A Cross-Cultural Genre Analysis of Firm-Generated Advertisements on Twitter and Sina Weibo

Abstract

To investigate the generic features of firm-generated advertisements (FGAs) in cross-cultural contexts, this study analyzed 327 FGAs by Dell Technologies and the Lenovo Group on Twitter and Sina Weibo. Integrating affordances and multimodality into genre analysis, the study showed that the FGAs were characterized by (a) flexible move structure, (b) persuasive language, (c) visual illustration, and (d) hyperlinks, hashtagging (#), and mentioning (@) functions. The FGAs on Sina Weibo, compared with those on Twitter, tended to use more language play, emojis, and contextual product pictures and show more emphasis on the niche of products, incentives, and celebrity endorsement.

Keywords

social media firm-generated advertisements genre analysis affordances multimodality cross-cultural differences

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Askehave

Nielsen

A. E.

(2005). Digital genres: A challenge to traditional genre theory. Information, Technology & People, 18(2), 120–141.

Askehave

Swales

J. M.

(2001). Genre identification and communicative purpose: A problem and a possible solution. Applied Linguistics, 22(2), 195–212.

Bhatia

V. K.

(1993). Analysing genre: Language use in professional settings. Longman.

Bhatia

V. K.

(2004). Worlds of written discourse. Continuum.

Bhatia

V. K.

(2008). Genre analysis, ESP and professional practice. English for Specific Purposes, 27(2), 161–174.

Biber

Connor

Upton

T. A.

(2007). Discourse on the move. Benjamins.

Burson-Marsteller. (2012, August 12). Burson-Marsteller global social media check-up 2012. Accessed from http://www.burson-marsteller.com/what-we-do/ourthinking/burson-marsteller-global-socialmedia-check-up-2012/ on August 12, 2018

Campbell

K. S.

Naidoo

J. S.

(2017). Rhetorical move structure in high-tech marketing white papers. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 31(1), 94–118.

Cardon

P. W.

(2008). A critique of Hall’s Contexting model: A meta-analysis of literature on intercultural business and technical communication. Journal of Business & Technical Communication, 22(4), 399–428.

10.

Cheung

(2008). “Click here”: The impact of new media on the encoding of persuasive messages in direct marketing. Discourse Studies, 10(2), 161–189.

11.

Cheung

(2010). The globalization and localization of persuasive marketing communication: A cross-linguistic socio-cultural analysis. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(2), 354–376.

12.

Choi

S. M.

Lee

W. N.

Kim

H. J.

(2005). Lessons from the rich and famous: A cross-cultural comparison of celebrity endorsement in advertising. Journal of Advertising, 34(2), 85–98.

13.

Cohen

J. A.

(1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37–46.

14.

Cotos

Huffman

Link

(2017). A move/step model for methods sections: Demonstrating rigour and credibility. English for Specific Purposes, 46(2), 90–106.

15.

Das

Wiener

H. J.

Kareklas

(2019). To emoji or not to emoji? Examining the influence of emoji on consumer reactions to advertising. Journal of Business Research, 96(3), 147–156.

16.

Dwivedi

Y. K.

Kapoor

K. K.

Chen

(2015). Social media marketing and advertising. Marketing Review, 15(3), 289–309.

17.

Evans

S. K.

Pearce

K. E.

Vitak

Treem

J. W.

(2016). Explicating affordances: A conceptual framework for understanding affordances in communication research. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22(1), 35–52.

18.

Feng

(2019). Interdiscursivity, social media and marketized university discourse: A genre analysis of universities’ recruitment posts on WeChat. Journal of Pragmatics, 143(5), 121–134.

19.

Florenthal

Chao

M. C.-H.

(2016). A cross-cultural comparison of a global brand’s Strategies on micro-blogging sites: Sina Weibo vs. Twitter. Journal of Online Marketing, 6(4), 54–72.

20.

Gretzel

(2018). Emoji rhetoric: A social media influencer perspective. Journal of Marketing Management, 34(15), 1272–1295.

21.

Gibson

J. J.

(1979). The ecological approach to perception. Houghton Mifflin.

22.

Giltrow

(2017). Bridge to genre: Spanning technological change. In Miller

C. R.

Kelly

A. R.

(Eds.), Emerging genres in new media environments (pp. 39–62). Palgrave Macmillan.

23.

Hall

E. T.

(1976). Beyond culture. Doubleday.

24.

Hofstede

G. H.

(2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Sage.

25.

Hofstede

G. H.

Hofstede

G. J.

Minkov

(2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.

26.

Honey

Herring

S. C.

(2009). Beyond microblogging: Conversation and collaboration via Twitter [Paper presentation]. In The 42nd Hawaii international conference on system sciences, Waikoloa, HI, USA. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4755499.

27.

Hutchby

(2001). Conversation and technology. Polity.

28.

Hyon

(1996). Genre in three traditions: Implications for ESL. TESOL Quarterly, 30(4), 693–722.

29.

Jones

(2014). Switching in Twitter’s Hashtagged exchanges. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 28(1), 83–108.

30.

Kress

(2003). Literacy in the new media age. Routledge.

31.

Kress

(2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. Routledge.

32.

Kress

van Leeuwen

(2001). Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. Arnold.

33.

Kumar

Bezawada

Rishika

Janakiraman

Kannan

P. K.

(2016). From social to sale: The effects of firm-generated content in social media. Journal of Marketing, 80(1), 7–25.

34.

Labrador

Ramón

Alaiz-Moretón

Sanjurjo-González

(2014). Rhetorical structure and persuasive language in the subgenre of online advertisements. English for Specific Purposes, 34(1), 38–47.

