In this research, we explore and theorize on the potential of hospital outpatient rehabilitation waiting areas to respond and contribute to the health literacy needs of consumers. Constructivist grounded theory informed the sampling and analytical procedures. Thirty-three consumers attending outpatient rehabilitation for a range of health conditions were recruited to this multi-site study. Semi-structured interview and participant observation data were collected and analyzed concurrently using the constant comparison method. The substantive theory of “seeking choice to fulfill health literacy needs” and five interdependent categories were developed. Results indicated that consumers sought choice reflective of their needs; however, the waiting area offered limited choice. Consumers shared ideas to address the lack of choice. Results provide insight into the health literacy needs of consumers in hospital outpatient waiting areas and how health services can appropriately respond to these needs. Future research should investigate the effect of health service environments on health outcomes.
AyresL. (2008). Semi-structured interview. In GivenL. (Ed), The sage encyclopedia of qualitative research methods: Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412963909.n420
5.
BatterhamR. W.HawkinsM.CollinsP.BuchbinderR.OsborneR. H. (2016). Health literacy: Applying current concepts to improve health services and reduce health inequalities. Public Health, 132, 3-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2016.01.001.
6.
BazeleyP.JacksonK. (2013). Qualitative data analysis with NVivo (2nd ed.): Sage Publications.
7.
BazleyC.VinkP.MontgomeryJ.HedgeA. (2016). Interior effects on comfort in healthcare waiting areas. Work, 54(4), 791–806. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-162347
8.
BeckerF.DouglassS. (2008). The ecology of the patient visit: Physical attractiveness, waiting times, and perceived quality of care. The Journal of Ambulatory Care Management, 31(2), 128–141. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.JAC.0000314703.34795.44
9.
BerkhoutC.Zgorska-Meynard-MoussaS.Willefert-BoucheA.FavreJ.PeremansL.Van RoyenP. (2018). Audiovisual aids in primary healthcare settings’ waiting rooms. A systematic review. European Journal of General Practice, 24(1), 202–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2018.1491964
10.
BlennerhassettJ. M.BorschmannK. N.Lipson-SmithR. A.BernhardtJ. (2018). Behavioral mapping of patient activity to explore the built environment during rehabilitation. HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 11(3), 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/1937586718758444
CarminatiL. (2018). Generalizability in qualitative research: A tale of two traditions. Qualitative Health Research, 28(13), 2094–2101. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732318788379
13.
CassS. J.BallL. E.LeverittM. D. (2016). Passive interventions in primary healthcare waiting rooms are effective in promoting healthy lifestyle behaviours: An integrative review. Australian Journal of Primary Health, 22(3), 198–210. https://doi.org/10.1071/PY15043
14.
ChamplinS.MackertM.GlowackiE. M.DonovanE. E. (2017). Toward a better understanding of patient health literacy: A focus on the skills patients need to find health information. Qualitative Health Research, 27(8), 1160–1176. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732316646355
15.
CharmazK. (Ed), (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.): Sage.
ClodeN. J.PerryM. A.WulffL. (2018). Does physiotherapy prehabilitation improve pre-surgical outcomes and influence patient expectations prior to knee and hip joint arthroplasty?International Journal of Orthopaedic and Trauma Nursing, 30, 14-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijotn.2018.05.004.
18.
CohnE. S. (2001). From waiting to relating: Parents’ experiences in the waiting room of an occupational therapy clinic. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 55(2), 167–174. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.55.2.167
19.
ConlonC.TimonenV.Elliott-O’DareC.O’KeeffeS.FoleyG. (2020). Confused about theoretical sampling? Engaging theoretical sampling in diverse grounded theory studies. Qualitative Health Research, 30(6), 947–959. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732319899139
DowlingS.HairH.BoudreauD.GrigatD.RiceC.BornK. B.VandenBergS. (2019). A patient-focused information design intervention to support the minor traumatic brain injuries (mTBI) choosing wisely Canada recommendation. Cureus, 11(10), e5877. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.5877
22.
HallW. A.CalleryP. (2001). Enhancing the rigor of grounded theory: Incorporating reflexivity and relationality. Qualitative Health Research, 11(2), 257–272. https://doi.org/10.1177/104973201129119082
23.
HigginbottomG. M.PillayJ. J.BoaduN. Y. (2013). Guidance on performing focused ethnographies with an emphasis on healthcare research. The Qualitative Report, 18(9), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.7939/R35M6287P
24.
IwarssonS.StahlA. (2003). Accessibility, usability and universal design: Positioning and definition of concepts describing person-environment relationships. Disability and Rehabilitation, 25(2), 57–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/dre.25.2.57.66
25.
JosephA.QuanX.KellerA. B.TaylorE.NandaU.HuaY. (2014). Building a knowledge base for evidence-based healthcare facility design through a post-occupancy evaluation toolkit. Intelligent Buildings International, 6(3), 155–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508975.2014.903163
26.
KrishnamurtiT.ArgoN. (2016). A patient-centered approach to informed consent: Results from a survey and randomized trial. Medical Decision Making, 36(6), 726–740. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X16636844
27.
