This article reports on a study of occupational health and safety (OHS) challenges for temporary foreign workers (TFWs) in low- and high-skilled occupations, based on twenty-two cases drawn from a broader study in three Canadian provinces. Interviewees in construction, meat processing, hospitality, and fast food reported concerns regarding working conditions and OHS issues. They include precarious migration status affecting voice; contrasting access to social support; and mechanisms undermining regulatory effectiveness. Sources of vulnerability include closed work permits (making workers dependent on a single employer for job security and family reunification); ineffective means to ensure contractual compliance; and TFW invisibility attributable to their dispersal throughout the labor market. Violations include increased workload without an increase in pay and non-compliance with OHS and contractual rules without oversight. Positive and negative practices are discussed. Recommendations include improving migration security to preserve worker voice and facilitating communication between immigration and OHS authorities.
International Labour Organization (ILO). ILO global estimate on migrant workers: Results and methodology. Report, International Labour Organization, Geneva, 2015.
2.
HoweJOwensR.Temporary labour migration in the global era: the regulatory challenges. In: HoweJOwensR (eds) Temporary labour migration in the global era.
Oxford:
Hart Publishing, 2016, pp. 3–40.
Employment and Social Development Canada (ESDC). Overhauling the temporary foreign worker program – putting Canadians first. Report, Government of Canada, Ottawa, 2014.
5.
ProkopenkoEHouF.How temporary were Canada’s temporary foreign workers? Report, Analytical Studies Branch – Research Paper Series, Statistics Canada, 2018.
6.
NakacheD.Temporary or transitional? Migrant workers’ experiences with permanent residence in Canada. Report, Institute for Research on Public Policy (IRPP), Montréal, 2016.
7.
LippelKJohnstoneRBaril-GingrasG.Regulation, change and the work environment. Ind Relat Relat Ind2017;
72: 3–16.
8.
LewchukW.The limits of voice: are workers afraid to express their health and safety rights?Osgoode Hall Law J2013;
50: 789–812.
9.
LewchukWClarkeMDe WolffA.Precarious employment and the internal responsibility system: some Canadian experiences. In: WaltersDNicholsT (eds) Workplace health and safety: international perspectives on worker representation.
Basingstoke:
Palgrave, MacMillan, 2009, pp. 109–133.
10.
WaltersDNicholsT.Workplace health and safety: international perspectives on worker representation.
Basingstoke:
Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.
11.
QuinlanM. The effects of non-standard forms of employment on worker health and safety. Report, International Labour Office, Geneva, 2015.
12.
MoyceSCSchenkerM.Migrant workers and their occupational health and safety. Ann Rev Public Health2018;
39: 351–365.
13.
UnderhillERimmerM.Itinerant foreign harvest workers in Australia: the impact of precarious employment on occupational safety and health. Pol Pract Health Saf2015;
13: 25–46.
14.
SargeantMTuckerE.Layers of vulnerability in occupational safety and health for migrant workers: case studies from Canada and the UK. Pol Pract Health Saf2009;
7: 51–73.
15.
McLaughlinJ.Migration and health implications for development: a case study of Mexican and Jamaican migrants in Canada’s seasonal agricultural workers program.
Ottawa:
FOCUS, 2009.
16.
MysykAEnglandMGallegosJA.Nerves as embodied metaphor in the Canada/Mexico seasonal agricultural workers program. Med Anthropol2008;
27: 383–404.
17.
HennebryJ. Not just a few bad apples: vulnerability, health and temporary migration in Canada. Canadian Issues/Thèmes Canadiens2010; Spring: 73–77.
18.
SalamiBMeheraliSSalamiA.The health of temporary foreign workers in Canada: a scoping review. Can J Public Health2016;
106: e546–e554.
19.
DorowSCassianoMSDoerksenC. Live-in caregivers in Fort McMurray: a socioeconomic footprint. Report, On the Move Partnership, St. John’s, NL, 2015.
20.
VahabiMWongJ.Caught between a rock and a hard place: mental health of migrant live-in caregivers in Canada. BMC Public Health2017;
17: 498.
21.
PreibischKOteroG.Does citizenship status matter in Canadian agriculture? Workplace health and safety for migrant and immigrant laborers. Rural Sociol2014;
79: 174–199.
22.
McLaughlinJHennebryJHainesT.Paper versus practice: occupational health and safety protections and realities for temporary foreign agricultural workers in Ontario. Pistes2014; 16(2).
HanleyJGravelSLippelK, et al.
Pathways to healthcare for migrant workers: how can health entitlement influence occupational health trajectories?Pistes2014; 16(2).
25.
GoldringLBerinsteinCBernhardJK.Institutionalizing precarious migratory status in Canada. Citizensh Stud2009;
13: 239–265.
26.
LandoltPGoldringL.Assembling noncitizenship through the work of conditionality. Citizensh Stud2015;
19: 853–869.
