Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Environmental discussions have increased on social media, along with the rising interest in sustainability. This study introduces a modified procedure for a deliberate metaphor analysis of environmental metaphors in two U.S. energy companies’ Twitter (now X) accounts. Its findings suggest that the two U.S. companies used HUMAN, WEALTH, COLOR, JOURNEY, WAR, SPORTS, STEWARDSHIP, EVIL CREATURE, FOOD, and CRIME metaphors to fulfill publicizing, commercial, persuasive, evocative, and interactive functions, as well as to communicate their inherent environmental identities as protectors, stewards, competitors, and collaborators. These findings provide insights into corporate environmental communication and offer new perspectives on the communicative functions of deliberate metaphors.

Keywords

deliberate metaphor analysis U.S. energy companies social media environmental identities communicative functions

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ahrens

Jiang

(2020). Source domain verification using corpus-based tools. Metaphor and Symbol, 35(1), 43–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2020.1712783

Albert

Whetten

D. A.

Staw

Cummings

(1985). Organizational identity. In Research in organizational behavior (pp. 263–295). JAO Press.

Ansah

G. N.

(2014). Culture in embodied cognition: Metaphorical/metonymic conceptualizations of FEAR in Akan and English. Metaphor and Symbol, 29(1), 44–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2014.859483

Atanasova

Koteyko

(2017). Metaphors in guardian online and mail online opinion-page content on climate change: War, religion, and politics. Environmental Communication, 11(4), 452–469. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2015.1024705

Augé

(2019). How metaphor scenarios can reveal socio-cultural and linguistic variations of meaning: A cross-linguistic perspective on the “NURTURING PARENT” and the “STRICT FATHER” frames. Metaphor and Symbol, 34(4), 209–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2019.1683949

Augé

(2023a). COVID-19 as a framing device for environmental protest: The ECOSYSTEM HEALTH metaphor. Environmental Communication, 17(3), 230–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2021.1890174

Augé

(2023b). Metaphor and argumentation in climate crisis discourse. Routledge.

Baş

(2020). A comparative critical metaphor analysis on the concept of democracy in Turkish and American English. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 18(2), 535–566. https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00073.bas

Bednarek

Caple

(2010). Playing with environmental stories in the news—good or bad practice? Discourse & Communication, 4(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481309351206

10.

Bednarek

Ross

A. S.

Boichak

Doran

Y. J.

Carr

Altmann

E. G.

Alexander

T. J.

(2022). Winning the discursive struggle? The impact of a significant environmental crisis event on dominant climate discourses on Twitter. Discourse, Context & Media, 45, 100564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2021.100564

11.

Beger

(2011). Deliberate metaphors? An exploration of the choice and functions of metaphors in US-American college lectures. Metaphorikde, 20, 39–60.

12.

Beger

(2019). The role of (deliberate) metaphor in communicating knowledge in academic discourse: An analysis of college lectures from different disciplines. Peter Lang.

13.

Bernard

(2015). A critical analysis of corporate reports that articulate corporate social responsibility. Stellenbosch University.

14.

Blombäck

Brunninge

(2009). Corporate identity manifested through historical references. Corporate Communications, 14(4), 404–419. https://doi.org/10.1108/13563280910998754

15.

Bowen

Aragon-Correa

J. A.

(2014). Greenwashing in corporate environmentalism research and practice: The importance of what we say and do. Organization & Environment, 27(2), 107–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026614537078

16.

Boykoff

McNatt

Goodman

(2015). Communicating in the anthropocene: The cultural politics of climate change news coverage around the world. In Hansen

Cox

(Eds.), The Routledge handbook of environment and communication (pp. 221–232). Routledge.

17.

Bravo

Matute

Pina

J. M.

(2012). Corporate social responsibility as a vehicle to reveal the corporate identity: A study focused on the websites of Spanish financial entities. Journal of Business Ethics, 107(2), 129–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1027-2

18.

