This article addresses a gap in methodological writing, concerning typical practice in designing qualitative inquiry, especially in research on educational leadership. The article focuses on how qualitative research designs are actually developed and explores implications for scholars’ work, especially for new scholars and for methods teachers. Working from methodological literature across multiple traditions, combined with the author’s experience designing qualitative studies and guiding emerging scholars and practitioner-scholars, the article describes alternative ways to develop viable designs, noting essential considerations and trade-offs along the way. While noting differences by tradition, the article emphasizes common patterns and implications shared by multiple traditions.
AndersonG. L. (1989). Critical ethnography in education: Origins, current status, new directions. Review of Educational Research, 59, 249-270.
2.
AndersonT.ShattuckJ. (2012). Design-based research: A decade of progress in education research?Educational Researcher, 41, 16-25.
3.
AtkinsonP.DelamontS.HammersleyM. (1988). Qualitative research traditions: A British response to Jacob. Review of Educational Research, 58, 231-250.
4.
BogdanR. C.BiklenS. K. (2006). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
5.
BrooksJ.NormoreA. H. (2015). Qualitative research and educational leadership: Essential dynamics to consider when designing and conducting studies. International Journal of Educational Management, 29, 798-806.
6.
BrymanA. (2004). Qualitative research on leadership: A critical but appreciative review. The Leadership Quarterly, 15, 729-769.
7.
BuchmannM.FlodenR. (1989). Research traditions, diversity, and progress. Review of Educational Research, 59, 241-248.
8.
CarneyT. F. (1990). Collaborative inquiry methodiology. Windsor, Ontario, Canada: University of Windsor, Division for Instructional Development.
9.
CarspeckenP. F. (1996). Critical ethnography in educational research: A theoretical and practical guide. New York, NY: Routledge.
CharmazK. (2007). Grounded theory as an emergent method. In Hesse-BiberS. N.LeavyP. (Eds.), Handbook of emergent methods (pp. 155-176). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
12.
ClandininD. J. (Ed.). (2007). Handbook of narrative inquiry: Mapping a methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13.
ClandininD. J. (2013). Engaging in narrative inquiry. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
14.
ClandininD. J.ConnellyF. M. (1988). Studying teachers’ knowledge of classrooms: Collaborative research, ethics, and the negotiation of narrative. Journal of Educational Thought, 22(2A), 269-282.
15.
CoplandM. A. (2003). Leadership of inquiry: Building and sustaining a capacity for school improvement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25, 375-396.
16.
CreswellJ. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17.
DiAngeloR. J. (2006). The production of Whiteness in education: Asian international students in a college classroom. Teachers College Record, 108, 1983-2000.
18.
FinkS.MarkholtA. (2011). Leading for instructional improvement: How successful leaders develop teaching and learning expertise. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
19.
FormanS. (2015). Interests and conflicts: Exploring the context for early implementation of a dual language policy in one middle school. Language Policy. Published online 04September, 2015. doi:10.1007/s10993-015-9377-8
20.
GlaserB.StraussA. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
HammersleyM.AtkinsonP. (2007). Ethnography: Principles in practice (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
23.
HonigM. I. (2012). District central office leadership as teaching: How central office administrators support principals’ development as instructional leaders. Educational Administration Quarterly, 48, 733-774.
24.
JacobE. (1987). Qualitative research traditions: A review. Review of Educational Research, 51, 1-50.
25.
JacobE. (1988). Clarifying qualitative research: A focus on traditions. Educational Researcher, 17, 16-24.
26.
JacobE. (1989). Qualitative research: A defense of traditions. Review of Educational Research, 59, 229-235.
27.
JamesE. A.MilenkiewiczM. T.BucknamA. (2008). Participatory action research for educational leadership: Using data-driven decision making to improve schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28.
JarvisP. (1999). The practitioner-researcher: Developing theory from practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
29.
KahlkeR. M. (2014). Generic qualitative approaches: Pitfalls and benefits of methodological mixology. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 13, 37-52.
30.
KnappM. S., Associates. (1995). Teaching for meaning in high-poverty classrooms. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
31.
KnappM. S.FeldmanS. B. (2012). Managing the intersection of internal and external accountability: Challenge for urban school leadership in the United States. Journal of Educational Administration, 50, 666-694.
32.
KnappM. S.FeldmanS. B.YehT. H. (2013). Learning-focused leadership in urban high schools: Response to demanding environments. Journal of School Leadership, 23, 253-286.
33.
KnappM. S.HonigM. I.PleckiM. L.PortinB. S.CoplandM. A. (2014). Learning-focused leadership in action: Improving instruction in schools and districts. New York, NY: Routledge.
34.
LancyD. F. (1993). Qualitative research in education: An introduction to the major traditions. White Plains, NY: Longmans.
35.
LuceroA. (2011). Dora’s program: The role of a constructively marginalized paraprofessional and her developmental biliteracy program. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 41, 126-143.
MerriamS. B.TisdellE. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
40.
MichelsonJ. L. (2013). Learning to navigate problems of coaching practice: A study of instructional coach development (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). College of Education, University of Washington, Seattle.
41.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
42.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M.SaldañaJ. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
43.
MosborgS. (2002). Speaking of history: How adolescents use their knowledge of history in reading the daily news. Cognition and Instruction, 20, 323-358.
44.
NeumerskiC. M. (2013). Rethinking instructional leadership, a review: What do we know about principal, teacher, and coach instructional leadership, and where should we go from here?Educational Administration Quarterly, 49, 310-347.
45.
PhillipsR. S. (2013). Toward authentic student-oriented practices: Voices of alternative school students. Education and Urban Society, 45, 668-699.
46.
RogoffB. (1995). Observing sociocultural activity on three planes: Participatory appropriation, guided participation, and apprenticeship. In WertschJ. V.del RioP.AlaverezA. (Eds.), Sociocultural studies of mind (pp. 139-164), Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
47.
RoweK. (2015). Potential influences of action research on teacher leaders (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). College of Education, University of Washington, Seattle.
48.
SamuelsonC. (2013). The community-based organization as cultural broker: Building bridges between recent immigrant families and schools in low-income communities (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). College of Education, University of Washington, Seattle.
49.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). London, England: Sage.
50.
StringerE. (2014). Action research (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
51.
StroupeD. (2014). Beginning science teachers’ use of tools to learn ambitious science instruction. LEARNing Landscapes, 8, 269-285.
52.
SwinnertonJ. A. (2007). Brokers and boundary crossers in an urban school district: Understanding central office coaches as instructional leaders. Journal of School Leadership, 17, 195-221.
53.
Van ManenM. (1990). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. New York: State University of New York Press.
54.
WeinerS. (1994). Four first graders’ descriptions of how they spell. The Elementary School Journal, 94, 315-330.
55.
WolcottH. (2005). The art of fieldwork (2nd ed.). Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.
56.
WolcottH. (2009). Writing up qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
57.
YehT. L. (2010). Service-learning and persistence of low-income, first-generation college students: An exploratory study. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 16(2), 50-65.
58.
YinR. K. (2014). Case study research: Design & methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
59.
YoonI. (2007). Teachers using texts to talk about race, equity, and diversity in their classroom practice—A proposal sketch. Unpublished manuscript, College of Education, University of Washington, Seattle.
60.
YoonI. (2012). The paradoxical nature of Whiteness-at-work in the daily life of schools and teacher communities. Race Ethnicity and Education, 15(5), 587-613.
