Since the late 1970s, technical communication scholars and teachers have largely agreed that technical communication’s humanistic character can be found in the field’s rhetorical nature and the social nature of discourse. Building on Patrick Moore’s efforts to rehabilitate “instrumental discourse” in the face of such general consensus, this essay argues that such notions of technical communication’s humanistic character, although unquestionably groundbreaking and crucial to the field’s sense of self and mission, remain too deeply indebted to traditional academic humanities’ and English studies’ constructions of humanistic purview, which largely refuse to accommodate technology, especially physical technology artifacts. Considering alternatives that recast the technology-humanities relationship and situate technology within a humanistic framework can yield benefits for both technical communication and English studies broadly construed.
Adams, K. H. (1993). A history of professional writing instruction in American colleges: Years of acceptance, growth, and doubt. Dallas, TX: Southern Methodist University Press.
2.
Allen, J. (1998). Refining a social consciousness: Late 20th century influences, effects, and ongoing struggles in technical communication. In M. J. Killingsworth (Series Ed.) & T. C. Kynell & M. G. Moran (Vol. Eds.), ATTW contemporary studies in technical communication: Vol. 7. Three keys to the past: The history of technical communication (pp. 227-246). Stamford, CT: Ablex.
3.
American Humanist Association. (2003). Humanism and its aspirations: Humanist manifesto III. Retrieved July 13, 2005, from http://www.americanhumanist.org/3/HumandItsAspirations.htm
4.
Atkins, G. D. (2000). On writing well: Or, springing the genie from the inkpot. Journal of Advanced Composition, 20, 73-83.
5.
Bolter, J. D. (1991). Writing space: The computer, hypertext, and the history of writing. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6.
Brantlinger, P. (2000). Who killed Shakespeare? What’s happened to English since the radical sixties. New York: Routledge.
7.
Connors, R. (1998). Landmark essay: The rise of technical writing instruction in America. In M. J. Killingsworth (Series Ed.) & T. C. Kynell & M. G. Moran (Vol. Eds.), ATTW contemporary studies in technical communication: Vol. 7. Three keys to the past: The history of technical communication (pp. 173-195). Stamford, CT: Ablex.
8.
Dombrowski, P. M. (1994). Humanistic aspects of technical communication. Amityville, NY: Baywood.
9.
Dombrowski, P. M. (1995). Post-modernism as the resurgence of humanism in technical communication studies. Technical Communication Quarterly, 4, 165-185.
10.
Dragga, S. (1996). “Is this ethical?” A survey of opinion on principles and practices of document design. Technical Commmunication: Journal for the Society of Technical Communication, 43, 255-265.
11.
Earle, S. C. (1911). The theory and practice of technical writing. New York: Macmillan.
12.
Ellul, J. (1964). The technological society (J. Wilkinson, Trans.). New York: Knopf.
13.
Faigley, L. (1985). Nonacademic writing: The social perspective. In L. Odell & D. Goswami (Eds.), Writing in nonacademic settings (pp. 231-248). New York: Guilford.
14.
Feenberg, A. (1991). Critical theory of technology. New York: Oxford University Press.
15.
Grobman, L. (1999). Beyond internationalization: Multicultural education in the professional writing contact zone. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 13, 427-448.
16.
Habermas, J. (1992). Moral consciousness and communicative action (S. W. Nicholsen & C. Lenhardt, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17.
Hovde, M. R. (2004, April 23). Tech comm and English departments (Message posted to Association of Teachers of Technical Writing mailing list). Retrieved from http://lyris.acs.ttu.edu/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=attw-l
18.
Humanist Manifesto I and II. (1973). Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books.
19.
Johnson, R. R. (1998). User-centered technology: A rhetorical theory for computers and other mundane artifacts. Albany: State University of New York Press.
20.
Johnson, R. R. (1999). Johnson responds. Technical Communication Quarterly, 8, 223-226.
21.
Katz, S. B. (1992). The ethic of expediency: Classical rhetoric, technology, and the Holocaust. College English, 54, 255-275.
