The therapeutic alliance is central to occupational rehabilitation, particularly for immigrant workers who face unique challenges of migration and of social and occupational integration. This study explores the development and maintenance of this alliance between immigrant workers with compensated work injuries and their care providers during work rehabilitation. Using ethnography, semi-structured interviews, and focus groups, the qualitative case study involved 7 injured immigrant workers and their interdisciplinary clinical team. The study identified several factors that weakened the alliance, including administrative complexity, conflicting views on pain and disability, cultural stereotypes, and interorganizational communication issues. Many of these challenges were systemic and structural, occurring outside the clinic, complicating the rehabilitation process, and potentially prolonging the duration of disability. This paper discusses these systemic issues and their implications for the rehabilitation of immigrant workers.
BordinES. The generalizability of the psychoanalytic concept of the working alliance. Psychother: Theory, Res Pract1979; 16(3): 252–260.
2.
HorvathAOGreenbergLS. The working alliance: Theory, research, and practice. Oxford, UK: Wiley, 1994.
3.
OliveiraVCRefshaugeKMFerreiraML, et al.Communication that values patient autonomy is associated with satisfaction with care: A systematic review. J Physiother2012; 58(4): 215–229.
4.
MartinDJGarskeJPDavisMK. Relation of the therapeutic alliance with outcome and other variables: A meta-analytic review. J Consult Clin Psychol2000; 68(3): 438–450.
5.
SeebacherBGeimerCNeuJ, et al.Identifying central elements of the therapeutic alliance in the setting of telerehabilitation: A qualitative study. PLoS One2024; 19(3): e0299909.
6.
BabatundeFMacDermidJMacIntyreN. Characteristics of therapeutic alliance in musculoskeletal physiotherapy and occupational therapy practice: A scoping review of the literature. BMC Health Serv Res2017; 17(1): 375.
7.
FerreiraPHFerreiraMLMaherCG, et al.The therapeutic alliance between clinicians and patients predicts outcome in chronic low back pain. Phys Ther2013; 93(4): 470–478.
8.
HallAMFerreiraMLClemsonL, et al.Assessment of the therapeutic alliance in physical rehabilitation: A RASCH analysis. Disabil Rehabil2012; 34(3): 257–266.
9.
FuentesJArmijo-OlivoSFunabashiM, et al.Enhanced therapeutic alliance modulates pain intensity and muscle pain sensitivity in patients with chronic low back pain: An experimental controlled study. Phys Ther2014; 94(4): 477–489.
10.
WilliamsLMDouglasJM. It takes two to tango: The therapeutic alliance in community brain injury rehabilitation. Brain Impair2022; 23(1): 24–41.
11.
PranskyGBorkanJMYoungAE, et al.Are we making progress? The tenth international forum for primary care research on low back pain. Spine2011; 36(19): 1608–1614.
12.
EftedalMKvaalAMReeE, et al.How do occupational rehabilitation clinicians approach participants on long-term sick leave in order to facilitate return to work? A focus group study. BMC Health Serv Res2017; 17: 1–13. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017- 2709-y
13.
LedererVLoiselPRivardM, et al.Exploring the diversity of conceptualizations of work (dis)ability: A scoping review of published definitions. J Occup Rehabil2014; 24(2): 242–267.
14.
FlynnMACheckPSteegeAL, et al.Health equity and a paradigm shift in occupational safety and health. Int J Environ Res Public Health2021; 19(1): 1–13. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19010349
CôtéDWhiteBWDubéJ, et al.Are healthcare systems failing immigrants? Transnational migration and social exclusion in the workers’ compensation process in Québec. Int Migr Rev2023. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/01979183231180192
17.
SenthanarSKoehoornMTamburicL, et al.Differences in work disability duration for immigrants and Canadian-born workers in British Columbia, Canada. Int J Environ Res Public Health2021; 18(22): 11794.
18.
NegiNJSwanbergJEClouserJM, et al.Working under conditions of social vulnerability: Depression among Latina/o immigrant horse workers. Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol2020; 26(1): 54–60.
19.
KosnyAYanarBBegumM, et al.Safe employment integration of recent immigrants and refugees. J Int Migr Integr2020; 21: 807–827.
20.
Bretones FDHealthSA. Safety and well-being of migrant workers: New hazards, new workers. London, UK: Springer, 2020.
21.
CôtéDDubéJGravelS, et al.Cumulative stigma among injured immigrant workers: A qualitative exploratory study in Montreal (Quebec, Canada). Disabil Rehabil2020; 42(8): 1153–1166.
22.
KaziMRFerdousMRumanaN, et al.Injury among the immigrant population in Canada: Exploring the research landscape through a systematic scoping review. Int Health2019; 11(3): 203–214.
23.
HamiltonERHaleJMSavinarR. Immigrant legal status and health: Legal status disparities in chronic conditions and musculoskeletal pain among Mexican-born farm workers in the United States. Demography2019; 56(1): 1–24.
