To critically examine the system dynamics necessary for successfully implementing a novel end-of-life integrated care pathway (EoL-ICP) program in promoting dignity and quality of life among terminally-ill Chinese nursing home residents.
Methods:
Thirty stakeholders were recruited to participate in 4 interpretive-systemic focus groups.
Results:
Framework analysis revealed 10 themes, organized into 3 categories, namely, (1) Regulatory Empowerment (interdisciplinary teamwork, resource allocation, culture building, collaborative policy making), (2) Family-Centered Care (continuity of care, family care conference, partnership in care), and (3) Collective Compassion (devotion in care, empathic understanding, compassionate actions).
Conclusions:
These findings highlight the importance of organizational structure, social discourse, and shared meaning in the provision of EoL-ICP in Chinese societies, underscoring the significant triangulation between political, cultural, and spiritual contexts embodied in the experience of dignity.
World Health Organization. Interesting facts about ageing. World Health Organization. Web site. http://www.who.int/ageing/about/facts/en/index.html. Published September 30, 2014. Accessed December 30, 2014.
2.
ChuiEWTChongAMLKoLSF. Elderly Commission’s Study on Residential Care Services for the Elderly Final Report. Hong Kong: Elderly Commission; 2009.
3.
Census and Statistics Department. Hong Kong Population Projections 2012-2014. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Government; 2012.
4.
TseDMW. Palliative Care: Setting the Scene for the Future. Hong Kong: Synapse, Hong Kong College of Physicians; 2013;12-16.
5.
LoRSKwanBHLauKPKwanCWLamLMWooJ. The needs, current knowledge, and attitudes of care staff toward the implementation of palliative care in old age homes. Am J Hosp Palliat Med. 2009;27(4):266-271.
6.
Department of Health. End of Life Care Strategy: Promoting High Quality Care for all Adults at the End of Life. London: Department of Health; 2009.
7.
Department of Health and Ageing. Supporting Australians to live well at the end of life: National Palliative Care Strategy. Canberra: Department of Health and Ageing; 2010.
8.
National Consensus Project for Quality Palliative Care. Clinical Practice Guideline for Quality Palliative Care, 2nd ed. Pittsburgh, PA: National Consensus project for Quality Palliative Care; 2009.
9.
The King’s Fund. Delivering Better Care at End of Life: The Next Steps. London: The King’s Fund; 2010.
10.
Department of Health. End of Life Care Strategy: Quality Markers and Measures for End of Life Care. London: Department of Health; 2009.
11.
LhussierMCarrSMWilcocksonJ. The evaluation of an end-of-life integrated care pathway. Int J Palliat Nurs. 2007;12(2):74-81.
12.
LuhrsCAPenrodJD. End-of-life care pathways. Curr Opin Support and Palliat Care. 2007;1(3):198-201.
13.
JohnstoneRPJonesAFowellABurtonCRRycroft-MaloneJ. End of life care in Wales: evaluation of a care pathway-based implementation strategy. BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2012;2(2):150-155.
14.
LukJKHLiuANgWCBehPChanFHW. End-of-life care in Hong Kong. Asian J Gerontol Geriatr. 2011;6(2):103-106.
15.
FuenmayorR. The self-referential structure of everyday-Living situation. A phenomenological ontology for interpretive systemology. Syst Practice. 1991;4(5):449-472.
16.
FuenmayorR. Truth and openness. An epistemology for interpretive systemology. Syst Pract. 1991;4(5):473-489.
17.
Ochoa-AriasAE. An Interpretive-Systemic Framework for the study of community organizations. Syst Pract Act Res. 1998;11(5):543-562.
18.
WilliamB. Systems Concepts in Action: A Practitioner’s Toolkit. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press; 2010.
19.
RitchieJSpencerE. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research: In: BrymanABurgessRG., editors. Analyzing Qualitative Data. London: Routledge; 1993.
20.
HoAHYChanCLW. Liberating bereaved persons from the oppression of death and loss in Chinese societies: example of public health approach. In: ConwayS., ed. Governing Death and Loss: Empowerment, Involvement and Participation. UK: Oxford University Press; 2011:198-228.
21.
HoAHYLeungPPYChanCLW. Dignity and quality of life in community palliative care. In: FongSTongKW., eds. Community Care in Hong Kong: Current practices, Practice-Research Studies and Future Directions. Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong Press; 2014:319-341.
22.
ChanCLWHoAHYLeungPPY. The blessing and curses of filial piety on dignity at the end-of-life: lived experience of Hong Kong Chinese adult children caregivers. J Ethn Cult Divers Soc Work. 2012;21(4):277-296.
23.
Hong Kong College of Physicians. Palliative Care: Setting the Scene for the Future. Hong Kong: Hong Kong College of Physicians; 2008.
24.
WiegandDLGrantMSCheonJGergisMA. Family-centered end-of-life care in the ICU. J Gerontol Nurs. 2013;39(8):60-68.
25.
HoAHChanCLLeungPP. Living and dying with dignity in Chinese society: perspectives of older palliative care patients in Hong Kong. Age Ageing. 2013;42(4):455-461.
26.
ScottAMCaughlinJP. Managing multiple goals in family discourse about end-of-life health decisions. Res Aging. 2012;24(6):670-691.
27.
PowazkiRDWalshD. The family conference in palliative medicine: a practical approach. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2014;31(6):678-684.
28.
KearneyMKWeiningerRVVachonMLHarrisonRLMountBN. Self-care of physicians caring for patients at the end-of-life: “Being connected… a key to my survival”. J Am Med Assoc. 2009;301(11):1155-1164.
29.
HoAHYLeungPPYTseDMW. Dignity amidst liminality: suffering within healing among Chinese terminal cancer patients. Death Stud. 2013;37(10):953-970.
30.
ShihCYHuWYLeeLTYaoCAChenCYChiuTY. Effect of a compassion-focused training program in palliative care education for Medical Students. Am J Hospice Palliat Med. 2012;30(2):114-120.
31.
PotashJSChanFHoAHWangXLChengC. A model for art therapy based supervision for end-of-life-care workers in Hong Kong. Death Stud. 2015;39(1-5):44–51. doi:10.1080/07481187.2013.859187.
32.
KellehearA. Compassionate Cities: Public Health and End of Life Care. New York: Routledge; 2005.