22.
Kreth, M., Miller, C. R., & Redish, J. (1996). Comments on “instrumental discourse is as humanistic as rhetoric.”Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 10, 476-490.
23.
Kurtz, P. (2000). Humanist manifesto 2000: A call for a new planetary humanism. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.
24.
Kurtz, P., & Wilson, E. H. (1973). Humanist manifesto II. Retrieved April 25, 2005, from http://www.americanhumanist.org/about/manifesto2.html
25.
Kynell, T. C. (1996). Writing in a milieu of utility: The move to technical communication in American engineering programs, 1850-1950. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
26.
Lamont, C. (1997). The philosophy of humanism. Amherst, NY: Humanist Press.
27.
Longo, B. (2000). Spurious coin: A history of science, management, and technical writing. Albany: State University of New York Press.
28.
Lyotard, J.-F.(1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge (G. Bennington & B. Massumi, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
29.
MacNealy, M. S., & Heaton, L. B. (1999). Can this marriage be saved: Is an English department a good home for technical communication?Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 29, 41-64.
30.
Markel, M. (2001). Ethics in technical communication: A critique and synthesis. In M. J. Killingsworth (Series Ed.), ATTW contemporary studies in technical communication (Vol. 14). Stamford, CT: Ablex.
31.
Merton, R. K. (1964). Foreword. In J. Ellul, The technological society (J. Wilkinson, Trans., pp. v-viii). New York: Knopf.
32.
Miller, C. R. (1979). A humanistic rationale for technical writing. College English, 40, 610-624.
33.
Moore, P. (1996a). Instrumental discourse is as humanistic as rhetoric. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 10, 100-118.
34.
Moore, P. (1996b). A response to Miller and Kreth. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 10, 491-502.
35.
Moore, P. (1997). Rhetorical vs. instrumental approaches to teaching technical communication. Technical Communication, 44, 163-173.
36.
Moore, P. (1999). Myths about instrumental discourse: Aresponse to Robert R. Johnson. Technical Communication Quarterly, 8, 210-226.
37.
Moore, P. (2000). Pluralism, instrumental discourse, and the limits of social construction: Acomment to Laurie Grobman. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 14, 74-83.
38.
Moore, P. (2004). Questioning the motives of technical communication and rhetoric: Stephen Katz’s “ethic of expediency.”Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 34, 5-29.
39.
Nardi, B. A., & O’Day, V. L. (1998). Information ecologies: Using technology with a heart. Cambridge, MA: MIT University Press.
40.
Noble, D. F. (1997). The religion of technology: The divinity of man and the spirit of invention. New York: Knopf.
41.
Ong, W. J. (1982). Orality and literacy: The technologizing of the word. London: Routledge.
42.
Porter, J. E. (1998). Rhetorical ethics and internetworked writing. Greenwich, CT: Ablex.
43.
Postman, N. (1992). Technopoly: The surrender of culture to technology. New York: Knopf.
44.
Rutter, R. (1985). Poetry, imagination, and technical writing. College English, 47, 698-712.
45.
Savage, G. J. (1996). Redefining the responsibilities of teachers and the social position of the technical communicator. Technical Communication Quarterly, 5, 309-327.
46.
Selfe, C. L. (2000). To his nibs G. Douglas Atkins—Just in case you’re serious about your not-so-modest proposal. Journal of Advanced Composition, 20, 405-413.
47.
Snow, C. P. (1959). The two cultures and the scientific revolution. New York: Cambridge University Press.
48.
Tebeaux, E. (1991). Technical communication, literary theory, and English studies: Stasis, change, and the problem of meaning. Technical Writing Teacher, 18, 15-27.
49.
Thralls, C., & Blyler, N. R. (1993). The social perspective and professional communication: Diversity and directions in research. In N. R. Blyler & C. Thralls (Eds.), Professional communication: The social perspective (pp. 3-34). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
50.
Winner, L. (1977). Autonomous technology: Technics-out-of-control as a theme in political thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT University Press.
