Abstract
Background:
Hybrid single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/computed tomography (CT) is used for the differential diagnosis of thyrotoxicosis, but its dependence on CT and complex analysis remains debated. This study evaluated whether CT-free thyroid SPECT using artificial intelligence (AI) could substitute for conventional SPECT/CT.
Methods:
This prospective multicenter noninferiority clinical trial (KCT0008387) included 152 patients with thyrotoxicosis from three tertiary referral hospitals. A pretrained AI model generated technetium thyroid uptake (TcTU) values using SPECT images without CT. These values were compared with TcTU derived from conventional SPECT/CT. The primary endpoint was diagnostic accuracy for Graves’ disease. Noninferiority was defined as a lower confidence interval (CI) limit greater than −10%. Secondary endpoints included diagnostic accuracy for destructive thyroiditis and prediction of antithyroid drug (ATD) prescription within one month.
Results:
Among 152 patients, 84 had Graves’ disease, 45 had indeterminate disease, and 23 had thyroiditis. For Graves’ disease, CT-free SPECT demonstrated 86.2% accuracy compared with 85.5% for conventional SPECT/CT. The lower bound of the CI of the accuracy difference was −3.0%, meeting the prespecified noninferiority margin. For thyroiditis and ATD prescription, the lower bounds were −7.4% and −3.2%, respectively. Omission of CT resulted in a 33.5% reduction of radiation exposure from 3.34 mSv to 2.22 mSv, and CT-free SPECT automatically generated TcTU values more quickly than SPECT/CT (40 minutes vs. 4 minutes).
Conclusions:
CT-free SPECT using AI demonstrated noninferior diagnostic performance for thyrotoxicosis compared with conventional hybrid imaging while reducing radiation exposure and analysis time.
Trial Registration:
https://cris.nih.go.kr (KCT0008387).
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
