Academic accommodations are intended to increase access to education for students with disabilities. Although the concept seems simple, implementation is challenging because of the ambiguous wording of some accommodations. This article reviews confusing aspects of frequently encountered accommodations. Research-based guidelines for writing explicit, functional accommodations are suggested and illustrated with student examples.
Americans with Disabilities Act, 42, U.S.C.A. § 12101 et seq. (1990).
2.
Bolt, S.E., & Thurlow, M.L. (2004). Five of the most frequently allowed testing accommodations in state policy: Synthesis of research. Remedial and Special Education, 25, 141-152.
3.
Byrnes, M. (in press). Educators' interpretations of ambiguous accommodations . Remedial and Special Education.
4.
Edgemon, E.A., Jablonski, B.R., & Lloyd, J.W. (2006). Large-scale assessments: A teacher's guide to making decisions about accommodations. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 38(3), 6-11.
5.
Fletcher, J.M., Francis, D.J., Boudousquie, A., Copeland, K., Young, V., Kalinowski, S., et al. (2006). Effects of accommodations on high-stakes testing for students with reading disabilities. Exceptional Children, 72, 136-150.
6.
Fuchs, L.S., & Fuchs, D. (2001). Helping teachers formulate sound test accommodation decisions for students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 16, 174-181.
7.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, 20 U.S.C.A. § 1400 et seq. (2005).
8.
Level playing field. (n.d.). Dictionary.com unabridged (v 1.0.1). Retrieved September 14, 2006, from http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=levelplayingfield&r=66
9.
Maccini, P., & Gagnon, J.C. (2006). Mathematics instructional practices and assessment accommodations by secondary special and general educators. Exceptional Children, 72, 217-234.
10.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, 20 USC § 6301 et seq. (2002).
11.
Ofiesh, N.S., Hughes, C., & Scott, S.S. (2004). Extended test time and postsecondary students with learning disabilities: A model for decision making. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 19, 57-70.
12.
Parker, B. (2006). Instructional adaptations for students with learning disabilities: An action research project. Intervention in School and Clinic, 42, 56-58.
Thompson, S.J., Lazarus, S.S., Thurlow, M.L., & Clapper, A.T. (2005). The role of accommodations in educational accountability systems (Topical Review 8). College Park, MD: Institute for the Study of Exceptional Children and Youth.
15.
Thompson, S.J., Morse, A.B., Sharpe, M., & Hall, S. (2005). Accommodations manual: How to select, administer, and evaluate use of accommodations for instruction and assessment of students with disabilities (2nd ed.). Retrieved June 22, 2006, from http://osepideasthatwork.org/toolkit/accommodations.asp
16.
Thurlow, M.L., & Bolt, S.E. (2001). Empirical support for accommodations most often allowed in state policy (Synthesis Report 41). Minneapolis : University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.
17.
Ysseldyke, J., Thurlow, M., Bielinski, J., House, A., Moody, M., & Haigh, J. (2001). The relationship between instructional and assessment accommodations in an inclusive state accountability system. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 212-220.