27.
Gesualdi-FecteauDNakacheD.Employment standards for mobile workers. Report, On the Move Research Partnership, 2017.
28.
WalportMBrestP.Sharing research data to improve public health. Lancet2011;
377: 537–539.
29.
ZieblandSHuntK.Using secondary analysis of qualitative data of patient experiences of health care to inform health services research and policy. J Health Serv Res Policy2014;
19: 177–182.
30.
ParryOMauthnerN.Back to basics: who re-uses qualitative data and why?Sociology2005;
39: 337–342.
31.
Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada and Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. Tri-Council policy statement: ethical conduct for research involving humans, http://www.pre.ethics.gc.ca/pdf/eng/tcps2-2014/TCPS_2_FINAL_Web.pdf (2014, accessed 20 March 2019).
32.
BucklaschukJ. An overview of temporary foreign workers in Brandon, Manitoba: expectations, roles and responsibilities of key stakeholders – governments, communities, and employers. Report, Rural Development Institute, Brandon, MB, 2008.
33.
BucklaschukJ, A temporary program for permanent gains? In: McDonaldSABarnetsonB (eds) Farm workers in Western Canada: injustices and activism.
Edmonton:
The University of Alberta Press, 2016, pp. 101–138.
34.
WattDKrywulakTKitagawaK. Renewing immigration: towards a convergence and consolidation of Canada’s immigration policies and systems. Report, The Conference Board of Canada, Ottawa, ON, 2008.
35.
KimJYKimJISonJE, et al.
Prevalence of carpal tunnel syndrome in meat and fish processing plants. J Occup Health2004;
46: 230–234.
36.
MagnussonMOrtengrenRAnderssonGB, et al.
An ergonomic study of work methods and physical disorders among professional butchers. Appl Ergon1987;
18: 43–50.
37.
ArvidssonIBaloghIHanssonGA, et al.
Rationalization in meat cutting – consequences on physical workload. Appl Ergon2012;
43: 1026–1032.
38.
MukhopadhyayPKhanA.The evaluation of ergonomic risk factors among meat cutters working in Jabalpur, India. Int J Occup Environ Health2015;
21: 192–198.
39.
KoukoulakiT.The impact of lean production on musculoskeletal and psychosocial risks: an examination of sociotechnical trends over 20 years. Appl Ergon2014;
45: 198–212.
40.
BerntsenL.Precarious posted worlds: posted migrant workers in the Dutch construction and meat processing industries. Int J Comp Lab Law Ind Relat2015;
31: 371–389.
41.
NovekJ.The labour process and workplace injuries in the Canadian meat packing industry. Can Rev Sociol Anthropol1992;
29: 17–37.
42.
CharleboisSSummanA.Abattoirs, meat processing and managerial challenges: a survey for lagging rural regions and food entrepreneurs in Ontario, Canada. Int J Rural2014;
10: 1–20.
43.
HsiaoHLongDSnyderK.Anthropometric differences among occupational groups. Ergonomics2002;
45: 136–152.
44.
MessingK.One-eyed science: occupational health and women workers.
Philadelphia:
Temple University Press, 1998.
45.
International Labour Office (ILO). Decent work indicators. Concepts and definitions. ILO manual first version. Report, ILO, Geneva, 2012.
46.
OxenbridgeSMoenstedML.The relationship between payment systems, work intensification and health and safety outcomes: a study of hotel room attendants. Pol Pract Health Saf2011;
9: 7–26. doi: 10.1080/14774003.2011.11667759.
47.
BuchananSVossenasPKrauseN, et al.
Occupational injury disparities in the US hotel industry. Am J Ind Med2010;
53: 116–125.
48.
PremjiSKrauseN.Disparities by ethnicity, language, and immigrant status in occupational health experiences among Las Vegas hotel room cleaners. Am J Ind Med2010;
53: 960–975.
49.
SeifertAMMessingK.Cleaning up after globalization: an ergonomic analysis of work activity of hotel cleaners. Antipode2006;
38: 557–578.
50.
RavenswoodKHarrisCWilliamsonD, et al.
Missing in action: building a case for culturally diverse OSH committees in New Zealand hotels. Pol Pract Health Saf2013;
11: 45–60.
51.
MessingK.Pain and prejudice: what science can learn about work from the people who do it.
Toronto:
Between the Lines, 2014.
52.
Employment and Social Development Canada (ESDC). Number of temporary foreign worker (TFW) positions on positive labour market impact assessments (LMIAs) by national occupational classification – 2011 (NOC), and province/territory, 2010–2017, https://open.Canada.ca/data/en/dataset/c65d2014-ef25-4781-b9b2-e13a7293b72d (accessed 24 February 2019).
53.
MayhewCQuinlanM.Fordism in the fast food industry: pervasive management control and occupational health and safety risks for young temporary workers. Sociol Health Illn2002;
24: 261–284.
