In this article, we explore the beliefs, values and attitudes about female genital mutilation in the diaspora of sub-Saharan women and how the migration process has influenced these beliefs. Our qualitative analysis of the life stories and lifelines of 10 women in the sub-Saharan diaspora in light of the Social Convention Theory indicated that making public statements about the topic is complex and that the taboo permeating the practice remains intact even outside of Africa. Furthermore, we discovered that, in our context, this practice was not a requirement and did not improve the chances of marriage, with female behaviours considered ‘appropriate’ instead gaining value. Any interventions based on this theory must consider the broad networks that help shape marriages in this diaspora. This work opened new lines of research regarding the situation of the diaspora of sub-Saharan women and the relationship of the practice of female genital mutilation with marriage.
AgboliA. A.RichardF.AujoulatI. (2020). “When my mother called me to say that the time of cutting had arrived, I just escaped to Belgium with my daughter”: Identifying turning points in the change of attitudes towards the practice of female genital mutilation among migrant women in Belgium. BMC Women’s Health, 20(1), 107. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-020-00976-w
2.
AkweongoP.JacksonE. F.Appiah-YeboahS.SakeahE.PhillipsJ. F. (2021). It’s a woman’s thing: Gender roles sustaining the practice of female genital mutilation among the Kassena-Nankana of northern Ghana. Reproductive Health, 18(1), 52. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-021-01085-z
3.
Al-AmoudiI.LatsisJ. (2014). The arbitrariness and normativity of social conventions. The British Journal of Sociology, 65(2), 358-378. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12042
4.
AyalaR. A.KochT. F. (2019). The image of ethnography-making sense of the social through images: A structured method. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919843014
5.
BarrettH. R.BrownK.AlhassanY.LeyeE. (2020). Transforming social norms to end FGM in the EU: An evaluation of the REPLACE Approach. Reproductive Health, 17(1), 40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-020-0879-2
6.
Bassi FollariJ. E. (2014). Constructing a life history: Key decisions in the research process. Athenea Digital. Revista de pensamiento e investigación social, 14(3), 129. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/athenea.1315
7.
BedriN.SherfiH.RudwanG.ElhadiS.KabiruC.AminW. (2019). Shifts in FGM/C practice in Sudan: Communities’ perspectives and drivers. BMC Women’s Health, 19(1), 168. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-019-0863-6
8.
BrownK.BeechamD.BarrettH. (2013). The applicability of behaviour change in intervention programmes targeted at ending female genital mutilation in the EU: Integrating social cognitive and community level approaches. Obstetrics and Gynecology International, 2013, 1−12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/324362
9.
CaetanoA.NicoM. (2018). Forever young: creative responses to challenging issues in biographical research. Contemporary Social Science, 14(3–4), 361−378. https://doi.org/10.1080/21582041.2018.1510134
10.
ChambersL. A.JacksonR.WorthingtonC.WilsonC. L.TharaoW.GreenspanN. R.MaschingR.Pierre-PierreV.MbulaheniT.AmiraultM.BrownleeP. (2017). Decolonizing scoping review methodologies for literature with, for, and by indigenous peoples and the African Diaspora: Dialoguing with the tensions. Qualitative Health Research, 28(2), 175−188. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732317743237
11.
CislaghiB.HeiseL. (2018). Four avenues of normative influence: A research agenda for health promotion in low and mid-income countries. Health Psychology, 37(6), 562−573. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000618
12.
CopelandA. J.AgostoD. E. (2012). Diagrams and relational maps: The use of graphic elicitation techniques with interviewing for data collection, analysis, and display. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 11(5), 513−533. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940691201100501
13.
DhunpathR. (2000). Life history methodology: “narradigm” regained. International Journal of Qualitative Studies inEducation, 13(5), 543−551. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518390050156459
14.
EakinJ. M.GladstoneB. (2020). “Value-adding” analysis: Doing more with qualitative data. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920949333
15.
EffersonC.VogtS.ElhadiA.AhmedH. E. F.FehrE. (2015). Female genital cutting is not a social coordination norm. Science, 349(6255), 1446−1447. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa7978
16.
EffersonC.VogtS.FehrE. (2019). The promise and the peril of using social influence to reverse harmful traditions. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(1), 55−68. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0768-2
17.
EssénB.MosselmansL. (2021). How to ensure policies and interventions rely on strong supporting facts to improve women’s health: The case of female genital cutting, using Rosling’s Factfulness approach. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 100(4), 579−586. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14059
18.