24.
BrinkerhoffCASEduardoCNegrónR, et al.‘There you enjoy life, here you work’: Brazilian and Dominican immigrants’ views on work and health in the U.S. International Journal of Environmental Research and Health2019; 16(20): 4020.
25.
AriciCRonda-PerezETamhidT, et al.Occupational health and safety of immigrant workers in Italy and Spain: A scoping review. Int J Environ Res Public Health2019; 16(22): 1–32. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16224416
26.
UnterbergerA. “No one cares if you can’t work”: Injured and disabled Mexican-origin workers in transnational life course perspective. Anthropol Work Rev2018; 39(2): 105–115.
27.
KyungMLeeS-JDancuC, et al.Underreporting of workers’ injuries or illnesses and contributing factors: A systematic review. BMC Public Health2023; 23(1): 20230324.
28.
UlhinKPerssonEStålnackeB-M, et al.Healthcare professionals’ experiences and perspectives of team-based interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation with immigrants requiring an interpreter. A qualitative study. Disabil Rehabil2023; 45(15): 2434–2445.
29.
CôtéDDubéJGravelS. Developing intercultural competence in a complex organizational structure: A case study within Quebec’s workers’ compensation board. J Appl Rehabil Counsel2022; 53(3): 170–192.
30.
BeaganBL. Approaches to culture and diversity: A critical synthesis of occupational therapy literature. Can J Occup Ther2015; 82(5): 272–282.
31.
DegnanASeymour-HydeAHarrisA, et al.The role of therapist attachment in alliance and outcome: A systematic literature review. Clin Psychol Psychother2016; 23(1): 47–65.
32.
HallAMFerreiraPHMaherCG, et al.The influence of the therapist-patient relationship on treatment outcome in physical rehabilitation: A systematic review. Phys Ther2010; 90(1): 1099–1110.
33.
PintoRZFerreiraMLOliveiraVC, et al.Patient-centred communication is associated with positive therapeutic alliance: A systematic review. J Physiother2012; 58(2): 77–87.
34.
LevineCSAmbadyN. The role of non-verbal behaviour in racial disparities in health care: Implications and solutions. Med Educ2013; 47(9): 867–876.
35.
AneasMASandínMP. Intercultural and cross-cultural communication research: Some reflections about culture and qualitative methods. Forum Qual Sozialforsch2009; 10(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-10.1.1251
36.
ApedaileSSchillL. Critical incidents for intercultural communication. An interactive tool for developing awareness, knowledge, and skills. Edmonton, AB: NorQuest College Intercultural Education Programs, 2008.
37.
CôtéD. Intercultural communication in health care: Challenges and solutions in work rehabilitation practices and training: A comprehensive review. Disabil Rehabil2013; 35(2): 153–163.
38.
CoutuM-FLégaréFDurandM-J, et al.Acceptability and feasibility of a shared decision-making model in work rehabilitation: A mixed-methods study of stakeholders’ perspectives. J Occup Rehabil2019; 29(1): 128–139.
39.
LecomteCSavardRGuillonV. Alliance de travail: élément pivot de la réintégration au travail. In: CorbièreMDurandMJ (eds) Du trouble mental à l’incapacité au travail : Une perspective transdisciplinaire qui vise à mieux saisir cette problématique et à offrir des pistes d’intervention. Québec: Presses de l’Université du Québec (PUQ), 2011, pp.279–314.
40.
LustigDCStrauserDRRiceDN, et al.The relationship between working alliance and rehabilitation outcomes. Rehabil Couns Bull2002; 46(1): 25–33.
41.
KissingerDB. Traumatic brain injury and employment outcomes: Integration of the working alliance model. Work: J Prevent, Assessm Rehabil2008; 31(3): 309–317.
42.
LiYWhistonSWongYJ, et al.Clients’ race/ethnicity as a moderator of the relationship between the therapeutic alliance and treatment outcome. Int J Adv Counsell2024; 46: 219–241.
43.
OhSChangCYPriestA, et al.Relationship between orientation toward multicultural competence, multicultural competent behaviors, and working alliance: Examining a multigroup mediation model. J Counsel Dev2023; 101(1): 3–14.
44.
UllrichHE. Culture, empathy, and the therapeutic alliance. Psychodyn Psychiatry2022; 50(1): 151–164.
45.
YonKMalikRMandinP, et al.Challenging core cultural beliefs and maintaining the therapeutic alliance: A qualitative study. J Fam Ther2018; 40(2): 180–200.
46.
GonzalezJBardenSMSharpJ. Multicultural competence and the working alliance as predictors of client outcomes. Profess Couns2018; 8(4): 314–327.
47.
LewickiT. Culturally adapted skill use as a therapeutic alliance catalyst. Rehabil Res Policy Educ2015; 29(4): 336–348.
48.
