Teaching organizational theory in a way that bridges to leadership practice is vital to preparing deft educational leaders who understand the organizational behavior of schools and districts. Organizational theory guides understanding of the complexities of schools and districts and can be a basis for collaborative and effective decision making. This article suggests specific theory that could be taught, strategies for teaching it that are illuminated by examples of student work, and benefits that are likely to accrue.
AllisonG. T. (1971). Essence of decision: Explaining the Cuban missile crisis. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
2.
ArgyrisC.SchonD. A. (1974). Theory in practice: Increasing professional effectiveness. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
3.
BarteeR. D. (2012). Recontextualizing the knowledge and skill involved with redesigned principal preparation: Implications of cultural and social capital in teaching, learning, and leading for administrators. Planning and Changing, 43, 322-343.
4.
BauerS. C.BrazerS. D. (2012). Using research to lead school improvement: Turning evidence into action. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
5.
BolmanL. G.DealT. E. (1993). Everyday epistemology in school leadership: Patterns and prospects. In HallingerP.LeithwoodK.MurphyJ. (Eds.), Cognitive perspectives on educational leadership (pp. 21-33). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
6.
BolmanL. G.DealT. E. (2008). Reframing organizations: Artistry, choice and leadership (4th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
7.
BolmanL. G.DealT. E. (2010). Reframing the path to school leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
8.
BrazerS. D.BauerS. C. (2013). Preparing instructional leaders: A model. Educational Administration Quarterly, 49, 645-684.
9.
BridgesE. (1992). Problem based learning for administrators. Eugene, OR: ERIC Clearinghouse on Educational Management.
10.
Browne-FerrignoT. (2003). Becoming a principal: Role conception, initial socialization, role-identity transformation, purposeful engagement. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39, 468-503.
11.
BrykA.SebringP. B.AllensworthE.LuppescuS.EastonJ. Q. (2009). Organizing schools for improvement. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
12.
BurnsJ. M. (1978). Leadership. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
13.
BushT. (2011). Theories of educational leadership and management (4th ed.). London, England: SAGE.
14.
CityE.ElmoreR.FiarmanS.TeitelL (2009). Instructional rounds in education: A network approach to improving teaching and learning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
15.
CollinsonV.CookT. F. (2007). Organizational learning: Improving learning, teaching and leading in school systems. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
16.
ConleyS.EnomotoE. (2005). Routines in school organizations: Creating stability and change. Journal of Educational Administration, 43, 9-21.
17.
ConleyS.EnomotoE. K. (2009, November). Ain’t no “Mickey Mouse” course: Challenges of teaching organizational theory. Conversation/dialogue session presented at the University Council of Educational Administration, Anaheim, CA.
CubanL. (1988). The managerial imperative and the practice of leadership in schools. Albany: State University of New York Press.
20.
DavisM. S. (1971). That’s interesting! Toward a phenomenology of sociology and a sociology of phenomenology. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 1, 309-344.
21.
DeweyJ. (1933). How we think. New York, NY: Prometheus Books.
22.
DeweyJ. (1938). Experience and education. New York, NY: Collier.
23.
DiMaggioP. J.PowellW. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited. American Sociological Review, 48, 147-160.
24.
EllstromP. (2004). The meaning and role of reflection in informal learning at work. In BoudD.CresseyP.DochertyP. (Eds.), Productive reflection at work: Learning for changing organizations (pp. 43-53). London, England: Routledge.
25.
ErautM. (1994). Developing professional knowledge and competence. New York, NY: Routledge Falmer.
26.
FeldmanM. S. (2000). Organizational routines as a source of continuous change. Organization Science, 11, 611-629.
27.
FeldmanM. S.PentlandB. T. (2003). Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 94-118.
28.
FullanM. (2001). Leading in a culture of change. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
GrissomJ.LoebS. (2011). Triangulating principal effectiveness: How perspectives of parents, teachers, and assistant principals identify the central importance of managerial skills. American Educational Research Journal, 20(10), 1-33.
31.
HardingS. G. (1991). Whose knowledge? Whose power?Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
32.
HessF. M.KellyA. P. (2007). Learning to lead: What gets taught in principal preparation programs. Teachers College Record, 109, 244-274.
33.
JohnsonB. L. (2004). Where have all the flowers gone? Reconnecting leadership preparation with the field of organizational theory. UCEA Review, 16(3), 19-21.
