Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Computer-assisted instruction (CAI) is a critical tool for accessing information and instruction among students with visual impairment (VI). This systematic review examined eight CAI intervention studies implemented with 92 U.S. school-age children with VI. The interventions were implemented with a diverse group of students across a variety of school types (e.g., neighborhood schools, schools for the blind), grade levels, and content areas (e.g., math, reading). Although some findings were promising, the effects of CAI were inconsistent across studies. This review highlights the need for (a) additional high-quality intervention evaluations, (b) more information on the social validity of CAI interventions, and (c) evaluations of CAI among students with a wider range of needs. Implications for practice and research aimed at enhancing the use of CAI are addressed.

Keywords

computer-assisted instruction assistive technology instructional technology visual impairment

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abner

G. H.

Lahm

E. A.

(2002). Implementation of assistive technology with students who are visually impaired: Teachers’ readiness. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 96(2), 98–105. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X0209600204

*Arslantas

T. K.

Yildirim

Arslantekin

B. A.

(2019). Educational affordances of a specific web-based assistive technology for students with visual impairment. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(6), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1619587

*Bickford

J. O.

Falco

R. A.

(2012). Technology for early braille literacy: Comparison of traditional braille instruction and instruction with an electronic notetaker. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 106(10), 679–693. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X1210601012

*Bouck

E. C.

Weng

P. L.

(2014). Reading math: A comparison of reading and listening to algebraic problems. Journal of Special Education Technology, 29(4), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264341402900401

Cheng

P. H.

(2016). Wearable ultrasonic guiding device with white cane for the visually impaired: A preliminary verisimilitude experiment. Assistive Technology, 28(3), 127–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2015.1123781

Cook

Buysse

Klingner

Landrum

McWilliam

Tankersley

Test

(2014). Council for Exceptional Children: Standards for evidence-based practices in special education. Remedial and Special Education, 36(4), 220–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932514557271

Della Líbera

Jurberg

(2017). Teenagers with visual impairment and new media: A world without barriers. British Journal of Visual Impairment, 35(3), 247–256. https://doi.org/10.1177/0264619617711732

Every Student Succeeds Act, 20 U. S. C. § 6301. (2015, December 10). https://congress.gov/114/plaws/publ95/PLAW-114publ95.pdf

Ferrell

K. A.

Bruce

Luckner

J. L.

(2014, September). Evidence-based practices for students with sensory impairments (Document No. IC-4). University of Florida, Collaboration for Effective Educator, Development, Accountability, and Reform Center. https://ceedar.education.ufl.edu/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/IC-4_FINAL_03-30-15.pdf

10.

Hofstetter

F. T.

(2001). The future’s future: Implications of emerging technology for special education program planning. Journal of Special Education Technology, 16(4), 7–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264340101600402

11.

*Kamei-Hannan

Lawson

(2012). Impact of a braille-note on writing: Evaluating the process, quality, and attitudes of three students who are visually impaired. Journal of Special Education Technology, 27(3), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264341202700301

12.

Kamei-Hannan

Lee

D. B.

Presley

(2017). Assistive technology. In Holbrook

M. C.

Kamei-Hanna

McCarthy

(Eds.), Foundations of education: Volume II instructional strategies for teaching children and youth with visual impairments (pp. 611–653). AFB Press.

13.

*Kapperman

Sticken

Smith

(2011). The effectiveness of the Nemeth Code tutorial for the BrailleNote. Insight: Research and Practice in Visual Impairment and Blindness, 4(1), 22–28.

14.

*Kapperman

Sticken

Smith

(2012). The effectiveness of the Nemeth Code Tutorial for the BrailleNote: A follow-up study. Insight: Research and Practice in Visual Impairment and Blindness, 5(4), 168–174. https://aerbvi.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/AER-Insight-Journal-Fall-2012.pdf#page=38

15.

Lohmeier

Blankenship

Hatlen

(2009). Expanded core curriculum: 12 years later. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 103(2), 103–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X0910300209

16.

*McCarthy

Rosenblum

L. P.

Johnson

B. G.

Dittel

Kearns

D. M.

(2016). An artificial intelligence tutor: A supplementary tool for teaching and practicing braille. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 110(5), 309–322. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X1611000503

17.

McDonnall

M. C.

Crudden

(2009). Factors affecting the successful employment of transition-age youths with visual impairments. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 103(6), 329–341. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X0910300603

18.

*McLaughlin

Kamei-Hannan

(2018). Paper or digital text: Which reading medium is best for students with visual impairments? Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 112(4), 337–350. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X1811200401

19.

Moher

Liberati

Tetzlaff

Altman

D. G.

, & The PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLOS Medicine, 6(7), Article e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097

20.

Odom

S. L.

Brantlinger

Gersten

Horner

R. H.

Thompson

Harris

K. R.

(2005). Research in special education: Scientific methods and evidence-based practices. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 137–148. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290507100201

21.

Odom

S. L.

Thompson

J. L.

Hedges

Boyd

B. A.

Dykstra

J. R.

Duda

M. A.

Szidon

K. L.

Smith

L. E.

Bord

(2015). Technology-aided interventions and instruction for adolescents with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45(12), 3805–3819. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-014-2320-6

22.

Root

J. R.

Stevenson

B. S.

Davis

L. L.

Geddes-Hall

Test

D. W.

(2017). Establishing computer-assisted instruction to teach academics to students with autism as an evidence-based practice. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 47(2), 275–284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-016-2947-6

23.

Shadish

W. R.

Zelinsky

N. A.

Vevea

J. L.

Kratochwill

T. R.

(2016). A survey of publication practices of single-case design researchers when treatments have small or large effects. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 49(3), 656–673. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.308

24.

Smith

D. W.

Kelley

S. M.

(2014). Assistive technology for students with visual impairments: A research agenda. In Hatton

(Ed.), International review of research in developmental disabilities (Vol. 46, pp. 23–53). Academic Press.

25.

Varma

Ying-Lai

Klein

Azen

S. P.

& Los Angeles Latino Eye Study Group. (2004). Prevalence and risk indicators of visual impairment and blindness in Latinos: The Los Angeles Latino eye study. Ophthalmology, 111(6), 1132–1140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.02.002

26.

Wolffe

K. E.

(2017). Growth and development in middle childhood and adolescence. In Holbrook

M. C.

McCarthy

Kamei-Hannan

(Eds.), Foundations of education. Volume I: History and theory of teaching children and youths with visual impairments (pp. 146–184). APH Press.

27.

Wolffe

K. E.

Sacks

S. Z.

Corn

A. L.

Erin

J. N.

Huebner

K. M.

Lewis

(2002). Teachers of students with visual impairments: What are they teaching? Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 96(5), 293–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X0209600502

A Review of Computer-Assisted Instruction for Students With Visual Impairment

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References