Cagle

L. E.

Tillery

(2018). Tweeting the Anthropocene #400 ppm as networked event. In Yu

Northcut

K. M.

(Eds.), Scientific communication: Practices, theories, and pedagogies (pp. 131–148). Routledge.

19.

Cahan

S. F.

Chen

Nguyen

N. H.

(2015). Corporate social responsibility and media coverage. Journal of Banking and Finance, 59, 409–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2015.07.004

20.

Charteris-Black

(2011). Politicians and rhetoric: The persuasive power of metaphor. Palgrave Macmillan.

21.

Charteris-Black

(2014). Analysing political speeches: Rhetoric, discourse and metaphor. Palgrave Macmillan.

22.

Chen

Bartlett

Peng

(2021). Drilling for fissures and exploiting common ground in the discourse of oil production. Pragmatics and Society, 12(2), 167–188. https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.20033.che

23.

Cho

Furey

L. D.

Mohr

(2017). Communicating corporate social responsibility on social media: Strategies, stakeholders, and public engagement on corporate Facebook. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 80(1), 52–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329490616663708

24.

Cho

Schweickart

Haase

(2014). Public engagement with nonprofit organizations on Facebook. Public Relations Review, 40(3), 565–567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2014.01.008

25.

Chrun

Dolšak

Prakash

(2016). Corporate environmentalism: Motivations and mechanisms. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 41(1), 341–362. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090105

26.

Coffey

(2016). Unpacking the politics of natural capital and economic metaphors in environmental policy discourse. Environmental Politics, 25(2), 203–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2015.1090370

27.

Dancygier

(2023). Multimodal media: Framing climate change. Discourse Studies, 25(2), 220–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614456231154724

28.

De Cock

Pizarro Pedraza

(2018). From expressing solidarity to mocking on Twitter: Pragmatic functions of hashtags starting with #jesuis across languages. Language in Society, 47(2), 197–217. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404518000052

29.

De Jong

M. D. T.

Harkink

K. M.

Barth

(2018). Making green stuff? Effects of corporate greenwashing on consumers. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 32(1), 77–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651917729863

30.

Di Biase-Dyson

Egg

(2020). Drawing attention to metaphor. Benjamins.

31.

Drury

Fuller

Keijzer

(2022). Biodiversity communication at the UN Summit 2020: Blending business and nature. Discourse & Communication, 16(1), 37–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/17504813211043720

32.

Evangelisti

Garzone

(2010). Discourse, identities and genres in corporate communication. Peter Lang.

33.

Feng

(2017). Discursive constructions of corporate identities by Chinese banks on Sina Weibo. Springer.

34.

Fielding

(2006). Effective communication in organisations. Juta.

35.

Fill

A. F.

Penz

(2017). The Routledge handbook of ecolinguistics. Routledge.

36.

Flusberg

S. J.

Matlock

Thibodeau

P. H.

(2017). Metaphors for the war (or race) against climate change. Environmental Communication, 11(6), 769–783. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2017.1289111

37.

Flusberg

S. J.

Matlock

Thibodeau

P. H.

(2018). War metaphors in public discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 33(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2018.1407992

38.

Flusberg

S. J.

Thibodeau

P. H.

(2023). Why is Mother Earth on life support? Metaphors in environmental discourse. Topics in Cognitive Science, 15(3), 522–545. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12651

39.

Fuoli

(2018). Building a trustworthy corporate identity: A corpus-based analysis of stance in annual and corporate social responsibility reports. Applied Linguistics, 39(6), 846–885. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amw058

40.

Gibbs

R. W.

(2015). Does deliberate metaphor theory have a future? Journal of Pragmatics, 90, 73–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.03.016

41.

Gibbs

R. W.

(2019). Metaphor as dynamical–ecological performance. Metaphor and Symbol, 34(1), 33–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2019.1591713

42.

Gilmore

(2012). Monsters: Evil beings, mythical beasts, and all manner of imaginary terrors. University of Pennsylvania Press.

