Female Genital Mutilation as a Social Norm: Examining the Beliefs and Attitudes of Women in This Diaspora

Abstract

In this article, we explore the beliefs, values and attitudes about female genital mutilation in the diaspora of sub-Saharan women and how the migration process has influenced these beliefs. Our qualitative analysis of the life stories and lifelines of 10 women in the sub-Saharan diaspora in light of the Social Convention Theory indicated that making public statements about the topic is complex and that the taboo permeating the practice remains intact even outside of Africa. Furthermore, we discovered that, in our context, this practice was not a requirement and did not improve the chances of marriage, with female behaviours considered ‘appropriate’ instead gaining value. Any interventions based on this theory must consider the broad networks that help shape marriages in this diaspora. This work opened new lines of research regarding the situation of the diaspora of sub-Saharan women and the relationship of the practice of female genital mutilation with marriage.

Keywords

female genital mutilation social convention theory Diaspora West Africa women Spain life history lifelines

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Agboli

A. A.

Richard

Aujoulat

(2020). “When my mother called me to say that the time of cutting had arrived, I just escaped to Belgium with my daughter”: Identifying turning points in the change of attitudes towards the practice of female genital mutilation among migrant women in Belgium. BMC Women’s Health, 20(1), 107. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-020-00976-w

Akweongo

Jackson

E. F.

Appiah-Yeboah

Sakeah

Phillips

J. F.

(2021). It’s a woman’s thing: Gender roles sustaining the practice of female genital mutilation among the Kassena-Nankana of northern Ghana. Reproductive Health, 18(1), 52. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-021-01085-z

Al-Amoudi

Latsis

(2014). The arbitrariness and normativity of social conventions. The British Journal of Sociology, 65(2), 358-378. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12042

Ayala

R. A.

Koch

T. F.

(2019). The image of ethnography-making sense of the social through images: A structured method. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919843014

Barrett

H. R.

Brown

Alhassan

Leye

(2020). Transforming social norms to end FGM in the EU: An evaluation of the REPLACE Approach. Reproductive Health, 17(1), 40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-020-0879-2

Bassi Follari

J. E.

(2014). Constructing a life history: Key decisions in the research process. Athenea Digital. Revista de pensamiento e investigación social, 14(3), 129. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/athenea.1315

Bedri

Sherfi

Rudwan

Elhadi

Kabiru

Amin

(2019). Shifts in FGM/C practice in Sudan: Communities’ perspectives and drivers. BMC Women’s Health, 19(1), 168. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-019-0863-6

Brown

Beecham

Barrett

(2013). The applicability of behaviour change in intervention programmes targeted at ending female genital mutilation in the EU: Integrating social cognitive and community level approaches. Obstetrics and Gynecology International, 2013, 1−12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/324362

Caetano

Nico

(2018). Forever young: creative responses to challenging issues in biographical research. Contemporary Social Science, 14(3–4), 361−378. https://doi.org/10.1080/21582041.2018.1510134

10.

Chambers

L. A.

Jackson

Worthington

Wilson

C. L.

Tharao

Greenspan

N. R.

Masching

Pierre-Pierre

Mbulaheni

Amirault

Brownlee

(2017). Decolonizing scoping review methodologies for literature with, for, and by indigenous peoples and the African Diaspora: Dialoguing with the tensions. Qualitative Health Research, 28(2), 175−188. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732317743237

11.

Cislaghi

Heise

(2018). Four avenues of normative influence: A research agenda for health promotion in low and mid-income countries. Health Psychology, 37(6), 562−573. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000618

12.

Copeland

A. J.

Agosto

D. E.

(2012). Diagrams and relational maps: The use of graphic elicitation techniques with interviewing for data collection, analysis, and display. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 11(5), 513−533. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940691201100501

13.

Dhunpath

(2000). Life history methodology: “narradigm” regained. International Journal of Qualitative Studies inEducation, 13(5), 543−551. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518390050156459

14.

Eakin

J. M.

Gladstone

(2020). “Value-adding” analysis: Doing more with qualitative data. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920949333

15.

