents with learning disabilities. Intervention in School and Clinic, 48(5), 267–275.
14.
McLeskeyJ.WaldonN. (2007). Making differences ordinary in inclusive classrooms. Intervention in School and Clinic, 42(3), 162–168.
15.
OkM. W.RaoK.BryantB. R.McDougallD. (2017). Universal design for learning in pre-K to grade 12 classrooms: A systematic review of research. Exceptionality, 25(2),116–138.
16.
PishaB.CoyneP. (2001). Smart from the start: The promise of universal design for learning. Remedial and Special Education, 22(4), 197–203.
17.
RaoK.OkM. W.BryantB. R. (2014). A review of research on universal design educational models. Remedial and Special Education, 35(3), 153–166.
18.
ScottL. A. (2018). Barriers with implementing a universal design for learning framework. Inclusion, 6(4), 274–286.
19.
ScottL. A.ThomaC. A.PugliaL.TempleP.D’AguilarA. (2017). Implementing a UDL framework: A study of current personnel preparation practices. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 55(1), 25–36.
20.
SpencerS. A. (2011). Universal design for learning: Assistance for teachers in today’s inclusive classrooms. Interdisciplinary Journal of Teaching and Learning, 1(1), 10–22.
21.
SuarezD. (2007). When students choose the challenge. Educational Leadership, 65(3), 60–65.
22.
TomlinsonC. A. (1999). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners. ASCD.
23.
VitelliE. M. (2015). Universal design for learning: Are we teaching it to preservice general education teachers?Journal of Special Education Technology, 30(3), 166–178.