43.

Herndl

C. G.

Brown

S. C.

(1996). Green culture: Environmental rhetoric in contemporary America. The University of Wisconsin Press.

44.

Heyvaert

Randour

Dodeigne

Perrez

Reuchamps

(2020). Metaphors in political communication: A case study of the use of deliberate metaphors in non-institutional political interviews. Journal of Language and Politics, 19(2), 201–225. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.17057.hey

45.

Huang-Horowitz

N. C.

Freberg

(2016). Bridging organizational identity and reputation messages online: A conceptual model. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 21(2), 195–212. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-06-2014-0034

46.

Inyang

I. H.

Daniels

L. J.

(2009). Environmental monitoring. ELOSS Publications.

47.

Jahdi

K. S.

Acikdilli

(2009). Marketing communications and corporate social responsibility (CSR): Marriage of convenience or shotgun wedding? Journal of Business Ethics, 88(1), 103–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0113-1

48.

Jaworska

Nanda

(2018). Doing well by talking good: A topic modelling-assisted discourse study of corporate social responsibility. Applied Linguistics, 39(3), 373–399. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amw014

49.

Kassinis

Panayiotou

(2017). Visuality as greenwashing. Organization & Environment, 31(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026616687014

50.

Kinneavy

J. L.

Eskin

C. R.

(2000). Kairos in Aristotle’s rhetoric. Written Communication, 17(3), 432–444. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088300017003005

51.

Kövecses

(2005). Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation. Cambridge University Press.

52.

Kövecses

(2010). Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford University Press.

53.

Kövecses

(2015). Where metaphors come from. Reconsidering context in metaphor. Oxford University Press.

54.

Krennmayr

(2011). Metaphor in newspapers (Vol. 276). LOT Dissertation Series.

55.

Lakoff

(2010). Why it matters how we frame the environment. Environmental Communication, 4(1), 70–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524030903529749

56.

Lakoff

Johnson

(1980). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.

57.

Leonardi

P. M.

Huysman

Steinfield

(2013). Enterprise social media: Definition, history, and prospects for the study of social technologies in organizations. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12029

58.

D. D.

(2018). Facework by global brands across Twitter and Weibo. Discourse, Context & Media, 26, 32–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2018.03.006

59.

Lin

Huang

Yao

(2021). Air pollution and environmental information disclosure: An empirical study based on heavy polluting industries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 278, 124313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124313

60.

Littlemore

(2019). Metaphors in the mind. Cambridge University Press.

61.

Liu

(2015). Discursive construction of corporate identity on the Web: A glocalization perspective. Intercultural Communication Studies, 24(1), 50–65.

62.

Lyon

T. P.

Maxwell

J. W.

(2011). Greenwash: Corporate environmental disclosure under threat of audit. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 20(1), 3–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9134.2010.00282.x

63.

Mahi

Ismail

Phoong

S. W.

Isa

C. R.

(2021). Mapping trends and knowledge structure of energy efficiency research: What we know and where we are going. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(27), 35327–35345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14367-7

64.

Mar García-de los Salmones

Herrero

Martínez

(2021). Determinants of electronic word-of-mouth on social networking sites about negative news on CSR. Journal of Business Ethics, 171(3), 583–597. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04466-9

65.

Marquis

Toffel

M. W.

Zhou

(2016). Scrutiny, norms, and selective disclosure: A global study of greenwashing. Organization Science, 27(2), 483–504. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2015.1039

66.

Mason

R. D.

(2012). Communicating a green corporate perspective: Ideological persuasion in the corporate environmental report. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 26(4), 479–506. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651912448872

67.

Mathison

M. A.

Stillman-Webb

Bell

S. A.

(2014). Framing sustainability: Business students writing about the environment. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 28(1), 58–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651913502488

68.

Melewar

T. C.

Karaosmanoglu

Paterson

(2005). Corporate identity: Concept, components and contribution. Journal of General Management, 31(1), 59–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/030630700503100104

69.

