As infographics are implicated in racist policies like redlining, we need to decolonize the genre. But previous studies have found that infographics’ panopticism—their at-a-glance reduction of complex issues—makes them tend to support hegemonic power structures in spite of their designers’ intentions. A way out of this dilemma can be located in the first attempt to decolonize the infographic: W.E.B. Du Bois's series depicting Black life in the United States, created for the 1900 Paris Exposition. This topological analysis of Du Bois's decolonial project reveals both problematic and promising avenues for our own attempts to decolonize the infographic.
AbdelmessihM. T. (2017). Atlantic decolonial critical approach to representations of Cairo's Cityscape. Atlantic Studies, 14(1), 51–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/14788810.2016.1219089.
2.
AgbokaG. Y. (2014). Decolonial methodologies: Social justice perspectives in intercultural technical communication research. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 44(3), 297–327. http://dx.doi.org/10.2190/TW.44.3.e.
3.
AkermanJ. R. (2009). The imperial map: Cartography and the mastery of empire. University of Chicago Press.
4.
AlbersM. J. (2014, October 13–15). Infographics: Horrid Chartjunk or quality communication. Paper presented at the 2014 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference (IPCC), Pittsburgh, PA.
BanksA. J. (2006). Race, rhetoric, and technology: Searching for higher ground. Routledge.
8.
BartonB. F.BartonM. S. (1993). Modes of power in technical and professional visuals. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 7(1), 138–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651993007001007.
9.
Battle-BaptisteW.RusertB. (2018). W.E.B. Du Bois's Data Portraits: Visualizing Black America. Chronicle Books.
10.
BeattieJ. (2012). Imperial landscapes of health: Place, plants and people between India and Australia, 1800s–1900s. Health and History, 14(1), 100–120. https://doi.org/10.5401/healthhist.14.1.0100.
11.
BrasseurL. (2005). Florence Nightingale's visual rhetoric in the rose diagrams. Technical Communication Quarterly, 14(2), 161–182. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15427625tcq1402_3.
12.
BrundageW. F. (2003). Meta Warrick's 1907 “Negro tableaux” and (re) presenting African American historical memory. Journal of American History, 89(4), 1368–1400. https://doi.org/10.2307/3092547.
13.
ByrdJ. A. (2011). The transit of empire: Indigenous critiques of colonialism. University of Minnesota Press.
14.
CallowayT. J. (1900, November 3). The American Negro Exhibit at the Paris exposition. The Colored American, 1–9.
15.
CeccarelliL. (2013). On the frontier of science: An American rhetoric of exploration and exploitation. Michigan State University Press.
Clary-LemonJ. (2009). The racialization of composition studies: Scholarly rhetoric of race since 1990. College Composition and Communication, 61(2), W1–W17.
18.
De CerteauM. (1984). The practice of everyday life (Steven Rendall, trans.). University of California Press.
19.
De CerteauM. (1986). Heterologies: Discourse on the other. University of Minnesota Press.
20.
DeVossD. N.LeBeauP. R. (2010). Reading and composing Indians: Invented Indian identity through visual literacy. Journal of Popular Culture, 43(1), 45–77.
21.
DraggaS.VossD. (2001). Cruel pies: The inhumanity of technical illustrations. Technical Communication, 48(3), 265–274.
22.
Du BoisW. E. B. (1900). The American Negro at Paris. American Monthly Review of Reviews, 22, 575–577.
23.
Du BoisW. E. B. (2007a). Autobiography of W. E. B. Du Bois. Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1940).
24.
Du BoisW. E. B. (2007b). Dusk of Dawn: An essay toward an autobiography of a race concept. Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1940).
25.
Du BoisW. E. B.EatonI. (1899). The Philadelphia Negro: A social study. University of Pennsylvania.
26.
DuffyT. M.WallerR.PiccoliA. (1985). Designing usable texts. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 28(4), 47–49. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.1985.6448850.
27.
EadesG. L. (2015). Maps and Memes: Redrawing culture, place, and identity in indigenous communities. McGill-Queen's University Press.
28.
EviaC.PatriarcaA. (2012). Beyond compliance: Participatory translation of safety communication for Latino construction workers. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 26(3), 340–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651912439697.
29.
