Taking notes from lectures or reading material can be challenging, especially for those who have learning disabilities. An alternative to traditional note-taking is a method called guided notes, which has been found to improve the accuracy of students’ notes, increase the frequency of student responses, and improve students’ quiz and test performance. Additionally, research has revealed that students prefer to use guided notes over taking their own notes or using preprinted notes. The purpose of this article is to provide teachers with several suggestions for creating and using guided notes to enhance other effective teaching methods, support students’ studying, and promote higher order thinking.
Austin, J.L., Lee, M.G., Thibeault, M.D., Carr, J.E., & Bailey, J.S. ( 2002). Effects of guided notes on university students’ responding and recall of information. Journal of Behavioral Education, 11, 243-254.
2.
Barbetta, F.M., & Skaruppa, C.L. (1995). Looking for a way to improve your behavior analysis lectures? Try guided notes. The Behavior Analyst, 18, 155-160.
3.
Blackwell, A.J., & McLaughlin, T.F. (2005). Using guided notes, choral responding, and response cards to increase student performance. International Journal of Special Education, 20, 1-5.
4.
Dye, G.A. ( 2000). Graphic organizers to the rescue! Helping students link-and remember-information. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 32(3), 72-76.
5.
Heward, W.L. ( 1994). Three "low-tech" strategies for increasing the frequency of active student response during group instruction. In R. Gardner, D. M. Sainato , J. O. Cooper, T. E. Heron, W. L. Heward, J. Eshleman, & T. A. Grossi (Eds.), Behavior analysis in education: Focus on measurably superior instruction (pp. 283-320). Monterey, CA: Brooks/ Cole.
6.
Heward, W.L. ( 2001). Guided notes: Improving the effectiveness of your lectures . Columbus: Ohio State University Partnership Grant for Improving the Quality of Education for Students With Disabilities.
7.
Heward, W.L. ( 2006). Exceptional children: An introduction to special education . Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
8.
Hughes, C.A., & Suritsky, S.K. (1994). Note-taking skills of university students with and without learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27, 20-24.
9.
Itoi, M. ( 2004). Effects of guided notes study cards on the accuracy of lecture notes and next-day quiz scores of students in a 7th grade social studies classroom. Unpublished master’s thesis, Ohio State University, Columbus.
10.
Konrad, M., Joseph, L.M., & Eveleigh, E. ( 2009). A metanalytic review of guided notes. Education & Treatment of Children, 32, 421-444.
11.
Lazarus, B.D. ( 1993). Guided notes: Effects with secondary and post secondary students with mild disabilities. Education and Treatment of Children, 16, 272-289.
12.
Lowry, L. ( 1993). The giver. New York, NY: Dell Laurel-Leaf.
13.
Neef, N.A., McCord, B.E., & Ferreri, S.J. ( 2006). Effects of guided notes versus completed notes during lectures on college students’ quiz performance. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 39, 123-130.
14.
Palinscar, A.S., & Brown, A.L. ( 1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension fostering and comprehension monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117-175.
15.
Patterson, K.B. ( 2005). Increasing positive outcomes for African American males in special education with the use of guided notes. Journal of Negro Education, 74, 311-320.
16.
Randolph, J.J. ( 2007). Meta-analysis of the effects of response cards on student achievement, participation, and intervals of off-task behavior. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 9, 113-128.
17.
Stringfellow, J.L., & Miller, S.P. ( 2005). Enhancing student performance in secondary classrooms while providing access to the general education curriculum using lecture format . TEACHING Exceptional Children Plus, 1(6), 2-16.
18.
Sweeney, W.J., Ehrhardt, A.M., Gardner, R., Jones, L., Greenfield, R., & Fribley, S. ( 1999). Using guided notes with academically at-risk high school students during a remedial summer social studies class. Psychology in the Schools, 36, 305-318.
19.
Tam, B.K.Y., & Scott, M.L. ( 1996). Three group instructional strategies for students with limited English proficiency in vocational education. Journal of Vocational Special Needs Education, 19(1), 31-36.
20.
van Garderen, D. ( 2004). Reciprocal teaching as a comprehension strategy for understanding mathematical word problems. Reading & Writing Quarterly , 20, 225-229.
21.
Veerkamp, M.B., Kamps, D.M., & Cooper, L. ( 2007). The effects of classwide peer tutoring on the reading achievement of urban middle school students. Education and Treatment of Children, 30, 21-51.
22.
Weishaar, M.K., & Boyle, J.R. ( 1999). Note-taking strategies for students with disabilities . Clearing House, 72, 392-395.
23.
Wood, C.L. ( 2005). Effects of random study checks and guided notes study cards on middle school special education students’ notetaking accuracy and science vocabulary quiz scores. Retrieved from OhioLINK Electronic Thesis and Dissertations Center.
