Digital Difference: Theorizing Frameworks of Bodies,Representation and Stereotypes in Digital Games

Abstract

This article presents a theoretical framework for making sense of gaming, ethnicity and race through the conceptual lens of critical approaches to the body, representation and the relationship between bodies and technologies of gameplay. Taking the view that gaming is a core activity of contemporary digital sociality that always involves bodies, whether represented on-screen or as game-players who are neither disembodied nor radically separated from those on-screen re-presentations, this article addresses the fact that, in everyday social life, stereotypes of representations of bodies of difference circulate in embedded ways in all communicative activities including digital gaming. However, if re-thinking the relationship of the body and its on-screen representations through assemblages of bodies–technologies beyond the more rudimentary real/virtual distinctions of older conceptualizations of media use, it is possible to open new critical frameworks for addressing race and ethnicity discrimination in the contemporary activity and performativity of gameplay. This article begins with a brief introduction to critical approaches to the body, followed by a discussion of on-screen representation and bodily stereotyping, finishing with an analysis of the relationship between bodies, gaming avatars and mutually constitutive body–technology relationships.

Keywords

Digital gaming race ethnicity bodies gaming technology

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ahmed

(2011). Problematic proximities: Or why critiques of gay imperialism matter. Feminist Legal Studies, 19(2), 119–132.

Bourdieu

(1990). The logic of practice. Oxford: Polity.

Butler

(1993). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of ‘sex’. London: Routledge.

Cover

(2004). New media theory: Electronic games, democracy and reconfiguring the author-audience relationship. Social Semiotics, 14(2), 173–191.

Cover

(2006). Audience inter/active: Interactive media, narrative control and reconceiving audience history. New Media & Society, 8(1), 213–232.

Cover

(2016). Digital identities: Creating and communicating the online self. London: Elsevier.

Filiciak

(2003). Hyper identities: Postmodern identity patterns in massively multiplayer online role-playing games. In J.

Mark

Wolf

and Perron

Bernard

(Eds), The Video game theory reader (pp. 87–101). New York: Routledge.

Foucault

(1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison ( Sheridan

, Trans.). London: Penguin.

Gibson

(1984). Neuromancer. New York: Ace Books.

10.

Grodal

(2003). Stories for eye, ear, and muscles: Video games, media, and embodied experiences. In Wolf

M. J. P.

& Perron

(Eds), The Video game theory reader (pp. 129–155). New York: Routledge.

11.

Grubb

(2014). ‘Las Vegas consumer electronics show unveils heaps of gadgets.’ The Age, 11 January. Retrieved 3 December 2015, from http://www.theage.com.au/technology/technology-news/

12.

Grosz

(1994). Volatile bodies: Toward a corporeal feminism. St. Leonards, NSW: Allen & Unwin.

13.

Grosz

(1995). Space, time and perversion: The politics of bodies. London: Routledge.

14.

Huizinga

John

(1949). Homo Ludens: A study of the play-element in culture. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

15.

Lahti

(2003). As we become machines: Corporealized pleasures in video games. In Wolf

M. J. P.

and Perron

(Eds), The video game theory reader (pp. 157–170). New York: Routledge.

16.

Lingis

(1994). Foreign bodies. New York: Routledge.

17.

Nakamura

(2008). Digitizing race: Visual cultures of the internet. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

18.

Rosello

(1998). Declining the stereotype: Ethnicity and representation in French cultures. Hanover, NH: University Press of New England.