54.
GodinJMassicotteP. Profil statistique des lésions professionnelles et de leur gravité chez les travailleurs de la restauration, 2001–2004. Report, IRSST, Montreal, QC, 2007.
55.
EakinJ.Towards a ‘standpoint’ perspective: health and safety in small workplaces from the perspective of the workers. Pol Pract Health Saf2010;
8: 113–127.
56.
SchmidtLGunnarssonKDellveL, et al.
Utilizing occupational health services in small- scale enterprises: a 10-year perspective. Small Enterprise Res2016;
23: 101–115.
57.
LundbergU.Work conditions and back pain problems. Stress Health2015;
31: 1–4.
58.
BoschmanJSvan der MolenHFSluiterJK, et al.
Improving occupational health care for construction workers: a process evaluation. BMC Public Health2013;
13: 218.
59.
RoelofsCSprague-MartinezLBrunetteM, et al.
A qualitative investigation of Hispanic construction worker perspectives on factors impacting worksite safety and risk. Environ Health2011;
10: 84.
FosterJBarnetsonB.Who’s on secondary? The impact of temporary foreign workers on Alberta construction employment patterns. Labour/Le Travail2017;
80: 27–53.
62.
NarushimaMSanchezAL.Employers’ paradoxical views about temporary foreign migrant workers’ health: a qualitative study in rural farms in southern Ontario. Int J Equity Health2014;
13: 65.
63.
WasilkiewiczKAlbrechtsenEAntonsenS.Occupational safety in a globalized construction industry: a study on Polish workers in Norway. Pol Pract Health Saf2016;
14: 128–143.
64.
TuckerSTurnerN.Safety voice among young workers facing dangerous work: a policy-capturing approach. Saf Sci2014;
62: 530–537.
65.
WrightCFGroutsisDvanDB.Employer-sponsored temporary labour migration schemes in Australia, Canada and Sweden: enhancing efficiency, compromising fairness?J Ethn Migr Stud2017;
43: 1854–1872.
66.
UnderhillERimmerM.Private governance, state regulation and employment standards: how political factors shape their nexus in Australian horticulture. Relat Ind Ind Relat2017;
72: 33–55.
67.
FudgeJMacPhailF.The temporary foreign worker program in Canada: low-skilled workers as an extreme form of flexible labor. Comp Labor Law J2009;
31: 5–45.
68.
TheorellTHammarströmAAronssonG, et al.
A systematic review including meta-analysis of work environment and depressive symptoms. BMC Public Health2015;
15: 738.
69.
LincolnKD.Social support, negative social interactions, and psychological wellbeing. Soc Serv Rev2000;
74: 231–252.
70.
KlumbPLVoelkleMCSieglerS.How negative social interactions at work seep into the home: a prosocial and an antisocial pathway. J Organiz Behav2017;
38: 629–649.
71.
VoskoLF.Precarious employment: understanding labour market insecurity in Canada.
Montreal:
McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2006.
72.
FaradayF.Made in Canada how the law constructs migrant workers’ insecurity.
Toronto:
Metcalf Foundation, 2012.
73.
MarsdenS.Enforcing exclusion: precarious migrants and the law in Canada.
Beaverton:
Report, Ringgold Inc., 2018.
74.
NakacheD.The Canadian temporary foreign worker program: do short-term economic needs prevail over human rights concerns?
Montreal:
Institute for Research on Public Policy, 2010.
75.
HillNDorowSBarnetsonB, et al.
Occupational health and safety for Migrant domestic workers in Canada: dimensions of (im)mobility. New Solut2019;
29: 397–421. Epub ahead of print 9 August 2019. doi:10.1177/1048291119867740.
76.
HowseD. “You can't solve precarity with precarity.” The New Alberta Workers program, peer-to-peer OHS education for new-to-Alberta workers: An interview with Jared Matsunaga-Turnbull, Executive Director of the Alberta Workers' Health Centre. New Solut 2019; 29: 459–477. Epub ahead of print 25 August 2019. doi:10.1177/1048291119869165.
TuckerE. Migrant workers and fissured workforces: CS Wind and the dilemmas of organizing intra- company transfers in Canada. Econ Ind Democr. Epub ahead of print 7 June 2017. doi: 10.1177/0143831X17707822.
82.
El-AssalKSweetmanA.A primer on Canada’s foreign workers. Report, The Conference Board of Canada, Ottawa, ON, 2016.
83.
HélinL.Le programme vacances-travail Canadien: trajectoire expérientielle et usage du droit du travail. PhD Thesis, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, QC, 2017.
84.
HelleinerJ.Recruiting the “culturally compatible” migrant: Irish working holiday migration and white settler Canadianness. Ethnicities2017;
17: 299–319.
85.
SmithAStaveleyJ.Toward an ethnography of mobile tourism industry workers in Banff National Park. Anthropologica2014;
56: 435–447.
