This study examines 50 business responses to negative reviews on Amazon.com in order to identify common genre moves for responding to negative online reviews. To complement the genre analysis and assess the effectiveness of these common genre moves, the author conducted a survey seeking consumers’ feedback on three typical business responses to negative online reviews. This investigation not only provides feedback on how businesses can publicly respond to negative online reviews but also presents an empirical case on how we can balance genre stability and variation and go beyond just teaching typified genre features in our genre pedagogy.
AalbertsR. J.KrajewskiL. A. (1987). Claim and adjustment letters: Theory versus practice and legal implications. Bulletin of the Association for Business Communication, 50(3), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1177/108056998705000301
2.
AkehurstG. (2009). User generated content: The use of blogs for tourism organizations and tourism consumers. Service Business, 3, 51–61.
3.
AlmaneyA. (1972). The effect of message treatment on feedback in business communication. Journal of Business Communication, 9(3), 19–23.
4.
AurnerR.WolfM. (1967). Effective communication in business. South-Western.
5.
BasgierC. (2017). Atypical rhetorical actions: Defying genre expectations on Amazon.com. In MillerC. R.KellyA. R. (Eds.), Emerging genres in new media environments (pp. 187–201). Palgrave Macmillan.
6.
BawarshiA. S.ReiffM. J. (2010). Genre: An introduction to history, theory, research, and pedagogy. WAC Clearinghouse.
7.
BhatiaV. (2017a). Critical genre analysis: Investigating interdiscursive performance in professional practice. Routledge
8.
BhatiaV. (2017b). Methodological issues in genre analysis. HERMES—Journal of Language and Communication in Business, 9(16), 39–59. https://doi.org/10.7146/hjlcb.v9i16.25383
9.
BitzerL. (1968). The rhetorical situation. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 1, 1–14.
10.
BovéeC. L.ThillJ. V. (2019). Business communication essentials: Fundamental skills for the mobile-digital-social workplace (8th ed.). Pearson.
11.
CampbellK. S.NaidooJ. S. (2017). Rhetorical move structure in high-tech marketing white papers. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 31(1), 94–118.
12.
CockrumJ. (2011). Free marketing: 101 low and no-cost ways to grow your business, online and off. Wiley & Sons.
13.
DaricsE.KollerV. (2018). Language in business, language at work. Palgrave Macmillan.
14.
DavidowM. (2000). The bottom line impact of organizational responses to customer complaints. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 24(4), 473–490. https://doi.org/10.1177/109634800002400404
15.
DavidowM. (2003). Organizational responses to customer complaints: What works and what doesn’t. Journal of Service Research, 5(3), 225–250. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670502238917
16.
DavidowM.LeighJ. (1998). The effects of organizational complaint responses on consumer satisfaction, word of mouth activity and repurchase intentions. Journal of Consumer Satisfaction, Dissatisfaction and Complaining Behavior, 11, 91–102.
17.
DevittA. J. (2004). Writing genres. Southern Illinois University Press.
18.
Dudley-EvansA. (1986). Genre analysis: An investigation of the introduction and discussion sections of MSc dissertations. In CoulthardM. (Ed.), Talking about text (Discourse Analysis Monograph; Vol. 13, pp. 128–145). English Language Research, University of Birmingham.
19.
EinwillerS.SteilenS. (2015). Handling complaints on social network sites: An analysis of complaints and complaint responses on Facebook and Twitter pages of large US companies. Public Relations Review, 41(2), 195–204.
20.
Evangelisti AlloriP.BatemanJ.BhatiaV. K. (2014). Evolution in genre: Emergence, variation, multimodality. Peter Lang.
21.
FengW.RenW. (2019). This is the destiny, darling: Relational acts in Chinese management responses to online consumer reviews. Discourse, Context & Media, 28, 52–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2018.09.003
22.
GhoseA.IpeirotisP. (2011). Estimating the helpfulness and economic impact of product reviews: Mining text and reviewer characteristics. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 23(10), 1498–1512.
23.
GillyM. C. (1987). Post complaint processes: From organizational response to repurchase behavior. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 21(2), 293–313.
24.
GiltrowJ.SteinD. (2009). Genres in the internet. John Benjamins.
25.
GottiM.D’AngeloL. (2014). Genre variation in mediation practice: Traditional vs. online processes. In AlloriP. E.BatemanJ.BhatiaV. K. (Eds.), Evolution in genre: Emergence, variation, multimodality (pp. 209–234). Peter Lang.
26.
GuffeyM. (2006). Business communication: Process and product (5th ed.). South Western.
27.
GuffeyM.LoewyD. (2014). Business communication: Process and product (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.
28.
GuffeyM.LoewyD. (2019). Essentials of business communication (11th ed.). Cengage Learning.
29.
Hennig-ThurauT.GwinnerK.WalshG.GremlerD. (2004). Electronic word-of-mouth via consumer-opinion platforms: What motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the Internet?Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(1), 38–52.
30.
HenzeB. (2018). Teaching genre in professional and technical communication. In BridgefordT. (Ed.), Teaching professional and technical communication: A practicum in a book (pp. 72–88). Utah State University Press.
31.
HoV. (2017). Achieving service recovery through responding to negative online reviews. Discourse & Communication, 11(1), 31–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481316683292
32.
JamesonD. A.LockerK. O.WeeksF. W. (1987). Business writing and problems. Stipes.
33.
KleinL. R. (1998). Evaluating the potential of interactive media through a new lens: Search versus experience goods. Journal of Business Research, 41, 196–203.
34.
KoskelaM. (2018). Disclosing principles of IR communication: Rhetorical moves for constructing transparency. International Journal of Business Communication, 55(2), 164–193. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488417735645
35.