Efferson

Vogt

Elhadi

Ahmed

H. E. F.

Fehr

(2015). Female genital cutting is not a social coordination norm. Science, 349(6255), 1446−1447. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa7978

16.

Efferson

Vogt

Fehr

(2019). The promise and the peril of using social influence to reverse harmful traditions. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(1), 55−68. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0768-2

17.

Essén

Mosselmans

(2021). How to ensure policies and interventions rely on strong supporting facts to improve women’s health: The case of female genital cutting, using Rosling’s Factfulness approach. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 100(4), 579−586. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14059

18.

Evans

W. D.

Donahue

Snider

Bedri

Elhussein

T. A.

Elamin

S. A.

(2019). The Saleema initiative in Sudan to abandon female genital mutilation: Outcomes and dose response effects. Plos One, 14(3), e0213380. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213380

19.

Fereday

Muir-Cochrane

(2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 80−92. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690600500107

20.

Fundación Wassu-UAB (2020). Female genital mutilation inSpain. Ministry of Equality. https://violenciagenero.igualdad.gob.es/violenciaEnCifras/estudios/investigaciones/2020/pdfs/Estudio_MGF.pdf

21.

Gele

A. A.

Sagbakken

Kumar

(2015). Is female circumcision evolving or dissolving in Norway? A qualitative study on attitudes toward the practice among young Somalis in the Oslo area. International Journal of Women’s Health, 7, 933. https://doi.org/10.2147/ijwh.s93217

22.

Graamans

E. P.

Zolnikov

T. R.

Smet

Nguura

P. N.

Leshore

L. C.

Have

S. T.

(2019). Lessons learned from implementing alternative rites in the fight against female genital mutilation/cutting. The Pan African Medical Journal, 32, 59. https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2019.32.59.17624

23.

Guenette

Marshall

(2009). Time line drawings: Enhancing participant voice in narrative interviews on sensitive topics. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(1), 85−92. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690900800108

24.

Gutiérrez-García

A. I.

Solano-Ruíz

Siles-González

Perpiñá-Galvañ

(2021). Life Histories and Lifelines: A Methodological Symbiosis for the Study of Female Genital Mutilation. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20, 160940692110409. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211040969

25.

Hamed

Ahlberg

B.-M.

Trenholm

(2017). Powerlessness, normalization, and resistance: A foucauldian discourse analysis of women’s narratives on obstetric Fistula in Eastern Sudan. Qualitative Health Research, 27(12), 1828−1841. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732317720423

26.

Hammersley

Atkinson

(2007). Etnografía: Métodos de investigación (2nd ed.). Paidós.

27.

Ismail

S. A.

Abbas

A. M.

Habib

Morsy

Saleh

M. A.

Bahloul

(2017). Effect of female genital mutilation/cutting; types I and II on sexual function: case-controlled study. Reproductive Health, 14(1), 108. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-017-0371-9

28.

Jiménez Ruiz

Almansa Martínez

Alcón Belchí

(2017). Dismantling the man-made myths upholding female genital mutilation. Health Care for Women International, 38(5), 478–491. https://doi.org/10.1080/07399332.2017.1289211

29.

Jimenez Ruiz

Almansa Martínez

Pastor Bravo

(2016). Key points for abolishing Female Genital Mutilation from the perspective of the men involved. Midwifery, 34, 30–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2016.01.017

30.

Jimenez Ruiz

Pastor Bravo

Almansa Martínez

Meseguer

C. B.

(2014). Men Facing the Ablation/Female Genital Mutilation (A/FGM): Cultural Factors that Support this Tradition. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 132, 631–638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.365

31.

Jiménez-Ruiz

Almansa Martínez

Pastor Bravo

(2016). Percepciones de los hombres sobre las complicaciones asociadas a la mutilación genital femenina. Gaceta Sanitaria, 30(4), 258–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2016.03.009

32.

Johansen

R. E. B.

(2019). Blurred transitions of female genital cutting in a Norwegian Somali community. Plos One, 14(8), e0220985. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220985

33.

Johansen

R. E. B.

Ahmed

S. A. E.

(2021). Negotiating female genital cutting in a transnational context. Qualitative Health Research, 31(3), 458−471. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732320979183

34.

