Why Do We Bother with Games and Simulations: An Organizational Learning Perspective

Abstract

The accelerating rate of change and the increasing uncertainty in the outcomes of change are evident across the whole business arena of today. This uncertainty is the result of the very complex and often inexplicable nature of our environment and the problems within it. Successful organizations are not trying to respond to this challenge by predicting the future, but are developing their ability to continuously learn and adapt to changes in their environment. This ability to adapt requires the organizational ability to learn. The process of developing and implementing games and simulations is one of the most effective approaches in enabling such organizational learning. Games and simulations help organizations develop symbolic thinking and gestalt understanding; help them create memories of the future; enable shared experiences and the building of shared intelligence; and, possibly most important, develop their members’motivation and confidence to act.

Keywords

business performance complexity future games organizational learning simulations uncertainty utilities

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adams, D. (1995). The hitchhiker’s guide to the galaxy. New York: Ballantine.

Barrow, J. D. (1998). Impossibility: The limits of science and the science of limits. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Capra, F. (1992). Belonging to the universe: New thinking about God and nature. London: Penguin.

de Geus, A. P. (1997). The living company: Growth, learning and longevity in business. London: Nicholas Brealey.

Handy, C. (1990). The age of unreason. Boston: Harvard Business School.

Handy, C. (1994). The empty raincoat: Making sense of the future. Sydney, Australia: Random House.

Ingvar, D. (1985). Memory of the future: An essay on the temporal organization of conscious awareness. Human Neurobiology, 4, 127-136.

Linstone, H. A. , & Meltsner, A. J. (1984). Multiple perspectives for decision-making: Bridging the gap between analysis and action. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsavier.

Pinker, S. (1998). How the mind works. London: Penguin.

10.

Taylor, J. ,& Wacker, W. (1997). The 500-year delta: What happens after what comes next. New York: Harper Business.

11.

Wenzler, I. (1993). Policy exercises: A new approach to policy development. Nijmegen, the Netherlands: ITS-KUN.