This article examines the authors’ arduous struggle to develop a professional communication program that would not only meet their students’ professional and intellectual needs but also achieve an identity consistent with their goals as scholars and teachers of composition. Ultimately, the authors argue that a professional communication program that combines in its teaching the ethos of a liberal arts tradition along with the practical skills needed by writers in the workplace is both desirable and possible but that it must be flexible enough to allow for ongoing curricular and philosophical negotiations to meet changing contextual demands.
Allen, N., & Benninghoff, S. T. (2004). TCP program snapshots: Developing curricula and addressing challenges. Technical Communication Quarterly, 13, 157-185.
2.
Bennett, B. S. (2002). Toward finding a common critical and pedagogical ground. In F. J. Antczak, C. Coggins, & G. D. Klinger (Eds.), Professing rhetoric: Selected papers from the 2000 Rhetoric Society of America Conference (pp. 29-35). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
3.
Cambridge, B. L. (Ed.). (2001). Electronic portfolios: Emerging practices in student, faculty, and institutional learning. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education.
4.
Campbell, N. (2002). Getting rid of the yawn factor: Using a portfolio assignment to motivate students in a professional writing class. Business Communication Quarterly, 65(3), 42-54.
5.
Couture, B. (1992). Categorizing professional discourse: Engineering, administrative, and technical/professional writing. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 6, 5-37.
6.
Emmons, K. (2003). Rethinking genres of reflection: Student portfolio cover letters and the narrative of progress. Composition Studies, 31, 43-62.
7.
Faber, B. (2002). Professional identities: What is professional about professional communication?Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 16, 306-337.
8.
Fish, S. (2001). Rhetoric. In P. Bizzell & B. Herzberg (Eds.), The rhetorical tradition: Readings from classical times to the present (2nd ed.), pp. 1609-1627). Boston: Bedford/St. Martins.
9.
Fleming, D. (1998). Rhetoric as a course of study. College English, 61, 169-191.
10.
Grobman, L. (1999). Beyond internationalization: Multicultural education in the professional writing contact zone. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 13, 427-448.
11.
Harris, J. S. (1978). Expanding the definition of technical writing. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 8, 133-138.
12.
Henry, J. (2000). Writing workplace cultures: An archaeology of professional writing. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
13.
Kogen, M. (Ed.). (1989). Writing in the business professions. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
14.
Kreth, M. (1996). Comments on “Instrumental discourse is as humanistic as rhetoric.”Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 10, 476-482.
15.
Lay, M. M. (1992). Gender studies: Implications for the professional communication classroom. In N. Blyler & C. Thralls (Eds.), Professional communication: The social perspective (pp. 215-229). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16.
Lazere, D. (1992). Back to basics: Aforce for oppression or liberation?College English, 54, 7-21.
17.
Locker, K. O. (2003). Will professional communication be the death of business communication?Business Communication Quarterly, 66, 118-132.
18.
Lumsden, J. A., Garis, J. W., Reardon, R. C., Unger, M. P., & Arkin, S. (2002). A blueprint for building an online career portfolio. Journal of Career Planning & Employment, 62, 33-38.
19.
McKoski, N. (2002). The politics of professing rhetoric in the history of composition and communication. In F. J. Antczak, C. Coggins, & G. D. Klinger (Eds.), Professing rhetoric: Selected papers from the 2000 Rhetoric Society of America Conference (pp. 13-19). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
20.
Miller, C. R. (1979). A humanistic rationale for technical writing. College English, 40, 610-617.
21.
Moore, P. (1996). Instrumental discourse is as humanistic as rhetoric. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 10, 100-104.
22.
Ohmann, R. (1995). Afterward. In K. Fitts & A. France (Eds.), Left margins: Cultural studies and composition pedagogy (pp. 325-331). Albany: State University of New York Press.
23.
O’Neill, P., LoBue, N. S., McLaughlin, M., Crow, A., & Albertson, K. S. (Eds.). (1999). A comment on “Rhetoric as a course of study.”College English, 62, 274-275.
24.
Plato. (1952). Gorgias (W.C. Helmbold, Trans.). New York: Macmillan. (Original work published 380 B.C.E.)
25.
Plato. (1966). Phaedrus (H. N. Fowler, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original work published 360 B.C.E.)
26.
Pullman, G. (2002). Electronic portfolios revisited: The efolios project. Computers and Composition, 19, 151-169.
27.
Quintilian. (1979). The institutio oratoria: Vol. IV (H.E. Butler, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original work published A.D. 88)
28.
Redish, J. (1996). Comments on “Instrumental discourse is as humanistic as rhetoric.”Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 10, 486-490.
29.
Richardson, M. (2003). Professional communication studies, the MLA, and civic discourse. Business Communication Quarterly, 66, 105-112.
30.
Rutter, R. (1991). History, rhetoric, and humanism: Toward a more comprehensive definition of technical communication. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 21, 133-153.
31.
Scanlon, P. M., & Coon, A. C. (1994). Attitudes of professional technical communicators regarding the content of an undergraduate course in technical communication: A survey [Electronic version]. Technical Communication, 41, 439-446.
32.
Selber, S. (1994). Beyond skill-building: Challenges facing technical communication teachers in the computer age. Technical Communication Quarterly, 3, 365-390.
33.
Smith, E. O. (1997). Intertextual connections to “A humanistic rationale for technical writing.”Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 11, 192-222.
34.
Smith, J. (1997). Students’ goals, gatekeeping, and some questions of ethics. College English, 59, 299-320.
35.
Spigelman, C. (1998). Taboo topics and the rhetoric of silence: Discussing lives on the boundary in a basic writing class. Journal of Basic Writing, 17(1), 42-55.
36.
Sullivan, P. A., & Porter, J. E. (1993). Remapping curricular geography: Professional writing in/and English. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 7, 389-422.
37.
Tebeaux, E. (1980). Let’s not ruin technical writing, too: Acomment on the essays of Carolyn Miller and Elizabeth Harris. College English, 41, 822-825.
38.
Tebeaux, E. (1985). Redesigning professional writing courses to meet the communication needs of writers in business and industry. College Composition and Communication, 36, 419-428.
39.
Thralls, C., &. Blyler, N. R. (1992). The social perspective and professional communication: Diversity and directions in research. In N. Blyler & C. Thralls (Eds.), Professional communication: The social perspective (pp. 3-34). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
40.
Thrush, E. A. (1993). Bridging the gaps: Technical communication in an international and multicultural society. Technical Communication Quarterly, 2, 271-283.
41.
Whitburn, M. D. (1984). The ideal orator and literary critic as technical communicators: An emerging revolution in English departments. In R. J. Connors, L. S. Ede, & A. A. Lunsford (Eds.), Essays on classical rhetoric and modern discourse (pp. 226-247). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
42.
Yancey, K. B. (1998). Reflection in the writing classroom. Logan: Utah State University Press.
43.
Yancey, K. B. (1999). Looking back as we look forward: Historicizing writing assessment. College Composition and Communication, 50, 483-503.
44.
Yancey, K. B., & Weiser, I. (Eds.). (1997). Situating portfolios: Four perspectives. Logan: Utah State University Press.