35.

Lam

P. W. Y.

(2013). Interdiscursivity, hypertextuality, multimodality: A corpus-based multimodal move analysis of internet group buying deals. Journal of Pragmatics, 51(2), 13–39.

36.

Landis

J. R.

Koch

G. G.

(1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174.

37.

D. D.

(2018). Facework by global brands across Twitter and Weibo. Discourse, Context & Media, 26(6), 32–42.

38.

(2015). Relationship maintenance on Twitter: Implications from loyalty leaders. Journal of Communication Management, 19(2), 184–202.

39.

Lin

H. C.

Swarna

Bruning

P. F.

(2017). Taking a global view on brand post popularity: Six social media brand post practices for global markets. Business Horizons, 60(5), 621–633.

40.

Lin

Lachlan

K. A.

Spence

P. R.

(2016). Exploring extreme events on social media: A comparison of user reposting/retweeting behaviors on Twitter and Weibo. Computers in Human Behavior, 65(13), 576–581.

41.

Ling

Dyer

Black

A. W.

Trancoso

(2016). Mining parallel corpora from Sina Weibo and Twitter. Computational Linguistics, 42(2), 307–343.

42.

Luders

Lin

Rasmussen

(2010). Emerging personal media genres. New Media & Society, 12(6), 947–963.

43.

J. W.

Yang

Wilson

J. A. J.

(2017). A window to the ideal self: A study of UK twitter and Chinese Sina Weibo selfie-takers and the implications for marketers. Journal of Business Research, 74(5), 139–142.

44.

Maier

(2019). The negative effect of product image inconsistency on product overviews during the online product search. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 23(1), 110–143.

45.

Maier

Dost

(2018). The positive effect of contextual image backgrounds on fluency and liking. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 40(1), 109–116.

46.

McSweeney

(2002). Hofstede’s model of national cultural differences and their consequences: A triumph of faith – a failure of analysis. Human Relations, 55(1), 89–118.

47.

Men

L. R.

Tsai

W. H. S.

(2012). How companies cultivate relationships with publics on social network sites: Evidence from China and the United States. Public Relations Review, 38(5), 723–730.

48.

Miller

C. R.

Devitt

A. J.

Gallagher

V. J.

(2018). Genre: Permanence and change. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 48(3), 269–277.

49.

Miller

C. R.

Shepherd

(2009). Questions for genre theory from the blogosphere. In Giltrow

Stein

(Eds.), Genres in the internet (pp. 263–290). John Benjamins.

50.

Moura

T. F. S.

Singh

Chun

(2016). The influence of culture in website design and users’ perceptions: Three systematic reviews. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 17(4), 312–316.

51.

Nelson-Field

Riebe

Sharp

(2012). “What's not to ‘like?’”: Can a Facebook fan base give a brand the advertising reach it needs? Journal of Advertising Research, 52(2), 262–269.

52.

Ngai

C. S. B.

Jin

(2016). The effectiveness of crisis communication strategies on Sina Weibo in relation to Chinese publics’ acceptance of these strategies. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 30(4), 451–494.

53.

Norman

(2013). The design of everyday things: Revised and expanded edition. Basic Books.

54.

Okazaki

Taylor

C. R.

(2013). Social media and international advertising: Theoretical challenges and future directions. International Marketing Review, 30(1), 56–71.

55.

Onder

(2013). Generic structure and promotional elements in best-selling online book blurbs: A cross-cultural study. Ibérica, 25(1), 171–194.

56.

Pehlivan

Sarican

Berthon

(2011). Mining messages: Exploring consumer response to consumer- vs. firm-generated ads. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 10(6), 313–321.

57.

Perez-Llantada

(2013). The article of the future: Strategies for genre stability and change. English for Specific Purposes, 32(4), 221–235.

58.

Prior

(2009). From speech genres to mediated multimodal genre systems: Bakhtin, Voloshinov, and the question of writing. In Bazerman

Bonini

Figueiredo

(Eds.), Genre in a changing world (pp. 17–34). WAC Clearinghouse and Parlor Press.

59.

Statista (2019, April 12). Social media statistics & facts . https://www.statista.com/topics/1164/social-networks/.

60.

Swales

J. M.

(1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press.

61.

Swales

J. M.

(2012). A text and its commentaries: Toward a reception history of “genre in three traditions” (Hyon, 1996). Ibérica, 24(1), 103–116.

62.

Thominet

(2020). We’ve selected a candidate who more closely fits our current needs: A genre analysis of academic job-refusal letters. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 34(1), 3–37.

63.

Vergaro

(2004). Discourse strategies of Italian and English sales promotion letters. English for Specific Purposes, 23(2), 181–207.

64.

Wang

(2016). Brand crisis communication through social media: A dialogue between brand competitors on Sina Weibo. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 21(1), 56–72.

65.

Wang

Forey

(2010). Analyzing the genre structure of Chinese call-center communication. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 24(4), 445–475.

66.

Yoo

Kim

(2014). The effects of online product presentation on consumer responses: A mental imagery perspective. Journal of Business Research, 67(11), 2464–2472.

67.

Zappavigna

(2012). Discourse of Twitter and social media. Continuum.

68.

Zhou

(2012). “Advertorials”: A genre-based analysis of an emerging hybridized genre. Discourse & Communication, 6(3), 323–346.

69.

Zhu

(2000). Structural moves reflected in English and Chinese sales letters. Discourse Studies, 2(4), 473–496.