Educational professionals have the challenging responsibility of serving a highly diverse population of students. Laws such as the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), also known as the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB, 2001), the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA, 2004), the Vocational Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and the Americans with Disabilities Amendment Act (ADAA, 2008), underscore the obligation to account for the needs of both children and adults with disabilities. As leaders face competing needs and demands, they confront ethical dilemmas that require a sophisticated framework to help resolve such issues. Relying on narrative analysis, this article explores the authors’ experience using an ethical framework to teach a course on disability law to graduate level education students. The reflective process that led to the integration of an ethical framework into the curriculum and instruction of a law-related course is discussed, as is the actual implementation of the model and its effect on students as evidenced through coursework, class discussions, course evaluations and personal communication. Further, the article documents the impact of utilizing an ethical framework in the evolution of the course over time providing practical information on course structure and delivery. The article concludes with implications for leadership preparation particularly with respect to education and understanding of students with disabilities. Recommendations are made for additional research and inquiry regarding the infusion of ethical frameworks into the overall curriculum and coursework within leadership preparation programs.
ArtilesA. J., Harris-MumN., & RostenbergD. (2006). Inclusion as social justice: Critical notes on discourses, assumptions, and the road ahead.Theory into Practice,45(3), 260–268.
4.
AstinH. S., & LelandC. (1991). Women of influence, women of vision: A cross-generational study of leaders and social change.San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
5.
BaglieriS., BejoianL. M., BroderickA. A., ConnorD. J., & ValleJ. (2011). [Re] claiming inclusive education toward cohesion in educational reform; Disability studies unravels the myth of the normal child.Teachers College Record,13(10), 2122–2154.
BlackmoreJ. (1989). Educational leadership: A feminist critique and reconstruction. In SmythJ. (Ed.), Critical perspectives on educationalleadership (pp. 93–129). London: Falmer.
12.
BonS. C. (2012). Examining the crossroads of law, ethics and educational leadership.Journal of School Leadership,22, 285–308.
13.
BonS. C., & BigbeeA. J. (2011). Special education leadership: Integrating professional and personal codes of ethics to serve the best interests of the child.Journal of School Leadership,21(3), 324–359.
14.
BowenC., BessetteH., & ChanT. C. (2006). Including ethics in the study of educational leadership.Journal of College and Character,7(7), 1–8.
15.
BoyleJ. R., & WeishaarM. (2001). Special education law with cases.Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
16.
BrooksJ. S., & MilesM. T. (2008). From scientific management to social justice … and back again? Pedagogical shifts in the study and practice of educational leadership. In NormoreA.H. (Ed.), Leadership for social justice: Promoting equity and excellence through inquiry and reflective practice (pp. 99–114). Charlotte, NC: IAP.
17.
BurelloL. C., SailorW., & Kleinhammer-TramillJ. (2013). Unifying educational systems: Leadership and policy perspectives.New York, NY: Routledge.
18.
CalabreseR. L., & RobertsB. (2002). Characters, school leadership, and the brain: Learning how to integrate knowledge with behavioral change.The International Journal of Educational Management,16(5), 229–238.
19.
CampbellE. (1999). Ethical school leadership: Problems of an elusive role. In BegleyP. (Ed.), Values and educational leadership (pp. 151–163). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
20.
ChinJ. (2003). Reconceptualizing administrative preparation of principals: Epistemological issues and perspectives. In HallingerP. (Ed.), Reshaping the landscape of school leadership development: A global perspective, pp. 53–68. Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
21.
ChristensenC. C., & DornS. (1997). Competing notions of social justice and contradictions in special education reform.The Journal of Special Education,31(2), 181–198.
22.
ClandininD. J., & RosickJ. (2007). Mapping a landscape of narrative inquiry: Borderland spaces and tensions. In ClandininD. J. (Ed.), Handbook of narrative inquiry: Mapping a methodology (pp. 35–75). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
ConnellyF. M., & ClandininD. J. (1990). Stories of experience and narrative inquiry.Educational Researcher,19(5), 2–14.
25.
ConnellyF. M., & ClandininD. J. (2000). Narrative inquiry.San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
26.
ConnorD. J., & FerriB. A. (2007). The conflict within; Resistance to inclusion and other paradoxes in special education.Disability and Society,22(1), 63–77.
EwingN. J. (2001). Teacher education: Ethics, power, and privilege.Teacher Education and Special Education,24(1), 13–24.
32.
FiedlerC. R., & van HarenB. (2009). A comparison of special education administrators’ and teachers’ knowledge and application of ethics and professional standards.The Journal of Special Education,43(3), 160–173. doi: 10.1077/0022466908319395.
33.
FinnC. E., RotherhamA. J., & HokansonC. R. (Eds). (2001). Rethinking special education for a new century.Washington, DC: Thomas B. Fordham Foundation and the Progressive Policy Institute.
34.
FosterW. (1986). Paradigms and promises.Buffalo, NY: Prometheus.
35.
