This article introduces a variation on the egg-drop exercise to generate active understanding of strategic choice by firms. Teams are challenged to design, build, and price devices for protecting an egg from a 20-foot drop. The materials are purchased in a bidding process that builds in asymmetries in resources, costs, and finished designs. Teams price their products to reflect their knowledge of the marketplace and what they believe is required to win the contest if their design successfully passes the drop test. This leads students to develop their own intuitive insights about strategic choice and resource markets.
Barney, J. B. (1986). Strategic factor markets: Expectations, luck, and business strategy. Management Science, 32(10), 1231-1241.
2.
Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-121.
3.
Benek-Rivera, J., & Mathews, V. E. (2004). Active learning with Jeopardy: Students ask the questions. Journal of Management Education, 28(1), 104-118.
4.
Brozik, D., & Zapalska, A. (2000). The restaurant game. Simulation& Gaming, 31(3), 407-416.
5.
CUES. (2004). The CUES management course 2004. Cambridge University Engineering Society. Retrieved January 21, 2004, from http://cues.firstentsol.com/default.xgi?param=261
6.
Hoffman, C. (2000). Profile: Emphasis on fairness leads to egg-cellence. University of Cincinnati. Retrieved January 21, 2004, from http://www.uc.edu/profiles/mastersn.htm
7.
Holt, C. A. (1999). Teaching economics with classroom experiments: A symposium. Southern Economic Journal, 65(3), 603-610.
8.
Jackson, A., Starrs, L., & Hossack, W. (1999). The egg race: Episode II—the fall of the egg. University of Edinburgh. Retrieved January 21, 2004, from http://www.ph.ed.ac.uk/skr/firbush/1999/fegg.rules.html
9.
McKendall, M. (2000). Teaching groups to become teams. Journal of Education for Business, 75(5), 277-282.
10.
Nakamine, M. (2003). LFM ’05 class experiences orientation week and the universe within. MIT Engineering Systems Division. Retrieved January 21, 2004, from http://esd.mit.edu/HeadLine/lfm05class.html
11.
Peteraf, M. A. (1993). The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 14, 179-191.
12.
Porter, M. E. (1979). How competitive forces shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 57(2), 137-154.
13.
Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. New York: Free Press.
14.
Roedel, R. (2002). Bungee omelet. Arizona State University. Retrieved January 21, 2004, from http://clte.asu.edu/active/lesscontbungee.htm
15.
Salemi, M. K. (2002). An illustrated case for active learning. Southern Economic Journal, 68(3), 721-732.
16.
Vik, G. N. (2001). Doing more to teach teamwork than telling students to sink or swim. Business Communication Quarterly, 64(4), 112-119.