EvansW. D.DonahueC.SniderJ.BedriN.ElhusseinT. A.ElaminS. A. (2019). The Saleema initiative in Sudan to abandon female genital mutilation: Outcomes and dose response effects. Plos One, 14(3), e0213380. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213380
19.
FeredayJ.Muir-CochraneE. (2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 80−92. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690600500107
GeleA. A.SagbakkenM.KumarB. (2015). Is female circumcision evolving or dissolving in Norway? A qualitative study on attitudes toward the practice among young Somalis in the Oslo area. International Journal of Women’s Health, 7, 933. https://doi.org/10.2147/ijwh.s93217
22.
GraamansE. P.ZolnikovT. R.SmetE.NguuraP. N.LeshoreL. C.HaveS. T. (2019). Lessons learned from implementing alternative rites in the fight against female genital mutilation/cutting. The Pan African Medical Journal, 32, 59. https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2019.32.59.17624
23.
GuenetteF.MarshallA. (2009). Time line drawings: Enhancing participant voice in narrative interviews on sensitive topics. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(1), 85−92. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690900800108
24.
Gutiérrez-GarcíaA. I.Solano-RuízC.Siles-GonzálezJ.Perpiñá-GalvañJ. (2021). Life Histories and Lifelines: A Methodological Symbiosis for the Study of Female Genital Mutilation. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20, 160940692110409. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211040969
25.
HamedS.AhlbergB.-M.TrenholmJ. (2017). Powerlessness, normalization, and resistance: A foucauldian discourse analysis of women’s narratives on obstetric Fistula in Eastern Sudan. Qualitative Health Research, 27(12), 1828−1841. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732317720423
26.
HammersleyM.AtkinsonP. (2007). Etnografía: Métodos de investigación (2nd ed.). Paidós.
27.
IsmailS. A.AbbasA. M.HabibD.MorsyH.SalehM. A.BahloulM. (2017). Effect of female genital mutilation/cutting; types I and II on sexual function: case-controlled study. Reproductive Health, 14(1), 108. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-017-0371-9
28.
Jiménez RuizI.Almansa MartínezP.Alcón BelchíC. (2017). Dismantling the man-made myths upholding female genital mutilation. Health Care for Women International, 38(5), 478–491. https://doi.org/10.1080/07399332.2017.1289211
29.
Jimenez RuizI.Almansa MartínezP.Pastor BravoM. (2016). Key points for abolishing Female Genital Mutilation from the perspective of the men involved. Midwifery, 34, 30–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2016.01.017
30.
Jimenez RuizI.Pastor BravoM.Almansa MartínezP.MeseguerC. B. (2014). Men Facing the Ablation/Female Genital Mutilation (A/FGM): Cultural Factors that Support this Tradition. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 132, 631–638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.365
31.
Jiménez-RuizI.Almansa MartínezP.Pastor BravoM. (2016). Percepciones de los hombres sobre las complicaciones asociadas a la mutilación genital femenina. Gaceta Sanitaria, 30(4), 258–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2016.03.009
JohansenR. E. B.AhmedS. A. E. (2021). Negotiating female genital cutting in a transnational context. Qualitative Health Research, 31(3), 458−471. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732320979183
34.
KandalaN. B.NnanatuC. C.AtilolaG.KombaP.MavatikuaL.MooreZ.MackieG.Shell-DuncanB. (2019). A spatial analysis of the prevalence of female genital mutilation/cutting among 0-14-year-old girls in Kenya. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(21), 4155. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16214155
35.
KhoslaR.BanerjeeJ.ChouD.SayL.FriedS. T. (2017). Gender equality and human rights approaches to female genital mutilation: A review of international human rights norms and standards. Reproductive Health, 14(1), 59. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-017-0322-5
36.
KolarK.AhmadF.ChanL.EricksonP. G. (2015). Timeline mapping in qualitative interviews: A study of resilience with marginalized groups. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 14(3), 13−32. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940691501400302
37.
La BarberaM. (2010). Intervenciones sobre los genitales femeninos: Entre el bisturí del cirujano plástico y el cuchillo ritual. Revista de Dialectología y Tradiciones Populares, 65(2), 465−488. https://doi.org/10.3989/rdtp.2010.16
MackieG. (1996). Ending footbinding and infibulation: A convention account. American Sociological Review, 61(6), 999. https://doi.org/10.2307/2096305
40.
MackieG. (2018). Social norms change: Believing makes it so. Social Research: An International Quarterly, 85(1), 141−166. https://www.muse.jhu.edu/article/692748
41.
MackieG.Le JeuneJ. (2009, mayo). Social dynamics of abandonment of harmful practices: A new look at the theory. Innocenti Research Centre UNICEF.