FosterW. (1989). Toward a critical practice of leadership. In SmythJ. (Ed.), Critical perspectives on education leadership (pp. 39–62). New York, NY: Falmer.
36.
FratturaE. M., & CapperC. A. (2007). Leading for social justice: Transforming schools for all learners.Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
37.
FrickW. C., FairclothS. C., & LittleK. S. (2013). Responding to the collective and individual “best interest of the students”: Revisiting the tension between administrative practice and ethical imperatives in special education leadership.Educational Administration Quarterly, doi: 10.1177/001316X124632230.
38.
FurmanG. C. (2003, Fall). Moral leadership and the ethic of community.Values and Ethics in Educational Administration,2(1), 1–8. Retrieved from http://rockethics.psu.edu.
39.
FurmanG. (2012). Social justice leadership as praxis: Developing capacities through preparation programs.Educational Administration Quarterly,48(2), 191–229. doi: 10.1177/0013161X11427394.
40.
GilliganC. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
41.
GilliganC. (1988). Remapping the moral domain: New images of self in relationship. In GilliganC., WardJ.V., & TaylorJ.M. (Eds.), Mapping the moral domain: A contribution of women's thinking to psychological theory and education (pp. 3–19). Cambridge, MA: Center for the Study of Gender, Education, and Human Development.
42.
GilliganC., & AttanucciJ. (1988). Two moral orientations. In GilliganC., WardJ.V., & TaylorJ.M. (Eds.), Mapping the moral domain: A contribution of women's thinking to psychological theory and education (pp. 73–86). Cambridge, MA: Center for the Study of Gender, Education, and Human Development.
43.
GlazerJ. S. (1991). Feminism and professionalism in teaching and educational administration.Educational Administration Quarterly,27, 321–342.
HelgesenS. (1990). The female advantage: Women's ways of leadership.New York, NY: Doubleday.
47.
HoweK. R., & MiramontesO. B. (1992). The ethics of special education.New York and London: Teachers College Press.
48.
Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) of 2004, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq.
49.
ItkonenA. (2009). Stories of hope and decline: Interest group effectiveness in national special education policy.Educational Policy,23(1), 43–65.
50.
JanesickV. J. (2004). “Stretching” exercises for qualitative researchers (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
51.
Jean-MarieG., & NormoreA. H. (2008). A repository of hope for social justice: Black women leaders at historically black colleges and universities. In NormoreA. H. (Ed.), Leadership for social justice: Promoting equity and excellence through inquiry and reflective practice (pp. 3–35), Charlotte, NC: IAP.
52.
JoleyL., McIntyreS., StaszenskiD., & YoungB. (1992). Leading from the heart: Toward a feminist reconstruction of educational leadership. In MiklosE., & RatsoyE. (Eds.), Educational Leadership: Challenge and change (pp. 235–257). Edmonton, Canada: University of Alberta Printing Services.
53.
KauffmanJ. M. (1992). Foreward. In HoweK. R., & MiramontesO. B., The ethics of special education (pp. xi–xvii). New York: Teachers College Press.
54.
Kleinhammer-TramillJ., BurrelloL. C., & SailorW. (2013). Special education: A critical perspective on reframing public policy for students with disabilities. In BurrelloL.C., SailorW., & Kleinhammer-TramillJ., Unifying educational systems: Leadership and policy perspectives (pp. 8–17). New York, NY: Routledge.
55.
LaNearJ., & FratturaE. (2007). Getting the stories straight: Allowing different voices to tell an ‘effective history’ of special education law in the United States.Education and the Law,19(2), 87–109.
56.
LangerE. J., & Moldoveanu. (2000). Mindfulness research and the future.Journal of Social Issues,56(1), 129–139.
57.
LashleyC. (2007). Principal leadership for special education: An ethical framework.Exceptionality,15(3), 177–187.
58.
LyonsN. P. (1988). Two perspectives: On self, relationships, and morality. In GilliganC., WardJ. V., & TaylorJ. M. (Eds.), Mapping the moral domain: A contribution of women's thinking to psychological theory and education (pp. 21–48). Cambridge, MA: Center for the Study of Gender, Education, and Human Development.
59.
McCarthyM. M. (2002). Educational leadership programs: A glance at the past with an eye toward the future.Leadership and Policy in Schools,1(3), 201–221.
60.
McKenzieK. B., SkrlaL., & ScheurichJ. J. (2006). Preparing instructional leaders for social justice.Journal of School Leadership,16(2), 158–170.
61.
McNiffJ. (2007). My story is my living educational theory. In ClandininD. J. (Ed.), Handbook of narrative inquiry: Mapping a methodology (pp. 308–329). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
62.
MerriamS. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation.San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
63.
MezirowJ. (1997). Transformative learning: Theory to practice.New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education,74, 5–12.
64.
MezirowJ. (2003). Transformative learning as discourse.Journal of Transformative Education,1(1), 58–63.
65.
MurdickN. L., GartinB. L., & FowlerG. A. (2014). Special education law (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
66.