Milne

M. J.

Kearins

Walton

(2006). Creating adventures in wonderland: The journey metaphor and environmental sustainability. Organization, 13(6), 801–839. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508406068506

70.

Missemer

(2018). Natural capital as an economic concept, history and contemporary issues. Ecological Economics, 143, 90–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.07.011

71.

Morgan

(2008). Competition, cooperation, and interconnection: Metaphor families and social systems. In Kristiansen

Dirven

(Eds.), Cognitive sociolinguistics: Language variation, cultural models, social systems (pp. 483–516). Mouton de Gruyter.

72.

Moser

D. V.

Martin

P. R.

(2012). A broader perspective on corporate social responsibility research in accounting. The Accounting Review, 87(3), 797–806. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-10257

73.

Musolff

(2016). Cross-cultural variation in deliberate metaphor interpretation. Metaphor and the Social World, 6(2), 205–224. https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.6.2.02mus

74.

C. J. W.

Koller

(2013). Deliberate conventional metaphor in images: The case of corporate branding discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 28(3), 131–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2013.797807

75.

Nicolau

J. L.

Mellinas

J. P.

Martín-Fuentes

(2020). The halo effect: A longitudinal approach. Annals of Tourism Research, 83, 102938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2020.102938

76.

Page

(2012). The linguistics of self-branding and micro-celebrity in Twitter: The role of hashtags. Discourse & Communication, 6(2), 181–201. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481312437441

77.

Pendse

M. K.

Nerlekar

V. S.

Darda

(2023). A comprehensive look at Greenwashing from 1996 to 2021: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Indian Business Research, 15(1), 157–186. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIBR-04-2022-0115

78.

Pérez-Sobrino

(2013). Metaphor use in advertising : Analysis of the interaction between multimodal metaphor and metonymy in a greenwashing advertisement. In Ervas

Gola

(Eds.), Metaphor in focus: Philosophical perspectives on metaphor use (pp. 67–82). Cambridge Scholars.

79.

Philip

(2006). Connotative meaning in English and Italian colour-word metaphors. Metaphorikde, 10, 59–93.

80.

Ponton

D. M.

(2022). Narratives of industrial damage and natural recovery: An ecolinguistic perspective. Text & Talk, 42(4), 475–497. https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2020-0079

81.

Prabhakaran

Rei

Shutova

(2021). How metaphors impact political discourse: A large-scale topic-agnostic study using neural metaphor detection. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 15(1), 503–512. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v15i1.18079

82.

Princen

(2010). Speaking of sustainability: The potential of metaphor. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 6(2), 60–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2010.11908050

83.

Reijnierse

W. G.

Burgers

Krennmayr

Steen

G. J.

(2018). DMIP: A method for identifying potentially deliberate metaphor in language use. Corpus Pragmatics, 2(2), 129–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41701-017-0026-7

84.

Renzi

B. G.

Cotton

Napolitano

Barkemeyer

(2017). Rebirth, devastation and sickness: Analyzing the role of metaphor in media discourses of nuclear power. Environmental Communication, 11(5), 624–640. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2016.1157506

85.

Ritchie

L. D.

Schell

(2009). “The ivory tower” on an “unstable foundation”: Playful language, humor, and metaphor in the negotiation of scientists’ identities. Metaphor and Symbol, 24(2), 90–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926480902830847

86.

Rundell

(2002). Macmillan English dictionary for advanced learners of American English. Macmillan Education.

87.

Sandel

T. L.

Wang

(2022). Selling intimacy online: The multi-modal discursive techniques of China’s wanghong. Discourse, Context and Media, 47, 100606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2022.100606

88.

Seele

Schultz

M. D.

(2022). From greenwashing to machinewashing: A model and future directions derived from reasoning by analogy. Journal of Business Ethics, 178(4), 1063–1089. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05054-9

89.

Semino

(2008). Metaphor in discourse. Cambridge University Press.

