Business games have been in use in university classes in North American for 50 years. A concern over this time has been whether or not participation in such games is a meaningful experience. The merit of business games has been examined by looking at what is taught by games, comparing games to other teaching approaches, and assessing the external and internal validity of games. This article examines another approach to assessing business games. The performance outcomes of more than 2,000 students operating 717 simulation companies in 154 industries has been examined to determine if these outcomes conform to real-world business firm outcomes as reported in the ongoing PIMS (Profit Impact of Marketing Strategies) project. The findings from this research suggest once again that business simulation games are a valid teaching tool.
Boyd, C. W., & Summers, I. (1984). Business policy course content: A survey of professors. Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Learning, 11, 1-3. (Reprinted in the Bernie Keys Library, available from http://www.absel.org)
2.
Buzzel, R. D., & Gale, B. T. (1987). The PIMS principles: Linking strategy to performance. New York: Free Press.
3.
Carvalho, T. A. (1991). Evaluating computerized business simulators for objective learning validity. Simulation & Gaming, 22, 328-347.
4.
Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5.
Faria, A. J. (1998). Business simulation games: Current usage levels. Simulation& Gaming, 29, 295-308.
6.
Faria, A. J. (2001). The changing nature of business simulation/gaming research: A brief history. Simulation & Gaming, 32, 97-110.
7.
Faria, A. J., & Dickinson, J. R. (1996). The marketing management simulation. Detroit, MI: The Simulation Source.
8.
Faria, A. J., Nulsen, R. O., & Roussos, D. S. (1994). COMPETE: A DYNAMIC MARKETING SIMULATION (4th ed.). Boston: Richard D. Irwin, Inc.
9.
Faria, A. J., & Wellington, W. (2004). A survey of simulation game users, former-users, and never-users. Simulation & Gaming, 35, 178-207.
10.
Green, D., & Faria, A. J. (1995). Are good strategies consistently good?Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Learning, 22, 31-37. (Reprinted in the Bernie Keys Library, available from http://www.absel.org)
11.
Greenlaw, P. S., & Wyman, F. P. (1973). The teaching effectiveness of games in collegiate business courses. Simulation & Games, 4, 259-294.
12.
Hall, D. R. (1987). Developing various student learning abilities via writing, the stock market game, and modified marketplace game. Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Learning, 14, 84-87. (Reprinted in the Bernie Keys Library, available from http://www.absel.org)
13.
Henderson, B. (1980). The PIMS program. Cambridge, MA: Strategic Planning Institute.
14.
Keys, B. (1976). A review of learning research in business gaming. Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Learning, 3, 76-83. (Reprinted in the Bernie Keys Library, available from http://www.absel.org)
15.
Miles, W. G., Biggs, W. D., & Schubert, J. N. (1986). Student perceptions of skill acquisition through cases and a general management simulation. Simulation & Games, 10, 75-86.
16.
Randel, J., Morris, B. A., Wetzel, C. D., & Whitehill, B. V. (1992). The effectiveness of games for educational purposes: A review of recent research. Simulation & Gaming, 23, 261-276.
17.
Schoeffler, S. (1993). Basic findings from business strategy. Cambridge, MA: Strategic Planning Institute.
18.
Snow, C. C. (1976). A comment on business policy teaching research. Academy of Management Review, 1, 133-135.
19.
Spect, L. B., & Sandlin, P. K. (1991). The differential effects of experientiall earning activities and traditional lecture classes in accounting. Simulation & Gaming, 22, 196-211.
20.
Waggener, H. A. (1979). Simulation vs. case vs. text: An analysis of student opinion. Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Exercises, 6, 113-118. (Reprinted in the Bernie Keys Library, available from http://www.absel.org)
21.
Washbush, J. B., & Gosenpud, J. J. (1991). Student attitudes about policy course simulations. Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Learning, 18, 105-110. (Reprinted in the Bernie Keys Library, available from http://www.absel.org)
22.
Watson, H. J. (1981). Computer simulation in business. New York: John Wiley.
23.
Wellington, W., & Faria, A. J. (2001). An investigation of the environmental awareness attained in a simple business simulation game. Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Learning, 28, 239-249. (Reprinted in the Bernie Keys Library, available from http://www.absel.org)
24.
Wolfe, J. (1985). The teaching effectiveness of games in collegiate business courses: A 1973-1983 update. Simulation & Games, 17, 251-288.
25.
Wolfe, J. (1987). The effects of game complexity on the acquisition of business policy knowledge. Decision Sciences, 9, 143-155.
26.
Wolfe, J. (1997). The effectiveness of business games in strategic management course work. Simulation & Gaming, 28, 360-376.
27.
Wolfe, J., & Roberts, C. R. (1986). The external validity of a business management game. Simulation & Games, 17, 45-59.
28.
Wolfe, J., & Roberts, C. R. (1993). A further study of the external validity of business games: Five year peer group indicators. Simulation & Gaming, 24, 21-34.