National Council of Professors of Educational Administration. (2007). Ethical administrators: Tools for the trade. Retrieved from the Connexions website http://cnx.org/content/m14495/1.1.
No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001, 20 U.S.C. §16301 et seq (2002).
69.
NoddingsN. (1993). Caring: A feminine approach to ethics and moral education.Berkeley: University of California Press.
70.
NussbaumM. C. (2006). Frontiers of justice: Disability, nationality, species membership.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
71.
OstermanK. F., & HafnerM. M. (2009). Curriculum in leadership preparation; Understanding where we have been in order to know where we might go. In YoungM. D., CrowG. M., MurphyJ., & OgawaR. T. (Eds.), Handbook of research on the education of school leaders (pp. 269–317). New York, NY: Routledge.
72.
PattonM. Q. (1990). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
73.
PattonM. Q. (2003). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
74.
PazeyB. L. (1994). Introducing the ethic of care into special education administration.CEC Today,1, 19.
75.
PazeyB. L. (1995). An essential link for the administration of special education: The ethic of care.Journal for a Just and Caring Education,1, 296–310.
76.
PazeyB. L., & ColeH. (2013). The role of special education training in the development of socially just leaders: Building an equity consciousness in educational leadership programs.Educational Administration Quarterly,49(2), 243–271. doi: 10.1177/0013161X12463934.
77.
PazeyB. L., ColeH., & GarciaS. B. (2012). A framework for an inclusive model of social justice leadership preparation: Equity-oriented leadership for students with disabilities. In BoskeC., & DiemS. (Eds.) Global leadership for social justice: Taking it from the field to practice, (pp. 193–216). Cambridge, MA: Emerald.
78.
PolatF. (2011). Inclusion in education: A step towards social justice.International Journal of Educational Development,31, 50–58.
79.
ReillyE. C. (2006, Fall). The future entering: Reflections on and challenges to ethical leadership.Educational Leadership and Administration,18, 163–169.
80.
RiessmanC. K. (1993). Qualitative research methods series: Narrative analysis.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
81.
RucinskiD. A., & BauchP. A. (2006). Reflective, ethical, and moral constructs in educational leadership preparation.Journal of Educational Administration,44(5), 487–508. doi: 10.1108/09578230610683778.
82.
SeltzerM. (2011). The “roundabout” of special education leadership.International Journal of Humanities and Social Science,1(15), 120–139.
83.
ShakeshaftC. (1987). Women in educational administration.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
84.
ShapiroJ. P., & StefkovichJ. A. (2005). Ethical leadership and decision making in education: Applying theoretical perspectives to complex dilemmas (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
85.
SkrticT. M. (2012). Disability, difference, and justice: Strong democratic leadership for undemocratic times. In CrockettJ., BillingsleyB., BoscardinM. L., (Eds.), Handbook of leadership in special education (pp. 129–150). London: Routledge.
86.
StakeR. (1995). The art of case study research.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
87.
StarrattR. J. (1991). Building an ethical school: A theory for practice in educational leadership.Educational Administration Quarterly, 27, 185–202.
88.
StarrattR. J. (2004). Ethical Leadership.San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
89.
StefkovichJ. A. (2006). Best interests of the student: Applying ethical constructs to legal cases in education.Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
90.
StrikeK. A. (1998). The ethics of school administration (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
91.
StrikeK. A. (2007). Ethical leadership in schools: Creating community in an environment of accountability.Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
92.
StrikeK. A., & SoltisJ. F. (1998). The ethics of teaching (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
93.
StrikeK. A., & TernaskyP. L. (Eds.) (1993). Ethics for professionals in education: Perspectives for preparation and practice.New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
94.
TurnbullH. R., StoweM. J., & HuertaN. E. (2007). Free appropriate public education: The law and children with disabilities (7th ed.). Denver, CO: Love Publishing.
95.
Vocational Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Section 504 Regulations, 34 C.F.R. § 104.1 et seq.
96.
VoltzD. L., & CollinsL. (2010). Preparing special education administrators for inclusion in diverse, standards-based contexts: Beyond the Council for Exceptional Children and the Interstate School Leaders Licensure Consortium.Teacher Education and Special Education,33(1), 70–82.
97.
WarnickB. R., & SilvermanS. K. (2011). A framework for professional ethics courses in teacher education.Journal of Teacher Education,62(3), 273–285. doi: 10.1177/0022487110398002.
98.
WeishaarM. K. (2007). Case studies in special education law: No child left behind and individuals with disabilities.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
99.
WeishaarM. K., BorsaJ. C., & WeishaarJ. C. (2007). Inclusive educational administration: A case-study approach (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
100.
YinR. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
101.
YoungM. D., CrowG. M., OrrT., OgawaR., & CreightonT. (2005). An educative look to educating school leaders.UCEA Review,47(2), 1–5.
102.
ZaretskyL. (2004). Responding ethically to complex school-based issued in special education.International Studies in Educational Administration,32(2), 63–77.