ScottWMiliotoMTrostZ, et al.The relationship between perceived injustice and the working alliance: A cross-sectional study of patients with persistent pain attending multidisciplinary rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil2016; 38(24): 2365–2373.
49.
PremjiSSmithPM. Education-to-job mismatch and the risk of work injury. Inj Prev2013; 19(2): 106–111.
50.
GravelSDubéJCôtéD, et al.Le retour au travail des immigrants victimes de lésions professionnelles : les embûches de la rencontre interculturelle et la précarité du lien d’emploi. Alterstice2017; 7(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.7202/1040609ar
51.
BusqueM-ABilodeauJLebeauM, et al.Portrait statistique des lésions professionnelles chez les immigrants au Québec. Montréal, QC (Canada): Institut de recherche Robert-Sauvé en santé et en sécurité du travail, 2024, p.86.
52.
CreswellJW. Research design. Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2014.
53.
GarstenCNyqvistA. Organisational anthropology: Doing ethnography in and among complex organisations. London, UK: Pluto Press, 2013.
54.
CampbellMGregorF. Mapping social relations: A primer in doing institutional ethnography. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press, 2008.
55.
EmersonRMFretzRIShawLL. Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995.
56.
SullivanMJLScottWTrostZ. Perceived injustice: A risk factor for problematic pain outcomes. Clin J Pain2012; 28(6): 484–488.
57.
PavilanisATruchonMAchilleM, et al.Perceived injustice as a determinant of the severity of post-traumatic stress symptoms following occupational injury. J Occup Rehabil2023; 33(1): 134–144.
58.
LonghoferJFloerschJHoyJ. Chapter 3: Institutional ethnography. In: Qualitative methods for practice research. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013, pp.83–124.
59.
MayerROuelletF. L’observation participante. In: Méthodologie de recherche pour les intervenants sociaux. Montréal: Gaëtan Morin, 1991, pp.401–437.
60.
CharmazK. Constructing grounded theory. A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage, 2006.
61.
FuertesJNToporovskyAReyesM, et al.The physician-patient working alliance: Theory, research, and future possibilities. Patient Educ Couns2016; 100(4). doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2016.10.018
62.
O’KeeffeMCullinanePHurleyJ, et al.What influences patient-therapist interactions in musculoskeletal physical therapy? Qualitative systematic review and meta-synthesis. Phys Ther2016; 96(5): 609–622.
63.
LoiselPDurandMJBertheletteD, et al.Disability prevention. New paradigm for the management of occupational back pain. Dis Manage Health Outcomes2001; 9(7): 351–360.
64.
SchultzIZStowellAWFeuersteinM, et al.Models of return to work for musculoskeletal disorders. J Occup Rehabil2007; 17(2): 327–352.
65.
ØyeflatenILieSAIhlebaekCM, et al.Multiple transitions in sick leave, disability benefits, and return-to-work. - A 4-year follow-up of patients participating in a work-related rehabilitation program. BMC Publ Health2012; 12. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-748748
66.
CôtéDDubéJ, et al.Pratiques de soins en réadaptation et diversité ethnoculturelle: L’adaptation des services peut-elle soutenir la performance et la santé des professionnels? In: FortierIHamisultaneSRuellandI (eds) Clinique en sciences sociales: Sens et pratiques alternatives. Québec: Presses de l’Université du Québec, 2018, pp.266–278.
67.
CôtéDDubéJ. Compassion fatigue, diversity fatigue: The chicken or the egg? (in French). Periferia2019; 11(3): 163–187.
68.
JonssonTB. Institutionalized strategies in face-to-face encounters: Focus on immigrant clients. Scand J Soc Welf1998; 7(1): 27–33.
69.
RosenbergCE. The tyranny of diagnosis: Specific entities and individual experience. Milbank Q2002; 80(2): 237–260.
70.
DuanC. Multicultural considerations in the working alliance. In: Working alliance skills for mental health professionals. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2020, pp.137–158. Chapter xvi, 230 Pages.
71.
SerranoNCosTADaubS, et al.Using standardized patients as a means of training and evaluating behavioral health consultants in primary care. Fam, Syst Health : J Collab Fam Healthc2017; 35(2): 174–183.
72.
BenoitMLévesqueGPerronL. De la « vocation » à prendre soin au joug de la performance : Dévoiler les réalités des travailleuses du care pour comprendre la crise du système de santé et de services sociaux. Lien Soc Polit2022; (88): 66–88. doi:https://doi.org/10.7202/1090981ar
73.
HartzbandPGroopmanJ. Medical Taylorism. N Engl J Med2016; 374(2): 106–108.
74.
BertheleuH. Sens et usages de « l’ethnicisation ». Revue européenne des migrations internationales2007; 23(2): 7–28.
75.
FlynnMA. Immigration, work, and health: Anthropology and the occupational health of labor im/migrants. Anthropol Work Rev2018; 39(2): 116–123.