FahnestockJ. (1999). Rhetorical figures in science. Oxford University Press.
30.
FinneganC. (2001). The naturalistic enthymeme and visual argument: Photographic representation in the “skull controversy”. Argumentation & Advocacy, 37(3), 133–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/00028533.2001.11951665.
31.
FisherR. R. (2005). Cultural artifacts and the narrative of history: WEB Du Bois and the exhibiting of culture at the 1900 Paris Exposition Universelle. MFS Modern Fiction Studies, 51(4), 741–774. https://doi.org/10.1353/mfs.2006.0009.
32.
FoucaultM. (1990). History of sexuality: An Introduction. Vintage Books(Original work published 1973).
33.
FoucaultM. (2008). “Panopticism” from discipline & punish: The birth of the prison. Race/Ethnicity: Multidisciplinary Global Contexts, 2(1), 1–12.
GorskiP. C. (2008). Good intentions are not enough: A decolonizing intercultural education. Intercultural education, 19(6), 515–525. https://doi.org/10.1080/14675980802568319.
36.
GouldC. R. (1972). The overhead projector. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 1, 2–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.1972.6591966.
37.
Gutiérrez LópezD. (2019, April 12). Digital imaginations: Rehearsing decolonial undocumented labor movements in higher education. Paper presented at the Institute for the Digital Arts and Humanities Symposium, Indiana University at Bloomington.
38.
HaasA. M. (2012). Race, rhetoric, and technology: A case study of decolonial technical communication theory, methodology, and pedagogy. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 26(3), 277–310. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651912439539.
39.
HamblenJ.ParkerA. (1988). Visual communication technologies for computer graphics. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 31(3), 135–141. https://doi.org/10.1109/47.7820.
40.
HuckinT. (2009). On textual silences, large and small. In BazermanC.KrutR.LunsfordK.McLeodS.NullS.RogersP.StansellA. (Eds.), Traditions of writing research (pp. 419–431). Routledge.
41.
HugganG. (1989). Decolonizing the map: Post-colonialism, post-structuralism and the cartographic connection. ARIEL: A Review of International English Literature, 20(4), 115–131.
42.
JonesN. N. (2016). The technical communicator as advocate: Integrating a social justice approach in technical communication. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 46(3), 342–361. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047281616639472.
43.
KillingsworthM. J.GilbertsonM. (1988). How can text and graphics be integrated effectively? In BeeneL.WhiteP. (Eds.), Solving problems in technical writing (pp. 130–149). Oxford University Press.
44.
KimballM. (2006). London through rose-colored graphics: Visual rhetoric and information graphic design in Charles Booth's Maps of London poverty. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 36(4), 353–381. https://doi.org/10.2190/k561-40p2-5422-ptg2.
45.
KimballM.KostelnickC. (2017). Introduction. In KimballM.KostelnickC. (Eds.), Visible numbers: Essays on the history of statistical graphics (pp. 1–16). Taylor & Francis.
LewisD. L.WillisD. (2010). A small nation of people: W.E.B. Du Bois and African American portraits of progress. HarperCollins e-books.
51.
LongoB. (1998). An approach for applying cultural study theory to technical writing research. Technical Communication Quarterly, 7(1), 53–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572259809364617.
ManningA. D. (1989). The semantics of technical graphics. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 19(1), 31–51. https://doi.org/10.2190/PV8H-VWDR-DK35-MTNH.
54.
MatthewsD. L. (1990). The scientific poster: Guidelines for effective visual communication. Technical Communication, 37(3), 225–232.
55.
MirzoeffN. (2014). Visualizing the anthropocene. Public Culture, 26(2), 213–232. https://doi.org/10.1215/08992363-2392039.
56.
MorrisA. (2017). The scholar denied: WEB Du Bois and the birth of modern sociology. University of California Press.
57.
MorrisA. (2018). American Negro at Paris, 1900. In Battle-BaptisteW.RusertB. (Eds.), W.E.B. Du Bois's Data Portraits: Visualizing Black America (pp. 23–36). Chronicle Books.
58.
MortonS.MartinM.MahoodK.CartyJ. (2013). Desert lake: Art, science and stories from Paruku. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO).
59.
