Study guides are a popular and frequently student-requested instructional support developed primarily by upper elementary, middle, and high school teachers to help students navigate through a course of study. With the increase of the number of learners with diverse needs in general education classrooms, teachers need to be mindful of various ways to differentiate study guides, that is, make adjustments that maintain the integrity of student outcomes while offering choices and respecting each learner’s background knowledge, skill-level, interests, and learning preferences. Specifically, teachers can differentiate study guides by adjusting questions and content, providing different kinds of study guides, allowing students to demonstrate knowledge in different ways, reinforcing student efforts, and allowing students to use classroom materials and space in various ways. This article presents ways teachers can apply the components of differentiation to maximize the use of study guides in inclusive classrooms.
AndersonL. W.KrathwohlD. R.AirasianP. W.CruikshankK. A.MayerR. E.PintrichP. R. . . . WittrockM. C. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York, NY: Pearson, Allyn & Bacon.
2.
BooneR.HigginsK. (1992). Hypermedia applications for content-area study guides. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 8, 379–393.
3.
BoyleJ.ScanlonD. (2010). Methods and strategies for teaching students with mild disabilities. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
4.
CondermanG.BresnahanV. (2010). Study guides to the rescue. Intervention in School and Clinic, 45, 169–176.
CondermanG.HedinL.BresnahanV. (2013). Strategy instruction for middle and secondary students with mild disabilities: Creating independent learners. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
7.
DeshlerD.EllisE.LenzK. (1996). Teaching adolescents with learning disabilities: Strategies and methods. Denver, CO: Love.
8.
FisherJ.SchumakerL.DeshlerD. (1995). Searching for validated inclusive practices: A review of literature. Focus on Exceptional Children, 28, 1–20.
9.
FordD. (2005). Welcoming all students to room 202: Creating culturally responsive classrooms. Gifted Child Today, 28(4), 28–30, 65.
10.
FriendM.BursuckW. (2015). Including students with special needs: A practical guide for classroom teachers. Boston, MA: Pearson.
11.
GargiuloR. M.MetcalfD. (2010). Teaching in today’s inclusive classrooms: A universal design for learning approach. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
12.
GoreM. C. (2004). Successful inclusion strategies for secondary and middle school teachers: Keys to help struggling learners access the curriculum. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
13.
GunningT. G. (2003). Building literacy in the content areas. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
14.
HewardW. L. (2013). Exceptional children: An introduction to special education. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
15.
HollingseadC.OstranderC.SchillingJ. (2004). Study guides: Teacher tips: A review of literature with practical implications. Language Arts Journal of Michigan, 20(2), 13.
16.
HortonS. V.BooneR.LovittT. (1990). Teaching social studies to learning disabled high school students: Effects of a hypertext study guide. British Journal of Educational Technology, 21, 118–131.
17.
HortonS. V.LovittT. C. (1989). Using study guides with three classifications of secondary students. Journal of Special Education, 22, 447–462.
18.
HortonS. V.LovittT. C.GivensA.NelsonR. (1989). Teaching social studies to high school students with academic handicaps in a mainstreamed setting: Effects of a computerized study guide. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 102–107.
19.
KozenA. A.MurrayR. K.WindellI. (2006). Increasing all students’ chance to achieve: Using and adapting anticipation guides with middle school learners. Intervention in School and Clinic, 41, 195–200.
20.
LenzB. K.DeshlerD.KissamB. (2004). Teaching content to all: Evidence-based inclusive practices in middle and secondary schools. Boston, MA: Pearson.
21.
MastersL. F.MoriB.MoriA. (1999). Teaching secondary students with mild learning and behavior problems. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
22.
MellorN. (2008). Attention seeking: A complete guide for teachers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23.
MunkD. (2003). Solving the grading puzzle for students with disabilities. Whitefish Bay, WI: Knowledge by Design.
24.
OgleD. M. (1989). The know, want to know, learn strategy. In MuthK. D. (Ed.), Children’s comprehension of text: Research into practice (pp. 205–223). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
25.
RaphaelT. E. (1986). Teaching question-answer relationships. Reading Teacher, 39, 516–520.
26.
SalyerB. K.CurranC.ThyfaultA. (2002, March). What can I use tomorrow? Strategies for accessible math and science curriculum for diverse learners in rural schools. Paper presented at the American Council on Rural Special Education proceedings, Reno, NV.
27.
SchummJ. S.VaughnS.LeavellA. G. (1994). Planning pyramid: A framework for planning for diverse student needs during content area instruction. Reading Teacher, 47, 608–615.
28.
SkylarA.HigginsK.BooneR. (2007). Strategies for adapting webquests for students with learning disabilities. Intervention in School and Clinic, 43, 20–28.
29.
TomlinsonC. A.ImbeauM. (2010). Leading and managing a differentiated classroom. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
30.
University of Kansas Center for Research on Learning. (2009). SIM strategic instruction model. Lawrence, KS: Author. Retrieved from http://kucrl.org/sim
WoodJ. W. (2006). Teaching students in inclusive settings: Adapting and accommodating instruction (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall.
34.
WoodK. D. (1995). Guiding middle school students through expository text. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 11, 137–147.
35.
ZimmermanB. J. (2001). Theories of self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview and analysis. In ZimmermanB. J.SchunkD. H. (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 1–65). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
