We conducted this systematic literature review to summarize single-case intervention studies in which academic instruction incorporated assistive and instructional technology for students with complex support needs. Thirty studies, published between 2012 and 2019, were included in the review and evaluated for methodological rigor. Of the 97 student participants across all studies, most received language arts instruction in self-contained elementary classrooms. The majority of interventions used instructional technology on mobile devices in conjunction with systematic instruction focusing on teaching word recognition or letter identification skills. We discuss the key findings with recommendations for future research, and implications for practice.
*Ahlgrim-DelzellL.BrowderD.WoodL. (2014). Effects of systematic instruction and an augmentative communication device on phonics skills acquisition for students with moderate intellectual disability who are nonverbal. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 49(4), 517–532. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24582348
2.
*AlisonC.RootJ. R.BrowderD. M.WoodL. (2017). Technology-based shared story reading for students with autism who are English-language learners. Journal of Special Education Technology, 32(2), 91–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643417690606
3.
*ArthanatS.CurtinC.KnotakD. (2013). Comparative observations of learning engagement by students with developmental disabilities using an iPad® and computer: A pilot study. Assistive Technology, 25(4), 204–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2012.761293
4.
*AultM. J.BaggermanM. A.HornC. K. (2017). Effects of an app incorporating systematic instruction to teach spelling to students with developmental delays. Journal of Special Education Technology, 32(3), 123–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643417696931
5.
BartonE. E.PustejovskyJ. E.MagginD. M.ReichowB. (2017). Technology-aided instruction and intervention for students with ASD: A meta-analysis using novel methods of estimating effect sizes for single-case research. Remedial and Special Education, 38(6), 371–386. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932517729508
6.
BouckE. C. (2016). A national snapshot of assistive technology for students with disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 31(1), 4–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643416633330
7.
*BouckE. C.ChamberlainC.ParkJ. (2017). Concrete and app-based manipulatives to support students with disabilities with subtraction. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 52(3), 317–331. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26420403
8.
*BouckE. C.ParkJ.MaherC.LevyK.CwiakalaK. (2019). Acquiring the skill of identifying fractions through the virtual-abstract framework. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 31(4), 435–452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-018-9650-9
9.
BrockM. E.CarterE. W. (2013). A systematic review of paraprofessional-delivered educational practices to improve outcomes for students with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 38(4), 211–221. https://doi.org/10.1177/154079691303800401
10.
*BrowderD. M.RootJ. R.WoodL.AllisonC. (2015). Effects of a story-mapping procedure using the iPad on the comprehension of narrative texts by students with autism spectrum disorder. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 32(4), 243–255. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357615611387
11.
BrowderD. M.WakemanS. Y.FlowersC.RickelmanR. J.PugaleeD.KarvonenM. (2007). Creating access to the general curriculum with links to grade-level content for students with significant cognitive disabilities an explication of the concept. The Journal of Special Education, 41(1), 2–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224669070410010101
12.
CarterE. W.AsmusJ.MossC. K.BiggsE. E.BoltD. M.BornT. L.BrockM. E.CatteyG. N.ChenR.CooneyM.FespermanE.HochmanJ. M.HuberH. B.LequiaJ. L.LyonsG.MoyseenkoK. A.RieschL. M.ShalevR. A.VincentL. B.WeirK. (2015). Randomized evaluation of peer support arrangements to support the inclusion of high school students with severe disabilities. Exceptional Children, 82(2), 209–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402915598780
13.
*ChaiZ.VailC. O.AyresK. M. (2015). Using an iPad® application to promote early literacy development in young children with disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 48(4), 268–278. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466913517554
14.
ChenM.WuT.LinT.TasiY.ChenH. (2009). The effect of different representations on reading digital text for students with cognitive disabilities. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(4), 764–770. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00869.x
15.
*ColemanM. B.CherryR. A.MooreT. C.ParkY.CihakD. F. (2015). Teaching sight words to elementary students with intellectual disability and autism: A comparison of teacher-directed versus computer-assisted simultaneous prompting. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 53(3), 196–210. https://doi.org/10.1352/1934-9556-53.3.196
16.
*Creech-GallowayC.CollinsB. C.KnightV.BauschM. (2013). Using a simultaneous prompting procedure with an iPad® to teach the Pythagorean Theorem to adolescents with moderate intellectual disability. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 38(4), 222–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/154079691303800402
17.
CummingT. M.Draper RodríguezC. (2017). A meta-analysis of mobile technology supporting individuals with disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 51(3), 164–176. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466917713983
18.
*DuekerS. A.Cannella-MaloneH. I. (2019). Teaching addition to students with moderate disabilities using video prompting. The Journal of Special Education Apprenticeship, 8(2), 1–20. https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/josea/vol8/iss2/2
EdyburnD. L. (2001). 2000 in review: A synthesis of the special education technology literature. Journal of Special Education Technology, 16(2), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264340101600201
21.