Kandala

N. B.

Nnanatu

C. C.

Atilola

Komba

Mavatikua

Moore

Mackie

Shell-Duncan

(2019). A spatial analysis of the prevalence of female genital mutilation/cutting among 0-14-year-old girls in Kenya. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(21), 4155. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16214155

35.

Khosla

Banerjee

Chou

Say

Fried

S. T.

(2017). Gender equality and human rights approaches to female genital mutilation: A review of international human rights norms and standards. Reproductive Health, 14(1), 59. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-017-0322-5

36.

Kolar

Ahmad

Chan

Erickson

P. G.

(2015). Timeline mapping in qualitative interviews: A study of resilience with marginalized groups. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 14(3), 13−32. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940691501400302

37.

La Barbera

(2010). Intervenciones sobre los genitales femeninos: Entre el bisturí del cirujano plástico y el cuchillo ritual. Revista de Dialectología y Tradiciones Populares, 65(2), 465−488. https://doi.org/10.3989/rdtp.2010.16

38.

Lincoln

Lanford

(2018). Life history’s second life. Qualitative Inquiry, 25(5), 464−470. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800418817835

39.

Mackie

(1996). Ending footbinding and infibulation: A convention account. American Sociological Review, 61(6), 999. https://doi.org/10.2307/2096305

40.

Mackie

(2018). Social norms change: Believing makes it so. Social Research: An International Quarterly, 85(1), 141−166. https://www.muse.jhu.edu/article/692748

41.

Mackie

Le Jeune

(2009, mayo). Social dynamics of abandonment of harmful practices: A new look at the theory. Innocenti Research Centre UNICEF.

42.

Malterud

Siersma

V. D.

Guassora

A. D.

(2016). Sample size in qualitative interview studies. Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1753−1760. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315617444

43.

Map of Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) in the Valencian Community (2016). Generalitat. Conselleria de Sanitat de Sanitat Universal i Salut Pública. http://www.san.gva.es/documents/151311/6810783/Mapa+riesgo+MGF.pdf

44.

Miller Moya

L. M.

(2009). La noción de convención social. Una aproximación analítica. Papers. Revista de Sociologia, 91, 29. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/papers/v91n0.720

45.

Mohamud

Qureshi

de Wildt

Jones

(2021). Exploring perceptions of female genital mutilation/cutting abandonment (FGM/C) in Kenyan health care professionals. Qualitative Health Research, 31(11), 1976−1989. https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323211015967

46.

Mollborn

Sennott

(2014). Bundles of norms about teen sex and pregnancy. Qualitative Health Research, 25(9), 1283−1299. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732314557086

47.

Moriña

(2016). Investigar con Historias de Vida. Narcea.

48.

Muthumbi

Svanemyr

Scolaro

Temmerman

Say

(2015). Female genital mutilation: A literature review of the current status of legislation and policies in 27 african countries and yemen. African Journal of Reproductive Health, 19(3), 32−40. https://search.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/female-genital-mutilation-literature-review/docview/1733920433/se-2?accountid=17192

49.

Naderifar

Goli

Ghaljaie

(2017). Snowball sampling: A purposeful method of sampling in qualitative research. Strides in Development of Medical Education, 14(3), 14. https://doi.org/10.5812/sdme.67670

50.

Nina

V. E.

Naomi

Sylvie

de Velde Sarah

(2020). An examination of the medicalization trend in female genital cutting in Egypt: How does it relate to a girl’s risk of being cut? Social Science & Medicine, 258, 113024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113024

51.

Ogunsiji

Ussher

(2021). Beyond illegality: Primary healthcare providers’ perspectives on elimination of female genital mutilation/cutting. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 30(9–10), 1253−1262. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15667

52.

O’Neill

Pallitto

(2021). The consequences of female genital mutilation on psycho-social well-being: A systematic review of qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 31(9), 1738−1750. https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323211001862

53.

Pastor-Bravo

M. D. M.

Almansa-Martínez

Jiménez-Ruiz

(2020). Postmigratory Perceptions of Female Genital Mutilation: Qualitative Life History Research. Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 104365962096257. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043659620962570

54.