LiamputtongP. (2008). Chapter 1 doing research in a cross-cultural context: Methodological and ethical challenges. In LiamputtongP. (Ed), Doing cross-cultural research: Ethical and methodological perspectives (pp. 3–20): Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8567-3_1
28.
LloydJ. E.SongH. J.DennisS. M.DunbarN.HarrisE.HarrisM. F. (2018). A paucity of strategies for developing health literate organisations: A systematic review. Plos One, 13(4), e0195018. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195018
McCannT.PolacsekM. (2018). Understanding, choosing and applying grounded theory: Part 1. Nurse Researcher, 26(3), 43. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.2018.e1592
31.
McDonaldC. E.RemediosL. J.CameronK. L.SaidC. M.GrangerC. L. (2021). Barriers, enablers, and consumer design ideas for health literacy responsive hospital waiting areas: A framework method analysis. HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal. https://doi.org/10.1177/19375867211032926.
32.
McDonaldC. E.RemediosL. J.SaidC. M.GrangerC. L. (2020). Health literacy in hospital outpatient waiting areas: An observational study of what is available to and accessed by consumers. HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal. 14(1), 1937586720954541. https://doi.org/10.1177/1937586720954541
33.
MentrupS.HarrisE.GomersallT.KöpkeS.AstinF. (2019). Patients’ experiences of cardiovascular health education and risk communication: A qualitative synthesis. Qualitative Health Research, 30(1), 88–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732319887949
34.
MillsJ.BonnerA.FrancisK. (2006). Adopting a constructivist approach to grounded theory: Implications for research design. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 12(1), 8–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-172X.2006.00543.x.
35.
MoreiraL. (2018). Health literacy for people-centred care: Where do OECD countries stand?OECD Health Working Papers, 107. https://doi.org/10.1787/d8494d3a-en.
36.
MorseJ. (2021). Why the qualitative health research (QHR) review process does not use checklists. Qualitative Health Research, 31(5), 819–821. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732321994114
37.
O’BrienB. C.HarrisI. B.BeckmanT. J.ReedD. A.CookD. A. (2014). Standards for reporting qualitative research: A synthesis of recommendations. Academic Medicine, 89(9), 1245–1251. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000388
38.
OksavikJ. D.KirchhoffR.SogstadM. K. R.SolbjørM. (2020). Sharing responsibility: Municipal health professionals’ approaches to goal setting with older patients with multi-morbidity – a grounded theory study. BMC Health Services Research, 20(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-4983-3
39.
Penry WilliamsC.ElliottK.GallJ.Woodward-KronR. (2019). Patient and clinician engagement with health information in the primary care waiting room: A mixed methods case study. Journal of Public Health Research, 8(1), 1476. https://doi.org/10.4081/jphr.2019.1476
40.
PolacsekM.BoardmanG.McCannT. (2018). Understanding, choosing and applying grounded theory: Part 2. Nurse Researcher, 26(3), 43-49. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.2018.e1593
41.
PopeC.ZieblandS.MaysN. (2006). Chapter 7: analysing qualitative data. In PopeC.MaysN. (Eds), Qualitative research in health care (3rd ed., p. 82): BMJ Publishing Group.
42.
RamseyI.CorsiniN.PetersM. D. J.EckertM. (2017). A rapid review of consumer health information needs and preferences. Patient Education and Counseling, 100(9), 1634–1642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2017.04.005
43.
SimondsV. W.GarroutteE. M.BuchwaldD. (2017). Health literacy and informed consent materials: Designed for documentation, not comprehension of health research. Journal of Health Communication, 22(8), 682–691. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2017.1341565
44.
SpradleyJ. (Ed), (1980). Participant observation: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Inc.
TansikD. A.RouthieauxR. (1999). Customer stress‐relaxation: The impact of music in a hospital waiting room. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 10(1), 68–81. https://doi.org/10.1108/09564239910255389
47.
ThomasS.KathrynV.PaulL.JeffreyD. (2014). What do patients want? Survey of patient desires for education in an urban university hospital. Western Journal of Emergency Medicine, 15(7), 764–769. https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2014.9.20674
48.
TrezonaA.DodsonS.OsborneR. H. (2017). Development of the organisational health literacy responsiveness (Org-HLR) framework in collaboration with health and social services professionals. BMC Health Services Research, 17(1), 513. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2465-z
49.
Vann-WardT.MorseJ. M.CharmazK. (2017). Preserving self: Theorizing the social and psychological processes of living with parkinson disease. Qualitative Health Research, 27(7), 964–982. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732317707494
50.
WalderK.MolinaeuxM. (2020). Listening to the client voice – a constructivist grounded theory study of the experiences of client-centred practice after stroke. Occupational Therapy Australia, 67(2), 100–109. https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1630.12627
51.
WattsG.KhanA.PheasantR. (2016). Influence of soundscape and interior design on anxiety and perceived tranquillity of patients in a healthcare setting. Applied Acoustics, 104, 135-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2015.11.007.
52.
WisemanT.FosterK.CurtisK. (2016). The experience of emotional wellbeing for patients with physical injury: A qualitative follow-up study. Injury, 47(9), 1983–1989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2016.03.021
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