MunroS. (2018). Plates: With an introduction and captions. In Battle-BaptisteW.RusertB. (Eds.), W.E.B. Du Bois's Data Portraits: Visualizing Black America: The color line at the turn of the twentieth century (pp. 51–137). Princeton Architectural Press.
60.
PinelliT. E.CordleV. M.McCulloughR. (1986). A survey of typography, graphic design, and physical media in technical reports. Technical Communication, 33(2), 75–80.
61.
ProvenzoE. F. (2013). W.E.B. Du Bois's Exhibit of the American negroes: African Americans at the beginning of the twentieth century. Rowman & Littlefield.
62.
PulidoL.De LaraJ. J. E. (2018). Reimagining “justice" in environmental justice: Radical ecologies, decolonial thought, and the black radical tradition. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, 1(1–2), 76–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/2514848618770363.
63.
RosaM. C. (2016). Sociologies of the south and the actor-network-theory: Possible convergences for an onto formative sociology. European Journal of Social Theory, 19(4), 485–502. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431015613714.
64.
RubensP. M. (1986). A reader's view of text and graphics: Implications for transactional text. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 16(1), 73–86. https://doi.org/10.2190/JQX6-EUB3-V1WA-JW74.
65.
SegaloP.ManoffE.FineM. (2015). Working with embroideries and counter-maps: Engaging memory and imagination within decolonizing frameworks. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 3(1), 342–364. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v3i1.145.
SmithS. M. (2000). “Looking at one's self through the eyes of others": W.E.B. Du Bois's photographs for the 1900 Paris exposition. African American Review, 34(4), 581–599. https://doi.org/10.2307/2901420.
68.
StarkE. (1993). The myth of black violence. Social Work, 38(4), 485–490.
69.
ThrushE. A. (1997). Multicultural issues in technical communication. In StaplesK.OrnatowskiC. (Eds.), Foundations for teaching technical communication: Theory, practice, and program design (pp. 161–178). Greenwood.
70.
TuckE.YangK. W. (2012). Decolonization is not a metaphor. Decolonization: Indigeneity, education & society, 1(1), 1–40.
71.
TufteE. R. (2001). Visual display of quantitative information (2nd ed.). Graphics Press.
72.
WalkerF. A. (1870). Statistical atlas of the United States. Secretary of the Interior.
73.
WalshL. (2013). Scientists as prophets: A rhetorical genealogy. Oxford University Press.
74.
WalshL. (2014). “Tricks,” hockey sticks, and the myth of natural inscription: How the visual rhetoric of Climategate conflated climate with character. In NockeT.SchneiderB. (Eds.), Image politics of climate change: Visualizations, imaginations, documentations (pp. 55–81). Springer.
75.
WalshL. (2018). Visual invention and the composition of scientific research graphics: A topological approach. Written Communication, 35(1), 3–31. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0741088317735837.
76.
WalshL.BoyleC. (2017). From intervention to invention: Introducing topological techniques. In WalshL.BoyleC. (Eds.), Topologies as techniques for a post-critical rhetoric (pp. 1–16). Palgrave Macmillan.
77.
WaltonR.MooreK.JonesN. (2019). Technical communication after the social justice turn: Building coalitions for action. Routledge.
78.
WattsE. K. (2001). Cultivating a Black public voice: W.E.B. Du Bois and the “criteria of Negro Art.”. Rhetoric & Public Affairs, 4(2), 181–201. https://doi.org/10.1353/rap.2001.0033.
79.
WilliamsM. F. (2006). Tracing W.E.B. Du Bois’ “color line” in government regulations. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 36(2), 141–165. https://doi.org/10.2190%2F67RN-UAWG-4NFF-5HL5.
80.
WilliamsM. F. (2012). Reimagining NASA: A cultural and visual analysis of the U.S. Space program. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 26(3), 368–389. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651912439535.
81.
WilliamsM. F.PimentelO. (2012). Introduction: Race, ethnicity, and technical communication. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 26(3), 271–276. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651912439535.
82.
WilsonM. O. (2018). The cartography of W. E. B. Du Bois's color line. In Battle-BaptisteW.RusertB. (Eds.), W.E.B. Du Bois's Data Portraits: Visualizing Black America (pp. 37–50). Chronicle Books.
