This article engages disciplinary (and interdisciplinary) conversations at the intersections of race, rhetoric, technology, and technical communication and offers a case study of curriculum development that supports disciplinary inquiry at these complex interstices. Specifically, informed by a decolonial framework, this article discusses the status of cultural and critical race studies in technical communication scholarship; tentative definitions of race, rhetoric, and technology; the cultural usability research conducted and located accountability in the process of designing a graduate course that studies rhetorics of race and technology; and the implications of this inquiry for the discipline, field, and practices of technical communication.
AtwillJ. M. (1998). Rhetoric reclaimed: Aristotle and the liberal arts tradition. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
4.
BanksA. (2006). Race, rhetoric, and technology: Searching for higher ground. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
5.
BanksA. (2011). Digital griots: African American rhetoric in a multimedia age. Carbondale,Southern Illinois University Press.
6.
BarnumC. A.HuilinL. (2006). Chinese and American technical communication: A cross-cultural comparison of differences. Technical Communication, 53, 143–166.
7.
BlackmonS. (2002). “But I’m just white”; Or, how “Other” pedagogies can benefit all students. In HuotB.TakayoshiP. (Eds.), Teaching writing with computers (pp. 92–102). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
8.
BlackmonS. (2007). (Cyber) conspiracy theories? African-American students in the computerized writing environment. In TakayoshiP.SullivanP. (Eds.), Labor, writing technologies, and the shaping of composition in the academy (pp. 153–166). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
9.
BowdonM. (2004). Technical communication and the role of the public intellectual: A community HIV-prevention case study. Technical Communication Quarterly, 13, 325–340.
10.
BrayF. (1997). Technology and gender: Fabrics of power in late imperial China. Berkeley, University of California Press.
11.
De CerteauM. (1984). The practice of everyday life. Trans. RendallS. F.Berkely, University of California Press.
12.
DingH. (2009). Rhetorics of alternative media in an emerging epidemic: SARS, censorship, and extra-institutional risk communication. Technical Communication Quarterly, 18, 327–350.
13.
EboB. (Ed.). (1998). Cyberghetto or cybertopia? Race, class and gender on the Internet. Westport, CT: Praeger.
14.
FernandezM.WildingF.WrightM. M. (Eds.). (2003). Domain errors! Cyberfeminist Practices (a subRosa project). Brooklyn, NY: Autonomedia.
15.
FlynnE. A. (1997). Emergent feminist technical communication. Technical Communication Quarterly, 6, 313–320.
16.
FoucaultM. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge & the discourse on language (Trans. Sheridan SmithA. M.) New York, NY: Pantheon.
17.
FrostE. (2010). Book review of Francesca Bray's technology and gender: Fabrics of power in late imperial china. Computers and Composition, 27, 324–327.
18.
GatesE. N. (Ed.). (1997). Racial classification and history. New York, NY: Routledge.
19.
GatesH. L. (Ed.). (1986). “Race,” writing, and difference. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
20.
GilyardK. (2004). Preface. In GilyardK.NunleyV. (Eds), Rhetoric and ethnicity (pp. v–x). Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.
21.
Gómez PeñaG. (1996). The virtual barrio @ the other frontier (or the Chicano Interneta). In LeesonL. H. (Ed.), Clicking in: Hot links to a digital culture (pp. 173–182). Seattle, WA: Bay Press.
22.
GrobmanL. (1999). Beyond internationalization: Multicultural education in the professional writing contact zone. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 13, 427–448.
23.
HaasA. M. (2005). Making online spaces more native to American Indians: A digital diversity recommendation. Computers and Composition Online. Retrieved fromhttp://www.bgsu.edu/cconline/Haas/index.htm
24.
HaasA. M. (2007). Wampum as hypertext: An American Indian intellectual tradition of multimedia theory and practice. Studies in American Indian Literatures, 19, 77–100.
25.
HaasC. (1999). On the relationship between old and new technologies. Computers & Composition, 16, 209–228.
26.
HerndlC. (1993). Teaching discourse and reproducing culture: A critique of research and pedagogy in professional and non-academic writing. College Composition and Communication, 44, 349–363.
27.
hooksb. (1990a). Postmodern blackness. Postmodern culture1 (1), pp. 510–518. Retrieved March 15, 2011, from the Project MUSE database.
28.
hooksb. (1990b). Representing whiteness: Seeing wings of desire. In Yearning: Race, gender, and cultural politics (pp. 165–172). Boston, MA: South End Press.
29.
JenkinsH. (2008). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York, New York University Press.
30.
JeyarajJ. (2004). Liminality and othering: The issue of rhetorical authority in technical discourse. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 18, 9–38.
31.