EdyburnD. L. (2002). 2001 in review: A syntheses of the special education technology literature. Journal of Special Education Technology, 17(2), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264340201700201
22.
EdyburnD. L. (2007). Technology-enhanced reading performance: Defining a research agenda. Reading Research Quarterly, 42, 146–152. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.42.1.7
23.
*EvmenovaA. S.GraffH. J.BehrmannM. M. (2017). Providing access to academic content for high-school students with significant intellectual disability through interactive videos. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 32(1), 18–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357615609307
24.
EvmenovaA. S.GraffH. J.JeromeM. K.BehrmannM. M. (2010). Word prediction programs with phonetic spelling support: Performance comparisons and impact on journal writing for students with writing difficulties. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 25(4), 170–182. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2010.00315.x
25.
FowlerS. A.ColemanM. R. B.BogdanW. K. (2019). The state of the special education profession survey report. Teaching Exceptional Children, 52(1), 8–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059919875703
26.
*HartJ. E.WhalonK. J. (2012). Using video self-modeling via iPads® to increase academic responding of an adolescent with autism spectrum disorder and intellectual disability. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 47(4), 438–446. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23879637
27.
HornerR. H.CarrE. G.HalleJ.McGeeG.OdomS.WoleryM. (2005). The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 165–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290507100203
28.
*HudsonM. E.ZamboneA.BrickhouseJ. (2016). Teaching early numeracy skills using single switch voice-output devices to students with severe multiple disabilities. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 28, 153–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-015-9451-3
29.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. (2004).
30.
*JamesonJ. M.ThompsonV.ManueleG.SmithD.EganH.MooreT. (2012). Using an iTouch to teach core curriculum words and definitions: Efficacy and social validity. Journal of Special Education Technology, 27(3), 41–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264341202700304
31.
JozwikS.MustianA. L. (2020). Effects of technology-supported language experience approach for English learners with exceptional needs. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 36(5), 418–437. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2019.1655690
32.
KagoharaD. M.van der MeerL.RamdossS.O’ReillyM. F.LancioniG. E.DavisT. N.RispoliM. J.LangR. B.MarschikP. B.SutherlandD.GreenV. A.SigafoosJ. (2013). Using iPods® and iPads® in teaching programs for individuals with developmental disabilities: A systematic review. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34(1), 147–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2012.07.027
33.
KleinertH.Towles-ReevesE.QuenemoenR.ThurlowM.FlueggeL.WesemanL.KerbelA. (2015). Where students with the most significant cognitive disabilities are taught implications for general curriculum access. Exceptional Children, 81(3), 312–328. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402914563697
34.
*KnightV. F.Creech-GallowayC. E.KarlJ. M.CollinsB. C. (2018). Evaluating supported eText to teach science to high school students with moderate intellectual disability. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 33(4), 227–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357617696273
35.
*KnightV. F.KuntzE. M.BrownM. (2018). Paraprofessional-delivered video prompting to teach academics to students with severe disabilities in inclusive settings. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 48(6), 2203–2216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-018-3476-2
36.
KnightV. F.McKissickB. R.SaundersA. (2013). A review of technology-based interventions to teach academic skills to students with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 43(11), 2628–2648. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-013-1814-y
37.
*KnightV. F.WoodC. L.SpoonerF.BrowderD. M.O’BrienC. P. (2015). An exploratory study using science eTexts with students with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 30(2), 86–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357614559214
38.
KretlowA. G.CookeN. L.WoodC. L. (2012). Using in-service and coaching to increase teachers’ accurate use of research-based strategies. Remedial and Special Education, 33(6), 348–361. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932510395397
39.
KroeschA. M.DouglasK. H.JozwikS.UpholdN. M.ChungY. C. (2020). Teaching American government content to students with developmental disabilities using technology and evidence-based interventions. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 32(6), 925–947. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-019-09726-9
40.
*LorahE. R.ParnellA. (2014). The acquisition of letter writing using a portable multi-media player in young children with developmental disabilities. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 26(6), 655–666. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-014-9386-0
41.
MechlingL. C. (2011). Review of twenty-first century portable electronic devices for persons with moderate intellectual disabilities and autism spectrum disorders. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 46(4), 479–498. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24232361
42.
NaraianS. (2017). Teaching for inclusion: Eight principles for effective and equitable practice. Teachers College Press.
43.
National Technical Assistance Center on Transition. (2016). Quality indicators checklist: Single case [Electronic checklist using Horner et al. 2005 criteria].
44.
