Tuning to Place: Using Photos to Better Understand Problems in Technical Communication Classes

Abstract

This article highlights the role of place in understanding problems, specifically within community-engaged projects in upper-level technical and professional communication courses. Drawing on a year-long participant-generated imagery study with students, instructors, and community partners, the authors argue that photographic research is effective in helping participants and researchers tune to place. Taking photos offers opportunities for documentation, individual interpretation, and collaborative reflection, resulting in a deeper, more nuanced sense of place. Ultimately, this article demonstrates how a greater awareness of place, cultivated through reflecting on visual evidence, enhances engagement projects and helps technical communicators address complex problems.

Keywords

photography place problem solving service learning pedagogy

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Agboka

G. Y.

(2013). Participatory localization: A social justice approach to navigating unenfranchised/disenfranchised cultural sites. Technical Communication Quarterly, 22(1), 28–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2013.730966

Aguilar

G. L.

(2020). Migrants as place-makers: The role of technical communicators in (re)locating place. In Proceedings of the 38th ACM International Conference on Design of Communication (pp. 1–7). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3380851.3416758

Balomenou

Garrod

(2019). Photographs in tourism research: Prejudice, power, performance and participant-generated images. Tourism Management, 70, 201–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2018.08.014

Batova

(2021). “Picturing” xenophobia: Visual framing of masks during COVID-19 and its implications for advocacy in technical communication. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 35(1), 50–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651920958501

Bourdieu

(1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Harvard University Press.

Bourelle

(2012). Bridging the gap between the technical communication classroom and the internship: Teaching social consciousness and real-world writing. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 42(2), 183–197. https://doi.org/10.2190/TW.42.2.f

Cannuscio

C. C.

Weiss

E. E.

Fruchtman

Schroeder

Weiner

Asch

D. A.

(2009). Visual epidemiology: Photographs as tools for probing street-level etiologies. Social Science & Medicine, 69(4), 553–564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.06.013

Coyne

(2010). The tuning of place. MIT Press.

Cushman

(2014). Our unstable artistry: Donald Schön’s counterprofessional practice of problem setting. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 28(3), 327–351. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651914524778

10.

De Certeau

(1984). The practice of everyday life. University of California Press.

11.

Desnoyers

(2011). Toward a taxonomy of visuals in science communication. Technical Communication, 58(2), 119–134.

12.

Edwards

D. W.

(2020). Digital rhetoric on a damaged planet: Storying digital damage as inventive response to the Anthropocene. Rhetoric Review, 39(1), 59–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/07350198.2019.1690372

13.

Eichberger

(2019). Maps, silence, and standing rock: Seeking a visuality for the age of environmental crisis. Communication Design Quarterly, 7(1), 9–21. https://doi.org/10.1145/3331558.3331560

14.

Fagerjord

(2017). Toward a rhetoric of the place: Creating locative experiences. In Potts

Salvo

M. J.

(Eds.), Rhetoric and experience architecture (pp. 225–240). Parlor Press.

15.

Farman

(2012). Mobile interface theory: Embodied space and locative media. London: Routledge.

16.

Fuller

Kamans

van Vuuren

Wolfensberger

de Jong

M. D.

(2021). Conceptualizing empathy competence: A professional communication perspective. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 35(3), 333–368. https://doi.org/10.1177/10506519211001125

17.

Garza

(2012). Why are you making me do this? An examination of student attitudes toward writing with the community service-learning projects. Studies in Writing, 26, 73–82. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004248472_006

18.

Greene

Burke

K. J.

McKenna

M. K.

(2018). A review of research connecting digital storytelling, photovoice, and civic engagement. Review of Educational Research, 88(6), 844–878. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318794134

19.

Haas

A. M.

(2012). Race, rhetoric, and technology: A case study of decolonial technical communication theory, methodology, and pedagogy. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 26(3), 277–310. https://doi.org/10.1177/105065191243953

20.

Harper

(2002). Talking about pictures: A case for photo-elicitation. Visual Studies, 17(1), 13–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/14725860220137345

21.

Harrison

(2004). Snap happy: Toward a sociology of “everyday” photography. Studies in Qualitative Methodology, 7, 23–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1042-3192(04)07003-X

22.

Herndl

C. G.

Hopton

Cutlip

Polush

E. Y.

Cruse

Shelley

(2018). What’s a farm? The languages of space and place. In Rai

Druschke

C. G.

(Eds.), Field rhetoric: Ethnography, ecology, and engagement in the places of persuasion (pp. 61–94). University of Alabama Press.

23.

Hurley

E. V.

(2018). Spatial orientations: Cultivating critical spatial perspectives in technical communication pedagogy. In Haas

A. M.

Eble

M. F.

(Eds.), Key theoretical frameworks: Teaching technical communication in the twenty-first century (pp. 93–113). Utah State University Press.

24.

Ingersoll

K. A.

(2016). Waves of knowing: A seascape epistemology. Duke University Press.

25.

Ingold

(2007). Lines: A brief history. Routledge.

26.

Johnson-Eilola

Selber

S. A.

(Eds.). (2012). Solving problems in technical communication. University of Chicago Press.

27.

Kimme Hea

A. C.

(2005). Developing stakeholder relationships: What’s at stake? Reflections: A Journal of Writing, Service-Learning, and Community Literacy, 4(2), 54–76.

28.

Kimme Hea

A. C.

Wendler Shah

R. W.

(2016). Silent partners: Developing a critical understanding of community partners in technical communication service-learning pedagogies. Technical Communication Quarterly, 25(1), 48–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2016.1113727

29.

