The Vulnerability of Occupational Health and Safety to Deregulation: The Weakening of Information Regulations during the Economic Crisis in Korea

Abstract

This study was conducted to investigate the causes and consequences of the vulnerability of occupational health and safety (OHS) regulations to deregulation during a period of economic crisis in the Republic of Korea. Analysis of Korea’s national regulation database revealed that the vulnerability of OHS regulations to deregulation was related to the fact that OHS policy included many regulations without direct deregulatory impacts on workers. The most affected victim of this characteristic was information regulation that provided a legal basis for government’s monitoring and inspection of OHS activities. The massive relaxation of information regulation has the potential to weaken government oversight and to tempt businesses to hide industrial accidents. Since changes in regulations without direct deregulatory impacts are not easily identifiable by workers, careful monitoring of deregulation is necessary to prevent policy impacts harmful to workers’ health and safety.

Keywords

deregulation deregulatory impact South Korea occupational health and safety policy

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Meier

. Regulation: politics, bureaucracy, and economics, New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press, 1985.

Francis

. The politics of regulation: a comparative perspective, Oxford, UK: Blackwell, 1993.

Moran

Wood

. States, regulation and the medical profession, Buckingham, UK: Open University Press, 1993.

Mitnick

. The political economy of regulation: creating, designing, and removing regulatory forms, New York, NY: Columbia University Press, 1980.

Ripley

. Policy analysis in political science, Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall Publishers, 1985.

Wincott

. Beyond social regulation? New instruments and/or a new agenda for social policy at Lisbon? Publ Admin 2003; 81: 533–553.

Baldwin

Cave

Lodge

. Understanding regulation: theory, strategy, and practice, 2nd ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2012.

Botero

Djankov

La Porta

et al.

The regulation of labor. Q J Econ 2004; 119: 1339–1382.

Kwon

. Economic crisis and social policy reform in Korea. Int J Soc Welfare 2001; 10: 97–106.

10.

Fallon

Lucas

REB

. The impact of financial crises on labor markets, household incomes, and poverty: a review of evidence. World Bank Res Obs 2002; 17: 21–45.

11.

Kondo

. Press statement on regulatory reform in Korea, Seoul: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2002.

12.

Larner

. Neo-liberalism: policy, ideology, governmentality. Stud Polit Econ 2000; 63: 5–25.

13.

Quinlan

Sheldon

. The enforcement of minimum labor standards in an era of neo-liberal globalisation: an overview. Econ Labour Relat Rev 2011; 22: 5–31.

14.

Jhang

. Changes in labor regulations during economic crises: does deregulation favor health and safety? J Prev Med Publ Health 2011; 44: 14–21.

15.

International Labour Organization. ILOSTAT Database, http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/ (accessed 17 June 2016).

16.

Moon

. A study of the enactment of national basic livelihood security act in Korea: with special references to the role of NGOs. Health Soc Welfare Rev 2008; 28: 87–103.

17.

The Regulatory Reform Committee, Republic of Korea. The criteria for the decision and classification of administrative regulations (Korean), Seoul: Author, 2000.

18.

Castree

. Neoliberalising nature: the logics of deregulation and reregulation. Environ Plan A 2008; 40: 131–152.

19.

deLeon

The stages approach for the policy process: what has it done? Where is it going? In: Sabatier

(ed). Theories of the policy process, Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1999. pp. 19–32.

20.

Sabatier

. An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein. Pol Sci 1988; 21: 129–168.

21.

Frantz

. Reviving and revising a termination model. Pol Sci 1992; 25: 175–189.

22.

Bardach

. Policy termination as a political process. Pol Sci 1976; 7: 123–131.

23.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. The OECD report on regulatory reform: synthesis, Paris: Author, 1997.

24.

Zhang

. Study on obstacles to policy termination. J Polit Law 2009; 2: 98–102.

25.

Taylor

Easter

Hegney

. Enhancing occupational safety and health, Oxford, England: Elsevier, 2004.

26.

Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency. Our businesses. Ulsan, http://english.kosha.or.kr/english/content.do?menuId=6106 (accessed 16 March 2015).

27.

Kongtip

Yoosook

Chantanakul

. Occupational health and safety management in small and medium-sized enterprises: an overview of the situation in Thailand. Saf Sci 2008; 46: 1356–1368.

28.

Walker

Tait

. Health and safety management in small enterprises: an effective low cost approach. Saf Sci 2004; 42: 69–83.

29.

Statistics Korea. Korean Statistical Information Service, http://kosis.kr/ (accessed 15 March 2016).

30.

Ministry of Employment and Labor, Republic of Korea. The current status of occupational accidents and diseases. Seoul: Author, 2014, pp. 9–27 (in Korean).

31.

Y-S

Yim

Park

J-S

et al.

An inquiry into the actual condition of occupational accidents in high risk occupations, Seoul: National Human Rights Commission of Korea, 2014. p. 124 (in Korean).

32.

Aalders

Wilthagen

. Moving beyond command-and-control: reflexivity in the regulation of occupational safety and health and the environment. Law Pol 1997; 19: 415–443.

33.

Parker

. Twenty years of responsive regulation: an appreciation and appraisal. Regul Govern 2013; 7: 2–13.

34.

Ayres

Braithwaite

. Responsive regulation: transcending the deregulation debate, New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 1992.

35.

Saksvik

PØ

Quinlan

. Regulating systematic occupational health and safety management: comparing the Norwegian and Australian experience. Ind Relat 2003; 58: 33–59.

36.

Lobel

New governance as regulatory governance. In: Levi-Faur

(ed). The Oxford handbook of governance, Oxford, England: Oxford University Press, 2012, pp. 65–82.

37.

Sabatier

. Social movements and regulatory agencies. Pol Sci 1975; 6: 301–342.