Peat

Rodriguez

Smith

(2018). Interpretive phenomenological analysis applied to healthcare research. Evidence Based Nursing, 22(1), 7−9. https://doi.org/10.1136/ebnurs-2018-103017

55.

Pujadas Muñoz

J. J.

(2002). The biographical method: the use of life histories in the social sciences. In Cuadernos metodológicos (5, 2nd ed.). Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas.

56.

Shahawy

Amanuel

Nour

N. M.

(2019). Perspectives on female genital cutting among immigrant women and men in Boston. Social Science & Medicine, 220, 331−339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.11.030

57.

Shell-Duncan

Hernlund

(2001). Female «circumcision» in Africa: Culture, controversy, and change (1st ed.). Lynne Rienner Pub. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022278X01313861

58.

Shell-Duncan

Wander

Hernlund

Moreau

(2011). Dynamics of change in the practice of female genital cutting in Senegambia: Testing predictions of social convention theory. Social Science & Medicine, 73(8), 1275−1283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.07.022

59.

Siles-González

Gutiérrez-García

A. I.

Solano-Ruíz

(2020). Leadership among Women Working to Eradicate Female Genital Mutilation: The Impact of Environmental Change in Transcultural Moments. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(16), 5996. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17165996

60.

Smit

Swartz

Bantjes

Roomaney

Coetzee

(2020). Moving beyond text-and-talk in qualitative health research: Methodological considerations of using multiple media for data collection. Qualitative Health Research, 31(3), 600−614. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732320976556

61.

Squires

(2008). Language barriers and qualitative nursing research: Methodological considerations. International Nursing Review, 55(3), 265−273. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-7657.2008.00652.x

62.

UNFPA-UNICEF (2018). How changing social norms is crucial in achieving gender equality. https://www.unfpa.org/sites/default/files/pub-pdf/WEB-UNFPASocial_Norms.pdf

63.

UNFPA - United Nations Population Fund (2020). Female genital mutilation (FGM) frequently asked questions. https://www.unfpa.org/es/resources/preguntas-frecuentes-sobre-la-mutilaci%C3%B3n-genital-femenina-mgf

64.

UNICEF (2021). 2 million additional cases of female genitalmutilation likely to occur over next decade due toCOVID-19. https://www.unicef.org/press-releases/2-million-additional-cases-female-genital-mutilation-likely-occur-over-next-decade

65.

Varol

Hall

J. J.

Black

Turkmani

Dawson

(2017). Evidence-based policy responses to strengthen health, community and legislative systems that care for women in Australia with female genital mutilation/cutting. Reproductive Health, 14(1), 63. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-017-0324-3

66.

Wahlberg

Johnsdotter

Ekholm Selling

Essén

(2019). Shifting perceptions of female genital cutting in a Swedish migration context. Plos One, 14(12), e0225629. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225629

67.

Wahlberg

Johnsdotter

Selling

K. E.

Källestål

Essén

(2017). Baseline data from a planned RCT on attitudes to female genital cutting after migration: when are interventions justified? BMJ Open, 7(8), e017506. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017506

68.

Wander

Shell-Duncan

(2020). Social norm coordination and readiness to change female genital cutting: Evidence from Senegambia. SSM - Population Health, 11, 100593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2020.100593

69.

Wilson

Kenny

Dickson-Swift

(2017). Ethical challenges in community-based participatory research: A scoping review. Qualitative Health Research, 28(2), 189−199. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732317690721

70.

World Health Organization . (2015, noviembre 23). Comprender y abordar la violencia contra las mujeres.Organización Mundial de la Salud. https://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/topics/violence/vaw_series/es/

71.

World Health Organization . (2020, 3 febrero). Female genital mutilation. https://www.who.int/es/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/female-genital-mutilation#:%7E:text=La%20mutilaci%C3%B3n%20genital%20femenina%20(MGF,mismos%20por%20motivos%20no%20m%C3%A9dicos.&text=La%20OMS%20se%20opone%20a,(medicalizaci%C3%B3n%20de%20la%20MGF).

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.07 MB