KrizanA. C.MerrierP.LoganJ.WilliamsK. S. (2011). Business communication (8th ed.). South-Western Cengage Learning.
36.
LéJ. B. (2017). From printed newspaper to digital newspaper: What has changed? In MillerC. R.KellyA. R. (Eds.), Emerging genres in new media environments (pp. 137–152). Palgrave Macmillan.
37.
LinC. A.XuX. (2017). Effectiveness of online consumer reviews: The influence of valence, reviewer ethnicity, social distance and source trustworthiness. Internet Research, 27(2), 362–380. https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-01-2016-0017
38.
LockerK. O. (1977). Patterns of organization for business writing. Journal of Business Communication, 14(3), 35–45.
39.
LockerK. O.AuneJ. E.MackiewiczJ.KienzlerD. S. (2019). Business and administrative communication (12th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
40.
LockerK.KienzlerD. (2013). Business and administration communication (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill Irwin.
MackiewiczJ. (2010). Assertions of expertise in online product reviews. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 24(1), 3–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651909346929
43.
MackiewiczJ.YeatsD. (2014). Product review users’ perceptions of review quality: The role of credibility, informativeness, and readability. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 57(4), 309–324.
44.
MattilaA. S. (2006). The power of explanations in mitigating the ill-effects of service failures. Journal of Services Marketing, 20(7), 422–428.
45.
McColloughM. A. (2000). The effect of perceived justice and attributions regarding service failure and recovery on post-recovery customer satisfaction and service quality attitudes. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 24(4), 423–447. https://doi.org/10.1177/109634800002400402
46.
MillerC. R. (2015). Genre change and evolution. In ArtemevaN.FreedmanA. (Eds.), Genre studies around the globe: Beyond the three traditions (pp. 154–185). Inkshed.
47.
MillerC. R. (2017). Where do genres come from? In MillerC. R.KellyA. R. (Eds.), Emerging genres in new media environments (pp. 1–34). Palgrave Macmillan.
48.
MillerC. R.KellyA. (2017). Emerging genres in new media environments. Palgrave Macmillan.
49.
MillerC. R.ShepherdD. (2004). Blogging as social action: A genre analysis of the weblog. In GurakL.AntonijevicS.JohnsonL.RatliffC.ReymannJ. (Eds.), Into the blogosphere: Rhetoric, community, and the culture of weblogs. University of Minnesota Libraries.
MorrisonR. (2017). Teaching toward the telos of critical thinking: Genre in business communication. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 80(4), 460–472.
52.
MudambiS.SchuffS. (2010). What makes a helpful online review? A study of customer reviews on Amazon.com. MIS Quarterly, 34(1), 185–200. https://doi.org/10.2307/20721420
53.
MurphyH.HildebrandtH.ThomasJ. (1997). Effective business communications (7th ed.). Irwin McGraw-Hill.
54.
ParkS.AllenJ. P. (2013). Responding to online reviews: Problem solving and engagement in hotels. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 54(1), 64–73.
55.
ParodiG. (2010). The rhetorical organization of the textbook genre across disciplines: A “colony-in-loops?” Discourse Studies, 12(2), 195–222.
56.
QingP.HuangH.RazzaqA.TangY.TuM. (2018). Impacts of sellers’ responses to online negative consumer reviews: Evidence from an agricultural product. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 66(4), 587–597. https://doi.org/10.1111/cjag.12184
57.
RandallN. (2017). Source as paratext: Videogame adaptations and the question of fidelity. In MillerC. R.KellyA. R. (Eds.), Emerging genres in new media environments (pp. 171–186). Palgrave Macmillan.
58.
ReaJ.RiedlingerM. (2016). Exigence, ecologies, and internet street science: Genre emergence in the context of Fukushima radiation-risk discourse. In ReiffM. J.BawarshiA. (Eds.), Genre and the performance of publics (pp. 219–238). Utah State University Press.
59.
RomanK.RaphaelsonJ. (2010). Writing that works: How to communicate effectively in business (3rd ed.). Harper Resource.
60.
SchryerC. F. (1993). Records as genre. Written Communication, 10, 200–234.
61.
ShwomB.SnyderL. G. (2016). Business communication: Polishing your professional presence (3rd ed.). Pearson.
StevensJ. L.SpaidB. I.BreazealeM.Esmark JonesC. L. (2018). Timeliness, transparency, and trust: A framework for managing online customer complaints. Business Horizons, 61(3), 375–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2018.01.007
64.
SundaramD. S.MitraK.WebsterC. (1998). Word-of-mouth communications: A motivational analysis. Advances in Consumer Research, 25(6), 527–531.
65.
SwalesJ. (1981). Aspects of article introductions. Aston University.
66.
SwalesJ. (1990). Genre analysis. English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press.
67.
SwalesJ. (2004). Research genres: Exploration and applications. Cambridge University Press.
68.
TardyC. (2015). Bending genres, or when is a deviation an innovation? In ArtemevaN.FreedmanA. (Eds.), Genre studies around the globe: Beyond the three traditions (pp. 339–365). Inkshed.
ThillJ. V.BovéeC. L. (1999). Excellence in business communication (4th ed.). Prentice Hall.
71.
ThumvichitA.GampperC. (2019). Composing responses to negative hotel reviews: A genre analysis. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 6(1), 1629154. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2019.1629154
72.
TrosborgA.ShawP. (2005). Acquiring prescriptive business pragmatics: The case of customer complaint handling. In TrosborgA.JorgensenP. E. F. (Eds.), Business discourse: Texts and contexts (pp. 185–223). Peter Lang.
73.
VásquezC. (2014). The discourse of online consumer reviews. Bloomsbury Academic.
74.
XuQ. (2014). Should I trust him? The effects of reviewer profile characteristics on eWOM credibility. Computers in Human Behavior, 33, 136–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.027
