This article explores genres as recurrent acts of positioning that contribute to associating particular positions with the genre users as social actors. As an illustration, the study investigates the positioning of Chinese university presidents in their published opening convocation speeches. By combining rhetorical move analysis with the positioning triangle framework, this study demystifies three positions conventionally used by university presidents in the genre: guiding educator, morale builder, and university representative. These positions, legitimized by the role of the university president, establish specific types of social relations between the president and the students, which function as channels for the transmission of values, particularly collective values, to address relevant social expectations in Chinese society. This study suggests that the genre-based positioning analysis can offer valuable genre knowledge to novice practitioners, enabling them to familiarize themselves with adequate positionings that adhere to the code of conduct within a discourse community, thereby facilitating effective genre realization.
ArtemevaN.FreedmanA. (2015). Introduction: Everything is illuminated, or genre beyond the three traditions. In ArtemevaN.FreedmanA. (Eds.), Genre studies around the globe: Beyond the three traditions (pp. xix–xxviii). Inkshed Publications.
2.
ArtemevaN.MylesD. N. (2015). Perceptions of prior genre knowledge: A case of incipient biliterate writers in the EAP classroom. In DowdG.RulyovaN. (Eds.), Genre trajectories (pp. 225–245). Palgrave Macmillan UK.
3.
AustinJ. L. (1959). How to do things with words. Oxford University Press.
4.
BergerP. L.LuckmannT. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Doubleday.
BhatiaV. (1993). Analysing genre. Language use in professional settings. Longman.
7.
BiberD.ConnorU.UptonT. A. (2007). Discourse on the move: Using corpus analysis to describe discourse structure (Vol. 28). John Benjamins Publishing.
8.
DaviesB.HarréR. (1990). Positioning: The discursive production of selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 20, 43–63.
9.
DeroeyK.TaverniersM. (2011). A corpus-based study of lecture functions. Moderna Språk, 105(2), 1–22.
10.
DevittA. J. (2004). Writing genres. Southern Illinois University Press.
11.
DryerD. B. (2013). Scaling writing ability: A corpus-driven inquiry. Written Communication, 30(1), 3–35.
12.
DurkheimE. (1912). The elementary forms of the religious life. Free Press.
13.
FanY. (2011). Zhongguogudaide"heli"bushiwanquanziyoudeliangyuanlihun [In ancient China, “voluntary separation” was not a completely voluntary divorce]. Tribune of Political Science and Law, 29(1), 53–60.
14.
FiolC. M.HarrisD.HouseR. (1999). Charismatic leadership: Strategies for effecting social change. The Leadership Quarterly, 10(3), 449–482.
15.
GeertzC. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. Basic Books.
16.
HarréR.DedaicM. (2012). Positioning theory, narratology, and pronoun analysis as discursive therapies. In LockA.StrongT. (Eds.), Discursive perspectives in therapeutic practice (pp. 45–64). Oxford University Press.
17.
HarréR.MoghaddamF. M.CairnieT. P.RothbartD.SabatS. R. (2009). Recent advances in positioning theory. Theory & Psychology, 19(1), 5–31.
18.
HarréR.Van LangenhoveL. (1999a). The dynamics of social episodes. In HarréR.Van LangenhoveL. (Eds.), Positioning theory: Moral contexts of intentional action (pp. 1–13). Blackwell Publishing.
19.
HarréR.Van LangenhoveL. (1999b). Epilogue: Further opportunities. In HarréR.Van LangenhoveL. (Eds.), Positioning theory: Moral contexts of intentional action (pp. 195–199). Blackwell Publishing.
20.
HenryA.RoseberryR. L. (2001). A narrow-angled corpus analysis of moves and strategies of the genre: ‘Letter of Application.’English for Specific Purposes, 20(2), 153–167.
21.
HouJ. (2022). Jitizhuyiwenhuashiyuxiadedaxuexiaozhangjuesexindingwei [A new positioning of the role of university presidents in the context of collectivist cultural perspective]. Jiaoyufazhanyanjiu (Research in Educational Development), 19, 24–30.
