Regular selves constructed through genres: A socio-cognitive approach to the study of positioning acts in Italian rectors’ inaugural speeches

Abstract

This study aims to provide a socio-cognitive approach to understand how the identity associated with a social category is constructed through regular positioning acts in conventionalized genres. Using genre-based positioning analysis, we analyzed a corpus of 30 Italian rectors’ inaugural speeches and identified six rhetorical moves regularly used in the genre, which revealed three underlying positionings – representative of the university, value disseminator, and advocate – associated with the social role of university rectors in the Italian higher education context. Drawing on the Entrenchment and Conventionalization Model (hereafter ECModel), we analyzed how these positionings are conventionalized through shared conformity profiles of the genre in the onomasiological, semasiological, syntagmatic, and contextual dimensions. This study implies that genres can be important mediums through which the cognitive entrenchment and social conventionalization of positionings contribute to constructing our regular selves to be performed in the social domain.

Keywords

Entrenchment conventionalization genre analysis positioning theory rhetorical move analysis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Barlow

Kemmer

(eds.) (2000) Usage-based Models of Language. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.

Berger

(1966) Identity as a problem in the sociology of knowledge. European Journal of Sociology/Archives Européennes de Sociologie 7(1): 105–115.

Bhatia

(1993) Analysing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. London: Longman.

Boffo

Dubois

Moscati

(2008) Changes in university governance in France and in Italy. Tertiary Education and Management 14(1): 13–26.

Bybee

(2006) From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language 82(4): 711–733.

Bybee

Hopper

(2001) Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Capone

Mey

(2016) Interdisciplinary studies in pragmatics, culture and society. Switzzerland: Springer.

Clark

(1999) On the origins of conversation. Verbum 21(2): 147–161.

Croft

(2009) Towards a social cognitive linguistics. In: Vyvyan

Pourcel

(eds) New Directions in Cognitive Linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp.395–420.

10.

Davies

Harré

(1990) Positioning: The discursive production of selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 20: 43–63.

11.

Dobbins

Knill

(2017) Higher education governance in France, Germany, and Italy: Change and variation in the impact of transnational soft governance. Policy and Society 36(1): 67–88.

12.

Durkheim

(1912) The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life. Glence, IL: Free Press.

13.

Harder

(2010) Meaning in Mind and Society. A Functional Contribution to the Social Turn in Cognitive Linguistics. Berlin and New York: Mouton De Gruyter.

14.

Harré

Dedaic

(2012) Positioning theory, narratology, and pronoun analysis as discursive therapies. In: Lock

Strong

(eds) Discursive Perspectives in Therapeutic Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.45–64.

15.

Harré

Van Langenhove

(1991) Varieties of positioning. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 21(4): 393–407.

16.

Harré

Van Langenhove

(1999) The dynamics of social episodes. In: Harré

Van Langenhove

(eds) Positioning Theory: Moral Contexts of Intentional Action. Massachusetts, MA: Blackwell Publishing, pp.1–13.

17.

Hopper

(1987) Emergent grammar. Berkeley Linguistic Society 13: 139–157,

18.

Krippendorff

(2004) Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi, India: Sage.

19.

Kroo

(2022) Negotiating identities: First person pronominal use between Japanese University students. Pragmatics and Society 13 (1): 22–44.

20.

Langacker

(2000) A dynamic usage-based model. In: Barlow

Kemmer

(eds) Usage-based Models of Language. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, pp.1–63.

21.

Manuti

Cortini

Mininni

(2006) Rhetorical argumentation in Italian academic discourse. Argumentation 20(1): 101–124.

22.

Nodoushan

MAS

Khakbaz

(2011) Theses ‘discussion’ sections: A structural move analysis. International Journal of English Studies 5(3): 111–132.

23.

Schmid

H-J

(2016) Why cognitive linguistics must embrace the pragmatic and social dimensions of language. Cognitive Linguistics 27(4): 543–557.

24.

Schmid

H-J

(2020) The Dynamics of the Linguistic System: Usage, Conventionalization and Entrenchment. Oxford: OUP.

25.

Searle

(2010) Making the Social World: The Structure of Human Civilization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

26.

Swales

(1981) Aspects of Article Introductions. Birmingham: The University of Aston, Language Studies Unit.

27.

Swales

(1990) Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

28.

Swales

(2004) Research Genres: Explorations and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

29.

Tajfel

(1974) Social identity and intergroup behaviour. Social Science Information 13(2): 65–93.

30.

Tantucci

(2021) Language and Social Minds: The Semantics and Pragmatics of Intersubjectivity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

31.

Turner

(1982) Towards a cognitive redefinition of the social group. In Tajfel

(ed.) Social Identity and Intergroup Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.15–41.

32.

Van De Mieroop

(2023) Identity gatekeeping in new work order organizations: Quality care discussions during performance appraisal interviews. Pragmatics and Society 14(4): 519–545.

33.

Van Langenhove

Harré

(1999) Introducing positioning theory. In: Harré

Van Langenhove

(eds) Positioning Theory: Moral Contexts of Intentional Action. Massachusetts, MA: Blackwell Publishing, pp.14–31.

34.

Vergaro

(2018) A cognitive framework for understanding genre. The entrenchment-and-conventionalization model. Pragmatics & Cognition 25 (3): 430–458.

35.

Vergaro

(2022) Syntagmatic conformity: Blessings and curses in Winthrop’s Christian Charitie 31(3): 365–382.

36.

(2022) Cross-cultural Genre Analysis: Investigating Chinese, Italian and English CSR reports. London and New York: Routledge.

37.

(2023) A cross-cultural genre analysis of leadership statements in Italian and American university sustainability reports. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 66(1): 26–47.

38.

(2024). Genre as an act of positioning. Written Communication 41(3).

39.

Bondi

(2017) The generic structure of CSR reports in Italian, Chinese, and English: A Corpus-Based Analysis. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 60(3): 273–291.