The diversity and inclusion (D&I) report is an important element in the corporate public reporting genre; however, as an emerging genre, it receives little attention from scholars interested in public discourse, so there are few guidelines on what should be included in a D&I report. This study helps to fill this gap in the research by examining 10 D&I reports from information technology and banking industries, exploring the reports’ rhetorical purpose and identifying their typified rhetorical moves. The author concludes by recommending what aspects of the current genre's substance and form should be improved to help meet the needs of stakeholders.
BazermanC. (2004). Speech acts, genres, and activity systems: How texts organize activity and people. In BazermanC.PriorP. (Eds.), What writing does and how it does it: An introduction to analyzing texts and textual practices (pp. 309–339). Erlbaum.
5.
BhatiaA. (2012). The corporate social responsibility report: The hybridization of a “confused” genre (2007–2011). IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 55(3), 221–238. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2012.2205732
6.
BhatiaV. K. (1993). Analysing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. Longman.
7.
BiberD.ConnorU.UptonT. A . (2007). Discourse on the move: Using corpus analysis to describe discourse structure. John Benjamins.
ConnorU.UptonT. A.KanoksilapathamB. (2007). Introduction to move analysis. In BiberD.ConnorU.UptonT. A. (Eds.), Discourse on the move: Using corpus analysis to describe discourse structure (pp. 23–41). John Benjamins.
DanielsC. (2001, July 9). Too diverse for our own good. Fortune, 144(1), 116.
14.
Das NevesJ. C.VaccaroA. (2013). Corporate transparency: A perspective from Thomas Aquinas’ summa theologiae. Journal of Business Ethics, 113(4), 639–648. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1682-6
15.
DeFronzoJ.GillJ. (2019). Social problems and social movements. Rowman & Littlefield.
DuS.YuK. (2021). Do corporate social responsibility reports convey value relevant information? Evidence from report readability and tone. Journal of Business Ethics, 172(2), 253–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04496-3
21.
Dudley-EvansA. (1986). Genre analysis: An investigation of the introduction and discussion sections of MSc dissertations. In CoulthardM. (Ed.), Talking about text (Discourse analysis monograph No. 13, pp. 128–145). English Language Research. University of Birmingham.
22.
Echeverri-CarrollE.OdenM. D.GibsonD. V.JohnstonE. A. (2018). Unintended consequences on gender diversity of high-tech growth and labor market polarization. Research Policy, 47(1), 209–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.10.013
HoardS. (2022). Set to fail? Scattered regulation leaves the glass ceiling “unbroken” in the USA. In EngeliI.MazurA. G. (Eds.), Gender equality and policy implementation in the corporate world: Making democracy work in business (pp. 111–135). Oxford University Press.
JohnstonW. B.PackerA. (1987). Workforce 2000: Work and workers for the 21st century. Hudson Institute.
36.
JonesT. M.HarrisonJ. S.FelpsW. (2018). How applying instrumental stakeholder theory can provide sustainable competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 43(3), 371–391. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2016.0111
37.
JonsenK.PointS.KelanE. K.GriebleA. (2019). Diversity and inclusion branding: A five-country comparison of corporate websites. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 32(3), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2018.1496125
KincaidC.SmithN. M. (2021). Diversity and inclusion in mining: An analysis of indicators used in sustainability reporting. The Extractive Industries and Society, 8, 100981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2021.100981
40.
KoskelaM. (2018). Disclosing principles of IR Communication: Rhetorical moves for constructing transparency. International Journal of Business Communication, 55(2), 164–193. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488417735645
McGrathJ. E.BerdahlJ. L.ArrowH. (1995). Traits, expectations, culture and clout: The dynamics of diversity in work groups. In JacksonS. E.RudermanM. N. (Eds.), Diversity in work teams (pp. 17–45). American Psychological Association.
MillerC. R. (2015). Genre change and evolution. In ArtemevaN.FreedmanA. (Eds.), Genre studies around the globe: Beyond the three traditions (pp. 154–185). Inkshed.
51.
MillerF. A. (1998). Strategic culture change: The door to achieving high performance and inclusion. Public Personnel Management, 27(2), 151–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/009102609802700203
52.
Mor BarakM. E.CherinD. (1998). A tool to expand organizational understanding of workforce diversity. Administration in Social Work, 22(1), 47–64. https://doi.org/10.1300/J147v22n01_04
53.
MorsingM.SchultzM. (2006). Corporate social responsibility communication: Stakeholder information, response and involvement strategies. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15(4), 323–338. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8608.2006.00460.x
54.
ParodiG. (2010). The rhetorical organization of the textbook genre across disciplines: A “colony-in-loops”?Discourse Studies, 12(2), 195–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445609356500
55.
PortocarreroS.CarterJ. (2022). Diversity initiatives in the US workplace: A brief history, their intended and unintended consequences. Sociology Compass, 16(7), e13001. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.13001
56.
RobersonQ. M. (2006). Disentangling the meanings of diversity and inclusion in organizations. Group & Organization Management, 31(2), 212–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601104273064
ShoreL. M.RandelA. E.ChungB. G.DeanM. A.Holcombe EhrhartK.SinghG. (2011). Inclusion and diversity in work groups: A review and model for future research. Journal of Management, 37(4), 1262–1289. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310385943
SwalesJ. (1981). Aspects of article introductions. Aston University.
63.
ThomasR. H.BendickM. (2013). Professionalizing diversity and inclusion practice: Should voluntary standards be the chicken or the egg?Industrial & Organizational Psychology, 6(3), 193–205. https://doi.org/10.1111/iops.12033
TschoppD. J. (2005). Corporate social responsibility: A comparison between the United States and the European Union. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 12(1), 55–59. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.69
66.
UptonT. A.CohenM. A. (2009). An approach to corpus-based discourse analysis: The move analysis as example. Discourse Studies, 11(5), 585–605. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445609341006
67.
U.S. Department of Commerce (2000). Best practices in achieving workforce diversity: U.S. Department of Commerce and Vice President Al Gore's national partnership for reinventing government. https://govinfo.library.unt.edu/npr/initiati/benchmk/workforce-diversity.pdf
WhiteR.HansonD. (2000). Rationality and rhetoric in the corporate world: The corporate annual report as an Aristotelian genre. Prometheus, 18(3), 303–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/713692069
73.
YuD.BondiM. (2017). The generic structure of CSR reports in Italian, Chinese, and English: A corpus-based analysis. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 60(3), 273–291. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2017.2702040
74.
YuD.BondiM. (2019). A genre-based analysis of forward-looking statements in corporate social responsibility reports. Written Communication, 36(3), 379–409. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088319841612
75.
ZachryM. (2000). Communicative practices in the workplace: A historical examination of genre development. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 30(1), 57–79. https://doi.org/10.2190/UMGD-LGR6-QJUE-CJHY