34.
JohnsonB. L.FauskeJ. R. (2000). Principals and the political economy of environmental enactment. Educational Administration Quarterly, 36, 159- 185.
35.
JohnsonB. L.KruseS. D. (2009). Decision making for educational leaders. New York: State University of New York Press.
36.
KruseS. D.LouisK. S. (2007). Building professional learning community top-down: A case-based reflection. In StollL.LouisK. S. (Eds.), Professional learning communities: Divergence, detail and difficulties (pp. 106-118). London, England: Swets and Zeitlinger Publishers.
37.
LeithwoodK.JantziD. (2008). Linking leadership to student learning: The contributions of leadership efficacy. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44, 496-528.
38.
LeithwoodK.LouisK. S.AndersonS.WahlstromK. (2004). How leadership influences student learning. New York, NY: Wallace Foundation.
39.
LeungD. Y. P.KemberD. (2003). The relationship between approaches to learning and reflection upon practice. Educational Psychology, 23, 61-71.
40.
LevaR. (2001). Really good ideas: Developing evidence-informed policy and practice in educational leadership and management. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 29, 5-25.
41.
LevittB.MarchJ. G. (1988). Organizational learning. Annual Review of Sociology, 14, 319-340.
42.
LewinK. (1947). Frontiers in group dynamics, Part 1: Concept, method, and reality in social sciences: Social equilibria and social change. Human Relations, 1, 5-41.
43.
MarchJ. G. (1994). A primer on decision making. New York, NY: The Free Press.
44.
MarksH. M.PrintyS. M. (2003). Principal leadership and school performance: An integration of transformational and instructional leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39, 370-397.
45.
MartinJ. (1990). Deconstructing organizational taboos: The suppression of gender conflict in organizations. Organization Science, 1, 339-359.
MeyerJ. W.RowanB. (1983). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. In MeyerJ. W.ScottW. R. (Eds.), Organizational environments: Ritual and rationality (pp. 21-44). Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
48.
MorganG. (2006). Images of organization. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
49.
MurphyJ. (2013). The architecture of school improvement. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
50.
NoddingsN. (1984). Caring: A feminine approach to ethics and moral education. Berekeley, CA: University of California Press.
51.
PfefferJ. (1982). Organizations and organizational theory. Marshfield, MA: Pitman.
52.
PfefferJ.SalancikG. (1977). Organizational design: The case for a coalitional model of organizations. Organizational Dynamics, 6, 15-29.
53.
RobinsonV.LloydC.RoweK. (2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44, 635-674.
54.
SchlechtyP. (2001). Shaking up the schoolhouse. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
55.
SchonD.A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
56.
ScottW. R. (2004). Reflections on a half-century of organizational sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 1-21.
57.
SmylieM. (2010). Continuous school improvement. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
58.
SpillaneJ. P. (2012). Data in practice: Conceptualizing the data-based decision making phenomena. American Journal of Education, 118, 113-141.
59.
TyackD.CubanL. (1995). Tinkering toward utopia: A century of public school reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
60.
VogusT.SutcliffeK. (2012). Organizational mindfulness and mindful organization: A reconciliation and path forward. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11, 722-735.
61.
WeickK. E. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely-coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 1-19.
62.
WeickK. E. (1995a). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
63.
WeickK. E. (1995b). What theory is not, theorizing is. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 385-390.
64.
WeickK. E. (2001a). Leadership as the legitimation of doubt. In BennisW.SpreitzerG.CummingsT. (Eds.), The future of leadership (pp. 91-102). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
65.
WeickK. E. (2001b). Making sense of the organization. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers.
66.
WeickK. E.PutnamT. (2006). Organizing for mindfulness. Journal of Management Inquiry, 15, 275-287.
67.
WeickK. E.SutcliffeK. (2001). Managing the unexpected: Assuring high performance in an age of complexity. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
68.
WeisbordM. (2004). Productive workplaces revisited: Dignity, meaning, and community in the 21st century. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
69.
WelchD. A. (1992). The organizational process and bureaucratic politics paradigm: Retrospect and prospect. International Security, 17, 112-146.
70.
WengerE. (2000). Communities of practice and social learning systems. Organization, 7, 225-246.
71.
WengerE.SnyderW. (2000). Communities of practice: The organizational frontier. Harvard Business Review, 78, 139-146.