90.

Semino

Deignan

Littlemore

(2013). Metaphor, genre, and recontextualization. Metaphor and Symbol, 28(1), 41–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2013.742842

91.

Shaw

Campbell

Radler

B. T.

(2021). Testing emphasis message frames and metaphors on social media to engage boaters to learn about preventing the spread of zebra mussels. Environmental Management, 68(6), 824–834. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-021-01506-6

92.

Shi

Wan

(2022). A cross-cultural genre analysis of firm-generated advertisements on Twitter and Sina Weibo. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 36(1), 71–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/10506519211044186

93.

Smith

B. G.

Gallicano

T. D.

(2015). Terms of engagement: Analyzing public engagement with organizations through social media. Computers in Human Behavior, 53, 82–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.05.060

94.

Steen

G. J.

(2008). The paradox of metaphor: Why we need a three-dimensional model of metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 23(4), 213–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926480802426753

95.

Steen

G. J.

(2011). From three dimensions to five steps: The value of deliberate metaphor. Metaphorik. de, 21(21), 83–110. https://research.vu.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/3059819/279659.pdf.

96.

Steen

G. J.

(2015). Developing, testing and interpreting deliberate metaphor theory. Journal of Pragmatics, 90, 67–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.03.013

97.

Steen

G. J.

(2017). Deliberate metaphor theory: Basic assumptions, main tenets, urgent issues. Intercultural Pragmatics, 14(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2017-0001

98.

Steen

G. J.

(2023). Slowing metaphor down elaborating deliberate metaphor theory. Benjamins.

99.

Steen

G. J.

Dorst

A. G.

Herrmann

J. B.

Kaal

A. A.

Krennmayr

Pasma

(2010). A method for linguistic metaphor identification: From MIP to MIPVU. Benjamins.

100.

Stibbe

(2015). Ecolinguistics: Language, ecology and the stories we live by. Routledge.

101.

Sun

Gou

Wang

(2022). To orient and to engage: Metaphorical hashtags in Weibo posts of Chinese banks. Journal of Pragmatics, 194, 87–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2022.04.011

102.

Sun

Jiang

(2014). Metaphor use in Chinese and US corporate mission statements: A cognitive sociolinguistic analysis. English for Specific Purposes, 33(1), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2013.07.005

103.

Sun

Wang

Ren

(2021). To entertain or to serve: Chinese and US Banks’ online identity based on a genre analysis of social media. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 64(2), 121–136. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2021.3064395

104.

Ültay

(2022). Primary pre-service teachers’ metaphorical perceptions of the concept of environmental pollution. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 21(2), 275–287. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/22.21.275

105.

Van Riel

C. B. M.

(1995). Principles of corporate communication. Prentice Hall.

106.

H. T.

Blomberg

Seo

Liu

Shayesteh

H. V.

(2021). Social media and environmental activism: Framing climate change on Facebook by global NGOs. Science Communication, 43(1), 91–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547020971644

107.

(2020). Corporate environmentalism: A critical metaphor analysis of Chinese, American, and Italian corporate social responsibility reports. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 63(3), 244–258. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2020.3012728

108.

Zappavigna

(2015). Searchable talk: The linguistic functions of hashtags. Social Semiotics, 25(3), 274–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2014.996948

109.

Zappavigna

(2022). Social media quotation practices and ambient affiliation: Weaponising ironic quotation for humorous ridicule in political discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 191, 98–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.12.003

110.

Zhang

Lin

Jin

(2022). What else besides war: Deliberate metaphors framing COVID-19 in Chinese online newspaper editorials. Metaphor and Symbol, 37(2), 114–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2021.1948333

111.

Zhang

Yang

(2023). Can environmental disclosure improve price efficiency? The perspective of price delay. Finance Research Letters, 52, 103556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.103556

A Tale of Identities: Environmental Identities Based on a Deliberate Metaphor Analysis of U.S. Energy Companies’ Social Media

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References