42.
MalterudK.SiersmaV. D.GuassoraA. D. (2016). Sample size in qualitative interview studies. Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1753−1760. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315617444
MohamudA.QureshiZ.de WildtG.JonesL. (2021). Exploring perceptions of female genital mutilation/cutting abandonment (FGM/C) in Kenyan health care professionals. Qualitative Health Research, 31(11), 1976−1989. https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323211015967
46.
MollbornS.SennottC. (2014). Bundles of norms about teen sex and pregnancy. Qualitative Health Research, 25(9), 1283−1299. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732314557086
47.
MoriñaA. (2016). Investigar con Historias de Vida. Narcea.
NaderifarM.GoliH.GhaljaieF. (2017). Snowball sampling: A purposeful method of sampling in qualitative research. Strides in Development of Medical Education, 14(3), 14. https://doi.org/10.5812/sdme.67670
50.
NinaV. E.NaomiB.SylvieG.de Velde SarahV. (2020). An examination of the medicalization trend in female genital cutting in Egypt: How does it relate to a girl’s risk of being cut?Social Science & Medicine, 258, 113024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113024
51.
OgunsijiO.UssherJ. (2021). Beyond illegality: Primary healthcare providers’ perspectives on elimination of female genital mutilation/cutting. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 30(9–10), 1253−1262. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15667
52.
O’NeillS.PallittoC. (2021). The consequences of female genital mutilation on psycho-social well-being: A systematic review of qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 31(9), 1738−1750. https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323211001862
53.
Pastor-BravoM. D. M.Almansa-MartínezP.Jiménez-RuizI. (2020). Postmigratory Perceptions of Female Genital Mutilation: Qualitative Life History Research. Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 104365962096257. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043659620962570
54.
PeatG.RodriguezA.SmithJ. (2018). Interpretive phenomenological analysis applied to healthcare research. Evidence Based Nursing, 22(1), 7−9. https://doi.org/10.1136/ebnurs-2018-103017
55.
Pujadas MuñozJ. J. (2002). The biographical method: the use of life histories in the social sciences. In Cuadernos metodológicos (5, 2nd ed.). Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas.
56.
ShahawyS.AmanuelH.NourN. M. (2019). Perspectives on female genital cutting among immigrant women and men in Boston. Social Science & Medicine, 220, 331−339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.11.030
57.
Shell-DuncanB.HernlundY. (2001). Female «circumcision» in Africa: Culture, controversy, and change (1st ed.). Lynne Rienner Pub. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022278X01313861
58.
Shell-DuncanB.WanderK.HernlundY.MoreauA. (2011). Dynamics of change in the practice of female genital cutting in Senegambia: Testing predictions of social convention theory. Social Science & Medicine, 73(8), 1275−1283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.07.022
59.
Siles-GonzálezJ.Gutiérrez-GarcíaA. I.Solano-RuízC. (2020). Leadership among Women Working to Eradicate Female Genital Mutilation: The Impact of Environmental Change in Transcultural Moments. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(16), 5996. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17165996
60.
SmitA.SwartzL.BantjesJ.RoomaneyR.CoetzeeB. (2020). Moving beyond text-and-talk in qualitative health research: Methodological considerations of using multiple media for data collection. Qualitative Health Research, 31(3), 600−614. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732320976556
61.
SquiresA. (2008). Language barriers and qualitative nursing research: Methodological considerations. International Nursing Review, 55(3), 265−273. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-7657.2008.00652.x
VarolN.HallJ. J.BlackK.TurkmaniS.DawsonA. (2017). Evidence-based policy responses to strengthen health, community and legislative systems that care for women in Australia with female genital mutilation/cutting. Reproductive Health, 14(1), 63. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-017-0324-3
66.
WahlbergA.JohnsdotterS.Ekholm SellingK.EssénB. (2019). Shifting perceptions of female genital cutting in a Swedish migration context. Plos One, 14(12), e0225629. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225629
67.
WahlbergA.JohnsdotterS.SellingK. E.KällestålC.EssénB. (2017). Baseline data from a planned RCT on attitudes to female genital cutting after migration: when are interventions justified?BMJ Open, 7(8), e017506. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017506
68.
WanderK.Shell-DuncanB. (2020). Social norm coordination and readiness to change female genital cutting: Evidence from Senegambia. SSM - Population Health, 11, 100593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2020.100593
69.
WilsonE.KennyA.Dickson-SwiftV. (2017). Ethical challenges in community-based participatory research: A scoping review. Qualitative Health Research, 28(2), 189−199. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732317690721
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
