Several approaches have been used to examine the external and internal validity of simulation game participation. This article proposes a new approach for measuring internal validity. Termed the random strategy criterion, this approach offers a more logical conceptual foundation than past research approaches. The random strategy criterion is defined and tested in a classroom setting with more than 660 students. The results presented support the use of this criterion for measuring internal validity.
Anderson, P. H.
, & Lawton, L. (1990). The relationship between financial performance and other measures of learning on a simulation exercise. Developments in Business Simulation & Experiential Learning, 17, 6-10.
2.
Babb, E. M.
, Leslie, M. A., & Van Slyke, M. D. (1966). The potential of business gaming methods in research. Journal of Business, 39, 465-472.
3.
Biggs, W. D.
(1975). Some impacts of varying amounts of information on frustration and attitudes in a finance game. Developments in Business Simulation & Experiential Learning, 2, 23-30.
4.
Biggs, W. D.
, & Greenlaw, P. S. (1976). The role of information in a functional business game. Simulation & Games, 7,53-64.
5.
Bray, J. H.
, & Maxwell, S. E. (1985). Multivariate analysis of variance. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
6.
Cangelosi, V. E.
, & Dill, W. R. (1965). Organizational learning: Observations toward a theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 10 (2), 175-203.
7.
Carvalho, G. F.
(1991). Evaluating computerized business simulators for objective learning validity. Simulation & Gaming, 22, 328-347.
8.
Chisholm, T. A.
(1979). An examination of the perceived effectiveness of computer simulations in a classroom setting as affected by game, environmental and respondent characteristics. Developments in Business Simulation & Experiential Learning, 6, 103-109.
9.
Dickinson, J. R.
, Faria, A. J., & Whiteley, T. R. (1990). The impact of market structure, versus competitor strategy, on simulation outcomes. In B. J. Dunlap (Ed.), Developments in marketing science (pp. 279-284). Miami, FL: Academy of Marketing Science.
10.
Edwards, W. F
(1987). Learning macroeconomic theory and policy analysis via microcomputer simulation. Developments in Business Simulation & Experiential Learning, 14, 50-53.
11.
Faria, A. J.
(1987). A survey of the use of business games in academia and business. Simulation & Games, 18 (2), 207-225.
12.
Faria, A. J.
, & Dickinson, J. R. (1987). LAPTOP: A marketing simulation. Plano, TX: Business Publications.
13.
Faria, A. J.
, Dickinson, J. R., & Whiteley, T. R. (1992). A measure of the internal validity of a marketing simulation game. Simulation/Games for Learning, 22, 351-366.
14.
Faria, A. J.
, & Nulsen, R. O. (1976). Student reactions and evaluations towards differing assignment levels in a marketing simulation competition. Developments in Business Simulation & Experiential Learning, 3, 26-35.
15.
Gray, C. E.
(1972). Performance as a criterion variable in measuring business gaming success. Paper presented at the Southeastern Conference of the American Institute for the Decision Sciences, Nashville, TN.
16.
Greenlaw, P. S.
, & Wyman, F P. (1973). The teaching effectiveness of games in collegiate business courses. Simulation & Games, 4 (2), 259-294.
17.
Hall, D. R.
(1987). Developing various student learning abilities via writing, the stock market game, and modified marketplace game. Developments in Business Simulation & Experiential Learning, 14, 84-87.
18.
Keys, B.
(1976). A review of learning research in business gaming. Developments in Business Simulation & Experiential Learning, 3, 76-83.
19.
McKenney, J. L.
, & Dill, W. R. (1966). Influences on learning in simulation games. American Behavioral Scientist, 10, 28-32.
20.
Mehrez, A.
, Reichel, A., & Olami, R. (1987). The business game versus reality. Simulation & Games, 18 (3), 488-500.
21.
Miles, W. G.
, Biggs, W. D., & Schubert, J. N. (1986). Student perceptions of skill acquisition through cases and a general management simulation. Simulation & Games, 10 (1), 75-86.
22.
Neuhauser, J. J.
(1976). Business games have failed. Academy of Management Review, 1, 124-129.
23.
Norris, D. R.
(1985). Management gaming: A longitudinal analysis of two decades of use in collegiate schools of business. Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meetings of the Academy of Management, 21, 253-259.
24.
Norris, D. R.
, & Snyder, A. (1982). External validation: An experimental approach to determining the worth of simulation games. Developments in Business Simulation & Experiential Learning, 9, 247-250.
25.
Parasuraman, A.
(1986). Marketing research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
26.
Philippatos, G. C.
, & Moscato, D. R. (1969). An empirical study of the learning aspects of experimental game playing. AIIE Transactions, 1, 343-348.
27.
Randel, J.
, Morris, B. A., Wetzel, C. D., & Whitehill, B. V. (1992). The effectiveness of games for educational purposes: A review of recent research. Simulation & Gaming, 23, 261-276.
28.
Snow, C. C.
(1976). A comment on business policy teaching research. Academy of Management Review, 1, 133-135.
29.
Specht, L. B.
, & Sandlin, P. K. (1991). The differential effects of experiential learning activities and traditional lecture classes in accounting. Simulation & Gaming, 22, 196-211.
30.
Stanislaw, H.
(1986). Tests of computer simulation validity. Simulation & Games, 17, 173-192.
31.
Vance, S. C.
, & Gray, C. F. (1967). Use of a performance evaluation model for research in business gaming. Academy of Management Journal, 10, 27-37.
32.
Waggener, H. A.
(1979). Simulation vs. case vs. text: An analysis of student opinion. Developments in Business Simulation & Experiential Learning, 1, 113-118.
33.
Washbush, J. B.
, & Gosenpud, J. J. (1991). Student attitudes about policy course simulations. Developments in Business Simulation & Experiential Learning, 18, 105-110.
34.
Watson, H. J.
(1981). Computer simulation in business. New York: John Wiley.
35.
Whiteley, T. R.
, & Faria, A. J. (1989). A study of the relationship between student final exam performance and simulation game participation. Developments in Business Simulation & Experiential Exercises, 16, 78-83.
36.
Whiteley, T. R.
, Faria, A. J., & Dickinson, J. R. (1991). An empirical investigation of the adaptive behavior of single-player teams to simulation game parameters. Proceedings of the International Simulation and Gaming Association, 17, 103-109.
37.
Wolfe, J.
(1976). The effects and effectiveness of simulation in business policy teaching applications. Academy of Management Review, 1, 47-56.
38.
Wolfe, J.
(1978). The effects of game complexity on the acquisition of business policy knowledge. Decision Sciences, 9, 143-155.
39.
Wolfe, J.
(1985). The teaching effectiveness of games in collegiate business courses: A 1973-1983 update. Simulation & Games, 16 (2), 251-288.
40.
Wolfe, J.
, & Roberts, C. R. (1986). The external validity of a business management game. Simulation & Games, 17 (3), 45-59.
41.
Wolfe, J.
, & Roberts, C. R. (1993). A further study of the external validity of business games: Five-year peer group indicators. Simulation & Gaming, 24, 21-34.