JohnsonJ. R.PimentelO.PimentelC. (2008). Writing new Mexico white: A critical analysis of early representations of new Mexico in technical writing. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 22, 211–236.
32.
JohnsonR. R. (1998). User-centered technology: A rhetorical theory for computers and other mundane artifacts. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
33.
KatzS. B. (1992). The ethic of expediency: Classical rhetoric, technology, and the Holocaust. College English, 54, 225–275.
34.
KatzS. B. (1993). Aristotle’s rhetoric, Hitler’s program, and the ideological problem of praxis, power, and professional discourse. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 7, 37–62.
35.
KolkoB.NakamuraL.RodmanG. (Eds.). (2000). Race in cyberspace. New York, NY: Routledge.
36.
LongoB. (1998). An approach for applying cultural study theory to technical writing research. Technical Communication Quarterly, 7, 53–73.
37.
MonroeB. J. (2004). Crossing the digital divide: Race, writing, and technology in the classroom. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
38.
NakamuraL. (2007). Digitizing race: Visual cultures of the Internet. Minneapolis University of Minnesota Press.
39.
NelsonA.TuT. L. N.HinesA. H. (Eds.). (2001). Technicolor: Race, technology, and everyday life. New York, NY: New York University Press.
40.
PalmeriJ. (2006). Disability studies, cultural analysis, and the critical practice of technical communication pedagogy. Technical Communication Quarterly, 15, 49–65.
41.
PowellM. (2002). Listening to ghosts: An alternative (non) argument. In SchroederC.FoxH.BizzellP. (Eds.), ALT DIS: Alternative discourses for the academy (pp. 11–22). Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook-Heinemann.
42.
RoedigerD. R. (1997). Introduction: From the social construction of race to the abolition of whiteness. In GatesE. N. (Ed.), Racial classification and history (pp. 345–363). New York, NY: Routledge.
43.
RossA. (2005). Technology. In BennettT.GrossburgL.MorrisM. (Eds.), New keywords: A revised vocabulary of culture and society. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
44.
SauerB. (2003). The rhetoric of risk. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
45.
SavageG.MattsonK. (2011). Perspectives on diversity in technical communication programs. Programmatic Perspectives, 3, 5–57.
46.
SavageG.MatveevaN. (2011). Seeking inter-racial collaborations in program design: A report on a study of technical and scientific communication programs in historically black colleges and universities (HBCUs) and tribal colleges and universities (TCUs) in the United States. Programmatic Perspectives, 3, 58–85.
47.
ScottJ. B. (2003). Risky rhetoric: AIDS and the cultural practices of HIV testing. Carbondale,Southern Illinois University Press.
48.
ScottJ. B.LongoB. (2006). Guest editors' introduction: Making the cultural turn. Technical Communication Quarterly, 15, 3–7.
49.
ScottJ. B.LongoB.WillsK. V. (Eds.). (2006). Critical power tools: Technical communication and cultural studies. New York, NY: SUNY Press.
50.
SelfeC. L.SelfeR. J.Jr. (1994). The politics of the interface: Power and its exercise in electronic contact zones. CCC, 45, 480–504.
51.
SlackJ. D.MillerD. J.DoakJ. (1993). The technical communicator as author: Meaning, power, authority. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 7, 12–36.
52.
SlackJ. D.WiseJ. M. (2005). Culture + technology: A primer. New York, NY: Lang.
53.
SmedleyA. (2007). Race in North America: Origin and evolution of a worldview (3rd ed.). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
54.
SpurrD. (1993). The rhetoric of empire: Colonial discourse in journalism, travel writing, and imperial administration. Durham, NY: Duke University Press.
55.
Germaine-MadisonN.St. (2006). Instructions, visuals, and the English-speaking bias of technical communication. Technical Communication Quarterly, 53, 184–194.
SunH. (2006). The triumph of users: Achieving cultural usability goals with user localization. Technical Communication Quarterly, 15, 457–481.
58.
ThatcherB. L. (2000). Writing policies and procedures in a U.S./South American context. Technical Communication Quarterly, 9, 365–399.
59.
ThatcherB. L. (2006). Intercultural rhetoric, technology transfer, and writing in U.S.–Mexico border maquilas. Technical Communication Quarterly, 15, 385–405.
60.
VillanuevaV. (1999). On the rhetoric and precedents of racism. CCC, 50, 645–661.
61.
WilliamsM. F. (2006). Tracing W. E. B. Dubois' “color line” in government regulations. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 36, 141–165.
62.
WilliamsM. F. (2010). From black codes to recodification: Removing the veil from regulatory writing. Amityville, NY: Baywood.
63.
WilliamsP. J. (1991). The alchemy of race and rights: Diary of a law professor. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
64.
WilsonP.StewartM. (Eds.). (2008). Global indigenous media: Cultures, poetics, and politics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