OkM. W.RaoK. (2019). Digital tools for the inclusive classroom: Google chrome as assistive and instructional technology. Journal of Special Education Technology, 34(3), 204–211. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643419841546
*PurrazzellaK.MechlingL. C. (2013). Evaluation of manual spelling, observational and incidental learning using computer-based instruction with a tablet PC, large screen projection, and a forward chaining procedure. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 48(2), 218–235. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23880641
47.
*RiveraC. J.SpoonerF.WoodC. L.HicksS. C. (2013). Multimedia shared stories for diverse learners with moderate intellectual disability. Journal of Special Education Technology, 28(4), 53–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264341302800405
48.
*RootJ. R.BrowderD. M.SaundersA. F.LoY. (2017). Schema-based instruction with concrete and visual manipulatives to teach problem solving to students with autism. Remedial and Special Education, 38(1), 42–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932516643592
49.
RupparA. L.NeeperL. S.DalsenJ. (2016). Special education teachers’ perceptions of preparedness to teach students with severe disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 41(4), 273–286. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796916672843
50.
*SaundersA. F.SpoonerF.Ley DavisL. (2018). Using video prompting to teach mathematical problem solving of real-world video-simulation problems. Remedial and Special Education, 39(1), 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932517717042
51.
*SeokS.DaCostaB.YuB. M. (2015). Spelling practice intervention: A comparison of tablet PC and picture cards as spelling practice methods for students with developmental disabilities. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 50(1), 84–94. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24827503
52.
SilioM. C.BarbettaP. M. (2010). The effects of word prediction and text-to-speech technologies on the narrative writing skills of Hispanic students with specific learning disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 25(4), 17–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264341002500402
53.
*SmithB. R.SpoonerF.JiménezB. A.BrowderD. (2013). Using an early science curriculum to teach science vocabulary and concepts to students with severe developmental disabilities. Education and Treatment of Children, 36(1), 1–31. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42900600
54.
SmithB. R.SpoonerF.WoodC. L. (2013). Using embedded computer-assisted explicit instruction to teach science to students with autism spectrum disorder. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 7(3), 433–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2012.10.010
55.
*SmithR. O. (2017). Technology and occupation: Past, present, and the next 100 years of theory and practice. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 71(6), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2017.716003
56.
SpoonerF.Ahlgrim-DelzellL.Kemp-InmanA.WoodL. A. (2014). Using an iPad2® with systematic instruction to teach shared stories for elementary-aged students with autism. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 39(1), 30–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796914534631
57.
*SpoonerF.Kemp-InmanA.Ahlgrim-DelzellL.WoodL.Ley DavisL. (2015). Generalization of literacy skills through portable technology for students with severe disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 40(1), 52–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796915586190
58.
SpoonerF.KnightV. F.BrowderD. M.JiménezB.DiBiaseW. (2011). Evaluating evidence-based practice in teaching science content to students with severe developmental disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 36(1–2), 62–75. https://doi.org/10.2511/rpsd.36.1-2.62
59.
SpoonerF.KnightV. F.BrowderD. M.SmithB. R. (2012). Evidence-based practice for teaching academics to students with severe developmental disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 33(6), 374–387. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932511421634
60.
*StasollaF.DamianiR.PerilliV.D’AmicoF.CaffòA. O.StellaA.AlbanoV.DamatoC.LeoneA. D. (2015). Computer and microswitch-based programs to improve academic activities by six children with cerebral palsy. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 45–46, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2015.07.005
61.
StephensonJ.LimbrickL. (2015). A review of the use of touch-screen mobile devices by people with developmental disabilities. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45(12), 3777–3791. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-013-1878-8
62.
SwanK.KratcoskiA.van’t HooftM. (2007). Highly mobile devices, pedagogical possibilities, and how teaching needs to be reconceptualized to realize them. Educational Technology, 47(3), 10–12. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44429499
63.
SwanK.van’t HooftM.KratcoskiA.UngerD. (2005). Uses and effects of mobile computing devices in K-8 classrooms. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38(1), 99–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2005.10782451
64.
U.S. Department of Education. (2017). What works clearinghouse: Procedures and standards handbook (Version 3.0). https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/handbooks
65.
VerdonschotM. M. L.de WitteL. P.ReichrathE.BuntinxW. H. E.CurfsL. M. G. (2009). Community participation of people with an intellectual disability: A review of empirical findings. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 53(4), 303–318. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2008.01144.x
66.
WalkerV. L.SmithC. G. (2015). Training paraprofessionals to support students with disabilities: A literature review. Exceptionality, 23(3), 170–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362835.2014.986606
*YakubovaG.HughesE. M.HornbergerE. (2015). Video-based intervention in teaching fraction problem-solving to students with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45(9), 2865–2875. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-015-2449-y
69.
ZhengB.WarschauerM.LinC.-H.ChangC. (2016). Learning in one-to-one laptop environments: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 1052–1084. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316628645
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