Kimmerer

(2013). Braiding sweetgrass: Indigenous wisdom, scientific knowledge and the teachings of plants. Milkweed.

30.

Legg

Strantz

(2021). “I’m surprised this hasn’t happened before”: An indigenous examination of UXD failure during the Hawai’i missile false alarm. In Walton

Agboka

G. Y.

(Eds.), Equipping technical communicators for social justice work: Theories, methodologies, and pedagogies (pp. 49–74). Utah State University Press.

31.

Leon

Sura

(2013). “We don't need any more brochures”: Rethinking deliverables in service-learning curricula. WPA: Writing Program Administration-Journal of the Council of Writing Program Administrators, 36(2), 59–74.

32.

Mara

(2017). Ethnography as a research aggregator. In Potts

Salvo

M. J.

(Eds.), Rhetoric and experience architecture (pp. 184–196). Parlor Press.

33.

Moore

(2017). Experience architecture in public planning: A material, activist practice. In Potts

Salvo

M. J.

(Eds.), Rhetoric and experience architecture (pp. 143–165). Parlor Press.

34.

Nielsen

(2016). Facilitating service learning in the online technical communication classroom. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 46(2), 236–256. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047281616633600

35.

Overmyer

Carlson

E. B.

(2019). Literature review: Design thinking and place. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 33(4), 431–436. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651919854079

36.

Pope-Ruark

(2014). A case for metic intelligence in technical and professional communication programs. Technical Communication Quarterly, 23(4), 323–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2014.942469

37.

Potts

Salvo

M. J.

(2017). Introduction. In Potts

Salvo

M. J.

(Eds.), Rhetoric and experience architecture (pp. 3–16). Parlor Press.

38.

Rai

Druschke

C. G.

(2018). On being there: An introduction to studying rhetoric in the field. In Rai

Druschke

C. G.

(Eds.), Field rhetoric: Ethnography, ecology, and engagement in the places of persuasion (pp. 1–21). University of Alabama Press.

39.

Rajan

(2021). Making-do on the margins: Organizing resource seeking and rhetorical agency in communities during grassroots entrepreneurship. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 35(2), 254–292. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651920979999

40.

Rehling

(2000). Doing good while doing well: Service learning internships. Business Communication Quarterly, 63(1), 77–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/108056990006300109

41.

Rickert

(2013). Ambient rhetoric: The attunements of rhetorical being. University of Pittsburgh Press.

42.

Rose

(2016). Design as advocacy: Using a human-centered approach to investigate the needs of vulnerable populations. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 46(4), 427–445. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047281616653494

43.

Ross

Oppegaard

Willerton

(2019). Principles of place: Developing a place-based ethic for discussing, debating, and anticipating technical communication concerns. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 62(1), 4–26. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8528511 . https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2018.2867179

44.

Rude

C. D.

(2009). Mapping the research questions in technical communication. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 23(2), 174–215. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/1050651908329562

45.

Sackey

D. J.

(2019). An environmental justice paradigm for technical communication. In Haas

A. M.

Eble

M. F.

(Eds.), Key theoretical frameworks: Teaching technical communication in the twenty-first century (pp. 138–162). Utah State University Press.

46.

Samuels

(2004). Breaking the ethnographer’s frames: Reflections on the use of photo elicitation in understanding Sri Lankan monastic culture. American Behavioral Scientist, 47(12), 1528–1550. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764204266238

47.

Santiago-Ortiz

(2019). From critical to decolonizing service-learning: Limits and possibilities of social justice–based approaches to community service-learning. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 25(1), 43–54.

48.

Schön

D. A.

(1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.

49.

Soja

E. W.

(1989). Postmodern geographies: The reassertion of space in critical social theory. Verso.

50.

Spinuzzi

(2003). Tracing genres through organizations: A sociocultural approach to information design (Vol. 1). MIT Press.

51.

Star

S. L.

Strauss

(1999). Layers of silence, arenas of voice: The ecology of visible and invisible work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 8(1-2), 9–30. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008651105359

52.

Sullivan

(2017). Participating with pictures: Promises and challenges of using images as a technique in technical communication research. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 47(1), 86–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047281616641930

53.

Swacha

K. Y.

(2021). Living visual-voice as a community-based social justice research method in technical and professional communication. Technical Communication Quarterly, 30(4), 375–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2021.1906451

54.

Tham

J. C. K.

(2021). Design thinking in technical communication: Solving problems through making and collaboration. Routledge.

55.

Tillery

(2003). Radioactive waste and technical doubts: Genre and environmental opposition to nuclear waste sites. Technical Communication Quarterly, 12(4), 405–421. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15427625tcq1204_4

56.

Tuck

McKenzie

(2015). Place in research: Theory, methodology, and methods. Routledge.

57.

Turnley

(2007). Integrating critical approaches to technology and service-learning projects. Technical Communication Quarterly, 16(1), 103–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572250709336579

58.

Walsh

(2010). Constructive interference: Wikis and service learning in the technical communication classroom. Technical Communication Quarterly, 19(2), 184–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572250903559381

59.

Walton

Moore

Jones

N. N.

(2019). Technical communication after the social justice turn: Building coalitions for action. Routledge.

60.

Wang

Burris

M. A.

(1997). Photovoice: Concept, methodology, and use for participatory needs assessment. Health Education & Behavior, 24(3), 369–387. https://doi.org/10.1177/109019819702400309

61.

Wickman

(2014). Wicked problems in technical communication. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 44(1), 23–42. https://doi.org/10.2190/TW.44.1.c

62.

Wolfe

(2015). Teaching students to focus on the data in data visualization. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 29(3), 344–359. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651915573944