22.
JungS. (2020). Institutional mission statements: Discursive construction of organizational identity in Canadian post-secondary education. Horizontes, 38(1), e020004.
23.
KerrC. (1963). The uses of the university (5th ed.). Harvard University Press.
24.
KotthoffH. (2015). Positioning in scholarship applications: On the intercultural pragmatics of an academic genre. Freiburger Arbeitspapiere Zue Germanistischen Linguistik (FRAGL), 27, 1–16.
25.
LuoD. (2013). Gaoxiaojitizhuyijiaoyudebiyaoxing, mianlindetiaozhanjiduice [The necessity and challenges of collectivist education in higher education institutions and countermeasures]. Qiushi (Truth-Seeking), S1, 241–243.
26.
MaoJ.XingL. (2018). Meiguodaxuexiaozhangdejuesedingwei [The positioning of the role of president in American universities]. Higher Education Development and Evaluation, 34(3), 74–83.
27.
MillerC. R. (1984). Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70, 151–167.
28.
MillerC. R. (2015). Genre as social action (1984), Revisited 30 years later (2014). Letras & Letras, 31(3), 56–72.
29.
MillerC. R. (2020). Exercising genres: A rejoinder to Anne Freadman. Discourse and Writing/Rédactologie, 30, 133–140.
30.
NodoushanM. A. S.KhakbazN. (2011). Theses ‘Discussion’ sections: A structural move analysis. International Journal of English Studies, 5(3), 111–132.
31.
SuL. (2011). Daxuelidezhici-Xiucixuedehefansishehuixuedejiaodu [Speeches in universities: Perspectives from Rhetoric and Reflective Sociology]. Jiangsushehuikexue (Jiangsu Social Sciences), 255(2), 1–14.
32.
SwalesJ. M. (1981). Aspects of article introductions. The University of Aston, Language Studies Unit.
33.
SwalesJ. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press.
34.
SwalesJ. M. (2004). Research genres: Explorations and applications. Cambridge University Press.
35.
SwalesJ. M. (2019). The futures of EAP genre studies: A personal viewpoint. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 38, 75–82.
36.
TardyC. M. (2012). A rhetorical genre theory perspective on L2 writing development. In ManchónR. (Ed.), Trends in applied linguistics: L2 writing development: Multiple perspectives (pp. 165–190). Walter de Gruyter.
37.
TardyC. M.SwalesJ. M. (2014). Genre analysis. In SchneiderK. P.BarronA. (Eds,), Pragmatics of discourse (pp. 166–187). De Gruyter Mouton.
38.
UptonT. A.CohenM. A. (2009). An approach to corpus-based discourse analysis: The move analysis as example. Discourse Studies, 11(5), 57–77.
39.
Van DijkT. A. (2015). Critical discourse analysis. In TannenD.HamiltonH. E.SchiffrinD. (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (2nd ed., Vols. 1 & 2, pp. 466–485). Wiley Blackwell.
40.
Van LangenhoveL.HarréR. (1994). Cultural stereotypes and positioning theory. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 24(4), 359–372.
41.
Van LangenhoveL.HarréR. (1999). Introducing positioning theory. In HarréR.Van LangenhoveL. (Eds.), Positioning theory: Moral contexts of intentional action (pp. 14–31). Blackwell Publishing.
42.
WuY. S. (2000). Gaodengxuexiaoxiaozhangyaochengweishehuizhuyijiaoyujia [University presidents should become socialist educators]. Gaodengjiaoyuyanjiu (Higher Education Research), 6, 13–18.
43.
YuD. (2022). Cross-cultural genre analysis: Investigating Chinese, Italian and English CSR reports. Routledge.
44.
YuD.BondiM. (2017). The generic structure of CSR reports in Italian, Chinese, and English: A corpus-based analysis. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 60(3), 273–291.
45.
YuX.ZhengR. (2019). Daxuekaixuedianlixiaozhangzhicidejiaoyujiazhitanze [Exploring the educational values in the presidential address at the opening ceremony of universities]. University Education Science, 5, 28–33.
